/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 50 The null hypothesis on rolling a... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The null hypothesis on rolling a die is a multiple of 3\. and the proportion of multiples of 3 is \(0.33\). A person rolling the die 12 times gets 8 successful rolls out of \(12 .\) The person says that he knows how to roll a die, because the one-tailed p-value from the one-proportion z-test is \(0.006\), and he is using a significance level of 0.10. What is wrong with his approach?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The person's approach is flawed because while his p-value is less than the significance level, suggesting that it's unlikely the observed outcomes were due to chance alone, it does not irrefutably prove his ability to control a dice roll. Furthermore, his claim is based on a small number of trials, which weakens his argument.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Z-Test and Significance Level

A one-sample Z test tests whether the population proportion is equal to a given value. The p-value obtained from this test gives the probability of obtaining the observed data (or data more extreme) assuming that the null hypothesis is true. If the p-value is less than the predetermined significance level, we reject the null hypothesis. In this case, the person's p-value (\(0.006\)) is less than his significance level (\(0.10\)), thus he rejects the null hypothesis, meaning he believes he can affect the outcome.
02

Identify Mistake in Approach

The error in his approach is that although the p-value is less than the significance level and he can reject the null hypothesis, it is not a definitive proof that the person can control the dice roll. The outcome could be due to chance or other factors not accounted for. Statistical testing only provides evidence against a hypothesis, it does not prove a hypothesis. Therefore, while the test results suggest that it is unlikely that the outcomes were random, it does not unequivocally prove his die-rolling skill.
03

Additional Observation

Moreover, the number of trials conducted is relatively small (only 12 rolls). A larger number of trials are commonly needed to strengthen any claim of departure from theoretical expectations (dice fairness, in this case). So, his conclusion on primarily 12 trials also weakens his.argument.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis is a fundamental concept in statistical hypothesis testing. It is the default position that there is no effect or no difference and is symbolically represented as H0. In the context of a one-proportion z-test, it is assumed that the population proportion is equal to a specified value. For example, when rolling a die, one might assume that each outcome has an equal chance of occurring—1 out of 6, or approximately 0.167. If an individual claims that the proportion of rolling a multiple of 3 is different from the expected value, they are essentially challenging the null hypothesis.

When conducting a z-test, if the data provide enough evidence against the null hypothesis, we may decide to reject it in favor of the alternative hypothesis, which posits that there is indeed a statistical effect or difference. However, rejecting the null does not confirm the alternative hypothesis; it only suggests that the data are not consistent with the null. In our exercise example, the person has rejected the null hypothesis of a fair die based on their success rate, but caution must be exercised before concluding that this reflects their special die-rolling ability.
P-value
The p-value plays a crucial role in deciding whether to reject the null hypothesis. It is the probability of obtaining the observed results, or more extreme ones, if the null hypothesis is actually true. A low p-value indicates that the observed data are uncommon under the assumption of the null hypothesis. In essence, a low p-value suggests that the evidence is strong enough to doubt the validity of the null hypothesis.

In the die-rolling exercise, a p-value of 0.006 implies a less than 1% chance of getting the observed number of successful rolls due to random variation if the die is fair (i.e., if the null hypothesis is true). The person's conclusion based on this p-value may seem convincing at first glance, but statistical rigor demands careful interpretation.
Significance Level
The significance level, often denoted as \(\alpha\), is a threshold chosen by the researcher to decide whether to reject the null hypothesis. It is the maximum probability of making a Type I error—rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true. Common choices for \(\alpha\) are 0.05 (5%) or 0.10 (10%), reflecting the researcher's tolerance for such an error.

In the given exercise, the individual uses a significance level of 0.10. Since the p-value (0.006) is less than this significance level, they conclude that the null hypothesis should be rejected. This interpretation is technically correct, but it is important to remember that a significance level of 0.10 indicates a higher willingness to accept the possibility of a Type I error compared to a more stringent level like 0.05.
Statistical Hypothesis Testing
Statistical hypothesis testing is a powerful method used to make inferences about population parameters based on sample data. In the classic setup, the test aims to determine whether there is enough evidence from the sample to reject the null hypothesis in favor of an alternative hypothesis. The process involves calculating a test statistic (in our case, the Z statistic), comparing it to a critical value associated with the desired significance level, and determining the p-value.

The person in our exercise scenario conducted a one-proportion z-test and made a conclusion based on the outcomes. However, statistical hypothesis testing can be affected by various factors such as sample size, variability in the data, and the chosen significance level. Test results must be combined with reasoning and context for the conclusion to be reliable.
Population Proportion
Population proportion refers to the ratio of individuals in a population that exhibit a particular trait or characteristic. In the case of the exercise, we're concerned with the proportion of dice rolls that result in a multiple of 3. The assumed population proportion under the null hypothesis is 0.33, or one-third, since there are two outcomes in six (3 and 6) that fulfill this condition.

When assessing claims through statistical testing, the reference to population proportion is essential—it’s the estimated parameter that the hypothesis test aims to investigate. A deviation from the expected population proportion in a sample may prompt an investigation to determine whether the difference is significant or merely due to chance. The person rolling the die 12 times has produced data suggesting a departure from the expected proportion, but inferences about the entire population based on a single small sample can be problematic.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A statistician studying ESP tests 500 students. Each student is asked to predict the outcome of a large number of dice rolls. For each student, a hypothesis test using a \(10 \%\) significance level is performed. If the p-value for the student is less than or equal to \(0.10\), the researcher concludes that the student has ESP. Out of 500 students who do not have ESP, about how many could you expect the statistician to declare do have ESP?

A new food supplement is being tested to see whether it can reduce obesity in the population of concern. At present, the percentage of obese people is \(60 .\) The null hypothesis is that \(p\) (the proportion of the population using the food supplement that is still obese) is \(0.60 .\) Pick the correct alternative hypothesis. i. \(p \neq 0.60\) ii. \(p<0.60\) iii. \(p>0.60\)

A 2003 study of dreaming found that out of a random sample of 113 people, 92 reported dreaming in color. However, the proportion of people who reported dreaming in color that was established in the 1940 s was \(0.29\) (Schwitzgebel 2003 ). Check to see whether the conditions for using a one-proportion \(z\) -test are met assuming the researcher wanted to see whether the proportion dreaming in color had changed since the \(1940 \mathrm{~s}\).

A yes/no test has 75 questions. A passing grade is 50 or more correct answers. a. What is the probability that a person will guess one yes/no question correctly? b. Test the hypothesis that a person who got 50 right out of 75 is not just guessing, using an alpha of \(0.05\). Steps 1 and 2 of a hypothesis testing procedure are given. Finish the question by doing steps 3 and 4 . Step \(1: \mathrm{H}_{0}: p=0.50\) \(\mathrm{H}_{\mathrm{a}}: p>0.50\) Step 2: Choose the one-proportion \(z\) -test. \(n\) times \(p\) is 75 times \(0.50\), which is \(37.5\). This is more than 10 , and 75 times \(0.50\) is also more than 10 . Assume a random sample.

A research hospital tries a new antibiotic scrub before surgery to see whether it can lower the rate of infections of surgical sites. The old rate of infection is \(4 \%\). The null hypothesis is that the proportion of infections is \(0.04, p=0.04\). Give the alternative hypothesis in words and symhols

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.