/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 61 Imagine you have a very large co... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Imagine you have a very large coin jar full of nickels, dimes, and quarters. You would like to know how much money you have in the jar, but you don't want to go through the trouble of counting all the coins. You decide to estimate how many nickels, dimes, and quarters are in the jar using the capture- recapture method. After shaking the jar well, you draw a first sample of 150 coins and get 36 quarters, 45 nickels, and 69 dimes. Using a permanent ink marker you tag each of the 150 coins with a black dot and put the coins back in the jar, shake the jar really well to let the tagged coins mix well with the rest, and draw a second sample of 100 coins. The second sample has 28 quarters, 29 nickels, and 43 dimes. Of these, 4 quarters, 5 nickels, and 8 dimes have black dots. Estimate how much money is in the jar. (Hint: You will need a separate calculation for estimating the quarters, nickels, and dimes in the jar.)

Short Answer

Expert verified
To estimate the total amount of money in the jar, apply the capture-recapture method to estimate the total number of quarters, nickels, and dimes, and then convert these estimates to their monetary values, and finally add them up. This method provides an estimation, not an exact amount, and its accuracy depends on the randomness of the sampling process.

Step by step solution

01

Estimate the total number of each type of coin

Based on the capture-recapture method, the total number of each type of coin can be estimated using the formula: \((\text{Total number of first sample} \times \text{Total number of second sample}) / \text{Number of recaptured coins}\). For example, the estimated total number of quarters is \((150 \times 28) / 4\). So the same should be done for nickels and dimes.
02

Calculate monetary value of estimated coins

Once the estimated total number of each type of coin is calculated, convert these to their monetary values. For quarters, the value is \(\text{Estimated Quarters} \times 0.25\). For dimes, the value is \(\text{Estimated Dimes} \times 0.10\). And for nickels, the value is \(\text{Estimated Nickels} \times 0.05\).
03

Sum the estimates

Finally, sum up the calculated monetary values of quarters, dimes, and nickels to estimate the total amount of money in the jar. This can be calculated as \(\text{Monetary Value of Quarters} + \text{Monetary Value of Dimes} + \text{Monetary Value of Nickels}\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Coin Estimation
When faced with a situation where counting each individual coin is impractical, estimation becomes a valuable tool. In this exercise, we aim to estimate the number of each coin type—nickels, dimes, and quarters—in a large jar using the capture-recapture method. This technique originates from ecology where it helps estimate animal populations. Here's a brief run-through:
  • Firstly, we take an initial sample. In this case, it consisted of 150 coins, recording how many of each type were drawn.
  • Next, we mark these sampled coins distinctly and return them to the jar, ensuring they mix thoroughly.
  • Another sample is drawn, where we check for marked coins. This helps us understand how samples overlap.
By capturing and recapturing, we can apply a mathematical model to infer something about the whole. Through this exercise, we're given formulas to estimate the numbers of each type of coin, making it much easier to handle large quantities without exhaustive counting.
Mathematical Modeling
In situations where direct counting isn't feasible, mathematical modeling is employed to make educated estimates. Here, in the context of coin estimation, we use a mathematical formula that leverages the relationship between tagged and recaught items.The fundamental formula used is:\[ \text{Estimated Total} = \frac{\text{Number of first sample} \times \text{Number of second sample}}{\text{Number of recaptured tags}} \]This formula helps model the scenario and gives us the means to extrapolate from our sample back to the entire population. Here's the breakdown:
  • The product of the two samples approximates the effect of total items interacting.
  • The division by recaptured tags compares overlap, giving us a ratio reflective of the entire jar.
By applying this model separately to each type of coin, we can piece together an overall estimate, showcasing how mathematical modeling simplifies complex problems. This remarkable ability to infer large-scale data from smaller samples is just one example of mathematical modeling's power.
Estimation Techniques
Estimation techniques, like the one used here, help us solve problems efficiently without exhaustive efforts. The fundamental steps include sampling, labeling, and resampling, which form the backbone of the capture-recapture method. Here's a closer look:
  • Sampling: Collect a representative subset of the whole.
  • Labeling: Mark or tag your initial subset so they can be identified if encountered again.
  • Resampling: Draw another sample and count how many of the labeled items are present.
These steps bridge the gap between impossible counts and usable estimates. By multiplying the sizes of the samples and dividing by the number of recaptured tags, we form reliable estimates.
The use of these techniques allows us not only to estimate in controlled situations, such as coin jars but also extends to more varied fields like wildlife management and quality control. Thus, we see that estimation is more than mere guesswork; it's a structured approach to gaining insight into larger populations.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Refer to a landmark study conducted in 1896 in Denmark by Dr. Johannes Fibiger, who went on to receive the Nobel Prize in Medicine in \(1926 .\) The purpose of the study was to determine the effectiveness of a new serum for treating diphtheria, a common and often deadly respiratory disease in those days. Fibiger conducted his study over a one-year period (May 1896-April 1897) in one particular Copenhagen hospital. New diphtheria patients admitted to the hospital received different treatments based on the day of admission. In one set of days (call them "even" days for convenience), the patients were treated with the new serum daily and received the standard treatment. Patients admitted on alternate days (the "odd" days) received just the standard treatment. Over the one-year period of the study, eight of the 239 patients admitted on the "even" days and treated with the serum died, whereas 30 of the 245 patients admitted on the "odd" days died. (a) Describe as specifically as you can the target population for Fibiger's study. (b) Describe the sampling frame for the study.

