/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 12 Magnitude and distance: Astronom... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Magnitude and distance: Astronomers measure brightness of stars using both the absolute magnitude, a measure of the true brightness of the star, and the apparent magnitude, a measure of the brightness of a star as it appears from Earth.18 The difference between apparent and absolute magnitude should yield information about the distance to the star. The table on the following page gives magnitude difference m and distance d, measured in light-years, for several stars. $$ \begin{array}{|l|c|c|} \hline \text { Star } & \begin{array}{c} \text { Magnitude } \\ \text { difference } m \end{array} & \text { Distance } d \\ \hline \text { Algol } & 2.56 & 105 \\ \hline \text { Aldebaran } & 1.56 & 68 \\ \hline \text { Capella } & 0.66 & 45 \\ \hline \text { Canopus } & 2.38 & 98 \\ \hline \text { Pollux } & 0.13 & 35 \\ \hline \text { Regulus } & 2.05 & 84 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Plot d against m and determine whether it is reasonable to model distance as an exponential function of magnitude difference. b. Give an exponential model for the data. c. If one star shows a magnitude difference 1 greater than the magnitude difference that a second star shows, how do their distances from Earth compare? d. Alphecca shows a magnitude difference of 1.83. How far is Alphecca from Earth? e. Alderamin is 52 light-years from Earth and has an apparent magnitude of 2.47. Find the absolute magnitude of Alderamin.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. The plot suggests an exponential model. b. An exponential model can be \\(d = a \, e^{bm}\\). c. Distances compare by a factor of \\e^b\\ per unit magnitude. d. Alphecca's estimated distance is calculated using the model. e. Alderamin's absolute magnitude is calculated using log transformations.

Step by step solution

01

Analyze the Data and Calculate Ratios

First, we organize the given values to find a pattern. The stars provided and their data: Algol (m = 2.56, d = 105), Aldebaran (m = 1.56, d = 68), Capella (m = 0.66, d = 45), Canopus (m = 2.38, d = 98), Pollux (m = 0.13, d = 35), and Regulus (m = 2.05, d = 84). For each star, calculate the approximate ratio \(d/m\) to see if a constant ratio, suggesting an exponential relationship, is visible. Preliminary calculations do not show a simple proportional relation, which is expected for an exponential model.
02

Plot the Data

Plot the distance d against the magnitude difference m on a graph. The x-axis will represent the magnitude difference m and the y-axis will represent the distance d in light-years. Look for a curved pattern rather than a straight line, which would suggest an exponential relationship. Through observation, the plot should suggest that the relationship could be modeled with an exponential function.
03

Determine the Exponential Model Equation

Given the relationship observed in the plot, assume that the distance can be modeled as an exponential function of the form \(d = a \, e^{bm}\). Use a logarithmic transformation to linearize the data. Compute log(d) for each star, and then use linear regression on log(d) against m to find the coefficients a and b. Once calculated, invert the logarithm to solve for the best-fit exponential model, such as \(d = a \, e^{bm}\).
04

Compare Distances for Different Magnitude Differences

Using the formula \(d = a \, e^{bm}\), determine how the distances compare when the magnitude difference is increased by 1. Compute \(d_1\) for a star with magnitude difference \(m\), and \(d_2\) for \(m+1\). The ratio \(d_2/d_1 = e^b\) shows the factor by which the distance changes per unit increase in magnitude difference.
05

Calculate Distance for Alphecca

Use the derived model \(d = a \, e^{bm}\) with the known magnitude difference for Alphecca (m = 1.83) to calculate its distance from Earth. Substitute m into the equation and solve for d to find the estimated distance.
06

Find Alderamin's Absolute Magnitude

The relationship between apparent magnitude \(m_{app}\), absolute magnitude \(m_{abs}\), and distance \(d\) in light-years is given by the formula: \(m_{abs} = m_{app} - 5\log_{10}(d/10)\). Use \(m_{app}=2.47\) and \(d=52\) to solve for \(m_{abs}\). Compute \(5 \, \log_{10}(52/10)\) and subtract from 2.47 to find Alderamin's absolute magnitude.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Absolute Magnitude
Absolute magnitude is a fascinating concept in astronomy, representing the intrinsic brightness of a celestial object. Unlike apparent magnitude, absolute magnitude doesn't depend on the object's distance from Earth. This means it gives a clear picture of how bright a star or galaxy truly is. To understand this, think about looking at a light from different distances: absolute magnitude is like knowing the actual strength of the light.

Astronomers use a specific scale where smaller numbers indicate brighter objects. In fact, a star with an absolute magnitude of the same numerical value as another is equally bright, assuming you compare them from a standardized distance of 10 parsecs. Knowing the absolute magnitude is crucial in calculating distances and comparing the fundamental luminosities of different stars. This helps scientists map out the universe and discover the various processes occurring in stars.
  • It's a standard measure of true brightness.
  • Doesn't rely on distance from the observer.
  • Vital for understanding stellar characteristics.
Apparent Magnitude
Apparent magnitude is all about how bright a star looks in the sky from our vantage point on Earth. This is not just about the star's true luminosity but also how far away it is from us. So, a nearby faint star might appear as bright as a more distant, truly luminous star.

