/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 69 The following two surveys were c... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The following two surveys were conducted in January 1991 to assess how the American public viewed media coverage of the Persian Gulf war. Survey 1 was an Area Code 900 telephone poll survey conducted by \(A B C\) News. Viewers were asked to call a certain 900 number if they believed that the media were doing a good job of covering the war and a different 900 number if they believed that the media were not doing a good job in covering the war. Each call cost 50 cents. Of the 60,000 respondents, \(83 \%\) believed that the media were not doing a good job. Survey 2 was a telephone poll of 1500 randomly selected households across the United States conducted by the Times-Mirror survey organization. In this poll, \(80 \%\) of the respondents indicated that they approved of the press coverage of the war. (a) Briefly discuss survey 1 , indicating any possible types of bias. (b) Briefly discuss survey \(2,\) indicating any possible types of bias. (c) Can you explain the discrepancy between the results of the two surveys? (d) In your opinion, which of the two surveys gives the more reliable data?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Survey 1 may have introduced selection bias due to its methodology, while Survey 2 may have non-response bias. The discrepancy between the surveys can be attributed to these biases. Survey 2, with its randomized sampling, is considered to be more reliable.

Step by step solution

01

Discuss Survey 1

Survey 1 used an area code 900 telephone call to gather its data from viewers. Several biases could potentially exist in this survey. An example is selection bias; it only includes those with access to a phone, are watching ABC news and are willing to pay 50 cents for the call. People who do not have the means to make the call or are not motivated enough to pay 50 cents are automatically excluded from the survey. This survey also ignores the possibility of multiple votes by the same person, introducing another potential bias.
02

Discuss Survey 2

Survey 2 was conducted by randomly selecting 1500 households across the United States. This drastically minimizes selection bias as opposed to Survey 1. It is a more representative sampling of the general population's views. Despite being preferable to Survey 1, potential bias may still be present. There could be non-response bias if there were those who declined to participate in the survey or could not be reached.
03

Explain Discrepancies

The discrepancy in the results of the two surveys can be explained by the biases discussed above. Survey 1 only included people who took the effort and paid to participate which may suggest a more strongly held opinion. On the other hand, Survey 2 was a randomized survey reaching out to a wide spectrum of households, reducing the intensity and selection bias, thus reflecting a less negative view about media coverage of the war.
04

Determining the More Reliable Survey

The more reliable survey is likely Survey 2. The use of random sampling better represents the population than a self-selected audience like in Survey 1. While both surveys have potential biases, the nature of bias in Survey 1 (self-selection and potential multiple entries by the same person) makes Survey 2 a more reliable data set.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Selection Bias
Selection bias occurs when certain individuals in a population are more likely to be included in a survey than others, leading to skewed results that do not accurately represent the entire population. In Survey 1, the bias is evident because participants self-selected by choosing to call the 900 number. This means that their responses may not reflect the views of individuals who did not watch ABC News, did not have access to a phone, or chose not to spend 50 cents for the call. Those willing to participate may have stronger opinions, which can distort the findings.

To minimize selection bias in surveys, ensuring a sampling method that gives every individual an equal chance to participate is critical. This helps in gathering data that more accurately represents the broader population's views.
Random Sampling
Random sampling is a method used to select individuals from a population in such a way that each person has an equal chance of being chosen. This technique is crucial in reducing bias and increasing the reliability of survey results. In Survey 2, the use of random sampling by selecting 1500 households across the United States helps to ensure that the sample is more representative of the general public's views.

Random sampling is beneficial in:
  • Providing a more accurate reflection of the population's opinions.
  • Reducing the likelihood of selection bias.
  • Ensuring diversity in the sample group, which can lead to more comprehensive insights.
By employing random sampling, researchers can better generalize their findings to a larger population.
Non-response Bias
Non-response bias occurs when individuals chosen for a survey do not participate, and these non-responders have different opinions from those who do respond. This can lead to inaccuracies in survey findings, as the collected data may over-represent certain viewpoints. In Survey 2, non-response bias is a potential concern since some households may decline participation or be unreachable.

To address non-response bias, researchers can:
  • Follow up with non-responders to encourage participation.
  • Ensure the survey method is accessible and convenient for respondents.
  • Analyze differences between responders and non-responders, if possible, to understand the level of bias.
Efforts to mitigate non-response bias can significantly improve the validity of survey results.
Data Reliability
Data reliability refers to the trustworthiness and consistency of data collected through surveys or research studies. Reliable data should accurately reflect the views of the target population without being skewed by biases or errors. In evaluating the two surveys, Survey 2 is considered more reliable due to its use of random sampling, which provides a more comprehensive picture of public opinion.

