/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q11-11BSC Police Calls The police departme... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Police Calls The police department in Madison, Connecticut, released the following numbers of calls for the different days of the week during February that had 28 days: Monday (114); Tuesday (152); Wednesday (160); Thursday (164); Friday (179); Saturday (196); Sunday (130). Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the different days of the week have the same frequencies of police calls. Is there anything notable about the observed frequencies?

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is enough evidence to conclude that the police calls do not occur equally frequently on the different days of the week.

The observed frequencies increase from Monday to Saturday and then decrease on Sunday.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The observed frequencies of the police calls on the seven days of the week are recorded.

It is expected that the calls occur equally frequently on the seven days of the week.

02

Check the requirements

Let the serial numbers from 1 to 7 denote the seven days of the week starting from Monday.

Let O denote the observed frequencies of the police calls.

The following values are obtained:

\(\begin{aligned}{l}{O_1} = 114\\{O_2} = 152\\{O_3} = 160\\{O_4} = 164\\{O_5} = 179\\{O_6} = 196\\{O_7} = 130\end{aligned}\)

The sum of all observed frequencies is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}n = 114 + 152 + .... + 130\\ = 1095\end{aligned}\)

Let E denote the expected frequencies. It is given that the days are expected to occur with the same frequency on each day.

The expected frequencies for each of the 7 days is equal to:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}E = \frac{{1095}}{7}\\ = 156.4286\end{aligned}\)

Assuming the experimental units are selected randomly and since the expected values are larger than 5, the requirements for the test are met.

03

State the hypotheses

The null hypothesis for conducting the given test is as follows:

The police calls occur equally frequently on the different days of the week.

The alternative hypothesis is as follows:

The police calls do not occur equally frequently on the different days of the week.

The test is right-tailed.

If the absolute value of the test statistic is greater than the critical value, the null hypothesis is rejected.

04

Compute the test statistic

The table below shows the necessary calculations:

Day

O

E

\(\left( {O - E} \right)\)

\({\left( {O - E} \right)^2}\)

\(\frac{{{{\left( {O - E} \right)}^2}}}{E}\)

Monday

114

156.4286

-42.4286

1800.184

11.5080

Tuesday

152

156.4286

-4.4286

19.61224

0.12537

Wednesday

160

156.4286

3.5714

12.7551

0.0815

Thursday

164

156.4286

7.5714

57.3265

0.3665

Friday

179

156.4286

22.5714

509.4694

3.2569

Saturday

196

156.4286

39.5714

1565.898

10.0103

Sunday

130

156.4286

-26.4286

698.4694

4.4651

The value of the test statistic is equal to:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{\chi ^2} = \sum {\frac{{{{\left( {O - E} \right)}^2}}}{E}} \\ = 11.5080 + 0.12538 + ... + 4.4651\\ = 29.8137\end{aligned}\)

Thus,\({\chi ^2} = 29.8137\).

Let k be the number of days, which are equal to 7.

The degrees of freedom for\({\chi ^2}\)is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}df = k - 1\\ = 7 - 1\\ = 6\end{aligned}\)

The critical value of\({\chi ^2}\)at\(\alpha = 0.01\)with 6 degrees of freedom is equal to 16.8119.

The p-value is equal to,

\(\begin{aligned}{c}p - value = P\left( {{\chi ^2} > 16.812} \right)\\ = 0.000\end{aligned}\)

Since the test statistic value is greater than the critical value and the p-value is less than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.

05

State the conclusion

There is enough evidence to conclude that the police calls do not occur equally frequently on the different days of the week.

The trend observed in the observed frequencies is that the calls increase from Monday through Saturday and decrease drastically on Sunday.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In his book Outliers,author Malcolm Gladwell argues that more

American-born baseball players have birth dates in the months immediately following July 31 because that was the age cutoff date for nonschool baseball leagues. The table below lists months of births for a sample of American-born baseball players and foreign-born baseball players. Using a 0.05 significance level, is there sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that months of births of baseball players are independent of whether they are born in America? Do the data appear to support Gladwell鈥檚 claim?


Born in America

Foreign Born

Jan.

387

101

Feb.

329

82

March

366

85

April

344

82

May

336

94

June

313

83

July

313

59

Aug.

503

91

Sept.

421

70

Oct.

434

100

Nov.

398

103

Dec.

371

82

Benford鈥檚 Law. According to Benford鈥檚 law, a variety of different data sets include numbers with leading (first) digits that follow the distribution shown in the table below. In Exercises 21鈥24, test for goodness-of-fit with the distribution described by Benford鈥檚 law.

Leading Digits

Benford's Law: Distributuon of leading digits

1

30.10%

2

17.60%

3

12.50%

4

9.70%

5

7.90%

6

6.70%

7

5.80%

8

5.10%

9

4.60%

Author鈥檚 Computer Files The author recorded the leading digits of the sizes of the electronic document files for the current edition of this book. The leading digits have frequencies of 55, 25, 17, 24, 18, 12, 12, 3, and 4 (corresponding to the leading digits of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, respectively). Using a 0.05 significance level, test for goodness-of-fit with Benford鈥檚 law.

In Exercises 5鈥20, conduct the hypothesis test and provide the test statistic and the P-value and, or critical value, and state the conclusion.

Baseball Player Births In his book Outliers, author Malcolm Gladwell argues that more baseball players have birth dates in the months immediately following July 31, because that was the age cutoff date for nonschool baseball leagues. Here is a sample of frequency counts of months of birth dates of American-born Major League Baseball players starting with January: 387, 329, 366, 344, 336, 313, 313, 503, 421, 434, 398, 371. Using a 0.05 significance level, is there sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that American-born Major League Baseball players are born in different months with the same frequency? Do the sample values appear to support Gladwell鈥檚 claim?

Flat Tire and Missed Class A classic story involves four carpooling students who missed a test and gave as an excuse a flat tire. On the makeup test, the instructor asked the students to identify the particular tire that went flat. If they really didn鈥檛 have a flat tire, would they be able to identify the same tire? The author asked 41 other students to identify the tire they would select. The results are listed in the following table (except for one student who selected the spare). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the author鈥檚 claim that the results fit a uniform distribution. What does the result suggest about the likelihood of four students identifying the same tire when they really didn鈥檛 have a flat tire?

Tire

Left Front

Right Front

Left Rear

Right Rear

Number Selected

11

15

8

16

In a study of high school students at least 16 years of age, researchers obtained survey results summarized in the accompanying table (based on data from 鈥淭exting While Driving and Other Risky Motor Vehicle Behaviors Among U.S. High School Students,鈥 by O鈥橫alley, Shults, and Eaton, Pediatrics,Vol. 131, No. 6). Use a 0.05 significance level to

test the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving when drinking alcohol. Are those two risky behaviors independent of each other?


Drove when drinking Alcohol?


Yes

No

Texted while driving

731

3054

No Texting while driving

156

4564

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.