/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 49 The following table gives the nu... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The following table gives the number of millionaires (in thousands) and the population (in hundreds of thousands) for the states in the northeastern region of the United States in 2008 . The numbers of millionaires come from Forbes Magazine in March 2007 . a. Without doing any calculations, predict whether the correlation and slope will be positive or negative. Explain your prediction. b. Make a scatterplot with the population (in hundreds of thousands) on the \(x\) -axis and the number of millionaires (in thousands) on the \(y\) -axis. Was your prediction correct? c. Find the numerical value for the correlation. d. Find the value of the slope and explain what it means in context. Be careful with the units. e. Explain why interpreting the value for the intercept does not make sense in this situation. $$ \begin{array}{|l|c|r|} \hline \text { State } & \text { Millionaires } & \text { Population } \\ \hline \text { Connecticut } & 86 & 35 \\ \hline \text { Delaware } & 18 & 8 \\ \hline \text { Maine } & 22 & 13 \\ \hline \text { Massachusetts } & 141 & 64 \\ \hline \text { New Hampshire } & 26 & 13 \\ \hline \text { New Jersey } & 207 & 87 \\ \hline \text { New York } & 368 & 193 \\ \hline \text { Pennsylvania } & 228 & 124 \\ \hline \text { Rhode Island } & 20 & 11 \\ \hline \text { Vermont } & 11 & 6 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
It is predicted that the correlation and slope will be positive, which can be validated by creating a scatterplot or calculating correlation using the data. The slope shows how much the number of millionaires grows per increase in population, with units considered. The intercept, representing millionaires at zero population, doesn't make sense in this context and thus can't be interpreted.

Step by step solution

01

Prediction of Correlation and Slope

Generally, a region with a larger population is likely to have more millionaires, due to a greater number of people and potentially larger economy. Therefore, it is expected that the correlation and slope would be positive.
02

Creation of Scatterplot

Create a scatterplot with population on the x-axis and number of millionaires on the y-axis using a statistical program or tool. With a presumed positive relationship, the dots on the scatterplot should generally move upwards as you go from left to right.
03

Find the Numerical Value for the Correlation

The correlation can be calculated with a statistical tool using the dataset. The resulting value should be positive, confirming the prediction.
04

Slope Value and Meaning

The slope in this context represents how much the number of millionaires increases with each increase in population. Calculate the slope using a statistical tool and interpret the value by considering the unit in context.
05

Intercept Interpretation

The intercept is the y-value when x is zero, i.e., the predicted number of millionaires when the population is zero. Since it's unrealistic to have a population of zero, the intercept in this context doesn't make sense and can't be interpreted.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Scatterplot Interpretation
A scatterplot is a type of graph used to visualize the relationship between two numerical variables. In our exercise, this involves plotting the population of a region on the x-axis and the number of millionaires on the y-axis.
Each point on the scatterplot represents a state, indicating the state's population in relation to its number of millionaires. A positive relationship means that as the population (x-axis) increases, the number of millionaires (y-axis) also tends to increase.
If your scatterplot shows this upward trend from left to right, it suggests a positive correlation. This is typical in demographic data where larger populations often have more millionaires.
Slope in Context
The slope in regression analysis offers profound insights into the relationship between two variables. In this context, the slope tells us how many more millionaires can be expected with a one-unit increase in the population (measured in hundreds of thousands).
For instance, suppose the slope is found to be 2.5. This indicates that for every additional 100,000 people in population, the number of millionaires increases by 2.5 thousand.
  • This slope provides an average rate of change or increase of one variable against the other.
  • Understanding the units is crucial in applying this slope practically. Misinterpretation can lead to misunderstandings of the relationship's scale and impact.
Intercept Interpretation
The intercept in a regression equation refers to the expected value of the dependent variable when all independent variables are zero. In our problem, this would conceptually mean the number of millionaires when the population is zero.
In real-world contexts like this one, such an interpretation often doesn't make practical sense because having zero population would logically lead to zero millionaires. Therefore, while mathematically computed, the intercept here serves little practical purpose and is primarily a mathematical artifact deriving from calculations.
  • The intercept helps in forming the line of best fit mathematically but should be interpreted cautiously in demographic datasets.
  • Ignoring unrealistic contexts like zero population is essential in these interpretations.
Population Data Analysis
Population data analysis involves examining population figures and their implications for other variables, such as wealth distribution, economic growth, or geographical patterns.
In our exercise, population data is crucial for understanding the number of millionaires in various states. Analyzing such datasets can provide insights into economic conditions, disparities, and trends across the states.
  • Empirical analysis often relies on such datasets to guide policy decisions.
  • Trends in this data can signal shifts in population wealth, influencing economic policymaking.
By leveraging regression analysis, we can make predictions and form insights that are invaluable for economists, policymakers, and researchers focused on demographic studies.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Seth Wagerman, a former professor at California Lutheran University, went to the website RateMyProfessors.com and looked up the quality rating and also the "easiness" of the six full-time professors in one department. The ratings are 1 (lowest quality) to 5 (highest quality) and 1 (hardest) to 5 (easiest). The numbers given are averages for each professor. Assume the trend is linear, find the correlation, and comment on what it means. $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \text { Quality } & \text { Easiness } \\ \hline 4.8 & 3.8 \\ \hline 4.6 & 3.1 \\ \hline 4.3 & 3.4 \\ \hline 4.2 & 2.6 \\ \hline 3.9 & 1.9 \\ 3.6 & 2.0 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

United Press International published an article with the headline "Study Fînds Correlation between Education, Life Expectancy." Would you expect this correlation to be negative or positive? Explain your reasoning in the context of this headline.

