/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q. 10.107 State one possible advantage of ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 10: Q. 10.107 (page 440)

State one possible advantage of using paired samples instead of independent samples.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Furthermore, when there is a difference in the means, the difference between the means is obtained. As a result, paired-samples outperform independent samples.

Step by step solution

01

Given Information

To explain The one possible advantage of using paired sample instead of an independent sample.

02

Explanation

One advantage of using paired samples instead of independent samples is as follows: Unrelated variation is eliminated by using paired samples, which have a lower sampling error for the difference in means than independent samples.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Discuss the relative advantages and disadvantages of using pooled and non pooled -procedures.

In Exercises 10.25-10.30, hypothesis tests are proposed. For each

hypothesis test,

a. identify the variable.

b. identify the two populations,

c. determine the null and alternative hypotheses.

d. classify the hypothesis test as two-tailed, left-tailed, or right-tailed.

Teaching Duties. Contingent faculty members in higher education are non-tenure track faculty, adjuncts, postdocs, lecturers, of instructors. R. Bowden and L. Gonzalez researched whether contingent faculty members are different from tenure-track faculty members with regards to teaching, research, and service in the article "The Rise of Contingent Faculty: Its Impact on the Professoriate and Higher Education" (Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 5-22). A hypothesis test was conducted to decide whether the mean number of classes taught for credit per semester was less for contingent faculty than for tenure-track faculty.

Refer again to Fig. 10.8 on page 427, where each pair of graphs shows the distributions of a variable on two populations. Suppose that, in each case, you want to perform a small-sample hypothesis test based on independent simple random samples to compare the means of the two populations. In each case, decide which, if any, of the following tests is preferable: the pooled t-test, the non pooled t-test, or the Mann-Whitney test. Explain your answers.

Gasoline Additive. This exercise shows what can happen when a hypothesis-testing procedure designed for use with independent samples is applied to perform a hypothesis test on a paired sample. The gas mileages, in miles per gallon (mpg), of 10 randomly selected cars, both with and without a new gasoline additive, are shown in the following table.

  1. Apply the paired t-test to decide, at the 5%significance level, whether the gasoline additive is effective in increasing gas mileage.
  2. Apply the pooled t-test to the sample data to perform the hypothesis test.
  3. Why is performing the hypothesis test the way you did in part (b) inappropriate?
  4. Compare your result in parts (a) and (b).

The Federal Bureau of Prisons publishes data in Prison Statistics on the times served by prisoners released from federal institutions for the first time. Independent random samples of released prisoners in the fraud and firearms offense categories yielded the following information on time served, in months.

At the 5% significance level, do the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the meantime served for fraud is less than that for firearms offenses? (Note: x炉1=10.12,s1=4.90,x炉2=18.78, and s2=4.64.)
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

Applied Mathematics

Read Explanation

Discrete Mathematics

Read Explanation

Logic and Functions

Read Explanation

Calculus

Read Explanation

Mechanics Maths

Read Explanation

Decision Maths

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.