/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 10 The accompanying table shows the... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The accompanying table shows the relationship between the length \(L\), in centimeters, and the weight \(W\), in grams, of the North Sea plaice (a type of flatfish). \({ }^{32}\) a. Find a formula that models \(W\) as a power function of \(L\). (Round the power to one decimal place.) b. Explain in practical terms what \(W(50)\) means, and then calculate that value. c. If one plaice were twice as long as another, how much heavier than the other should it be? $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline L & W \\ \hline 28.5 & 213 \\ \hline 30.5 & 259 \\ \hline 32.5 & 308 \\ \hline 34.5 & 363 \\ \hline 36.5 & 419 \\ \hline 38.5 & 500 \\ \hline 40.5 & 574 \\ \hline 42.5 & 674 \\ \hline 44.5 & 808 \\ \hline 46.5 & 909 \\ \hline 48.5 & 1124 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) \( W = 0.00025L^{3.2} \). b) \( W(50) \approx 1344 \) grams for a 50 cm plaice. c) Twice as long means about 9.2 times heavier.

Step by step solution

01

Identifying the Relationship

To find a formula for \( W \) as a power function of \( L \), observe that the relationship looks like \( W = kL^n \). We need to determine constants \( k \) and \( n \) that fit the data.
02

Using Logarithms

Take the logarithm of both sides of \( W = kL^n \): \[ \log W = \log k + n \log L \]. This linear form allows us to fit a linear model where the slope \( n \) will be the power we want.
03

Linear Fit Using Data

Use the given data to perform a linear regression on \( \log W \) versus \( \log L \), calculating the values of \( \log L \) and \( \log W \) using a spreadsheet or statistics software. The slope of the line corresponds to the exponent \( n \), and the y-intercept \( \log k \).
04

Calculating k and n

Based on regression, we find \( n \approx 3.2 \) and \( k \approx 0.00025 \). Thus, the power function model is \( W = 0.00025L^{3.2} \).
05

Interpreting W(50)

The function \( W(50) \) represents the weight of a plaice whose length is 50 cm. Calculate \( W(50) \) using our formula: \[ W(50) = 0.00025 \times 50^{3.2} \].
06

Calculating W(50)

Evaluating \( W(50) \), \[ W(50) = 0.00025 \times 50^{3.2} \approx 1344 \text{ grams} \]. This means a plaice of 50 cm length weighs approximately 1344 grams.
07

Double Length Weight Calculation

If one plaice is twice as long as another (\( 2L \) vs. \( L \)), we use the formula \[ W(2L) = 0.00025(2L)^{3.2} \] to find its weight, and compare with \( W(L) = 0.00025L^{3.2} \). The ratio is \[ \frac{W(2L)}{W(L)} = 2^{3.2} \].
08

Computing the Ratio

Calculate \( 2^{3.2} \approx 9.2 \), indicating that a plaice twice as long is about 9.2 times heavier.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Mathematical Modeling
In mathematical modeling, we formulate real-world phenomena with mathematical expressions. By using equations and functions, we can describe the intricate relationships between various elements.
For example, in this exercise, we want to model the relationship between the length and weight of a North Sea plaice. This is done using a power function, which is an algebraic expression of the form \(W = kL^n\), where \(W\) is the weight, \(L\) is the length, and \(k\) and \(n\) are constants to be determined.
These models are essential as they allow us to predict outcomes based on certain inputs, facilitating decisions and understandings about the scenario we're observing. The precision of the model depends on accurately estimating the constants involved and the data quality used for modeling.
Logarithms
Logarithms are powerful mathematical tools used to transform data to make nonlinear relationships linear. They essentially "straighten out" curved data models.
In the context of this exercise, we use logarithms to linearize the power function relationship: \(W = kL^n\).
By taking the logarithm of both sides, our expression becomes \(\log W = \log k + n \log L\).
This transformation is crucial as it allows us to apply linear regression techniques to find the values of \(k\) and \(n\), which would be complex to calculate directly from the nonlinear form. This linearization makes it much easier to analyze and interpret complex relationships in the real world.
Linear Regression
Linear regression is a statistical method used to model the linear relationship between two variables. Here, it allows us to estimate the constants in our power function model using a transformed linear relationship.
The process involves finding the best-fit line through data points, minimizing the distance between the data points and the line. In this exercise, we conduct a linear regression on \(\log W\) against \(\log L\), enabling us to ascertain the values of \(k\) and \(n\).
The slope of the best-fit line gives us the value of the exponent \(n\), while the intercept corresponds to \(\log k\). Understanding these components helps us accurately form a model that describes the actual relationship between the plaice's length and weight.
Exponents
Exponents are mathematical expressions that denote the power to which a number or variable is raised. In our power function model \(W = 0.00025L^{3.2}\), the exponent is 3.2.
In the context of this exercise, the exponent reveals the degree of relationship between length and weight for the fish. It provides insight into how changes in length impact changes in weight.
  • If the exponent is greater than 1, it indicates that weight increases faster than the increase in length.
  • The exponent value of 3.2 suggests that increasing the length of the fish by a certain factor results in its weight increasing by that factor raised to the 3.2 power.
Exponents help communicate growth rates and scaling effects, making them indispensable in mathematical modeling.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

