/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 21 Test the given claim. Identify t... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, \(P\) -value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. In a random sample of males, it was found that 23 write with their left hands and 217 do not. In a random sample of females, it was found that 65 write with their left hands and 455 do not (based on data from "The Left-Handed: Their Sinister History," by Elaine Fowler Costas, Education 91Ó°ÊÓ Information Center, Paper 399519). We want to use a \(0.01\) significance level to test the claim that the rate of left-handedness among males is less than that among females. a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test. b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval. c. Based on the results, is the rate of left-handedness among males less than the rate of lefthandedness among females?

Short Answer

Expert verified
There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the rate of left-handedness among males is less than that among females.

Step by step solution

01

Define the Hypotheses

Identify the null and alternative hypotheses. Let \[ p_1 \] be the proportion of left-handed males, and \[ p_2 \] be the proportion of left-handed females.Null Hypothesis (\[ H_0 \]): \[ p_1 \, = \, p_2 \]Alternative Hypothesis (\[ H_1 \]): \[ p_1 \, < \, p_2 \]
02

Collect and Calculate Proportions

Calculate the sample proportions for each group:\[ \hat{p}_1 = \frac{23}{23 + 217} = \frac{23}{240} \approx 0.0958 \]\[ \hat{p}_2 = \frac{65}{65 + 455} = \frac{65}{520} \approx 0.125 \]
03

Calculate the Test Statistic

The test statistic for comparing two proportions can be calculated using the formula:\[ z = \frac{\hat{p}_1 - \hat{p}_2}{\sqrt{\hat{p}(1 - \hat{p})(\frac{1}{n_1} + \frac{1}{n_2})}} \]where\[ \hat{p} = \frac{x_1 + x_2}{n_1 + n_2} = \frac{23 + 65}{240 + 520} = \frac{88}{760} \approx 0.1158 \]The test statistic is:\[ z = \frac{0.0958 - 0.125}{\sqrt{0.1158(1 - 0.1158)(\frac{1}{240} + \frac{1}{520})}} \approx -1.05 \]
04

Find the P-value

Use the standard normal distribution (Z-distribution) to find the P-value. The P-value corresponding to \( z = -1.05 \) is about 0.1469 (using Z-tables or statistical software).
05

Compare the P-value to the Significance Level

The significance level is 0.01. Since the P-value (0.1469) is greater than the significance level (0.01), we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
06

State the Conclusion for Hypothesis Test

We fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not enough evidence at the 0.01 significance level to support the claim that the rate of left-handedness among males is less than that among females.
07

Construct a Confidence Interval

Construct a 99% confidence interval for the difference in proportions. The formula for the confidence interval for the difference in proportions is:\[ (\hat{p}_1 - \hat{p}_2) \pm Z_{\alpha/2} \sqrt{\hat{p}_1(1-\hat{p}_1)/n_1 + \hat{p}_2(1-\hat{p}_2)/n_2} \]Using a Z value of 2.576 for a 99% confidence level:\[ CI = (0.0958 - 0.125) \pm 2.576 \sqrt{0.0958(1-0.0958)/240 + 0.125(1-0.125)/520} \approx -0.0292 \pm 0.0520 \]Which gives us:\[ CI \approx (-0.0812, 0.0228) \]
08

Conclusion for Confidence Interval

Since the confidence interval contains 0, we do not have sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of left-handed males is less than that of females.
09

Final Conclusion

Based on both the hypothesis test and the confidence interval, we conclude that there is not enough evidence to support the claim that the rate of left-handedness among males is less than that among females.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

