/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 76 The table shows the heights (in ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The table shows the heights (in inches) and weights (in pounds) of 14 college men. The scatterplot shows that the association is linear enough to proceed. $$ \begin{aligned} &\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \begin{array}{c} \text { Height } \\ \text { (inches) } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Weight } \\ \text { (pounds) } \end{array} \\ \hline 68 & 205 \\ \hline 68 & 168 \\ \hline 74 & 230 \\ \hline 68 & 190 \\ \hline 67 & 185 \\ \hline 69 & 190 \\ \hline 68 & 165 \\ \hline \end{array}\\\ &\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \begin{array}{c} \text { Height } \\ \text { (inches) } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Weight } \\ \text { (pounds) } \end{array} \\ \hline 70 & 200 \\ \hline 69 & 175 \\ \hline 72 & 210 \\ \hline 72 & 205 \\ \hline 72 & 185 \\ \hline 71 & 200 \\ \hline 73 & 195 \\ \hline \end{array} \end{aligned} $$ a. Find the equation for the regression line with weight (in pounds) as the response and height (in inches) as the predictor. Report the slope and the intercept of the regression line, and explain what they show. If the intercept is not appropriate to report, explain why. b. Find the correlation between weight (in pounds) and height (in inches). c. Find the coefficient of determination and interpret it. d. If you changed each height to centimeters by multiplying heights in inches by \(2.54\), what would the new correlation be? Explain. e. Find the equation with weight (in pounds) as the response and height (in inches) as the predictor, and interpret the slope. f. Summarize what you found: Does changing units change the correlation? Does changing units change the regression equation?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The correlation remains unchanged when the units are changed. Although the slope changes with the change in the units of the predictor variable (height), the y-intercept remains the same.

Step by step solution

01

Calculation of Regression Line

First, calculate the regression line of the data which is in the form \(y = mx + c\), where \(y\) is the weight (response variable), \(x\) is the height (predictor variable), \(m\) is the slope and \(c\) is the intercept. The formula is \(y=\bar{y}+m(x-\bar{x})\), where \(\bar{y}\) and \(\bar{x}\) are the means of the \(y\) and \(x\) values respectively. Importantly, \(m=r\left(\frac{s_y}{s_x}\right)\), where \(r\) is the correlation coefficient, \(s_y\) is the standard deviation of the \(y\) values, and \(s_x\) is the standard deviation of the \(x\) values.
02

Interpretation of Slope and Intercept

The slope represents how much the weight changes for each increase in height by 1 inch. The intercept represents the weight when the height is zero, which has no practical meaning in this context since people cannot have zero height.
03

Calculation of Correlation

The formula to calculate correlation is \(r=\frac{n\sum xy -( \sum x)( \sum y)}{\sqrt{[n\sum x^2 -(\sum x)^2][n\sum y^2 -(\sum y)^2]}}\) where \(x\) is height and \(y\) is weight, and \(n\) is the number of data points.
04

Calculation of Coefficient of Determination

Next, find the coefficient of determination which is the square of the correlation coefficient. It denotes the fraction of the variance in the weights that can be explained by the heights.
05

Changing Units

If height is converted to centimeters from inches by multiplying by 2.54, the correlation does not change because correlation is a unit-less measure of the strength of linear relationship between two variables.
06

Effect of Changing Units on Regression Line

If the units of the height are changed from inches to centimeters, the slope will change but the y-intercept and correlation will remain the same. This is because the slope is proportional to the unit change of x, which is height in this case, while the y-intercept and the correlation don't depend on the units of measurement.
07

Summary

Changing units does not change the correlation because it is unitless and measures only the strength of linear relationship between two variables. The slope of the regression line changes because it is influenced by the units of the predictor variable height. The y-intercept stays the same because it represents where the line crosses the y axis at x=0 and does not depend on the units of measurement, but it is not meaningful in this context because height cannot be zero.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Correlation Coefficient
The correlation coefficient, often represented by the symbol \( r \), is a crucial measure in regression analysis. It quantifies the degree of a linear relationship between two variables, such as height and weight in our example. The value of \( r \) ranges from -1 to 1.

If \( r = 1 \), it indicates a perfect positive linear relationship, meaning as one variable increases, the other variable increases at a consistent rate. Conversely, an \( r = -1 \) denotes a perfect negative linear relationship, indicating that as one variable increases, the other decreases consistently.

