/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q9 Testing Claims About Variation. ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Testing Claims About Variation. In Exercises 5鈥16, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Assume that a simple random sample is selected from a normally distributed population.

Cola Cans A random sample of 20 aluminum cola cans with thickness 0.0109 in. is selected and the axial loads are measured and the standard deviation is 18.6 lb. The axial load is the pressure applied to the top that causes the can to crush. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that cans with thickness 0.0109 in. have axial loads with the same standard deviation as the axial loads of cans that are 0.0111 in. thick. The thicker cans have axial loads with a standard deviation of 27.8 lb (based on Data Set 30 鈥淎luminum Cans鈥 in Appendix B). Does the thickness of the cans appear to affect the variation of the axial loads?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Hypotheses for the claim:

H0:=27.8H1:27.8

The test statistic is 8.505.

The critical values are obtained as 8.907 and 32.852.

The null hypothesis is rejected at a 0.05 level of significance. Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim.

It can be stated that the thickness of the cans appears to affect the variation of the axial loads.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

A random sample of 20 aluminum cola cans with a thickness of 0.0109 in measured for the axial loads has a standard deviation of 18.6 lb.

The significance level is 0.05.

The claim to be tested is that the axial load standard deviation for cans with a thickness of 0.0109 in is the same as the cans with a thickness of 0.0111 in.

02

Describe the hypothesis testing

For applying the hypothesis test, first, set up a null and an alternative hypothesis.

The null hypothesis is the statement about the value of a population parameter, which is equal to the claimed value. It is denoted by H0.

The alternate hypothesis is a statement that the parameter has a value opposite to the null hypothesis. It is denoted by H1.

03

State the null and alternative hypotheses

The claim is that cans with a thickness of 0.0109 in have axial loads with the same standard deviation of 27.8 lb.

From the claim, the null and alternative hypotheses are as follows.

H0:=27.8H1:27.8

Here, is the measure of standard deviation for axial loads with a thickness of 0.0109 in.

04

Find the test statistic

To conduct a hypothesis test of a claim about a population standard deviation or population variance2,the test statistic is stated as follows.

2=n-1s22=20-118.6227.82=8.5053

Thus, the value of the test statistic is 8.5053.

05

Find the critical value

For a two-sided hypothesis, divide the equally between two tails as2 and 1-2.

Mathematically,

P2<22=1-2and

P2>22=2

Referring to chi-square table, the critical value of2 is obtained corresponding to row 19 and significance level 0.025 as 32.852.

Referring to Table A-4, chi-square table, the critical value of 2is obtained corresponding to row 19 and significance level 0.975 as as 8.907 from the area to the right of 0.975

Thus, the critical values are 8.907 and 32.852, and the non-rejection region is 2:8.907<2<32.852.

06

Conclude the test result

The decision rule for the test is as follows.

If the value of the test statistic lies beyond the non-region, reject the null hypothesis at the given level of significance; otherwise, fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Thus, it is observed that 2=8.505lies beyond the non-rejection region.

Therefore, it is concluded that the null hypothesis is rejected, and it can be stated that there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that cans with a thickness of 0.0109 in have the same load as the ones with 0.0111 in thickness.

Hence, it can be concluded that the thickness of the cans appears to affect the variation of the axial loads.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Interpreting Power Chantix (varenicline) tablets are used as an aid to help people stop smoking. In a clinical trial, 129 subjects were treated with Chantix twice a day for 12 weeks, and 16 subjects experienced abdominal pain (based on data from Pfizer, Inc.). If someone claims that more than 8% of Chantix users experience abdominal pain, that claim is supported with a hypothesis test conducted with a 0.05 significance level. Using 0.18 as an alternative value of p, the power of the test is 0.96. Interpret this value of the power of the test.

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 9鈥32, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the P-value method unless your instructor specifies otherwise. Use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution, as described in Part 1 of this section.

Births A random sample of 860 births in New York State included 426 boys. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that 51.2% of newborn babies are boys. Do the results support the belief that 51.2% of newborn babies are boys?

Testing Hypotheses. In Exercises 13鈥24, assume that a simple random sample has been selected and test the given claim. Unless specified by your instructor, use either the P-value method or the critical value method for testing hypotheses. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses, test statistic, P-value (or range of P-values), or critical value(s), and state the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Car Booster Seats The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration conducted crash tests of child booster seats for cars. Listed below are results from those tests, with the measurements given in hic (standard head injury condition units). The safety requirement is that the hic measurement should be less than 1000 hic. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the sample is from a population with a mean less than 1000 hic. Do the results suggest that all of the child booster seats meet the specified requirement?

774 649 1210 546 431 612

In Exercises 13鈥16, refer to the exercise identified and find the value of the test statistic. (Refer to Table 8-2 on page 362 to select the correct expression for evaluating the test statistic.)

Exercise 6 鈥淐ell Phone鈥

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 9鈥32, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the P-value method unless your instructor specifies otherwise. Use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution, as described in Part 1 of this section.

Touch Therapy When she was 9 years of age, Emily Rosa did a science fair experiment in which she tested professional touch therapists to see if they could sense her energy field. She flipped a coin to select either her right hand or her left hand, and then she asked the therapists to identify the selected hand by placing their hand just under Emily鈥檚 hand without seeing it and without touching it. Among 280 trials, the touch therapists were correct 123 times (based on data in 鈥淎 Close Look at Therapeutic Touch,鈥 Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 279, No. 13). Use a 0.10 significance level to test the claim that touch therapists use a method equivalent to random guesses. Do the results suggest that touch therapists are effective?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.