/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 4 In a 2018 study reported in Chil... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In a 2018 study reported in Child Development, Ballard et al. examined links between civic engagement (voting, volunteering, and activism) during late adolescence and early adulthood, and socioeconomic status and mental and physical health in adulthood. The researchers studied how civic engagement was associated with outcomes among 9471 adolescents and young adults. They found that all forms of civic engagement are positively associated with subsequent income and education level. Was this a controlled experiment or an observational study? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The study conducted by Ballard et al was an observational study because they watched subjects without any intervention or manipulation to observe naturally occurring variables.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the nature of the study

In the exercise, Ballard et al. studied the links between civic engagement and outcomes such as socioeconomic status and health in adulthood. The researchers did not manipulate or control the variables - they simply observed and recorded the levels of civic engagement and the associated outcomes.
02

Identifying the type of study design

Based on the information given, because the researchers did not manipulate any variables, the study aligns with the definition of an observational study. In an observational study, researchers simply observe and record the parameters of interest, without intervention.
03

Final Decision

Since the researchers in this situation observed the behaviors and outcomes without any interference or manipulation from their end, we can conclude that the research conducted by Ballard et al. was indeed an observational study.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Civic Engagement
Civic engagement refers to the ways in which individuals participate in activities that contribute to the betterment of their communities or society as a whole. Examples of civic engagement include voting, volunteering, and activism. These activities are not just about benefiting others, they can also lead to personal growth and development.

When young people engage in their communities, they often acquire skills that can lead to increased opportunities later in life, such as better jobs and higher education. The study by Ballard et al. highlighted that individuals who participated more in civic activities during adolescence tended to have higher income and educational outcomes in adulthood. This suggests that engaging in civic activities can be a stepping stone for more success later in life.

While civic engagement has many benefits, it's also important to recognize that it requires effort and commitment. People need to be educated about issues, stay informed, and sometimes take actions that may challenge their comfort zones. However, these efforts help build a stronger and more connected society.
Socioeconomic Status
Socioeconomic status (SES) encompasses various factors that define an individual's or family's economic and social standing in the community. It usually includes aspects like income level, educational attainment, and occupational status. Individuals with higher SES often have access to better resources and opportunities.

In the context of the study mentioned, SES was analyzed in relation to civic engagement during adolescence. Individuals from higher SES backgrounds often find it easier to participate in civic activities due to better access to information, resources, and networks. However, the researchers found that civic engagement positively impacted SES levels, indicating a potential intersecting benefit - those who engage civically might enjoy upward social mobility.

Understanding one's SES can shed light on potential life opportunities and challenges. It helps in realizing how socioeconomic dynamics can shape different life paths and the importance of fostering environments where everyone, regardless of their initial SES, can engage civically.
Adolescence
Adolescence is a critical period in human development, characterized by the transition from childhood to adulthood. This stage is marked by significant biological, psychological, and social changes. Young people during adolescence are exploring their identities, gaining independence, and experiencing various new challenges and responsibilities.

In the study by Ballard et al., adolescence was significant because it is a time when individuals start to engage more with society and develop lifelong habits. Civic engagement during this time can play a crucial role in shaping future socio-economic and health outcomes. Adolescents are beginning to form their worldviews and engage in activities that could influence their adult lives.

It's a time filled with opportunities for growth but also complex decisions. Being active in civic activities during this time can equip adolescents with valuable skills like leadership, responsibility, and teamwork, which can be advantageous later in life. Encouraging positive engagement during this stage can help in forming active and informed adult members of society.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose you grow tomato plants in a greenhouse and sell the tomatoes by weight, so the amount of money you make depends on plants producing a large total weight of tomatoes. You want to determine which of two fertilizers will produce a heavier harvest of tomatoes, fertilizer A or fertilizer \(\mathrm{B}\). There are two distinct regions in the greenhouse: one on the southern side that gets more light and one on the northern side that gets less light. There is room for 20 tomato plants on the southern side and 20 on the northern side. Assume that all the plants are beefsteak tomato plants. a. Identify the treatment and response variables. b. Describe a simple randomized design to test whether fertilizer A is better than fertilizer \(\mathrm{B}\). c. Describe a blocked design to test which fertilizer produces a greater weight of tomatoes, blocking by southern side and northern side of the greenhouse. Explain why creating blocks based on whether plants are on the southern or northern side makes sense. d. Explain why researchers might prefer a blocked design.