A value of \( r = 0 \) suggests no linear relationship between the variables. In practical contexts:
  • A positive \( r \) indicates that as height increases, weight tends to increase.
  • A negative \( r \) would suggest that as height increases, weight tends to decrease.
  • The closer \( r \) is to 1 or -1, the stronger the linear relationship.
Importantly, the correlation coefficient does not change when the units of measurement are altered, as it is a dimensionless measure.
Coefficient of Determination
The coefficient of determination, denoted as \( R^2 \), provides insight into how well the regression line fits the data. It is calculated as the square of the correlation coefficient (\( r^2 \)).

The \( R^2 \) value tells us the proportion of variance in the dependent variable (weight, in this case) that is predictable from the independent variable (height).
  • An \( R^2 \) of 0.9, for example, implies that 90% of the variance in weight can be explained by height.
  • Conversely, an \( R^2 \) of 0.3 would mean only 30% of the weight variance is due to height.
Understanding \( R^2 \) is crucial as it provides a single number summary of the strength of the relationship, and helps in determining the effectiveness of the predictor variable.
Linear Relationship
A linear relationship describes a straight-line relationship between two quantitative variables. In regression analysis, this is expressed by the equation: \( y = mx + c \), where \( y \) represents the dependent variable (weight), \( x \) is the independent variable (height), \( m \) is the slope, and \( c \) is the y-intercept.

When examining a linear relationship:
  • The slope \( m \) indicates how much \( y \) changes for a unit change in \( x \). For example, a slope of 2 implies that for each inch increase in height, weight increases by 2 pounds.
  • The intercept \( c \), in the context of height and weight, is the expected weight when height is zero. Although this has no realistic interpretation in our example, it provides a starting point for the regression line.
A strong linear relationship is indicated by a high correlation coefficient and subsequently a substantial coefficient of determination, showing that the data points closely fit the regression line.
Predictor Variable
In the context of regression analysis, the predictor variable is the independent variable used to forecast the dependent variable. In our example, height is the predictor variable used to predict weight.

Key considerations for a predictor variable include its ability to accurately reflect changes in the dependent variable and the strength of its linear relationship with the dependent variable. The predictor variable's reliability is often measured by the correlation coefficient and the coefficient of determination.
  • In linear regression, choosing the right predictor variable is paramount. A predictor variable with a high correlation to the dependent variable enhances the accuracy of predictions.
  • However, the units of the predictor variable can affect the slope of the regression equation, though not the relationship's strength, as indicated by the correlation coefficient.
Understanding the role and effects of the predictor variable is essential for making reliable predictions and drawing valid conclusions from the regression analysis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that the growth rate of children looks like a straight line if the height of a child is observed at the ages of 24 months, 28 months, 32 months, and 36 months. If you use the regression obtained from these ages and predict the height of the child at 21 years, you might find that the predicted height is 20 feet. What is wrong with the prediction and the process used?

The table shows the calories in a five-ounce serving and the \(\%\) alcohol content for a sample of wines. (Source: healthalicious.com) $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \text { Calories } & \% \text { alcohol } \\ \hline 122 & 10.6 \\ \hline 119 & 10.1 \\ \hline 121 & 10.1 \\ \hline 123 & 8.8 \\ \hline 129 & 11.1 \\ \hline 236 & 15.5 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Make a scatterplot using \(\%\) alcohol as the independent variable and calories as the dependent variable. Include the regression line on your scatterplot. Based on your scatterplot do you think there is a strong linear relationship between these variables? b. Find the numerical value of the correlation between \(\%\) alcohol and calories. Explain what the sign of the correlation means in the context of this problem. c. Report the equation of the regression line and interpret the slope of the regression line in the context of this problem. Use the words calories and \(\%\) alcohol in your equation. Round to two decimal places. d. Find and interpret the value of the coefficient of determination. e. Add a new point to your data: a wine that is \(20 \%\) alcohol that contains 0 calories. Find \(r\) and the regression equation after including this new data point. What was the effect of this one data point on the value of \(r\) and the slope of the regression equation?

Suppose a doctor telephones those patients who are in the highest \(10 \%\) with regard to their recently recorded blood pressure and asks them to return for a clinical review. When she retakes their blood pressures, will those new blood pressures, as a group (that is, on average), tend to be higher than, lower than, or the same as the earlier blood pressures, and why?

