/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q 21. Top North American Athletes. Ref... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Top North American Athletes. Refer to Problem 17.

(a) Use systematic random sampling to obtain a sample of 15 athletes.

(b) In this case, is systematic random sampling an appropriate alternative to simple random sampling? Explain your answer.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Part (a) 002, 009, 016, 023, 030, 037, 055, 051, 058, 065, 072, 079, 086, 093, 100.

Part (b) Yes.

Step by step solution

01

Part (a) Step 1. Given information.

The given statement is:

Problem 17 says that the best 100 North American athletes of the twentieth century were ranked by an ESPN panel.

We have to select a sample using systematic random sampling.

02

Part (a) Step 2. Obtain a sample of 15 athletes by using systematic random sampling.

A total of 100 North American athletes were ranked.

Therefore, the given population is 100.

N=100

Our sample size is: 15

n=15

Therefore, the proportionality is:

Nn=10015=6.67

Its nearest whole number is 7.

Therefore, m=7.

03

Part (a) Step 3. Obtain a sample of 15 athletes by using systematic random sampling. 

Now use the random numbers table to obtain a number, between kand 7:

So, k=2.

After it, select those samples that are numbered k,k+m,k+2m,...

The samples of 15 athletes are:

002, 009, 016, 023, 030, 037, 055, 051, 058, 065, 072, 079, 086, 093, 100.

04

Part (b) Step 1. Identify if systematic random sampling is an appropriate alternative to simple random sampling in this case.

Yes.

Here systematic random sampling is a better option than simple random sampling. Because every sample has an equal chance of getting selected.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Identify and explain the significance of the three basic principles of experimental design.

Lifetimes of Flashlight Batteries.Two different options are under consideration for comparing the lifetimes of four brands of flashlight battery, using 20 flashlights.

(a) One option is to randomly divide 20 flashlights into four groups of 5 flashlights each and then randomly assign each group to use a different brand of battery. Would this statistical design be a completely randomized design or a randomized block design? Explain your answer.

(b) Another option is to use 20 flashlights - five different brands of 4 flashlights-each and randomly assign the 4 flashlights of each sign be a completely randomized design or a randomized block design? Explain your answer.

In Exercises 1.92-1.97, we present descriptions of designed experiments. In each case, identify the

(a) experimental units

(b) response variable

(c) factor (s)

(d) levels of each factor:-

(e) treatments.

Dexamethasone and IQ. In the paper "Outcomes at School Age After Postnatal Dexamethasone Therapy for Lung Disease of Prematurity" (New England Journal of Medicine,Vol . 350, No. 13, pp . 1304-1313), T. Yeh et al . studied the outcomes at school age in children who had participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of early postnatal dexamethasone therapy for the prevention of chronic lung disease of prematurity. One result reported in the study was that, at school age, the control group of 74 children had an average IQ score of 84.4, whereas the dexamethasone group of 72 children had an average IQ score of 78.

Identify two methods for obtaining a simple random sample.

Child-Proof Bottles.Designing medication packaging that resists opening by children, but yields readily to adults presents numerous challenges. In the article "Painful Design" (American Scientist, Vol. 93, No. 2, pp. 113-118 ), H. Petroski examined the packaging used for Aleve, a brand of pain reliever. Three new container designs were given to a panel of children aged 42 months to 51 months. For each design, the children were handed the bottle, shown how to open it, and then left alone with it. If more than 20 % of the children succeeded in opening the bottle on their own within 10 minutes, even if by using their teeth, the bottle failed to qualify as child resistant.

Identify the

a. experimental units. b. response variable.

c. factor (s). d. levels of each factor.

e. treatments.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.