/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q11-21BSC Benford鈥檚 Law. According to Be... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Benford鈥檚 Law. According to Benford鈥檚 law, a variety of different data sets include numbers with leading (first) digits that follow the distribution shown in the table below. In Exercises 21鈥24, test for goodness-of-fit with the distribution described by Benford鈥檚 law.

Leading Digits

Benford's Law: Distributuon of leading digits

1

30.10%

2

17.60%

3

12.50%

4

9.70%

5

7.90%

6

6.70%

7

5.80%

8

5.10%

9

4.60%

Detecting Fraud When working for the Brooklyn district attorney, investigator Robert Burton analyzed the leading digits of the amounts from 784 checks issued by seven suspect companies. The frequencies were found to be 0, 15, 0, 76, 479, 183, 8, 23, and 0, and those digits correspond to the leading digits of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, respectively. If the observed frequencies are substantially different from the frequencies expected with Benford鈥檚 law, the check amounts appear to result from fraud. Use a 0.01 significance level to test for goodness-of-fit with Benford鈥檚 law. Does it appear that the checks are the result of fraud?

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is enough evidence to conclude thatthe observed frequencies are not the same as the frequencies expected from Benford鈥檚 law.

Since the observed frequencies differ from the expected frequencies, the check amounts are a result of fraud.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The frequencies of the different leading digits of the amounts of 784 checks are recorded.

02

Check the requirements

Assume that random sampling is conducted.

Let O denote the observed frequencies of the leading digits.

The observed frequencies are noted below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{O_1} = 0\\{O_2} = 15\;\;\\{O_3} = 0\;\;\\{O_4} = 76\end{aligned}\)

\({O_5} = 479\)

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{O_6} = 183\\{O_7} = 8\;\;\\{O_8} = 23\;\;\\{O_9} = 0\end{aligned}\)

The sum of all observed frequencies is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}n = 0 + 15 + ...... + 0\\ = 784\end{aligned}\)

Let E denote the expected frequencies.

Let the expected proportion and expected frequencies of the ith digit as given by Benford鈥檚 law.

Leading Digits

Benford's Law: Distributuon of leading digits

Proportions

Expected Frequencies

1

30.10%

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{p_1} = \frac{{30.1}}{{100}}\\ = 0.301\end{aligned}\)

\[\begin{aligned}{c}{E_1} = n{p_1}\\ = 784\left( {0.301} \right)\\ = 235.984\end{aligned}\]

2

17.60%

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{p_2} = \frac{{17.6}}{{100}}\\ = 0.176\end{aligned}\)

\[\begin{aligned}{c}{E_2} = n{p_2}\\ = 784\left( {0.176} \right)\\ = 137.984\end{aligned}\]

3

12.50%

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{p_3} = \frac{{12.5}}{{100}}\\ = 0.125\end{aligned}\)

\[\begin{aligned}{c}{E_3} = n{p_3}\\ = 784\left( {0.125} \right)\\ = 98\end{aligned}\]

4

9.70%

\[\begin{aligned}{c}{p_4} = \frac{{9.7}}{{100}}\\ = 0.097\end{aligned}\]

\[\begin{aligned}{c}{E_4} = n{p_4}\\ = 784\left( {0.097} \right)\\ = 76.048\end{aligned}\]

5

7.90%

\[\begin{aligned}{c}{p_5} = \frac{{7.9}}{{100}}\\ = 0.079\end{aligned}\]

\[\begin{aligned}{c}{E_5} = n{p_5}\\ = 784\left( {0.079} \right)\\ = 61.936\end{aligned}\]

6

6.70%

\[\begin{aligned}{c}{p_6} = \frac{{6.7}}{{100}}\\ = 0.067\end{aligned}\]

\[\begin{aligned}{c}{E_6} = n{p_6}\\ = 784\left( {0.067} \right)\\ = 52.528\end{aligned}\]

7

5.80%

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{p_7} = \frac{{5.8}}{{100}}\\ = 0.058\end{aligned}\)

\[\begin{aligned}{c}{E_7} = n{p_7}\\ = 784\left( {0.058} \right)\\ = 45.472\end{aligned}\]

8

5.10%

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{p_8} = \frac{{5.1}}{{100}}\\ = 0.051\end{aligned}\)

\[\begin{aligned}{c}{E_8} = n{p_8}\\ = 784\left( {0.051} \right)\\ = 39.984\end{aligned}\]

9

4.60%

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{p_9} = \frac{{4.6}}{{100}}\\ = 0.046\end{aligned}\)

\[\begin{aligned}{c}{E_9} = n{p_9}\\ = 784\left( {0.046} \right)\\ = 36.064\end{aligned}\]

Since the expected values are larger than 5, the requirements of the test are met.

03

State the hypotheses

The null hypothesis for conducting the given test is as follows:

The observed frequencies are the same as the frequencies expected from Benford鈥檚 law.

The alternative hypothesis is as follows:

The observed frequencies are not the same as the frequencies expected from Benford鈥檚 law.