The following table gives the distance from Boston to each city and the cost of a train ticket from Boston to that city for a certain date. $$ \begin{array}{lcc} \hline \text { City } & \text { Distance (in miles) } & \text { Ticket Price (in \$) } \\ \hline \text { Washington, } & 439 & 181 \\ \text { D.C. } & & \\ \hline \text { Hartford } & 102 & 73 \\ \hline \text { New York } & 215 & 79 \\ \hline \text { Philadelphia } & 310 & 293 \\ \hline \text { Baltimore } & 406 & 175 \\ \hline \text { Charlotte } & 847 & 288 \\ \hline \text { Miami } & 1499 & 340 \\ \hline \text { Roanoke } & 680 & 219 \\ \hline \text { Atlanta } & 1086 & 310 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ $$ \begin{array}{lcc} \text { City } & \text { Distance (in miles) } & \text { Ticket Price (in \$) } \\ \hline \text { Tampa } & 1349 & 370 \\ \text { Montgomery } & 1247 & 373 \\ \text { Columbus } & 776 & 164 \\ \hline \text { Indianapolis } & 950 & 245 \\ \hline \text { Detroit } & 707 & 189 \\ \hline \text { Nashville } & 1105 & 245 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Use technology to produce a scatterplot. Based on your scatterplot do you think there is a strong linear relationship between these two variables? Explain. b. Compute \(r\) and write the equation of the regression line. Use the words "Ticket Price" and "Distance" in your equation. Round off to two decimal places. c. Provide an interpretation of the slope of the regression line. d. Provide an interpretation of the \(y\) -intercept of the regression line or explain why it would not be appropriate to do so. e. Use the regression equation to predict the cost of a train ticket from Boston to Pittsburgh, a distance of 572 miles.

The table shows the heights (in inches) and weights (in pounds) of 14 college men. The scatterplot shows that the association is linear enough to proceed. $$ \begin{aligned} &\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \begin{array}{c} \text { Height } \\ \text { (inches) } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Weight } \\ \text { (pounds) } \end{array} \\ \hline 68 & 205 \\ \hline 68 & 168 \\ \hline 74 & 230 \\ \hline 68 & 190 \\ \hline 67 & 185 \\ \hline 69 & 190 \\ \hline 68 & 165 \\ \hline \end{array}\\\ &\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \begin{array}{c} \text { Height } \\ \text { (inches) } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Weight } \\ \text { (pounds) } \end{array} \\ \hline 70 & 200 \\ \hline 69 & 175 \\ \hline 72 & 210 \\ \hline 72 & 205 \\ \hline 72 & 185 \\ \hline 71 & 200 \\ \hline 73 & 195 \\ \hline \end{array} \end{aligned} $$ a. Find the equation for the regression line with weight (in pounds) as the response and height (in inches) as the predictor. Report the slope and the intercept of the regression line, and explain what they show. If the intercept is not appropriate to report, explain why. b. Find the correlation between weight (in pounds) and height (in inches). c. Find the coefficient of determination and interpret it. d. If you changed each height to centimeters by multiplying heights in inches by \(2.54\), what would the new correlation be? Explain. e. Find the equation with weight (in pounds) as the response and height (in inches) as the predictor, and interpret the slope. f. Summarize what you found: Does changing units change the correlation? Does changing units change the regression equation?

The distance (in kilometers) and price (in dollars) for one-way airline tickets from San Francisco to several cities are shown in the table. $$ \begin{array}{|lcc|} \hline \text { Destination } & \text { Distance }(\mathbf{k m}) & \text { Price (\$) } \\ \hline \text { Chicago } & 2960 & 229 \\ \hline \text { New York City } & 4139 & 299 \\ \hline \text { Seattle } & 1094 & 146 \\ \hline \text { Austin } & 2420 & 127 \\ \hline \text { Atlanta } & 3440 & 152 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Find the correlation coefficient for this data using a computer or statistical calculator. Use distance as the \(x\) -variable and price as the \(y\) -variable. b. Recalculate the correlation coefficient for this data using price as the \(x\) -variable and distance as the \(y\) -variable. What effect does this have on the correlation coefficient? c. Suppose a $$\$ 50$$ security fee was added to the price of each ticket. What effect would this have on the correlation coefficient? d. Suppose the airline held an incredible sale, where travelers got a round- trip ticket for the price of a one-way ticket. This means that the distances would be doubled while the ticket price remained the same. What effect would this have on the correlation coefficient?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.