/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 48 Refer to a study on the effectiv... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Refer to a study on the effectiveness of an HPV (human papilloma virus) vaccine conducted between October 1998 and November \(1999 .\) HPV is the most common sexually transmitted infection-more than 20 million Americans are infected with HPV-but most HPV infections are benign, and in most cases infected individuals are not even aware they are infected. (On the other hand, some HPV infections can lead to cervical cancer in women.) The researchers recruited 2392 women from 16 different centers across the United States to participate in the study through advertisements on college campuses and in the surrounding communities. To be eligible to participate in the study, the subjects had to meet the following criteria: (1) be a female between 16 and 23 years of age, (2) not be pregnant, (3) have no prior abnormal Pap smears, and (4) report to have had sexual relations with no more than five men. At each center, half of the participants were randomly selected to receive the HPV vaccine, and the other half received a placebo injection. After 17.4 months, the incidence of HPV infection was 3.8 per 100 woman-years at risk in the placebo group and 0 per 100 woman-years at risk in the vaccine group. In addition, all nine cases of HPV-related cervical precancerous growths occurred among the placebo recipients. Carefully state what a legitimate conclusion from this study might be.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The HPV vaccine demonstrated effectiveness in this study, based on zero instances of HPV infection and precancerous growths among vaccine recipients. It indicates that the vaccine successfully prevented HPV and HPV-related issues, as evidenced by the observed contrast between the control and treatment groups.

Step by step solution

01

Outline the Situation

In this study, 2392 women were recruited across 16 centers in the United States. The women had to be between 16 and 23 years old, not pregnant, have no prior abnormal Pap smears, and have had sexual relations with no more than five men. They were randomly selected to either receive the HPV vaccine or a placebo injection.
02

Identify the Control and Treatment Groups

The group that received the placebo serves as the control group, and the group that received the HPV vaccine serves as the treatment group. This arrangement is crucial for observing the effects of the HPV vaccine, and if it can lower HPV infection rates and prevent HPV-related cervical precancerous growths.
03

Examine Study Results

After a period of 17.4 months, the incidence of HPV infection was recorded as 3.8 per 100 woman-years in the control group and 0 in the treatment group. Additionally, all nine cases of HPV-related cervical precancerous growths occurred in the control group, not in the vaccinated group.
04

Formulate a Conclusion

The HPV vaccine proves to be effective in preventing HPV infection and precancerous growths related to HPV. All the women who encountered such health issues did not receive the vaccine and were in the control group, indicating that the vaccine may protect against HPV if implemented in the manner conducted in the study.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Experimental Design
The study on the HPV vaccine employed a well-thought-out experimental design to assess the vaccine's effectiveness. An experimental design is a structured approach to testing hypotheses by measuring the effects of independent variables on dependent variables in a controlled environment. In this study:
  • The researchers selected a diverse group of 2392 women from 16 different locations across the United States.
  • Participants were chosen based on specific eligibility criteria, such as age, pregnancy status, and sexual history, ensuring the study's applicability to a targeted demographic.
  • Random selection was used to assign participants to either the treatment or control group, ensuring that the study results were unbiased and reliable.
The thorough design helps distinguish the true effect of the HPV vaccine on infection rates and health outcomes. Carefully crafted eligibility criteria and randomization prevent confounding variables from influencing the study's results. This solid foundation allows researchers to draw meaningful conclusions about the vaccine's efficacy.
Control and Treatment Groups
Control and treatment groups are essential components of clinical trials, such as the HPV vaccine study. These groups allow researchers to isolate the impact of the treatment from other variables. Here’s how these groups functioned in this study:
  • The treatment group received the HPV vaccine. This group is crucial for observing the direct effects of the vaccine on the participants' health.
  • The control group received a placebo injection (an inactive substance), which serves as a baseline for comparison. It helps determine what changes can be attributed to the vaccine as opposed to natural variations in health or behavior.
By comparing outcomes between the treatment and control groups, researchers can evaluate the vaccine's success in preventing HPV infections and assess its role in reducing cervical precancerous growths. As all cases of HPV-related health issues occurred in the control group, it indicates that the absence of such cases in the treatment group is likely due to the vaccine.
Vaccine Efficacy
Vaccine efficacy refers to the ability of a vaccine to prevent a disease under ideal and controlled circumstances. The HPV vaccine study demonstrated overwhelming efficacy in this context.
  • After 17.4 months, the vaccine group's HPV infection rate was notably low, at 0 per 100 woman-years at risk, whereas the placebo group's rate was 3.8 per 100 woman-years.
  • Moreover, all occurrences of HPV-related cervical precancerous growths were documented in the control group, with none in the treatment group.
These outcomes showcase the vaccine's high efficacy in preventing both HPV infections and subsequent precancerous conditions. It suggests a strong protective effect when the vaccine is administered as per the study's protocol. This information is vital for public health authorities and practitioners in planning vaccination strategies to combat HPV-related diseases.
Data Analysis in Clinical Trials
Data analysis in clinical trials involves interpreting the collected data to make sound decisions regarding the efficacy and safety of interventions, such as the HPV vaccine. Effective data analysis was pivotal in drawing conclusions from this study.
  • The researchers examined infection rates and the incidence of cervical precancerous growths over the course of 17.4 months.
  • Statistical tools likely assessed the significance of the observed differences between the control and treatment groups, confirming that these outcomes weren’t due to random chance.
Data analysis allowed for a clear assessment of the vaccine's impact, ensuring that the differences in health outcomes were genuinely attributable to the vaccine rather than external factors. Ultimately, this rigorous analysis provided convincing evidence of the HPV vaccine's preventive benefits, which are crucial for informing policy and future research decisions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Refer to a landmark study conducted in 1896 in Denmark by Dr. Johannes Fibiger, who went on to receive the Nobel Prize in Medicine in \(1926 .\) The purpose of the study was to determine the effectiveness of a new serum for treating diphtheria, a common and often deadly respiratory disease in those days. Fibiger conducted his study over a one-year period (May 1896-April 1897) in one particular Copenhagen hospital. New diphtheria patients admitted to the hospital received different treatments based on the day of admission. In one set of days (call them "even" days for convenience), the patients were treated with the new serum daily and received the standard treatment. Patients admitted on alternate days (the "odd" days) received just the standard treatment. Over the one-year period of the study, eight of the 239 patients admitted on the "even" days and treated with the serum died, whereas 30 of the 245 patients admitted on the "odd" days died. In a different study on the effectiveness of the diphtheria serum conducted prior to Fibiger's study, patients in one Copenhagen hospital were chosen to be in the treatment group and were given the new serum, whereas patients in a different Copenhagen hospital were chosen to be in the control group and were given the standard treatment. Fibiger did not believe that the results of this earlier study could be trusted. What are some possible confounding variables that may have affected the results of this earlier study?

