/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q19 Testing Claims About Proportions... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 9鈥32, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the P-value method unless your instructor specifies otherwise. Use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution, as described in Part 1 of this section.

Lie Detectors Trials in an experiment with a polygraph yield 98 results that include 24 cases of wrong results and 74 cases of correct results (based on data from experiments conducted by researchers Charles R. Honts of Boise State University and Gordon H. Barland of the Department of Defense Polygraph Institute). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that such polygraph results are correct less than 80% of the time. Based on the results, should polygraph test results be prohibited as evidence in trials?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Null hypothesis: The proportion of correct results is equal to 80%.

Alternative hypothesis: The proportion of correct results is less than 80%.

Test statistic: -1.111

Critical value: -1.645

P-value: 0.1332

The null hypothesis is failed to reject.

There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of correct results is less than 80%.

The sample proportion of correct polygraph results equal to 75.5% is not very high, and thus, polygraph test results should be prohibited as evidence in trials as they are not reliable enough.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Out of 98 polygraph results, 74 are correct results, and 24 are wrong results.

02

Hypotheses

The null hypothesis is written as follows.

The proportion of correct results is equal to 80%.

H0:p=0.80

The alternative hypothesis is written as follows.

The proportion of correct results is less than 80%.

H1:p<0.80

The test is left-tailed.

03

Sample size, sample proportion, and population proportion

The sample size is n=98.

The sample proportion of correct results is computed below.

p^=NumberofcorrectresultsSampleSize=7498=0.755

The population proportion of correct results is equal to 0.80.

04

Test statistic

The value of the test statistic is computed below.

z=p^-ppqn=0.755-0.800.801-0.8098=-1.111

Thus, z=-1.111.

05

Critical value and p-value

Referring to the standard normal table, the critical value of z at =0.05 for a left-tailed test is equal to -1.645.

Referring to the standard normal table, the p-value for the test statistic value of -1.111 is equal to 0.1332.

As the p-value is greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis is failed to reject.

06

Conclusion of the test

There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of correct results is less than 80%.

The sample proportion of correct polygraph results equal to 75.5% is not very high. Thus, polygraph results do not appear to have a high accuracy rate that is required to produce them in court.

Thus, their use in the court as evidence should be ceased.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Finding Critical t Values When finding critical values, we often need significance levels other than those available in Table A-3. Some computer programs approximate critical t values by calculating t=dfeA2/df-1where df = n-1, e = 2.718, A=z8df+3/8df+1, and z is the critical z score. Use this approximation to find the critical t score for Exercise 12 鈥淭ornadoes,鈥 using a significance level of 0.05. Compare the results to the critical t score of 1.648 found from technology. Does this approximation appear to work reasonably well?

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 9鈥32, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the P-value method unless your instructor specifies otherwise. Use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution, as described in Part 1 of this section.

Touch Therapy When she was 9 years of age, Emily Rosa did a science fair experiment in which she tested professional touch therapists to see if they could sense her energy field. She flipped a coin to select either her right hand or her left hand, and then she asked the therapists to identify the selected hand by placing their hand just under Emily鈥檚 hand without seeing it and without touching it. Among 280 trials, the touch therapists were correct 123 times (based on data in 鈥淎 Close Look at Therapeutic Touch,鈥 Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 279, No. 13). Use a 0.10 significance level to test the claim that touch therapists use a method equivalent to random guesses. Do the results suggest that touch therapists are effective?

We have been provided a sample mean, sample size, and population standard deviation. In the given case, use the one-mean z-test to perform the required hypothesis test at the 5%significance level.

x=21,n=32,=4,H0:=22,Ha:<22

Testing Claims About Variation. In Exercises 5鈥16, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Assume that a simple random sample is selected from a normally distributed population.

Mint Specs Listed below are weights (grams) from a simple random sample of 鈥渨heat鈥 pennies (from Data Set 29 鈥淐oin Weights鈥 in Appendix B). U.S. Mint specifications now require a standard deviation of 0.0230 g for weights of pennies. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that wheat pennies are manufactured so that their weights have a standard deviation equal to 0.0230 g. Does the Mint specification appear to be met?

2.5024 2.5298 2.4998 2.4823 2.5163 2.5222 2.4900 2.4907 2.5017

Testing Hypotheses. In Exercises 13鈥24, assume that a simple random sample has been selected and test the given claim. Unless specified by your instructor, use either the P-value method or the critical value method for testing hypotheses. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses, test statistic, P-value (or range of P-values), or critical value(s), and state the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

How Many English Words? A simple random sample of 10 pages from Merriam-Webster鈥檚 Collegiate Dictionary is obtained. The numbers of words defined on those pages are found, with these results: n = 10, x = 53.3 words, s = 15.7 words. Given that this dictionary has 1459 pages with defined words, the claim that there are more than 70,000 defined words is equivalent to the claim that the mean number of words per page is greater than 48.0 words. Assume a normally distributed population. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the mean number of words per page is greater than 48.0 words. What does the result suggest about the claim that there are more than 70,000 defined words?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.