Handing over the care of a patient from one anesthesiologist to another occurs during some surgeries. A study was conducted to determine if this transfer of care might increase the risk of adverse outcomes (Jones et al. 2018). Read the excerpt from the study abstract published in JAMA below and answer the questions that follow. Methods: A retrospective population-based cohort study was conducted of adult patients undergoing major surgeries expected to last at least two hours and requiring a hospital stay of at least one night. The primary outcome measured was a composite of all-cause death, hospital readmission or major postoperative complications all within 30 postoperative days. Results: A total of 5941 patients underwent surgery with complete handover of anesthesia care. The primary outcome (death, readmission, or major postoperative complications) occurred in 2614 of these patients. A total of 307,125 patients underwent surgery without complete handover of anesthesia care. Of these, the primary outcome occurred in 89,066 patients. The complete handovers were statistically significantly associated with an increased risk of the primary outcome ([95\% CI, 4.5\% to \(9.1 \%] ; P<0.001\) ), all-cause death ([95\% CI, 0.5\% to \(2 \%] ; P=0.002\) ), and major complications ([95\% CI, 3.6\% to 7.9\%]; \(P<0.001\) ), but not with hospital readmission within 30 days of surgery \(([95 \% \mathrm{CI},-0.3 \%\) to \(2.7 \%] ; P=0.11) .\) a. Compare the percentage of each group who experienced the primary outcome (death, readmission, or major postoperative complications). Based on the abstract, can you reject the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the rates of primary outcome? b. If you were a hospital administrator, would you recommend that complete handover of anesthesia care during operations be limited? Why or why not? c. A difference between the two groups was found for all of the primary care outcomes except hospital readmission within 30 days of surgery. How do the confidence interval and p-values provided support this conclusion?

Does frequent use of acetaminophen lead to asthma-related complications among children? Excerpts from the abstract of a study published in The New England Journal of Medicine about this are given (Sheehan et al. 2016). Read them and then answer the questions that follow. Methods: In a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial, we enrolled 300 children (age range, \(12-59\) months) with mild persistent asthmas and assigned them to receive either acetaminophen or ibuprofen when needed for the alleviation of fever or pain over the course of 48 weeks. The primary outcome was the number of asthma exacerbations that let to treatment with systemic glucocorticoids. Results: The number of asthmas exacerbations did not differ significantly between the two groups, with a mean of \(0.81\) per participant with acetaminophen and \(0.87\) per participant in the ibuprofen group \((\mathrm{p}=0.67)\) a. Identify the treatment variable and the response variable. b. Was this a controlled experiment or an observational study? c. How does the p-value support the conclusion of the study? d. Did this study use random sampling, random assignment, or both?

A random sample of 50 college first-year students (out of a total of 1000 first-years) was obtained from college records using systematic sampling. Half of those students had a campus tour with a sophomore student, and half had a tour with an instructor. The tour guide was determined randomly by coin flip for each student. Suppose that those with the student guide rated their experience higher than those with the instructor guide. a. Can you generalize to other first-year students at this college? Explain. b. Can you infer causality from this study? Explain.

A researcher wants to determine whether the faculty-to-student ratio tends to be different in private colleges from that in public colleges. She has an almanac that lists this information for all accredited colleges. She creates two subgroups: one for private and one for public colleges. Then she selects every 20 th private college and every 20 th public college for her analysis. What two types of sampling are combined here?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.