/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 17 A building that is subjected to ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A building that is subjected to shaking (caused, for example, by an earthquake) may collapse. Failure depends both on intensity and on duration of the shaking. If an intensity \(I_{1}\) causes a building to collapse in \(t_{1}\) seconds, then an intensity \(I_{2}\) will cause the collapse in \(t_{2}\) seconds, where $$ \frac{t_{1}}{t_{2}}=\left(\frac{I_{2}}{I_{1}}\right)^{2} $$ If a certain building collapses in 30 seconds at one intensity, how long would it take the building to collapse at triple that intensity?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The building will collapse in 3.33 seconds at triple the original intensity.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Relationship Between Times and Intensities

The problem gives us a relationship between two times, \(t_1\) and \(t_2\), and their corresponding intensities, \(I_1\) and \(I_2\). This relationship is expressed as \( \frac{t_1}{t_2} = \left( \frac{I_2}{I_1} \right)^2 \). We need to apply this to find how long it takes the building to collapse at triple the initial intensity.
02

Assign Known Values

From the problem, we know \( t_1 = 30 \) seconds, \( I_2 = 3I_1 \), and we need to find \( t_2 \). This means the intensity \( I_2 \) is three times the initial intensity \( I_1 \).
03

Substitute and Simplify the Formula

Substitute the known values into the relationship: \( \frac{30}{t_2} = \left( \frac{3I_1}{I_1} \right)^2 \). This simplifies to \( \frac{30}{t_2} = 3^2 = 9 \).
04

Solve for \(t_2\)

Rearrange the equation to solve for \( t_2 \): \( t_2 = \frac{30}{9} = \frac{10}{3} \). This simplifies to \( t_2 = 3.33 \) seconds.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Intensity and Duration Relationship
Understanding the relationship between intensity and duration is crucial in solving problems involving dynamic forces, such as earthquakes. Intensity here refers to the strength or amplitude of the shaking. When a building is subjected to stronger forces, or higher intensity, it will take less time to reach the point of collapse compared to lower intensity. This is because the building absorbs energy at a faster rate as intensity increases.

In the exercise, we are provided with an equation: \[ \frac{t_1}{t_2} = \left( \frac{I_2}{I_1} \right)^2. \] This tells us that the ratio of times to failure, \(t_1\) and \(t_2\), is equal to the square of the ratio of intensities, \(I_2\) and \(I_1\). It means if you increase the intensity of the shaking, the duration until collapse becomes shorter at a rate that is the square of the change in intensity.

This mathematical model is an example of how engineering and physics can predict building responses in assessing how they might fare under different conditions.
Exponential Relationship
The relationship presented in the problem illustrates an exponential relationship between intensity and duration. An exponential formula is used when changes apply not by simple addition, but by multiplying. In this context, as you increase the intensity, the time until failure decreases at the square of that intensity increase.

Let’s break this down:
  • The equation \( \frac{t_1}{t_2} = \left( \frac{I_2}{I_1} \right)^2 \) describes how doubling the intensity more than halves the time to collapse.
  • In our exercise, tripling the intensity leads to the duration reducing by a factor of nine, calculated by squaring three (\(3^2 = 9\)).
Understanding this exponential relationship helps engineers and scientists predict how rapidly a building could succumb to varying earthquake intensities, enabling more informed safety measures and building codes.
Problem Solving Steps
Here's a straightforward guide to solving problems like this one, involving intensity and duration of shaking. First, identify the given values and what you need to find out. In this example, you are provided with \(t_1 = 30\) seconds and \(I_2 = 3I_1\). You need to determine \(t_2\), the time at tripled intensity.

