/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 48 By establishing a small value fo... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

By establishing a small value for the significance level, are we guarding against the first type of error (rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true) or guarding against the second type of error?

Short Answer

Expert verified
By setting a small value for the significance level, we are guarding against the first type of error (rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true), also known as a Type I error. However, this increases the chances of committing a Type II error.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the significance level and its role in hypothesis testing

The significance level, often denoted as \(\alpha\), is a threshold that we set for the p-value of our test statistic. If the p-value is less than \(\alpha\), we reject the null hypothesis. It gives the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true, leading to a Type I error.
02

Understand Type I and Type II errors

A Type I error occurs when the null hypothesis is rejected when it is true. This is also knowned as a 'false positive'. A Type II error, on the other hand, occurs when the null hypothesis is not rejected when it is false. This is also knowned as a 'false negative'.
03

Relate the significance level and Type I error

By setting a small value for the significance level, we are making it harder to reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, we are reducing the likelihood of a Type I error (rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true). However, when we decrease the probability of Type I error, we increase the probability of Type II error (failing to reject the null hypothesis when it is false).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The percentage of female CEOs in 2013 in Fortune 500 companies was \(4 \%\), according to Time magazine (March 18,2013 ). Suppose a student did a survey of 250 randomly selected large companies (not Fortune 500 companies), and 15 of them had women CEOs. a. About how many of the 250 should we expect to have female CEOs if the proportion of female CEOs is \(4 \%\), as it is for the Fortune 500 companies? b. Carry out the first two steps of a hypothesis test that will test whether the population proportion of women CEOs is not \(0.04\).

Shankaran and colleagues (2012) reported the results of a randomized trial of whole-body hypothermia (cooling) for neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (brain problems in babies due to lack of oxygen). Twenty-seven of the 97 infants randomly assigned to hypothermia died and 41 of the 93 infants in the control group died. a. Find and compare the sample percentages that died for these two groups. b. Test the hypothesis that the death rate was less for those treated with hypothermia at a \(0.05\) significance level.

In the mid-1800s, Dr. Ignaz Semmelweiss decided to make doctors wash their hands with a strong disinfectant between patients at a clinic with a death rate of \(9.9 \%\). Semmelweiss wanted to test the hypothesis that the death rate would go down after the new hand-washing procedure was used. What null and alternative hypotheses should he have used? Explain, using both words and symbols. Explain the meaning of any symbols you use.

An education board declared that \(64 \%\) of all stu- dents who appeared for examination had passed in 2015, whereas \(58 \%\) passed in 2016 . Why can you not use this report for a hypothesis test?

Suppose a friend says he can predict whether a coin lip will result in heads or tails. You test him, and he gets 10 right but of \(20 .\) Do you think he can predict the coin flip (or has a way of

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.