/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 47 Nielsen Media Research provides ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Nielsen Media Research provides two measures of the television viewing audience: a television program rating, which is the percentage of households with televisions watching a program, and a television program share, which is the percentage of households watching a program among those with televisions in use. The following data show the Nielsen television ratings and share data for the Major League Baseball World Series over a nine-year period (Associated Press, October 27,2003 ). \\[\begin{array}{l|lllllllll} \text { Rating } & 19 & 17 & 17 & 14 & 16 & 12 & 15 & 12 & 13 \\ \hline \text { Share } & 32 & 28 & 29 & 24 & 26 & 20 & 24 & 20 & 22 \end{array}\\] a. Develop a scatter diagram with rating on the horizontal axis. b. What is the relationship between rating and share? Explain. c. Compute and interpret the sample covariance. d. Compute the sample correlation coefficient. What does this value tell us about the relationship between rating and share?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The scatter plot shows a positive relationship, confirmed by correlation (r ≈ 0.824), indicating strong linear association.

Step by step solution

01

Plot the Scatter Diagram

To create the scatter diagram, plot each pair of values from the given data, with the rating on the horizontal axis (x-axis) and the share on the vertical axis (y-axis). Mark points for each of the nine pairs of ratings and shares: (19, 32), (17, 28), (17, 29), (14, 24), (16, 26), (12, 20), (15, 24), (12, 20), and (13, 22). Connect these points or leave them as is for a visual representation of the data.
02

Analyze the Relationship

Observe the scatter plot created in Step 1. Look for any pattern or trend that indicates the kind of relationship between the rating and share. A positive, negative, or no trend suggests different relationship types. In this data set, as the rating increases, typically the share also increases, indicating a positive relationship.
03

Calculate the Sample Covariance

The sample covariance is calculated using the formula: \[ \text{Cov}(X,Y) = \frac{1}{n-1} \sum_{i=1}^{n} (x_i - \bar{x})(y_i - \bar{y}) \], where \( x_i \) and \( y_i \) are individual values of ratings and shares, and \( \bar{x} \) and \( \bar{y} \) are their respective means. Calculate \( \bar{x} = 15 \) and \( \bar{y} = 25 \), then use these to compute Cov(X,Y). For this data, the result is approximately 8.64.
04

Compute the Sample Correlation Coefficient

The sample correlation coefficient \( r \) is computed using \[ r = \frac{\text{Cov}(X,Y)}{s_x s_y} \], where \( s_x \) and \( s_y \) are the standard deviations of the ratings and shares, respectively. Calculate \( s_x \approx 2.67 \) and \( s_y \approx 3.94 \). Then, \( r = \frac{8.64}{2.67 \times 3.94} \approx 0.824 \).
05

Interpret the Sample Correlation Coefficient

A correlation coefficient of approximately 0.824 indicates a strong positive linear relationship between the television program rating and share. This suggests that higher ratings are associated with higher shares.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding a Scatter Diagram
A scatter diagram is a simple visual tool used in statistical analysis to examine the potential relationship between two variables. In our example, we are looking at television program ratings and shares. Each pair of values from the data is plotted on a graph. Ratings are placed on the horizontal axis while shares are plotted on the vertical axis.

After plotting, each point on the diagram represents one data pair of rating and share. This creates a visual map of the data, often enabling us to immediately identify the pattern of the relationship. Additionally, if the points trend upwards as they move to the right, this suggests a positive relationship, where increases in one variable tend to be associated with increases in the other. Conversely, a downward trend indicates a negative relationship, while a scatter without any distinct pattern may suggest no relationship.

For the television series data, the scatter plot showed that as the rating increased, the share increased as well. This visual representation gives an immediate indication of a positive correlation.
Deciphering Sample Covariance
Sample covariance quantifies the direction of the linear relationship between two variables. It helps us understand whether the variables increase or decrease together. The formula for sample covariance is:\[ \text{Cov}(X,Y) = \frac{1}{n-1} \sum_{i=1}^{n} (x_i - \bar{x})(y_i - \bar{y})\]where \( x_i \) and \( y_i \) are individual data points, and \( \bar{x} \) and \( \bar{y} \) are the means of the two variables.

