/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q11-22BSC Benford鈥檚 Law. According to Be... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Benford鈥檚 Law. According to Benford鈥檚 law, a variety of different data sets include numbers with leading (first) digits that follow the distribution shown in the table below. In Exercises 21鈥24, test for goodness-of-fit with the distribution described by Benford鈥檚 law.

Leading Digits

Benford's Law: Distributuon of leading digits

1

30.10%

2

17.60%

3

12.50%

4

9.70%

5

7.90%

6

6.70%

7

5.80%

8

5.10%

9

4.60%

Author鈥檚 Check Amounts Exercise 21 lists the observed frequencies of leading digits from amounts on checks from seven suspect companies. Here are the observed frequencies of the leading digits from the amounts on the most recent checks written by the author at the time this exercise was created: 83, 58, 27, 21, 21, 21, 6, 4, 9. (Those observed frequencies correspond to the leading digits of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, respectively.) Using a 0.01 significance level, test the claim that these leading digits are from a population of leading digits that conform to Benford鈥檚 law. Does the conclusion change if the significance level is 0.05?

Short Answer

Expert verified

At\(\alpha = 0.01\), there is not enough evidence to conclude thatthe observed frequencies of the leading digits are not the same as the frequencies expected from Benford鈥檚 law.

At\(\alpha = 0.05\), itcan be concluded that the observed frequencies of the leading digits from the amounts of checks are not the same as the expected frequencies using Benford鈥檚 law.

Thus, the result changes as the significance level changes.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The frequencies of the different leading digits of the amounts of checks are recorded.

02

Check the requirements

Assume that random sampling is conducted.

Let O denote the observed frequencies of the leading digits.

The observed frequencies are noted below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{O_1} = 83\\{O_2} = 58\;\;\\{O_3} = 27\;\;\\{O_4} = 21\end{aligned}\)

\({O_5} = 21\)

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{O_6} = 21\\{O_7} = 6\;\;\\{O_8} = 4\;\;\\{O_9} = 9\end{aligned}\)

The sum of all observed frequencies is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}n = 83 + 58 + ... + 9\\ = 250\end{aligned}\)

Let E denote the expected frequencies.

Let the expected proportion and expected frequencies of the ith digit as given by Benford鈥檚 law.

Leading Digits

Benford's Law: Distributuon of leading digits

Proportions

Expected Frequencies

1

30.10%

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{p_1} = \frac{{30.1}}{{100}}\\ = 0.301\end{aligned}\)

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{E_1} = n{p_1}\\ = 250\left( {0.301} \right)\\ = 75.25\end{aligned}\)

2

17.60%

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{p_2} = \frac{{17.6}}{{100}}\\ = 0.176\end{aligned}\)

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{E_2} = n{p_2}\\ = 250\left( {0.176} \right)\\ = 44\end{aligned}\)

3

12.50%

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{p_3} = \frac{{12.5}}{{100}}\\ = 0.125\end{aligned}\)

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{E_3} = n{p_3}\\ = 250\left( {0.125} \right)\\ = 31.25\end{aligned}\)

4

9.70%

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{p_4} = \frac{{9.7}}{{100}}\\ = 0.097\end{aligned}\)

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{E_4} = n{p_4}\\ = 250\left( {0.097} \right)\\ = 24.25\end{aligned}\)

5

7.90%

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{p_5} = \frac{{7.9}}{{100}}\\ = 0.079\end{aligned}\)

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{E_5} = n{p_5}\\ = 250\left( {0.079} \right)\\ = 19.75\end{aligned}\)

6

6.70%

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{p_6} = \frac{{6.7}}{{100}}\\ = 0.067\end{aligned}\)

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{E_6} = n{p_6}\\ = 250\left( {0.067} \right)\\ = 16.75\end{aligned}\)

7

5.80%

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{p_7} = \frac{{5.8}}{{100}}\\ = 0.058\end{aligned}\)

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{E_7} = n{p_7}\\ = 250\left( {0.058} \right)\\ = 14.5\end{aligned}\)

8

5.10%

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{p_8} = \frac{{5.1}}{{100}}\\ = 0.051\end{aligned}\)

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{E_8} = n{p_8}\\ = 250\left( {0.051} \right)\\ = 12.75\end{aligned}\)

9

4.60%

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{p_9} = \frac{{4.6}}{{100}}\\ = 0.046\end{aligned}\)

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{E_9} = n{p_9}\\ = 250\left( {0.046} \right)\\ = 11.5\end{aligned}\)

Since the expected values are larger than 5, the requirements of the test are met.

