/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 13 Spectroscopic parallax: Stars ha... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Spectroscopic parallax: Stars have an apparent magnitude \(m\), which is the brightness of light reaching Earth. They also have an absolute magnitude \(M\), which is the intrinsic brightness and does not depend on the distance from Earth. The difference \(S=m-M\) is the spectroscopic parallax. Spectroscopic parallax is related to the distance \(D\) from Earth, in parsecs, 35 by $$ S=5 \log D-5 $$ a. The distance to the star Kaus Astralis is \(38.04\) parsecs. What is its spectroscopic parallax? b. The spectroscopic parallax for the star Rasalhague is 1.27. How far away is Rasalhague? c. How is spectroscopic parallax affected when distance is multiplied by 10 ? d. The star Shaula is \(3.78\) times as far away as the star Atria. How does the spectroscopic parallax of Shaula compare to that of Atria?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. 2.901 b. 17.98 parsecs c. Increases by 5 d. Increases by approximately 2.89

Step by step solution

01

Calculate Spectroscopic Parallax for Kaus Astralis

Given the distance to Kaus Astralis, \(D = 38.04\) parsecs, we need to find the spectroscopic parallax \(S\) using the formula: \[ S = 5 \log D - 5 \]Substitute \(D = 38.04\) into the formula. First, compute \(\log D\):\[ \log D = \log 38.04 \approx 1.5802 \]Then compute \(S\):\[ S = 5(1.5802) - 5 = 7.901 - 5 = 2.901 \]
02

Determine Distance to Rasalhague

Given the spectroscopic parallax \(S = 1.27\), we need to find the distance \(D\) using the formula: \[ S = 5 \log D - 5 \]Rearrange to find \(D\): \[ 5 \log D = S + 5 \]\[ \log D = \frac{S + 5}{5} = \frac{1.27 + 5}{5} = \frac{6.27}{5} = 1.254 \]Now find \(D\) by taking the antilog:\[ D = 10^{1.254} \approx 17.98 \text{ parsecs} \]
03

Effect of Multiplying Distance by 10 on Spectroscopic Parallax

Consider how \(S = 5 \log D - 5\) changes if \(D\) is multiplied by 10. This modifies \(D\) to \(10D\) and results in:\[ S' = 5 \log(10D) - 5 \]Recognizing the logarithm property, we can express:\[ \log(10D) = \log D + \log 10 = \log D + 1 \]So,\[ S' = 5(\log D + 1) - 5 = 5 \log D + 5 - 5 = 5 \log D \]Thus, when the distance is multiplied by 10, the spectroscopic parallax increases by 5.
04

Compare Spectroscopic Parallax for Shaula and Atria

The distance to Shaula is \(3.78\) times the distance to Atria, i.e., \(D_{\text{Shaula}} = 3.78D_{\text{Atria}}\).Using the formula \[ S = 5 \log D - 5 \], we have:\[ S_{\text{Shaula}} = 5 \log(3.78D_{\text{Atria}}) - 5 \]Using the property of logarithms:\[ \log(3.78D_{\text{Atria}}) = \log 3.78 + \log D_{\text{Atria}} \]Hence:\[ S_{\text{Shaula}} = 5 (\log 3.78 + \log D_{\text{Atria}}) - 5 = S_{\text{Atria}} + 5 \log 3.78 \]Calculate the increment:\[ \log 3.78 \approx 0.5775 \]Thus,\[ S_{\text{Shaula}} = S_{\text{Atria}} + 5 \times 0.5775 = S_{\text{Atria}} + 2.8875 \]Shaula's spectroscopic parallax is greater than Atria’s by approximately 2.89.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Apparent Magnitude
In astronomy, apparent magnitude is a measure of how bright a star or other astronomical object appears from Earth. It's important to remember that this is not an absolute measure of the object's brightness, but rather how bright it seems to us, as viewed from our planet.
  • The scale of apparent magnitude is logarithmic. A difference of 1 in magnitude means a difference in brightness by a factor of about 2.512.
  • Brighter objects have lower apparent magnitudes. For instance, a star with an apparent magnitude of 1 is brighter than a star with a magnitude of 2.
  • Negative magnitudes are possible, and they indicate an object brighter than all stars in the night sky. The Sun, for example, has an apparent magnitude of about -26.74.
This system allows astronomers to compare the brightness of celestial objects easily, but it doesn't provide information about the true luminosity of those objects.
Absolute Magnitude
Absolute magnitude, on the other hand, gives us a way to compare the intrinsic brightness of astronomical objects. It's defined as the apparent magnitude a star would have if it were located exactly 10 parsecs (about 32.6 light-years) from Earth. By standardizing this measurement, astronomers can compare the true brightness of objects regardless of their actual distance from us.
  • Like apparent magnitude, the scale is logarithmic. A change of 1 in absolute magnitude reflects a roughly 2.512 times change in brightness.
  • Absolute magnitude helps in understanding the luminosity of stars and galaxies, providing insight into their energy output.
  • By understanding both apparent and absolute magnitudes, astronomers can calculate the distance to an astronomical object using the formula for spectroscopic parallax.
This concept is especially useful in cosmology and the study of stellar evolution, as it gives a clear picture of the power emitted by stars beyond the influence of distance.
Distance in Parsecs
In the field of astronomy, the parsec is a key unit of length. It's commonly used to describe astronomical distances, offering an alternative to the more familiar light-year. A single parsec corresponds to about 3.26 light-years, which is approximately 3.086 x 10^13 kilometers.
  • The term 'parsec' comes from "parallax of one arcsecond." It's the distance at which one astronomical unit subtends an angle of one arcsecond.
  • Parsecs are particularly useful in many astronomical calculations, including the determination of a star's distance using spectroscopic parallax.
  • The relationship between a star's apparent and absolute magnitudes can be expressed in terms of its distance in parsecs, which is crucial for identifying where heavenly bodies lie in the universe.
By using parsecs, astronomers can carry out calculations more comfortably and understand distances on a cosmic scale, fundamental for exploring the universe's structure and size.
Logarithms in Astronomy
Logarithms play a pivotal role in many areas of astronomy, including magnitude scales and spectroscopic parallax calculations. They simplify the mathematical treatment of the vast ranges in brightness and distance found in the universe.
  • The logarithmic scale allows astronomers to manage and process the enormous differences in brightness or luminosity of celestial objects efficiently.
  • For spectroscopic parallax, the relationship between apparent magnitude, absolute magnitude, and distance employs logarithms to express these wide-ranging figures in manageable equations.
  • The equation for spectroscopic parallax, \( S = 5 \log D - 5 \), demonstrates how logarithms are used to relate star distance with apparent and absolute magnitudes.
By understanding the application of logarithms, students and astronomers can better handle the calculations that arise in their study of stars and the structure of the universe, thus providing deeper insights into their work.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Population growth: A population of animals is growing exponentially, and an ecologist has made the following table of the population size, in thousands, at the start of the given year. $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \text { Year } & \begin{array}{c} \text { Population } \\ \text { in thousands } \end{array} \\ \hline 2003 & 5.25 \\ \hline 2004 & 5.51 \\ \hline 2005 & 5.79 \\ \hline 2006 & 6.04 \\ \hline 2007 & 6.38 \\ \hline 2008 & 6.70 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Looking over the table, the ecologist realizes that one of the entries for population size is in error. Which entry is it, and what is the correct population? (Round the ratios to two decimal places.)