null hypothesis
The null hypothesis (often denoted as \(H_0\)) is a statement that there is no effect or no difference. It acts as a baseline or starting assumption for statistical testing. For example, in our problem, the null hypothesis is that the proportion of left-handed males (\( p_1 \)) is equal to the proportion of left-handed females (\( p_2 \)). In notation, this is written as: \[ H_0: p_1 = p_2 \] We use the null hypothesis to test whether any observed differences between groups (like males and females) are due to random chance.
alternative hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis (denoted as \( H_1 \)) is a statement that changes based on the claim we are testing. It represents a new effect or difference we're investigating. In our scenario, we want to test if the proportion of left-handed males is less than that of females. So, the alternative hypothesis states: \[ H_1: p_1 < p_2 \] If we find enough evidence against the null hypothesis, we'll support the alternative hypothesis, indicating a significant difference between the two proportions.
test statistic
The test statistic is a value determined from sample data, which we compare against a threshold to decide whether to reject the null hypothesis. For comparing two proportions, we use the Z-test formula: \[ z = \frac{\hat{p_1} - \hat{p_2}}{\sqrt{\hat{p} (1 - \hat{p}) (\frac{1}{n_1} + \frac{1}{n_2})}} \] Here, \( \hat{p_1} \) and \( \hat{p_2} \) are the sample proportions, and \( \hat{p} \) is the pooled proportion. For our exercise, the test statistic is calculated to be approximately -1.05. This negative value suggests that our sample mean of proportions aligns with our alternative hypothesis direction.
confidence interval
A confidence interval offers a range of values where we expect the true population parameter to lie, based on our sample data. For the difference in proportions, the confidence interval helps us determine if there's a significant difference. The formula for the confidence interval of the difference in proportions is: \[ (\hat{p_1} - \hat{p_2}) \pm Z_{\alpha /2} \sqrt{\hat{p_1}(1- \hat{p_1})/n_1 + \hat{p_2}(1- \hat{p_2})/n_2} \] For a 99% confidence level (Z-value of about 2.576), we found our interval to be approximately -0.0812 to 0.0228. Since this interval contains 0, we don't have enough evidence to claim a difference between male and female left-handedness proportions.
P-value
The P-value quantifies the evidence against the null hypothesis, representing the probability of observing the test result, or one more extreme, if the null hypothesis is true. For our test, the P-value is calculated from the Z-distribution. Given our Z-value of about -1.05, the corresponding P-value is approximately 0.1469. Because this P-value is greater than our significance level of 0.01, we do not reject the null hypothesis. This means there's not enough evidence to support the claim that the rate of left-handedness among males is less than that among females.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of hypnotism in reducing pain. Results for randomly selected subjects are given in the accompanying table (based on "An Analysis of Factors That Contribute to the Efficacy of Hypnotic Analgesia," by Price and Barber, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Vol. 96, No. 1 ). The values are before and after hypnosis; the measurements are in centimeters on a pain scale. Higher values correspond to greater levels of pain. Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the mean of the "before/after" differences. Does hypnotism appear to be effective in reducing pain? $$ \begin{array}{l|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline \text { Subject } & \text { A } & \text { B } & \text { C } & \text { D } & \text { E } & \text { F } & \text { G } & \text { H } \\ \hline \text { Before } & 6.6 & 6.5 & 9.0 & 10.3 & 11.3 & 8.1 & 6.3 & 11.6 \\ \hline \text { After } & 6.8 & 2.4 & 7.4 & 8.5 & 8.1 & 6.1 & 3.4 & 2.0 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

When the author visited Dublin, Ireland (home of Guinness Brewery employee William Gosset, who first developed the \(t\) distribution), he recorded the ages of randomly selected passenger cars and randomly selected taxis. The ages can be found from the license plates. (There is no end to the fun of traveling with the author.) The ages (in years) are listed below. We might expect that taxis would be newer, so test the claim that the mean age of cars is greater than the mean age of taxis. $$ \begin{array}{|l|l|l|l|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|l|l|c|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \text { Car Ages } & 4 & 0 & 8 & 11 & 14 & 3 & 4 & 4 & 3 & 5 & 8 & 3 & 3 & 7 & 4 & 6 & 6 & 1 & 8 & 2 & 15 & 11 & 4 & 1 & 6 & 1 & 8 \\ \hline \text { Taxi Ages } & 8 & 8 & 0 & 3 & 8 & 4 & 3 & 3 & 6 & 11 & 7 & 7 & 6 & 9 & 5 & 10 & 8 & 4 & 3 & 4 & & & & & & & \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Listed below are the numbers of words spoken in a day by each member of six different couples. The data are randomly selected from the first two columns in Data Set 24 "Word Counts" in Appendix B. a. Use a \(0.05\) significance level to test the claim that among couples, males speak fewer words in a day than females. b. Construct the confidence interval that could be used for the hypothesis test described in part (a). What feature of the confidence interval leads to the same conclusion reached in part (a)? $$ \begin{array}{l|l|l|r|r|r|r|r|r} \hline \text { Male } & 15,684 & 26,429 & 1,411 & 7,771 & 18,876 & 15,477 & 14,069 & 25,835 \\ \hline \text { Female } & 24,625 & 13,397 & 18,338 & 17,791 & 12,964 & 16,937 & 16,255 & 18,667 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Listed below are student evaluation scores of female professors and male professors from Data Set 17 "Course Evaluations" in Appendix B. Test the claim that female professors and male professors have the same mean evaluation ratings. Does there appear to be a difference? $$ \begin{array}{|l|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline \text { Females } & 4.4 & 3.4 & 4.8 & 2.9 & 4.4 & 4.9 & 3.5 & 3.7 & 3.4 & 4.8 \\ \hline \text { Males } & 4.0 & 3.6 & 4.1 & 4.1 & 3.5 & 4.6 & 4.0 & 4.3 & 4.5 & 4.3 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Data Set 7 "IQ and Lead" in Appendix B lists full IQ scores for a random sample of subjects with low lead levels in their blood and another random sample of subjects with high lead levels in their blood. The statistics are summarized below. a. Use a \(0.05\) significance level to test the claim that the mean IQ score of people with low blood lead levels is higher than the mean IQ score of people with high blood lead levels. b. Construct a confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a). c. Does exposure to lead appear to have an effect on IQ scores? Low Blood Lead Level: \(\quad n=78, \bar{x}=92.88462, s=15.34451\) High Blood Lead Level: \(\quad n=21, \bar{x}=86.90476, s=8.988352\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.