03

State the hypotheses

The null hypothesis for conducting the given test is as follows:

The observed frequencies of leading digits are the same as the frequencies expected from Benford鈥檚 law.

The alternative hypothesis is as follows:

The observed frequencies of leading digits are not the same as the frequencies expected from Benford鈥檚 law.

04

Conduct the hypothesis

The table below shows the necessary calculations:

Leading Digits

O

E

\(\left( {O - E} \right)\)

\(\frac{{{{\left( {O - E} \right)}^2}}}{E}\)

1

83

75.25

7.75

0.798173

2

58

44

14

4.454545

3

27

31.25

-4.25

0.578

4

21

24.25

-3.25

0.435567

5

21

19.75

1.25

0.079114

6

21

16.75

4.25

1.078358

7

6

14.5

-8.5

4.982759

8

4

12.75

-8.75

6.004902

9

9

11.5

-2.5

0.54348

The value of the test statistic is equal to:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{\chi ^2} = \sum {\frac{{{{\left( {O - E} \right)}^2}}}{E}} \\ = 0.798173 + 4.454545 + ....... + 0.543478\\ = 18.955\end{aligned}\)

Thus,\({\chi ^2} = 18.955\).

Let k be the number of digits, which are 9.

The degrees of freedom for\({\chi ^2}\)is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}df = k - 1\\ = 9 - 1\\ = 8\end{aligned}\)

05

State the conclusion

Using the chi-square table, the critical value of\({\chi ^2}\)at\(\alpha = 0.01\)with 8 degrees of freedom is equal to 20.090.

The p-value is,

\(\begin{aligned}{c}p - value = P\left( {{\chi ^2} > 18.955} \right)\\ = 0.015\end{aligned}\).

Since the test statistic value is less than the critical value and the p-value is greater than 0.01, thenull hypothesis is failed to be rejected.

There is enough evidence to conclude that the observed frequencies of the leading digits are the same as the frequencies expected from Benford鈥檚 law.

06

Change the level of significance to 0.05

The value of the chi-square test statistic is equal to 18.955.

The critical value of\({\chi ^2}\)at\(\alpha = 0.05\)with 8 degrees of freedom is equal to 15.507.

The p-value is,

\(\begin{aligned}{c}p - value = P\left( {{\chi ^2} > 18.955} \right)\\ = 0.015\end{aligned}\)

Since the test statistic value is greater than the critical value and the p-value is less than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected at a 0.05 level of significance.

Thus, it can be concluded that the observed frequencies of the leading digits from the amounts of checks are not the same as the expected frequencies using Benford鈥檚 law.

Thus, the conclusion changes as the level of significance changes from 0.01 to 0.05.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The table below shows results since 2006 of challenged referee calls in the U.S. Open. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the gender of the tennis player is independent of whether the call is overturned. Do players of either gender appear to be better at challenging calls?

Was the Challenge to the Call Successful?


Yes

No

Men

161

376

Women

68

152

Cybersecurity When using the data from Exercise 1 to test for goodness-of-fit with the distribution described by Benford鈥檚 law, identify the null and alternative hypotheses.

In a study of high school students at least 16 years of age, researchers obtained survey results summarized in the accompanying table (based on data from 鈥淭exting While Driving and Other Risky Motor Vehicle Behaviors Among U.S. High School Students,鈥 by O鈥橫alley, Shults, and Eaton, Pediatrics,Vol. 131, No. 6). Use a 0.05 significance level to

test the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving when drinking alcohol. Are those two risky behaviors independent of each other?


Drove when drinking Alcohol?


Yes

No

Texted while driving

731

3054

No Texting while driving

156

4564

In Exercises 5鈥20, conduct the hypothesis test and provide the test statistic and the P-value and , or critical value, and state the conclusion.

California Daily 4 Lottery The author recorded all digits selected in California鈥檚 Daily 4 Lottery for the 60 days preceding the time that this exercise was created. The frequencies of the digits from 0 through 9 are 21, 30, 31, 33, 19, 23, 21, 16, 24, and 22. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim of lottery officials that the digits are selected in a way that they are equally likely.

Loaded Die The author drilled a hole in a die and filled it with a lead weight, then proceeded to roll it 200 times. Here are the observed frequencies for the outcomes of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, respectively: 27, 31, 42, 40, 28, and 32. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the outcomes are not equally likely. Does it appear that the loaded die behaves differently than a fair die?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.