/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q11-21BSC Benford鈥檚 Law. According to Be... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Benford鈥檚 Law. According to Benford鈥檚 law, a variety of different data sets include numbers with leading (first) digits that follow the distribution shown in the table below. In Exercises 21鈥24, test for goodness-of-fit with the distribution described by Benford鈥檚 law.

Leading Digits

Benford's Law: Distributuon of leading digits

1

30.10%

2

17.60%

3

12.50%

4

9.70%

5

7.90%

6

6.70%

7

5.80%

8

5.10%

9

4.60%

Detecting Fraud When working for the Brooklyn district attorney, investigator Robert Burton analyzed the leading digits of the amounts from 784 checks issued by seven suspect companies. The frequencies were found to be 0, 15, 0, 76, 479, 183, 8, 23, and 0, and those digits correspond to the leading digits of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, respectively. If the observed frequencies are substantially different from the frequencies expected with Benford鈥檚 law, the check amounts appear to result from fraud. Use a 0.01 significance level to test for goodness-of-fit with Benford鈥檚 law. Does it appear that the checks are the result of fraud?

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is enough evidence to conclude thatthe observed frequencies are not the same as the frequencies expected from Benford鈥檚 law.

Since the observed frequencies differ from the expected frequencies, the check amounts are a result of fraud.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The frequencies of the different leading digits of the amounts of 784 checks are recorded.

02

Check the requirements

Assume that random sampling is conducted.

Let O denote the observed frequencies of the leading digits.

The observed frequencies are noted below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{O_1} = 0\\{O_2} = 15\;\;\\{O_3} = 0\;\;\\{O_4} = 76\end{aligned}\)

\({O_5} = 479\)

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{O_6} = 183\\{O_7} = 8\;\;\\{O_8} = 23\;\;\\{O_9} = 0\end{aligned}\)

The sum of all observed frequencies is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}n = 0 + 15 + ...... + 0\\ = 784\end{aligned}\)

Let E denote the expected frequencies.

Let the expected proportion and expected frequencies of the ith digit as given by Benford鈥檚 law.

Leading Digits

Benford's Law: Distributuon of leading digits

Proportions

Expected Frequencies

1

30.10%

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{p_1} = \frac{{30.1}}{{100}}\\ = 0.301\end{aligned}\)

\[\begin{aligned}{c}{E_1} = n{p_1}\\ = 784\left( {0.301} \right)\\ = 235.984\end{aligned}\]

2

17.60%

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{p_2} = \frac{{17.6}}{{100}}\\ = 0.176\end{aligned}\)

\[\begin{aligned}{c}{E_2} = n{p_2}\\ = 784\left( {0.176} \right)\\ = 137.984\end{aligned}\]

3

12.50%

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{p_3} = \frac{{12.5}}{{100}}\\ = 0.125\end{aligned}\)

\[\begin{aligned}{c}{E_3} = n{p_3}\\ = 784\left( {0.125} \right)\\ = 98\end{aligned}\]

4

9.70%

\[\begin{aligned}{c}{p_4} = \frac{{9.7}}{{100}}\\ = 0.097\end{aligned}\]

\[\begin{aligned}{c}{E_4} = n{p_4}\\ = 784\left( {0.097} \right)\\ = 76.048\end{aligned}\]

5

7.90%

\[\begin{aligned}{c}{p_5} = \frac{{7.9}}{{100}}\\ = 0.079\end{aligned}\]

\[\begin{aligned}{c}{E_5} = n{p_5}\\ = 784\left( {0.079} \right)\\ = 61.936\end{aligned}\]

6

6.70%

\[\begin{aligned}{c}{p_6} = \frac{{6.7}}{{100}}\\ = 0.067\end{aligned}\]

\[\begin{aligned}{c}{E_6} = n{p_6}\\ = 784\left( {0.067} \right)\\ = 52.528\end{aligned}\]

7

5.80%

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{p_7} = \frac{{5.8}}{{100}}\\ = 0.058\end{aligned}\)

\[\begin{aligned}{c}{E_7} = n{p_7}\\ = 784\left( {0.058} \right)\\ = 45.472\end{aligned}\]

8

5.10%

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{p_8} = \frac{{5.1}}{{100}}\\ = 0.051\end{aligned}\)

\[\begin{aligned}{c}{E_8} = n{p_8}\\ = 784\left( {0.051} \right)\\ = 39.984\end{aligned}\]

9

4.60%

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{p_9} = \frac{{4.6}}{{100}}\\ = 0.046\end{aligned}\)

\[\begin{aligned}{c}{E_9} = n{p_9}\\ = 784\left( {0.046} \right)\\ = 36.064\end{aligned}\]

Since the expected values are larger than 5, the requirements of the test are met.

