/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q11-13BSC In Exercises 5–20, conduct the... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In Exercises 5–20, conduct the hypothesis test and provide the test statistic and the P-value and, or critical value, and state the conclusion.

Kentucky Derby The table below lists the frequency of wins for different post positions through the 141st running of the Kentucky Derby horse race. A post position of 1 is closest to the inside rail, so the horse in that position has the shortest distance to run. (Because the number of horses varies from year to year, only the first 10 post positions are included.) Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the likelihood of winning is the same for the different post positions. Based on the result, should bettors consider the post position of a horse racing in the Kentucky Derby?

Post Position

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Wins

19

14

11

15

15

7

8

12

5

11

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is not enough evidence to conclude that the probability of winning is not the same for different post positions.

Since there is no significant difference in the frequency of wins for the different post positions, there isn’t a need for the bettors to consider the post position of a horse in the Kentucky Derby.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The frequency of wins is provided for the different post positions in the 141 Kentucky Derby horse races.

02

Check the requirements of the test

Assume the experimental units are obtained by random sampling.

If the expected frequencies are larger than 5, the requirements of the test are fulfilled.

Let O denote the observed frequencies of the wins.

The following values are obtained:

\(\begin{aligned}{l}{O_1} = 19\\{O_2} = 14\\{O_3} = 11\\{O_4} = 15\end{aligned}\)

\(\begin{aligned}{l}{O_5} = 15\\{O_6} = 7\\{O_7} = 8\\{O_8} = 12\end{aligned}\)

\(\begin{aligned}{l}{O_9} = 5\\{O_{10}} = 11\end{aligned}\)

The sum of all observed frequencies is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}n = 19 + 14 + .... + 11\\ = 117\end{aligned}\)

Let E denote the expected frequencies.It is given that the number of wins is expected to be the same for all the positions.

The expected frequencies for each of the 10 positions are equal to:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}E = \frac{{117}}{{10}}\\ = 11.7\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the requirements of the test are satisfied.

03

State the hypotheses

The null hypothesis for conducting the given test is as follows:

\({H_0}:\)The probability of winning is the same for different post positions.

The alternative hypothesis is as follows:

\({H_a}:\)The probability of winning is not the same for different post positions.

04

Conduct the hypothesis test

The table below shows the necessary calculations:

Post Position

O

E

\(\left( {O - E} \right)\)

\({\left( {O - E} \right)^2}\)

\(\frac{{{{\left( {O - E} \right)}^2}}}{E}\)

1

19

11.7

7.3

53.29

4.5547

2

14

11.7

2.3

5.29

0.4521

3

11

11.7

-0.7

0.49

0.0419

4

15

11.7

3.3

10.89

0.9308

5

15

11.7

3.3

10.89

0.9308

6

7

11.7

-4.7

22.09

1.8880

7

8

11.7

-3.7

13.69

1.1701

8

12

11.7

0.3

0.09

0.0077

9

5

11.7

-6.7

44.89

3.8367

10

11

11.7

-0.7

0.49

0.0419

The value of the test statistic is equal to:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{\chi ^2} = \sum {\frac{{{{\left( {O - E} \right)}^2}}}{E}} \;\;\\ = 4.5547 + 0.4521 + ... + 0.0419\\ = 13.855\end{aligned}\)

Thus,\({\chi ^2} = 13.855\).

Let k be the number of posts that are equal to 10.

The degrees of freedom for\({\chi ^2}\)is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}df = k - 1\\ = 10 - 1\\ = 9\end{aligned}\)

05

State the decision

The chi-square table is used to determine the critical value of\({\chi ^2}\)at\(\alpha = 0.05\)with 9 degrees of freedom as 16.919.

The p-value is equal to,

\(\begin{aligned}{c}p - value = P\left( {{\chi ^2} > 13.855} \right)\\ = 0.128\end{aligned}\)

Since the test statistic value is less than the critical value and the p-value is greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis is failed to be rejected.

06

Determine the conclusion

There is enough evidence to conclude that the probability of winning is same for different post positions.

Since there is no significant difference in the frequency of wins for the different post positions, there isn’t the need for the bettors to consider the post position of a horse in the Kentucky Derby.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Police Calls The police department in Madison, Connecticut, released the following numbers of calls for the different days of the week during February that had 28 days: Monday (114); Tuesday (152); Wednesday (160); Thursday (164); Friday (179); Saturday (196); Sunday (130). Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the different days of the week have the same frequencies of police calls. Is there anything notable about the observed frequencies?

In Exercises 5–20, conduct the hypothesis test and provide the test statistic and the P-value and, or critical value, and state the conclusion.

Police Calls Repeat Exercise 11 using these observed frequencies for police calls received during the month of March: Monday (208); Tuesday (224); Wednesday (246); Thursday (173); Friday (210); Saturday (236); Sunday (154). What is a fundamental error with this analysis?

In his book Outliers,author Malcolm Gladwell argues that more

American-born baseball players have birth dates in the months immediately following July 31 because that was the age cutoff date for nonschool baseball leagues. The table below lists months of births for a sample of American-born baseball players and foreign-born baseball players. Using a 0.05 significance level, is there sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that months of births of baseball players are independent of whether they are born in America? Do the data appear to support Gladwell’s claim?


Born in America

Foreign Born

Jan.

387

101

Feb.

329

82

March

366

85

April

344

82

May

336

94

June

313

83

July

313

59

Aug.

503

91

Sept.

421

70

Oct.

434

100

Nov.

398

103

Dec.

371

82

Benford’s Law. According to Benford’s law, a variety of different data sets include numbers with leading (first) digits that follow the distribution shown in the table below. In Exercises 21–24, test for goodness-of-fit with the distribution described by Benford’s law.

Leading Digits

Benford's Law: Distributuon of leading digits

1

30.10%

2

17.60%

3

12.50%

4

9.70%

5

7.90%

6

6.70%

7

5.80%

8

5.10%

9

4.60%

Detecting Fraud When working for the Brooklyn district attorney, investigator Robert Burton analyzed the leading digits of the amounts from 784 checks issued by seven suspect companies. The frequencies were found to be 0, 15, 0, 76, 479, 183, 8, 23, and 0, and those digits correspond to the leading digits of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, respectively. If the observed frequencies are substantially different from the frequencies expected with Benford’s law, the check amounts appear to result from fraud. Use a 0.01 significance level to test for goodness-of-fit with Benford’s law. Does it appear that the checks are the result of fraud?

American Idol Contestants on the TV show American Idol competed to win a singing contest. At one point, the website WhatNotToSing.com listed the actual numbers of eliminations for different orders of singing, and the expected number of eliminations was also listed. The results are in the table below. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the actual eliminations agree with the expected numbers. Does there appear to be support for the claim that the leadoff singers appear to be at a disadvantage?

Singing Order

1

2

3

4

5

6

7–12

Actual Eliminations

20

12

9

8

6

5

9

Expected Eliminations

12.9

12.9

9.9

7.9

6.4

5.5

13.5

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.