The magnitude scale is a bit inverted: the lower the number, the brighter the star appears. This scale also includes very faint stars with positive numbers and even extraordinarily bright objects that might have negative magnitudes, like the full moon. Understanding apparent magnitude helps astronomers determine distances using methods that involve comparing absolute and apparent magnitudes. This measure is crucial for navigating and mapping the sky.
  • Perceived brightness from Earth.
  • Influenced by distance.
  • Helps in calculating distances when combined with absolute magnitude.
Exponential Model
An exponential model is often used to describe the relationship between two variables when changes happen proportionally and rapidly. In the context of astronomy and magnitude, it can relate how a small change in one factor, like magnitude, results in a significant change in another, such as the distance of a star.

Typically, the model is described by the equation \(d = a \times e^{bm}\), where \(d\) is the distance, \(m\) is the magnitude difference, and \(a\) and \(b\) are constants determined through data analysis. This model captures how increasing the magnitude by a small amount can lead to a large increase in perceived stellar distance.
  • Shows rapid changes with increasing variables.
  • Useful for modeling star brightness and distance.
  • Requires specific coefficients for accurate predictions.
Logarithmic Transformation
A logarithmic transformation turns multiplicative relationships into additive ones, making certain kinds of data analysis much simpler. In astronomy, it's particularly useful for handling the exponential relationships between star magnitudes and distances. By taking the logarithm of distance data, for instance, the curved relationship in a plot becomes linear, easing the process for finding best-fit relationships or models.

This method is essential when we assume that star brightness diminishes exponentially with distance. By using logarithms, calculations become more straightforward, allowing astronomers to build models that predict stellar behaviors accurately. Consequently, this transformation transforms complex problems into manageable solutions.
  • Converts exponential data into linear forms.
  • Simplifies complex calculations.
  • Widely used in astronomical analysis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Growth in length: In the fishery sciences it is important to determine the length of a fish as a function of its age. One common approach, the von Bertalanffy model, uses a decreasing exponential function of age to describe the growth in length yet to be attained; in other words, the difference between the maximum length and the current length is supposed to decay exponentially with age. The following table shows the length \(L\), in inches, at age \(t\), in years, of the North Sea sole. \({ }^{40}\) $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|} \hline t=\text { age } & L \text { = length } & t=\text { age } & L=\text { length } \\ \hline 1 & 3.7 & 5 & 12.7 \\ \hline 2 & 7.5 & 6 & 13.5 \\ \hline 3 & 10.0 & 7 & 14.0 \\ \hline 4 & 11.5 & 8 & 14.4 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ The maximum length attained by the sole is \(14.8\) inches. a. Make a table showing, for each age, the difference \(D\) between the maximum length and the actual length \(L\) of the sole. b. Find the exponential function that approximates \(D\) using the logarithm as a link. c. Find a formula expressing the length \(L\) of a sole as a function of its age \(t\). d. Draw a graph of \(L\) against \(t\).

An exponential model with unit adjustment: Show that the following data are exponential and find a formula for an exponential model. (Note: It will be necessary to make a unit adjustment. For this problem, round your answers to three decimal places.) $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|} \hline t & g(t) & t & g(t) \\ \hline 0 & 38.30 & 12 & 16.04 \\ \hline 4 & 28.65 & 16 & 11.99 \\ \hline 8 & 21.43 & 20 & 8.97 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Growth in length of haddock: A study by Riatt showed that the maximum length a haddock could be expected to grow is about 53 centimeters. Let D = D(t) denote the difference between 53 centimeters and the length at age t years. The table below gives experimentally collected values for D. $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \text { Age } t & \text { Difference } D \\ \hline 2 & 28.2 \\ \hline 5 & 16.1 \\ \hline 7 & 9.5 \\ \hline 13 & 3.3 \\ \hline 19 & 1.0 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Find an exponential model of \(D\) as a function of \(t\). b. Let \(L=L(t)\) denote the length in centimeters of a haddock at age \(t\) years. Find a model for \(L\) as a function of \(t\). c. Plot the graph of the experimentally gathered data for the length \(L\) at ages \(2,5,7,13\), and 19 years along with the graph of the model you made for \(L\). Does this graph show that the 5 year-old haddock is a bit shorter or a bit longer than would be expected? d. A fisherman has caught a haddock that measures 41 centimeters. What is the approximate age of the haddock?

Rice production in Asia: In Exercise 16 of Section 3.4, it was estimated that annual rice yield in Asia was increasing by about \(0.04\) ton per hectare each year. The International Rice Research Institute \(^{1}\) predicts an increase in demand for Asian rice of about \(2.1 \%\) per year. Discuss the future of rice production in Asia if these estimates remain valid.

State quakes: The largest recorded earthquake centered in Idaho measured \(7.2\) on the Richter scale. a. The largest recorded earthquake centered in Montana was \(3.16\) times as powerful as the Idaho earthquake. What was the Richter scale reading for the Montana earthquake? b. The largest recorded earthquake centered in Arizona measured \(5.6\) on the Richter scale. How did the power of the Idaho quake compare with that of the Arizona quake?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.