03

State the hypotheses

The null hypothesis for conducting the given test is as follows:

The observed frequencies are the same as the frequencies expected from Benford鈥檚 law.

The alternative hypothesis is as follows:

The observed frequencies are not the same as the frequencies expected from Benford鈥檚 law.

04

Conduct the hypothesis

The table below shows the necessary calculations:

Leading Digits

O

E

\(\left( {O - E} \right)\)

\(\frac{{{{\left( {O - E} \right)}^2}}}{E}\)

1

0

235.984

-235.984

235.984

2

15

137.984

-122.984

109.6146

3

0

98

-98

98

4

76

76.048

-0.048

0.00003

5

479

61.936

417.064

2808.421

6

183

52.528

130.472

324.0737

7

8

45.472

-37.472

30.87946

8

23

39.984

-16.984

7.214292

9

0

36.064

-36.064

36.064

The value of the test statistic is equal to:

\[\begin{aligned}{c}{\chi ^2} = \sum {\frac{{{{\left( {O - E} \right)}^2}}}{E}} \\ = 235.984 + 109.6146 + ....... + 36.064\\ = 3650.251\end{aligned}\]

Thus,\({\chi ^2} = 3650.251\).

Let k be the number of digits, which is 9.

The degrees of freedom for\({\chi ^2}\)is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}df = k - 1\\ = 9 - 1\\ = 8\end{aligned}\)

05

State the decision

The chi-square table is used to obtain the critical value of\({\chi ^2}\)at\(\alpha = 0.01\)with 8 degrees of freedom is equal to 20.090.

The p-value is,

\(\begin{aligned}{c}p - value = P\left( {{\chi ^2} > 3650.251} \right)\\ = 0.000\end{aligned}\)

Since the test statistic value is greater than the critical value and the p-value is less than 0.01, the null hypothesis is rejected.

06

State the conclusion

There is enough evidence to conclude thatthe observed frequencies are not the same as the frequencies expected from Benford鈥檚 law.

Since the observed frequencies differ from the expected frequencies, the check amounts are a result of fraud.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A randomized controlled trial was designed to compare the effectiveness of splinting versus surgery in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Results are given in the table below (based on data from 鈥淪plinting vs. Surgery in the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome,鈥 by Gerritsen et al., Journal of the American Medical Association,Vol. 288,

No. 10). The results are based on evaluations made one year after the treatment. Using a 0.01 significance level, test the claim that success is independent of the type of treatment. What do the results suggest about treating carpal tunnel syndrome?

Successful Treatment

Unsuccessful Treatment

Splint Treatment

60

23

Surgery Treatment

67

6

The accompanying TI-83/84 Plus calculator display results from thehypothesis test described in Exercise 1. Assume that the hypothesis test requirements are allsatisfied. Identify the test statistic and the P-value (expressed in standard form and rounded tothree decimal places), and then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis.

In a clinical trial of the effectiveness of echinacea for preventing

colds, the results in the table below were obtained (based on data from 鈥淎n Evaluation of Echinacea Angustifoliain Experimental Rhinovirus Infections,鈥 by Turner et al., NewEngland Journal of Medicine,Vol. 353, No. 4). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that getting a cold is independent of the treatment group. What do the results suggest about the

effectiveness of echinacea as a prevention against colds?

Treatment Group


Placebo

Echinacea:

20% Extract

Echinacea:

60% Extract

Got a Cold

88

48

42

Did Not Get a Cold

15

4

10

In Exercises 5鈥20, conduct the hypothesis test and provide the test statistic and the P-value and , or critical value, and state the conclusion.

World Series Games The table below lists the numbers of games played in 105 Major League Baseball (MLB) World Series. This table also includes the expected proportions for the numbers of games in a World Series, assuming that in each series, both teams have about the same chance of winning. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the actual numbers of games fit the distribution indicated by the expected proportions.

Games Played

4

5

6

7

World Series Contests

21

23

23

38

Expected Proportion

2/16

4/16

5/16

5/16

A study of seat belt users andnonusers yielded the randomly selected sample data summarized in the given table (based on data from 鈥淲hat Kinds of People Do Not Use Seat Belts?鈥 by Helsing and Comstock, American Journal of Public Health,Vol. 67, No. 11). Test the claim that the amount of smoking is independent of seat belt use. A plausible theory is that people who smoke more are lessconcerned about their health and safety and are therefore less inclined to wear seat belts. Is this theory supported by the sample data?

Number of Cigarettes Smoked per Day

0

1-14

15-34

35 and over

Wear Seat Belts

175

20

42

6

Don't Wear Seat Belts

149

17

41

9

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.