The data shows the number of calories, carbohydrates (in grams) and sugar (in grams) found in a selection of menu items at McDonald's. Scatterplots suggest the relationship between calories and both carbs and sugars is linear. The data are also available on this text's website. (Source: shapefit.com) $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|} \hline \text { Calories } & \text { Carbs (in grams) } & \text { Sugars (in grams) } \\ \hline 530 & 47 & 9 \\ \hline 520 & 42 & 10 \\ \hline 720 & 52 & 14 \\ \hline 610 & 47 & 10 \\ \hline 600 & 48 & 12 \\ \hline 540 & 45 & 9 \\ \hline 740 & 43 & 10 \\ \hline 240 & 32 & 6 \\ \hline 290 & 33 & 7 \\ \hline 340 & 37 & 7 \\ \hline 300 & 32 & 6 \\ \hline 430 & 35 & 7 \\ \hline 380 & 34 & 7 \\ \hline 430 & 35 & 6 \\ \hline 440 & 35 & 7 \\ \hline 430 & 34 & 7 \\ \hline 750 & 65 & 16 \\ \hline 590 & 51 & 14 \\ \hline 510 & 55 & 10 \\ \hline 350 & 42 & 8 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ $$ \begin{array}{|l|l|} \hline \text { Calories } & \text { Carbs (in grams) } & \text { Sugars (in grams) } \\ \hline 670 & 58 & 11 \\ \hline 510 & 44 & 9 \\ \hline 610 & 57 & 11 \\ \hline 450 & 43 & 9 \\ \hline 360 & 40 & 5 \\ \hline 360 & 40 & 5 \\ \hline 430 & 41 & 6 \\ \hline 480 & 43 & 6 \\ \hline 430 & 43 & 7 \\ \hline 390 & 39 & 5 \\ \hline 500 & 44 & 11 \\ \hline 670 & 68 & 12 \\ \hline 510 & 54 & 10 \\ \hline 630 & 56 & 7 \\ \hline 480 & 42 & 6 \\ \hline 610 & 56 & 8 \\ \hline 450 & 42 & 6 \\ \hline 540 & 61 & 14 \\ \hline 380 & 47 & 12 \\ \hline 340 & 37 & 8 \\ \hline 260 & 30 & 7 \\ \hline 340 & 34 & 5 \\ \hline 260 & 27 & 4 \\ \hline 360 & 32 & 3 \\ \hline 280 & 25 & 2 \\ \hline 330 & 26 & 3 \\ \hline 190 & 12 & 0 \\ \hline 750 & 65 & 16 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Calculate the correlation coefficient and report the equation of the regression line using carbs as the predictor and calories as the response variable. Report the slope and interpret it in the context of this problem. Then use your regression equation to predict the number of calories in a menu item containing 55 grams of carbohydrates. b. Calculate the correlation coefficient and report the equation of the regression line using sugar as the predictor and calories as the response variable. Report the slope and interpret it in the context of this problem. Then use your regression equation to predict the number of calories in a menu item containing 10 grams of sugars. c. Based on your answers to parts (a) and (b), which is a better predictor of calories for these data: carbs or sugars? Explain your choice using appropriate statistics.

The table for part (a) shows distances between selected cities and the cost of a business class train ticket for travel between these cities. a. Calculate the correlation coefficient for the data shown in the table by using a computer or statistical calculator. $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \text { Distance (in miles) } & \text { Cost (in \$) } \\ \hline 439 & 281 \\ \hline 102 & 152 \\ \hline 215 & 144 \\ \hline 310 & 293 \\ \hline 406 & 281 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ b. The table for part (b) shows the same information, except that the distance was converted to kilometers by multiplying the number of miles by \(1.609\). What happens to the correlation when the numbers are multiplied by a constant? $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \text { Distance (in kilometers) } & \text { Cost } \\ \hline 706 & 281 \\ \hline 164 & 152 \\ \hline 346 & 144 \\ \hline 499 & 293 \\ \hline 653 & 281 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ c. Suppose a surcharge is added to every train ticket to fund track maintenance. A fee of $$\$ 20$$ is added to each ticket, no matter how long the trip is. The following table shows the new data. What happens to the correlation coefficient when a constant is added to each number? $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \text { Distance (in miles) } & \text { Cost (in \$) } \\ \hline 439 & 301 \\ \hline 102 & 172 \\ \hline 215 & 164 \\ \hline 310 & 313 \\ \hline 406 & 301 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.