Reaction time: For certain decisions, the time it takes to respond is a logarithmic function of the number of choices faced. \({ }^{32}\) One model is $$ R=0.17+0.44 \log N, $$ where \(R\) is the reaction time in seconds and \(N\) is the number of choices. a. Draw a graph of \(R\) versus \(N\). Include values of \(N\) from 1 to 10 choices. b. Express using functional notation the reaction time if there are seven choices, and then calculate that time. c. If the reaction time is to be at most \(0.5\) second, how many choices can there be? d. If the number of choices increases by a factor of 10 , what happens to the reaction time? e. Explain in practical terms what the concavity of the graph means.

Growth in length: In the fishery sciences it is important to determine the length of a fish as a function of its age. One common approach, the von Bertalanffy model, uses a decreasing exponential function of age to describe the growth in length yet to be attained; in other words, the difference between the maximum length and the current length is supposed to decay exponentially with age. The following table shows the length \(L\), in inches, at age \(t\), in years, of the North Sea sole. \({ }^{40}\) $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|} \hline t=\text { age } & L \text { = length } & t=\text { age } & L=\text { length } \\ \hline 1 & 3.7 & 5 & 12.7 \\ \hline 2 & 7.5 & 6 & 13.5 \\ \hline 3 & 10.0 & 7 & 14.0 \\ \hline 4 & 11.5 & 8 & 14.4 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ The maximum length attained by the sole is \(14.8\) inches. a. Make a table showing, for each age, the difference \(D\) between the maximum length and the actual length \(L\) of the sole. b. Find the exponential function that approximates \(D\) using the logarithm as a link. c. Find a formula expressing the length \(L\) of a sole as a function of its age \(t\). d. Draw a graph of \(L\) against \(t\).

Fully stocked stands: This is a continuation of Exercise 11. In this exercise we study one of the ingredients used in formulating the relation given in the preceding exercise among the stand-density index \(S D I\), the number \(N\) of trees per acre, and the diameter \(D\), in inches, of a tree of average size. \({ }^{34}\) This ingredient is an empirical relationship between \(N\) and \(D\) for fully stocked stands - that is, stands for which the tree density is in some sense optimal for the given size of the trees. This relationship, which was observed by L. H. Reineke in 1933 , is $$ \log N=-1.605 \log D+k $$ where \(k\) is a constant that depends on the species in question. a. Assume that for loblolly pines in an area the constant \(k\) is 4.1. If in a fully stocked stand the diameter of a tree of average size is 8 inches, how many trees per acre are there? (Round your answer to the nearest whole number.) b. For fully stocked stands, what effect does multiplying the average size of a tree by a factor of 2 have on the number of trees per acre? c. What is the effect on \(N\) of increasing the constant \(k\) by 1 if \(D\) remains the same?

Population growth: The following table shows the size, in thousands, of an animal population at the start of the given year. ? Find an exponential model for the population. $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \text { Year } & \begin{array}{c} \text { Population } \\ \text { (thousands) } \end{array} \\ \hline 2004 & 2.30 \\ \hline 2005 & 2.51 \\ \hline 2006 & 2.73 \\ \hline 2007 & 2.98 \\ \hline 2008 & 3.25 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.