Next, substitute the known values into the relationship formula. Replace \(I_2\) with \(3I_1\) in the equation \(\frac{t_1}{t_2} = \left(\frac{I_2}{I_1}\right)^2\). This will provide the equation: \[ \frac{30}{t_2} = (3)^2 = 9. \] Now solve for \(t_2\) by rearranging the equation: \[ t_2 = \frac{30}{9} = \frac{10}{3} = 3.33 \text{ seconds}. \] This step-by-step approach is crucial in determining how changes in one variable affect another, helping you to accurately model the problem and anticipate outcomes effectively.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose a certain population is initially absent from a certain area but begins migrating there at a rate of \(v\) individuals per day. Suppose further that this is an animal group that would normally grow at an exponential rate. Then the population after \(t\) days in the new area is given by $$ N=\frac{v}{r}\left(e^{r t}-1\right), $$ where \(r\) is a constant that depends on the species and the environment. If the new location proves unfavorable, then the value of \(r\) may be negative. In such a case, we can rewrite the population function as $$ N=\frac{v}{r}\left(a^{t}-1\right), $$ where \(a\) is less than 1. Under these conditions, what is the limiting value of the population?

One of the two tables below shows data that can be modeled by a linear function, and the other shows data that can be modeled by a quadratic function. Identify which table shows the linear data and which table shows the quadratic data, and find a formula for each model. $$ \begin{aligned} &\begin{array}{|l|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline x & 0 & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 \\ \hline f(x) & 10 & 17 & 26 & 37 & 50 \\ \hline \end{array}\\\ &\text { Table A } \end{aligned} $$ $$ \begin{aligned} &\begin{array}{|l|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline x & 0 & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 \\ \hline g(x) & 10 & 17 & 24 & 31 & 38 \\ \hline \end{array}\\\ &\text { Table B } \end{aligned} $$

Under certain conditions, tsunami war encountering land will develop into bores. A b is a surge of water much like what would expected if a dam failed suddenly and empti a reservoir into a river bed. In the case of a bc traveling from the ocean into a dry river b one study \({ }^{13}\) shows that the velocity \(V\) of the of the bore is proportional to the square root of height \(h\). Expressed in a formula, this is $$ V=k h^{0.5} \text {, } $$ where \(k\) is a constant. a. A bore travels up a dry river bed. How does the velocity of the tip compare with its initial velocity when its height is reduced to half of its initial height? b. How does the height of the bore compare with its initial height when the velocity of the tip is reduced to half its initial velocity? c. If the tip of one bore surging up a dry river bed is three times the height of another, how do their velocities compare?

The retrovirus HIV can be transmitted from mother to child during breastfeeding. But under conditions of poverty or poor hygiene, the alternative to breastfeeding carries its own risk for infant mortality. These risks differ in that the risk of HIV transmission is the same regardless of the age of the child, whereas the risk of mortality due to artificial feeding is high for newborns but decreases with the age of the child. \({ }^{50}\) Figure \(5.85\) illustrates the additional risk of death due to artificial feeding and due to HIV transmission from breastfeeding. Here the lighter curve is additional risk of death from artificial feeding, and the darker curve is additional risk of death from breastfeeding. For the purposes of this exercise, assume that the additional risk of death from artificial feeding is \(A=5 \times 0.785^{t}\) and that the additional risk from breastfeeding is \(B=2\), where \(t\) is the child's age in months. a. At what age is the additional risk of HIV transmission from breastfeeding the same as the additional risk from artificial feeding? b. For which ages of the child does breastfeeding carry the smaller additional risk? c. What would be the optimal plan for feeding a child to minimize additional risk of death? d. Write a formula for a piecewise-defined function \(R\) of \(t\) giving the additional risk of death under the optimal plan from part c.

Northern Yellowstone elk: The northern Yellowstone elk winter in the northern range of Yellowstone National Park. \({ }^{6}\) A moratorium on elk hunting was imposed in 1969 , and after that the growth of the elk population was approximately logistic for a time. The following table gives data on the growth. $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \text { Year } & N \\ \hline 1968 & 3172 \\ \hline 1969 & 4305 \\ \hline 1970 & 5543 \\ \hline 1971 & 7281 \\ \hline 1972 & 8215 \\ \hline 1973 & 9981 \\ \hline 1974 & 10,529 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Use regression to find a logistic model for this elk population. b. According to the model you made in part a, when would the elk population reach half of the carrying capacity? Note: At one time the gray wolf was a leading predator of the elk, but it was not a factor during this study period. The level at which the elk population stabilized suggests that food supply (and not just predators) can effectively regulate population size in this setting.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.