/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q11-2-20BSC Winning team data were collected... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Winning team data were collected for teams in different sports, with the results given in the table on the top of the next page (based on data from 鈥淧redicting Professional Sports Game Outcomes fromIntermediateGame Scores,鈥 by Copper, DeNeve, and Mosteller, Chance,Vol. 5, No. 3鈥4). Use a 0.10significance level to test the claim that home/visitor wins are independent of the sport. Given that among the four sports included here, baseball is the only sport in which the home team canmodify field dimensions to favor its own players, does it appear that baseball teams are effective in using this advantage?

Basketball

Baseball

Hockey

Football

Home Team Wins

127

53

50

57

Visiting Team Wins

71

47

43

42

Short Answer

Expert verified

Home/visitor wins are independent of the sport.

Thus, the advantage to the baseball teams is not effective.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The data for different sports and home/Visiting team wins is provided.

The level of significance 0.10.

02

Compute the expected frequencies

The formula forexpected frequencyis,

\(E = \frac{{\left( {row\;total} \right)\left( {column\;total} \right)}}{{\left( {grand\;total} \right)}}\)

The table with row and column total for observed counts is represented as,


Basketball

Baseball

Hockey

Football

Row total

Home Team Wins

127

53

50

57

287

Visiting Team Wins

71

47

43

42

203

Column total

198

100

93

99

490

Theexpected frequency tableis represented as,


Basketball

Baseball

Hockey

Football

Home Team Wins

115.9714

58.5714

54.4714

57.9857

Visiting Team Wins

82.0286

41.4286

38.5286

41.0143

03

State the null and alternate hypothesis

The hypotheses are formulated as,

\({H_0}:\)Home/visitor wins are independent of the sport.

\({H_1}:\)Home/visitor wins are dependent on the sport.

04

Compute the test statistic

The value of the test statisticis computed as,

\[\begin{aligned}{c}{\chi ^2} = \sum {\frac{{{{\left( {O - E} \right)}^2}}}{E}} \\ = \frac{{{{\left( {127 - 115.9714} \right)}^2}}}{{115.9714}} + \frac{{{{\left( {53 - 58.5714} \right)}^2}}}{{58.5714}} + ... + \frac{{{{\left( {42 - 41.0143} \right)}^2}}}{{41.0143}}\\ = 4.7372\end{aligned}\]

Therefore, the value of the test statistic is 4.7372.

05

Compute the degrees of freedom

The degrees of freedomare computed as,

\(\begin{aligned}{c}\left( {r - 1} \right)\left( {c - 1} \right) = \left( {2 - 1} \right)\left( {4 - 1} \right)\\ = 3\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the degrees of freedom are 3.

06

Compute the critical value

From the chi-square table, the critical value to 3 degrees of freedom and at 0.10 level of significance 6.2514.

Therefore, the critical value is 6.2514

07

State the decision

Since the critical value (6.2514) is greater than the value of the test statistic (4.7372). In this case, the null hypothesis fails to be rejected.

Therefore, the decision is to fail to reject the null hypothesis.

08

State the conclusion

There issufficient evidence to support the claim that Home/visitor wins are independent of the sport.

Thus, the wins are not dependent on the sport.

Thus, the advantage is not effective for the wins of baseball teams.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

American Idol Contestants on the TV show American Idol competed to win a singing contest. At one point, the website WhatNotToSing.com listed the actual numbers of eliminations for different orders of singing, and the expected number of eliminations was also listed. The results are in the table below. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the actual eliminations agree with the expected numbers. Does there appear to be support for the claim that the leadoff singers appear to be at a disadvantage?

Singing Order

1

2

3

4

5

6

7鈥12

Actual Eliminations

20

12

9

8

6

5

9

Expected Eliminations

12.9

12.9

9.9

7.9

6.4

5.5

13.5

In his book Outliers,author Malcolm Gladwell argues that more

American-born baseball players have birth dates in the months immediately following July 31 because that was the age cutoff date for nonschool baseball leagues. The table below lists months of births for a sample of American-born baseball players and foreign-born baseball players. Using a 0.05 significance level, is there sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that months of births of baseball players are independent of whether they are born in America? Do the data appear to support Gladwell鈥檚 claim?


Born in America

Foreign Born

Jan.

387

101

Feb.

329

82

March

366

85

April

344

82

May

336

94

June

313

83

July

313

59

Aug.

503

91

Sept.

421

70

Oct.

434

100

Nov.

398

103

Dec.

371

82

Flat Tire and Missed Class A classic story involves four carpooling students who missed a test and gave as an excuse a flat tire. On the makeup test, the instructor asked the students to identify the particular tire that went flat. If they really didn鈥檛 have a flat tire, would they be able to identify the same tire? The author asked 41 other students to identify the tire they would select. The results are listed in the following table (except for one student who selected the spare). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the author鈥檚 claim that the results fit a uniform distribution. What does the result suggest about the likelihood of four students identifying the same tire when they really didn鈥檛 have a flat tire?

Tire

Left Front

Right Front

Left Rear

Right Rear

Number Selected

11

15

8

16

Alert nurses at the Veteran鈥檚 Affairs Medical Center in Northampton, Massachusetts, noticed an unusually high number of deaths at times when another nurse, Kristen Gilbert, was working. Those same nurses later noticed missing supplies of the drug epinephrine, which is a synthetic adrenaline that stimulates the heart. Kristen Gilbert was arrested and charged with four counts of murder and two counts of attempted murder. When seeking a grand jury indictment, prosecutors provided a key piece of evidence consisting of the table below. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the defense claim that deaths on shifts are independent of whether Gilbert was working. What does the result suggest about the guilt or innocence of Gilbert?

Shifts With a Death

Shifts Without a Death

Gilbert Was Working

40

217

Gilbert Was Not Working

34

1350

Benford鈥檚 Law. According to Benford鈥檚 law, a variety of different data sets include numbers with leading (first) digits that follow the distribution shown in the table below. In Exercises 21鈥24, test for goodness-of-fit with the distribution described by Benford鈥檚 law.

Leading Digits

Benford's Law: Distributuon of leading digits

1

30.10%

2

17.60%

3

12.50%

4

9.70%

5

7.90%

6

6.70%

7

5.80%

8

5.10%

9

4.60%

Detecting Fraud When working for the Brooklyn district attorney, investigator Robert Burton analyzed the leading digits of the amounts from 784 checks issued by seven suspect companies. The frequencies were found to be 0, 15, 0, 76, 479, 183, 8, 23, and 0, and those digits correspond to the leading digits of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, respectively. If the observed frequencies are substantially different from the frequencies expected with Benford鈥檚 law, the check amounts appear to result from fraud. Use a 0.01 significance level to test for goodness-of-fit with Benford鈥檚 law. Does it appear that the checks are the result of fraud?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.