/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 74 Organizations Consider two corpo... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Organizations Consider two corporate organizations. The first organization has 124 employees and the second organization has 15 employees. Which of the two organizations is more likely to have between \(40 \%\) and \(60 \%\) female employees, assuming that both males and females have equal employment opportunities in both the organizations? Why?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The first organization with 124 employees is more likely to have between 40% and 60% female employees, as it is more likely to have empirical proportions closer to the expected proportion due to its larger sample size.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the problem

We are asked to compare the likelihood of the percentage of female employees in two organizations to lie between 40% and 60%. Each organization hires males and females in equal proportions, which suggests that each organization could have about 50% female employees. However, the size interval of 40% to 60% is just a small part of the entire range, which is from 0% to 100%. Therefore, to answer, one must understand the relationship between sample size and variability: the larger the sample size, the smaller the variability of the percentage.
02

Applying the law of large numbers

Applying the law of large numbers, we know that as the sample size increases, the likelihood of having observed proportions close to true proportions also increases. Therefore, it is expected that a larger sample is more likely to have a female rate closer to the true value of 50%.
03

Conclusion

Based on this, it can be concluded that the first organization with 124 employees is more likely to have between 40% and 60% female employees, because it is more probable to have empirical proportions closer to the expected proportion, thanks to the larger sample size.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Law of Large Numbers
The Law of Large Numbers is a fundamental statistical theorem that describes the result of performing the same experiment a large number of times. According to this law, as the number of trials or sample size increases, the actual ratio of outcomes will converge on the theoretical, or expected, ratio of outcomes. For example, if you flip a fair coin, the proportion of heads to tails will get closer to a 1:1 ratio as you flip the coin more and more times.

In the context of employment within organizations, this law suggests that as the number of employees (sample size) increases, the variability of the percentage of female employees around the expected probability (which is 50%, assuming equal employment opportunity) decreases. This means that an organization with a greater number of employees is more likely to have a percentage of female employees closer to this expected value. Consequently, a larger organization is less likely to see erratic swings in gender proportions from one hiring period to another.
Employment Gender Probability
When discussing employment gender probability, it's important to consider the probability of an individual being hired without bias towards gender. If the likelihood of hiring a male is equal to that of hiring a female, the probability for each is 0.5, or 50%. This ideal assumes an unbiased, random process of hiring, meaning each gender has an equal chance of being selected.

In real-world scenarios, we analyze employment gender probability to understand or detect potential biases in hiring practices. If an organization consistently has a significantly higher or lower percentage of one gender over time, this could suggest the presence of bias. However, smaller sample sizes can result in greater variability due to chance alone. In our example, the smaller organization could, by pure chance, have a less representative gender ratio purely as a result of its smaller size rather than any intentional bias.
Variability of Percentages
Variability of percentages in statistics refers to how much the percentage values vary from one sample to another or from the expected result. High variability means that the percentage values can fluctuate widely, while low variability indicates that the values are more consistent. This concept is closely related to the precision of estimations or the degree to which repeated measurements under unchanged conditions show the same results.

In the case of the two organizations in our exercise, the smaller organization with 15 employees is prone to greater variability, meaning the percentage of female employees could swing more dramatically than in the larger organization with 124 employees. This is because each new hire or departure represents a larger fraction of the whole in a smaller organization. Thus, when assessing employment data or carrying out similar analyses, it is crucial to account for variability and recognize that smaller sample sizes may not provide an accurate representation of the overall population.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Literacy in 2015 The UNESCO Institute for Statistics reported that the literacy rate in Zimbabwe was \(88.5 \%\) for males and \(84.6 \%\) for females. Suppose these are accurate percentages. Now suppose a random man and a random woman meet. a. What is the probability that both of them are literate? b. What is the probability that neither of them is literate? c. What is the probability that one of them is literate? d. What is the probability that at least one of them is literate?

Empirical vs. Theoretical A Monopoly player claims that the probability of getting a 4 when rolling a six-sided die is \(1 / 6\) because the die is equally likely to land on any of the six sides. Is this an example of an empirical probability or a theoretical probability? Explain.

Playing Cards Refer to Exercise \(5.11\) for information about cards. If you draw 1 card randomly from a standard 52 -card playing deck, what is the probability that it will be: a. A black card? b. A diamond? c. A face card (jack, queen, or king)? d. A nine? e. A king or queen?

Mutually Exclusive Suppose a person is selected at random. Label each pair of events as mutually exclusive or not mutually exclusive. a. The person is a parent; the person is a toddler. b. The person is a woman; the person is a CEO (chief executive officer).

Coin Flips Let H stand for heads and let T stand for tails in an experiment where a fair coin is flipped twice. Assume that the four outcomes listed are equally likely outcomes: \(\mathrm{HH}, \mathrm{HT}, \mathrm{TH}, \mathrm{TT}\) What are the probabilities of getting: a. 0 heads? b. Exactly 1 head? c. Exactly 2 heads? d. At least 1 head? e. Not more than 2 heads?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.