/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 22 In the past, \(20 \%\) of all ai... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In the past, \(20 \%\) of all airline passengers flew first class. In a sample of 15 passengers, 5 flew first class. At \(\alpha=0.10,\) can you conclude that the proportions have changed?

Short Answer

Expert verified
No, there is not enough evidence to conclude the proportions have changed at \(\alpha=0.10\).

Step by step solution

01

Define Hypotheses

First, we need to formulate our null and alternative hypotheses. The null hypothesis, denoted as \(H_0\), is that the proportion of first class passengers is still \(0.2\). The alternative hypothesis, \(H_a\), is that the proportion has changed. Thus, we have:\[ H_0: p = 0.2 \]\[ H_a: p eq 0.2 \]
02

Identify Parameters and Conditions

The sample size \(n\) is 15, and the sample proportion \( \hat{p} \) is \( \frac{5}{15} = \frac{1}{3} \approx 0.333 \). We check the conditions for using the normal approximation for the binomial distribution: \(np = 15 \times 0.2 = 3\) and \(n(1-p) = 15 \times 0.8 = 12\). Both are greater than 5, so the normal approximation is appropriate.
03

Calculate the Test Statistic

Using the sample proportion \( \hat{p} = 0.333 \), we calculate the test statistic \(z\) using the formula: \[ z = \frac{\hat{p} - p}{\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}} \]Substitute the values: \[ z = \frac{0.333 - 0.2}{\sqrt{\frac{0.2 \times 0.8}{15}}} = \frac{0.133}{0.103} \approx 1.29 \]
04

Determine the Critical Value and Decision Rule

For a two-tailed test at \(\alpha = 0.10\), we split the alpha level into two tails. Hence, each tail is \(\alpha/2 = 0.05\). Using a standard normal distribution table, the critical z-scores are approximately \( \pm 1.645 \). If the test statistic is greater than 1.645 or less than -1.645, we reject the null hypothesis.
05

Conclusion

The calculated \(z\)-score is 1.29. Since 1.29 is between -1.645 and 1.645, we do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not enough evidence at the \(\alpha = 0.10\) significance level to conclude that the proportion of first-class passengers has changed.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
In hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis represents an initial assumption about a population parameter. Typically denoted as \(H_0\), it asserts that any observed effect or difference is due to random chance. It is a crucial step in testing as it provides a baseline for statistical comparison.

In our airline passenger example, the null hypothesis states that the proportion of passengers flying first-class has not changed from the original \(20\%\). We express this with the equation: \(H_0: p = 0.2\).

The purpose of the null hypothesis is to be challenged and possibly disproved by evidence found in the data sample. If the evidence (i.e., statistical data) supports the opposite of the null hypothesis, then we are prompted to reject it in favor of an alternative hypothesis.
Alternative Hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by \(H_a\), is the statement we accept when we reject the null hypothesis. It suggests that there is a statistically significant effect or difference - meaning that the initial assumption is incorrect.

For the airline study, our alternative hypothesis considers that the proportion of first-class passengers has changed, expressed as \(H_a: p eq 0.2\). This hypothesis includes the possibility that the percentage could have increased or decreased.

The alternative hypothesis is two-sided in this scenario because we are interested in detecting any change in the proportion, regardless of direction. Consequently, this requires splitting the level of significance \(\alpha\) equally between both tails of the normal distribution curve.
Normal Approximation
Normal approximation allows us to simplify the analysis of binomial data by using the normal distribution—especially when dealing with large sample sizes, due to its simpler properties and wider use.

To use normal approximation, certain conditions must be met. Primarily, both \(np\) and \(n(1-p)\) need to be greater than 5, where \(p\) is the hypothesized population proportion and \(n\) is the sample size. In our scenario, the values \(np = 3\) and \(n(1-p) = 12\) satisfy this criterion.

When these conditions are satisfied, the binomial distribution of sample proportions can be approximated using a normal distribution. This approach simplifies calculating probabilities and critical values in hypothesis testing.
Binomial Distribution
The binomial distribution models binary outcomes, where there are only two possible results—such as success or failure—in a fixed number of independent trials.

In the context of the exercise, each airline passenger can be viewed as having a binary outcome: they either fly first class (success) or not (failure). Here, the total number of trials equals the number of passengers sampled, which is 15.

The binomial distribution relies on two parameters: the number of trials \(n\) and the probability of success on each trial \(p\). When conditions allow, this distribution can be approximated with a normal distribution to facilitate straightforward analytical techniques, as we utilized in this hypothesis testing scenario.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

When should a one-tailed test be used? A two-tailed test?

A medical college dean read that the average number of applications a potential medical school student sends is 7.8 . She thinks that the mean is higher. So she selects a random sample of 35 applicants and asks each how many medical schools they applied to. The mean of the sample is 8.7 . The population standard deviation is \(2.6 .\) Test her claim at \(\alpha=0.01\)

A survey taken several years ago found that the average time a person spent reading the local daily newspaper was 10.8 minutes. The standard deviation of the population was 3 minutes. To see whether the average time had changed since the newspaper's format was revised, the newspaper editor surveyed 36 individuals. The average time that these 36 randomly selected people spent reading the paper was 12.2 minutes. At \(\alpha=0.02\), is there a change in the average time an individual spends reading the newspaper? Find the \(98 \%\) confidence interval of the mean. Do the results agree? Explain.

Perform each of the following steps. a. State the hypotheses and identify the claim. b. Find the critical value(s). c. Find the test value. d. Make the decision. e. Summarize the results. Use the traditional method of hypothesis testing unless otherwise specified. Assume that the population is approximately normally distributed. A researcher estimates that the average height of the buildings of 30 or more stories in a large city is at least 700 feet. A random sample of 10 buildings is selected, and the heights in feet are shown. At \(\alpha=0.025\), is there enough evidence to reject the claim? $$ \begin{array}{lllll} 485 & 511 & 841 & 725 & 615 \\ 520 & 535 & 635 & 616 & 582 \end{array} $$

What is meant by the critical region? The noncritical region?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.