/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q6BSC Interpreting the Coefficient of ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Interpreting the Coefficient of Determination. In Exercises 5鈥8, use the value of the linear correlation coefficient r to find the coefficient of determination and the percentage of the total variation that can be explained by the linear relationship between the two variables.

Pizza and Subways r = 0.992 (x = cost of a slice of pizza, y = subway fare in New York City

Short Answer

Expert verified

The coefficient of determination is 0.984.

The percentage of variation that can be explained by the linear association between the cost of a slice of pizza and the subway fare in New York City is 98.4%.

1.6% of the variation in the response variable (subway fare in New York city) is explained by other factors and random variation.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The linear correlation coefficient between the cost of a slice of pizza and the subway fare in New York City is 0.992.

02

Coefficient of determination

The coefficient of determination is the square of the linear correlation coefficient between the two variables.

Here, the linear correlation coefficient (r) between the cost of a slice of pizza and the subway fare in New York City is 0.992.

Thus,

\(\begin{array}{c}{\rm{Coefficient}}\;{\rm{of}}\;{\rm{determination}} = {r^2}\\ = {0.992^2}\\ = 0.984\end{array}\)

Therefore, the value of the coefficient of determination is 0.984.

03

Percentage of variation

Here,

\(\begin{array}{c}{r^2} = 0.984\\ = \frac{{98.4}}{{100}} \times 100\% \\ = 98.4\% \end{array}\)

Therefore, the percentage of the variation explained by the linear association between the cost of a slice of pizza and the subway fare in New York City is 98.4%.

The remaining \(100\% - 98.4\% = 1.6\% \) variation is explained by other factors and random variation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Scatterplots Match these values of r with the five scatterplots shown below: 0.268, 0.992, -1, 0.746, and 1.

Exercises 13鈥28 use the same data sets as Exercises 13鈥28 in Section 10-1. In each case, find the regression equation, letting the first variable be the predictor (x) variable. Find the indicated predicted value by following the prediction procedure summarized in Figure 10-5 on page 493.

Using the listed duration and interval after times, find the best predicted 鈥渋nterval after鈥 time for an eruption with a duration of 253 seconds. How does it compare to an actual eruption with a duration of 253 seconds and an interval after time of 83 minutes?

Testing for a Linear Correlation. In Exercises 13鈥28, construct a scatterplot, and find the value of the linear correlation coefficient r. Also find the P-value or the critical values of r from Table A-6. Use a significance level of A = 0.05. Determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support a claim of a linear correlation between the two variables. (Save your work because the same data sets will be used in Section 10-2 exercises.)

Tips Listed below are amounts of bills for dinner and the amounts of the tips that were left. The data were collected by students of the author. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a linear correlation between the bill amounts and the tip amounts? If everyone were to tip with the same percentage, what should be the value of r?

Bill(dollars)

33.46

50.68

87.92

98.84

63.6

107.34

Tip(dollars)

5.5

5

8.08

17

12

16

In Exercises 5鈥8, use a significance level 0.05 and refer to theaccompanying displays.Cereal Killers The amounts of sugar (grams of sugar per gram of cereal) and calories (per gram of cereal) were recorded for a sample of 16 different cereals. TI-83>84 Plus calculator results are shown here. Is there sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between sugar and calories in a gram of cereal? Explain.

let the predictor variable x be the first variable given. Use the given data to find the regression equation and the best predicted value of the response variable. Be sure to follow the prediction procedure summarized in Figure 10-5 on page 493. Use a 0.05 significance level.

Heights (cm) and weights (kg) are measured for 100 randomly selected

adult males (from Data Set 1 鈥淏ody Data鈥 in Appendix B). The 100 paired measurements yield\(\bar x = 173.79\)cm,\(\bar y = 85.93\)kg, r= 0.418, P-value = 0.000, and\(\hat y = - 106 + 1.10x\). Find the best predicted value of\(\hat y\)(weight) given an adult male who is 180 cm tall.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.