04

Conduct the hypothesis

The table below shows the necessary calculations:

Leading Digits

O

E

\(\left( {O - E} \right)\)

\(\frac{{{{\left( {O - E} \right)}^2}}}{E}\)

1

0

235.984

-235.984

235.984

2

15

137.984

-122.984

109.6146

3

0

98

-98

98

4

76

76.048

-0.048

0.00003

5

479

61.936

417.064

2808.421

6

183

52.528

130.472

324.0737

7

8

45.472

-37.472

30.87946

8

23

39.984

-16.984

7.214292

9

0

36.064

-36.064

36.064

The value of the test statistic is equal to:

\[\begin{aligned}{c}{\chi ^2} = \sum {\frac{{{{\left( {O - E} \right)}^2}}}{E}} \\ = 235.984 + 109.6146 + ....... + 36.064\\ = 3650.251\end{aligned}\]

Thus,\({\chi ^2} = 3650.251\).

Let k be the number of digits, which is 9.

The degrees of freedom for\({\chi ^2}\)is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}df = k - 1\\ = 9 - 1\\ = 8\end{aligned}\)

05

State the decision

The chi-square table is used to obtain the critical value of\({\chi ^2}\)at\(\alpha = 0.01\)with 8 degrees of freedom is equal to 20.090.

The p-value is,

\(\begin{aligned}{c}p - value = P\left( {{\chi ^2} > 3650.251} \right)\\ = 0.000\end{aligned}\)

Since the test statistic value is greater than the critical value and the p-value is less than 0.01, the null hypothesis is rejected.

06

State the conclusion

There is enough evidence to conclude thatthe observed frequencies are not the same as the frequencies expected from Benford鈥檚 law.

Since the observed frequencies differ from the expected frequencies, the check amounts are a result of fraud.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Benford鈥檚 Law. According to Benford鈥檚 law, a variety of different data sets include numbers with leading (first) digits that follow the distribution shown in the table below. In Exercises 21鈥24, test for goodness-of-fit with the distribution described by Benford鈥檚 law.

Leading Digits

Benford's Law: Distributuon of leading digits

1

30.10%

2

17.60%

3

12.50%

4

9.70%

5

7.90%

6

6.70%

7

5.80%

8

5.10%

9

4.60%

Author鈥檚 Check Amounts Exercise 21 lists the observed frequencies of leading digits from amounts on checks from seven suspect companies. Here are the observed frequencies of the leading digits from the amounts on the most recent checks written by the author at the time this exercise was created: 83, 58, 27, 21, 21, 21, 6, 4, 9. (Those observed frequencies correspond to the leading digits of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, respectively.) Using a 0.01 significance level, test the claim that these leading digits are from a population of leading digits that conform to Benford鈥檚 law. Does the conclusion change if the significance level is 0.05?

The table below shows results since 2006 of challenged referee calls in the U.S. Open. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the gender of the tennis player is independent of whether the call is overturned. Do players of either gender appear to be better at challenging calls?

Was the Challenge to the Call Successful?


Yes

No

Men

161

376

Women

68

152

Alert nurses at the Veteran鈥檚 Affairs Medical Center in Northampton, Massachusetts, noticed an unusually high number of deaths at times when another nurse, Kristen Gilbert, was working. Those same nurses later noticed missing supplies of the drug epinephrine, which is a synthetic adrenaline that stimulates the heart. Kristen Gilbert was arrested and charged with four counts of murder and two counts of attempted murder. When seeking a grand jury indictment, prosecutors provided a key piece of evidence consisting of the table below. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the defense claim that deaths on shifts are independent of whether Gilbert was working. What does the result suggest about the guilt or innocence of Gilbert?

Shifts With a Death

Shifts Without a Death

Gilbert Was Working

40

217

Gilbert Was Not Working

34

1350

A case-control (or retrospective) study was conductedto investigate a relationship between the colors of helmets worn by motorcycle drivers andwhether they are injured or killed in a crash. Results are given in the table below (based on datafrom 鈥淢otorcycle Rider Conspicuity and Crash Related Injury: Case-Control Study,鈥 by Wellset al., BMJ USA,Vol. 4). Test the claim that injuries are independent of helmet color. Shouldmotorcycle drivers choose helmets with a particular color? If so, which color appears best?

Color of helmet


Black

White

Yellow/Orange

Red

Blue

Controls (not injured)

491

377

31

170

55

Cases (injured or killed)

213

112

8

70

26

In a clinical trial of the effectiveness of echinacea for preventing

colds, the results in the table below were obtained (based on data from 鈥淎n Evaluation of Echinacea Angustifoliain Experimental Rhinovirus Infections,鈥 by Turner et al., NewEngland Journal of Medicine,Vol. 353, No. 4). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that getting a cold is independent of the treatment group. What do the results suggest about the

effectiveness of echinacea as a prevention against colds?

Treatment Group


Placebo

Echinacea:

20% Extract

Echinacea:

60% Extract

Got a Cold

88

48

42

Did Not Get a Cold

15

4

10

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.