In our context, the covariance of ratings and shares is calculated as approximately 8.64. A positive covariance (like ours) indicates that as one variable tends to increase, so does the other, suggesting a positive relationship. However, the covariance alone does not measure the strength of this relationship or its consistency.
Exploring the Correlation Coefficient
The correlation coefficient, denoted as \( r \), builds upon the concept of covariance by normalizing it with the product of the standard deviations of the two variables. This helps us measure not only the direction but also the strength of the relationship. The formula is:\[ r = \frac{\text{Cov}(X,Y)}{s_x s_y}\]where \( s_x \) and \( s_y \) are the standard deviations of the ratings and shares, respectively.

For the given data, the correlation coefficient is approximately 0.824, indicating a strong positive relationship between television program ratings and shares. The value of \( r \) varies from -1 to 1, where 1 signifies a perfect positive linear relationship, -1 a perfect negative one, and 0 no linear relationship at all. Therefore, an \( r \approx 0.824 \) suggests that higher ratings tend to be strongly linked with higher shares, giving us significant insight into how these variables interact.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The high costs in the California real estate market have caused families who cannot afford to buy bigger homes to consider backyard sheds as an alternative form of housing expansion. Many are using the backyard structures for home offices, art studios, and hobby areas as well as for additional storage. The mean price of a customized wooden, shingled backyard structure is \(\$ 3100\) ( Newsweek , September 29,2003 ). Assume that the standard deviation is \(\$ 1200\). a. What is the \(z\) -score for a backyard structure costing \(\$ 2300 ?\) b. What is the \(z\) -score for a backyard structure costing \(\$ 4900 ?\) c. Interpret the \(z\) -scores in parts (a) and (b). Comment on whether either should be considered an outlier. d. The Newsweek article described a backyard shed-office combination built in Albany, California, for \(\$ 13,000\). Should this structure be considered an outlier? Explain.

Public transportation and the automobile are two methods an employee can use to get to work each day. Samples of times recorded for each method are shown. Times are in minutes. Public Transportation: \(28 \quad 29 \quad 32 \quad 37 \quad 33 \quad 25 \quad 29 \quad 32 \quad 41 \quad 34\) Automobile: \(\begin{array}{llllllll}29 & 31 & 33 & 32 & 34 & 30 & 31 & 32 & 35 & 33\end{array}\) a. Compute the sample mean time to get to work for each method. b. Compute the sample standard deviation for each method. c. \(\quad\) On the basis of your results from parts (a) and (b), which method of transportation should be preferred? Explain. d. Develop a box plot for each method. Does a comparison of the box plots support your conclusion in part (c)?

Consider a sample with data values of \(10,20,21,17,16,\) and \(12 .\) Compute the mean and median.

In automobile mileage and gasoline-consumption testing, 13 automobiles were road tested for 300 miles in both city and highway driving conditions. The following data were recorded for miles-per-gallon performance. \\[\text { City: } \quad 16.2 \quad 16.7 \quad 15.9 \quad 14.4 \quad 13.2 \quad 15.3 \quad 16.8 \quad 16.0 \quad 16.1 \quad 15.3 \quad 15.2 \quad 15.3 \quad 16.2\\] Highway: \(19.4 \quad 20.6 \quad 18.3 \quad 18.6 \quad 19.2 \quad 17.4 \quad 17.2 \quad 18.6 \quad 19.021 .1 \quad 19.4 \quad 18.5 \quad 18.7\) Use the mean, median, and mode to make a statement about the difference in performance for city and highway driving.

Consider a sample with a mean of 500 and a standard deviation of \(100 .\) What are the \(z\) -scores for the following data values: \(520,650,500,450,\) and \(280 ?\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.