Refer to the following story: \(A n\) orange grower wishes to compute the average yield from his orchard. The orchard contains three varieties of trees: \(50 \%\) of his trees are of variety \(A, 25 \%\) of variety \(B,\) and \(25 \%\) of variety \(C .\) (a) Suppose that in his survey, the grower found that each tree of variety A averages 100 oranges, each tree of variety \(\mathrm{B}\) averages 50 oranges, and each tree of variety C averages 70 oranges. Estimate the average yield per tree of his orchard. (b) Is the yield you found in (a) a parameter or a statistic? Explain.

Refer to the following story: The manufacturer of a new vitamin (vitamin \(X\) ) decides to sponsor a study to determine the vitamin's effectiveness in curing the common cold. Five hundred college students having a cold were recruited from colleges in the San Diego area and were paid to participate as subjects in this study. The subjects were each given two tablets of vitamin \(X\) a day. Based on information provided by the subjects themselves, 457 of the 500 subjects were cured of their colds within 3 days. (The average number of days a cold lasts is 4.87 days.) As a result of this study, the manufacturer launched an advertising campaign based on the claim that "vitamin \(X\) is more than \(90 \%\) effective in curing the common cold." Make some suggestions for improving the study.

You are a fruit wholesaler. You have just received 250 crates of pineapples: 75 crates came from supplier \(A, 75\) crates from supplier \(\mathrm{B},\) and 100 crates from supplier \(\mathrm{C}\). You wish to determine if the pineapples are good enough to ship to your best customers by inspecting a sample of \(n=20\) crates. Describe how you might implement each of the following sampling methods. (a) Simple random sampling (b) Convenience sampling (c) Stratified sampling (d) Quota sampling

Refer to the following story (see also Exercise 32): The Dean of Students at Tasmania State University wants to determine how many undergraduates at TSU are familiar with a new financial aid program offered by the university. There are 15,000 undergraduates at \(T S U,\) so it is too expensive to conduct a census. The following sampling method, known as systematic sampling, is used to choose a representative sample of undergraduates to poll. Start with the registrar's alphabetical listing containing the names of all undergraduates. Randomly pick a number between 1 and \(100,\) and count that far down the list. Take that name and every 100 th name after it. For example, if the random number chosen is \(73,\) then pick the \(73 \mathrm{rd}, 173 \mathrm{rd}, 273 \mathrm{rd},\) and so forth, names on the list. (a) Suppose that the survey had a response rate of \(90 \%\) and that 108 students responded that they were not familiar with the new financial aid program. Give a statistic for the total number of students at the university who were not familiar with the new financial aid program. (b) Do you think the results of this survey will be reliable? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.