An article in the Providence Journal about automobile accident fatalities includes the following observation: "Fortytwo percent of all fatalities occurred on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday, apparently because of increased drinking on the weekends." (a) Give a possible argument as to why the conclusion drawn may not be justified by the data. (b) Give a different possible argument as to why the conclusion drawn may be justified by the data after all.

Refer to the following story (see also Exercise 32): The Dean of Students at Tasmania State University wants to determine how many undergraduates at TSU are familiar with a new financial aid program offered by the university. There are 15,000 undergraduates at \(T S U,\) so it is too expensive to conduct a census. The following sampling method, known as systematic sampling, is used to choose a representative sample of undergraduates to poll. Start with the registrar's alphabetical listing containing the names of all undergraduates. Randomly pick a number between 1 and \(100,\) and count that far down the list. Take that name and every 100 th name after it. For example, if the random number chosen is \(73,\) then pick the \(73 \mathrm{rd}, 173 \mathrm{rd}, 273 \mathrm{rd},\) and so forth, names on the list. (a) Suppose that the survey had a response rate of \(90 \%\) and that 108 students responded that they were not familiar with the new financial aid program. Give a statistic for the total number of students at the university who were not familiar with the new financial aid program. (b) Do you think the results of this survey will be reliable? Explain.

Refer to the following story: The city of Cleansburg has 8325 registered voters. There is an election for mayor of Cleansburg, and there are three candidates for the position: Smith, Jones, and Brown. The day before the election a telephone poll of 680 randomly chosen registered voters produced the following results: 306 people surveyed indicated that they would vote for Smith, 272 indicated that they would vote for Jones and 102 indicated that they would vote for Brown. Do you think that the sampling error in this example was due primarily to sampling bias or to chance? Explain your answer

Refer to a landmark study conducted in 1896 in Denmark by Dr. Johannes Fibiger, who went on to receive the Nobel Prize in Medicine in \(1926 .\) The purpose of the study was to determine the effectiveness of a new serum for treating diphtheria, a common and often deadly respiratory disease in those days. Fibiger conducted his study over a one-year period (May 1896-April 1897) in one particular Copenhagen hospital. New diphtheria patients admitted to the hospital received different treatments based on the day of admission. In one set of days (call them "even" days for convenience), the patients were treated with the new serum daily and received the standard treatment. Patients admitted on alternate days (the "odd" days) received just the standard treatment. Over the one-year period of the study, eight of the 239 patients admitted on the "even" days and treated with the serum died, whereas 30 of the 245 patients admitted on the "odd" days died. (a) Describe the control and treatment groups in Fibiger's study. (b) What conclusions would you draw from Fibiger's study? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.