Reliable survey data should:
  • Minimize various biases, including selection and non-response.
  • Be collected using consistent and standardized methods.
  • Accurately reflect the diversity within the population.
By focusing on these aspects, researchers ensure that their findings are valid and can be confidently used for decision-making and policy formulation.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Refer to the following story: The manufacturer of a new vitamin (vitamin \(X\) ) decides to sponsor a study to determine the vitamin's effectiveness in curing the common cold. Five hundred college students having a cold were recruited from colleges in the San Diego area and were paid to participate as subjects in this study. The subjects were each given two tablets of vitamin \(X\) a day. Based on information provided by the subjects themselves, 457 of the 500 subjects were cured of their colds within 3 days. (The average number of days a cold lasts is 4.87 days.) As a result of this study, the manufacturer launched an advertising campaign based on the claim that "vitamin \(X\) is more than \(90 \%\) effective in curing the common cold." (a) Describe as specifically as you can the target population for the study. (b) Describe the sampling frame for the study. (c) Describe the sample used for the study.

Refer to a clinical study conducted at the Houston Veterans Administration Medical Center on the effectiveness of knee surgery to cure degenerative arthritis (osteoarthritis) of the knee. Of the 324 individuals who met the inclusion criteria for the study, 144 declined to participate. The researchers randomly divided the remaining 180 subjects into three groups: One group received a type of arthroscopic knee surgery called debridement; a second group received a type of arthroscopic knee surgery called lavage; and a third group received skin incisions to make it look like they had had arthroscopic knee surgery, but no actual surgery was performed. The patients in the study did not know which group they were in and in particular did not know if they were receiving the real surgery or simulated surgery. All the patients who participated in the study were evaluated for two years after the procedure. In the two-year follow-up, all three groups said that they had slightly less pain and better knee movement, but the "fake" surgery group often reported the best results. As a result of this study, the Department of Veterans Affairs issued an advisory to its doctors recommending that they stop using arthroscopic knee surgery for patients suffering from osteoarthritis. Do you agree or disagree with the advisory? Explain your answer.

Refer to a landmark study conducted in 1896 in Denmark by Dr. Johannes Fibiger, who went on to receive the Nobel Prize in Medicine in \(1926 .\) The purpose of the study was to determine the effectiveness of a new serum for treating diphtheria, a common and often deadly respiratory disease in those days. Fibiger conducted his study over a one-year period (May 1896-April 1897) in one particular Copenhagen hospital. New diphtheria patients admitted to the hospital received different treatments based on the day of admission. In one set of days (call them "even" days for convenience), the patients were treated with the new serum daily and received the standard treatment. Patients admitted on alternate days (the "odd" days) received just the standard treatment. Over the one-year period of the study, eight of the 239 patients admitted on the "even" days and treated with the serum died, whereas 30 of the 245 patients admitted on the "odd" days died. (a) Describe the control and treatment groups in Fibiger's study. (b) What conclusions would you draw from Fibiger's study? Explain.

Refer to a study conducted between 2008 and 2010 on the effectiveness of saw palmetto fruit extracts at treating lower urinary tract symptoms in men with prostate enlargement. (Saw palmetto is a widely used over-the-counter supplement for treating urinary tract symptoms.) In the study, 369 men aged 45 years or older were randomly divided into a group taking a daily placebo and a group taking saw palmetto. Participants were nonpaid volunteers recruited at 11 North American sites. All had moderately impaired urinary flow. Because the saw palmetto extract has a mild odor, the doses were administered using gelcaps to eliminate the odor. In an analysis of the 306 men who completed the 72 -week trial, both groups had similar small improvements in mean symptom scores, but saw palmetto conferred no benefit over placebo on symptom scores or on any secondary outcomes. (a) Describe as specifically as you can the target population for the study. (b) Compare and contrast the sampling frame and target population for the study.

Refer to a clinical study conducted at the Houston Veterans Administration Medical Center on the effectiveness of knee surgery to cure degenerative arthritis (osteoarthritis) of the knee. Of the 324 individuals who met the inclusion criteria for the study, 144 declined to participate. The researchers randomly divided the remaining 180 subjects into three groups: One group received a type of arthroscopic knee surgery called debridement; a second group received a type of arthroscopic knee surgery called lavage; and a third group received skin incisions to make it look like they had had arthroscopic knee surgery, but no actual surgery was performed. The patients in the study did not know which group they were in and in particular did not know if they were receiving the real surgery or simulated surgery. All the patients who participated in the study were evaluated for two years after the procedure. In the two-year follow-up, all three groups said that they had slightly less pain and better knee movement, but the "fake" surgery group often reported the best results. (a) Was the sample chosen by random sampling? Explain. (b) Was this study a controlled placebo experiment? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.