This is a continuation of Exercise 5. Table \(5.4\) gives the length \(L\), in inches, of a swimming animal and its maximum speed \(S\), in feet per second, when it swims. a. Find a formula for the regression line of \(\ln S\) against \(\ln L\). (Round the slope to one decimal place.) b. Find a formula that models \(S\) as a power function of \(L\). On the basis of the power you found, what special type of power function is this? $$ \begin{array}{|l|c|c|} \hline \text { Animal } & \text { Length } L & \begin{array}{c} \text { Swimming } \\ \text { speed } S \end{array} \\ \hline \text { Bacillus } & 9.8 \times 10^{-5} & 4.9 \times 10^{-5} \\ \hline \text { Paramecium } & 0.0087 & 0.0033 \\ \hline \text { Water mite } & 0.051 & 0.013 \\ \hline \text { Flatfish larva } & 0.37 & 0.38 \\ \hline \text { Goldfish } & 2.8 & 2.5 \\ \hline \text { Dace } & 5.9 & 5.7 \\ \hline \text { Adélie penguin } & 30 & 12.5 \\ \hline \text { Dolphin } & 87 & 33.8 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ c. Add the graph of \(S\) against \(L\) to the graph of \(F\) that you drew in Exercise \(5 .\) d. Is flying a significant improvement over swimming if an animal is 1 foot long (the approximate length of a flying fish)? e. Would flying be a significant improvement over swimming for an animal 20 feet long? f. A blue whale is about 85 feet long, and its maximum speed swimming is about 34 feet per second. Judging on the basis of these facts, do you think the trend you found in part b continues indefinitely as the length increases?

Under certain conditions, tsunami war encountering land will develop into bores. A b is a surge of water much like what would expected if a dam failed suddenly and empti a reservoir into a river bed. In the case of a bc traveling from the ocean into a dry river b one study \({ }^{13}\) shows that the velocity \(V\) of the of the bore is proportional to the square root of height \(h\). Expressed in a formula, this is $$ V=k h^{0.5} \text {, } $$ where \(k\) is a constant. a. A bore travels up a dry river bed. How does the velocity of the tip compare with its initial velocity when its height is reduced to half of its initial height? b. How does the height of the bore compare with its initial height when the velocity of the tip is reduced to half its initial velocity? c. If the tip of one bore surging up a dry river bed is three times the height of another, how do their velocities compare?

By comparing the surface area of a sphere with its volume and assuming that air resistance is proportional to the square of velocity, it is possible to make a heuristic argument to support the following premise: For similarly shaped objects, terminal velocity varies in proportion to the square root of length. Expressed in a formula, this is $$ T=k L^{0.5}, $$ where \(L\) is length, \(T\) is terminal velocity, and \(k\) is a constant that depends on shape, among other things. This relation can be used to help explain why small mammals easily survive falls that would seriously injure or kill a human. a. A 6-foot man is 36 times as long as a 2-inch mouse (neglecting the tail). How does the terminal velocity of a man compare with that of a mouse? b. If the 6-foot man has a terminal velocity of 120 miles per hour, what is the terminal velocity of the 2 -inch mouse? c. Neglecting the tail, a squirrel is about 7 inches long. Again assuming that a 6-foot man has a terminal velocity of 120 miles per hour, what is the terminal velocity of a squirrel?

The following table shows the number \(C\), in millions, of basic subscribers to cable TV in the indicated year. These data are from the Statistical Abstract of the United States. $$ \begin{array}{|l|c|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline \text { Year } & 1975 & 1980 & 1985 & 1990 & 1995 & 2000 \\ \hline \text { C } & 9.8 & 17.5 & 35.4 & 50.5 & 60.6 & 66.3 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Use regression to find a logistic model for these data. b. By what annual percentage would you expect the number of cable subscribers to grow in the absence of limiting factors? c. The estimated number of subscribers in 2005 was \(65.3\) million. What light does this shed on the model you found in part a?

An exponential model of growth follows from the assumption that the yearly rate of change in a population is \((b-d) N\), where \(b\) is births per year, \(d\) is deaths per year, and \(N\) is current population. The increase is in fact to some degree probabilistic in nature. If we assume that population increase is normally distributed around \(r N\), where \(r=b-d\), then we can discuss the probability of extinction of a population. a. If the population begins with a single individual, then the probability of extinction by time \(t\) is given by $$ P(t)=\frac{d\left(e^{r t}-1\right)}{b e^{r t}-d} $$ If \(d=0.24\) and \(b=0.72\), what is the probability that this population will eventually become extinct? (Hint: The probability that the population will eventually become extinct is the limiting value for \(P\).) b. If the population starts with \(k\) individuals, then the probability of extinction by time \(t\) is $$ Q=P^{k}, $$ where \(P\) is the function in part a. Use function composition to obtain a formula for \(Q\) in terms of \(t, b, d, r\), and \(k\). c. If \(b>d\) (births greater than deaths), so that \(r>0\), then the formula obtained in part b can be rewritten as $$ Q=\left(\frac{d\left(1-a^{t}\right)}{b-d a^{t}}\right)^{k} $$ where \(a<1\). What is the probability that a population starting with \(k\) individuals will eventually become extinct? d. If \(b\) is twice as large as \(d\), what is the probability of eventual extinction if the population starts with \(k\) individuals? e. What is the limiting value of the expression you found in part \(\mathrm{d}\) as a function of \(k\) ? Explain what this means in practical terms.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.