/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q11BSC Outlier Refer to the accompanyin... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Outlier Refer to the accompanying Minitab-generated scatterplot. a. Examine the pattern of all 10 points and subjectively determine whether there appears to be a correlation between x and y. b. After identifying the 10 pairs of coordinates corresponding to the 10 points, find the value of the correlation coefficient r and determine whether there is a linear correlation. c. Now remove the point with coordinates (10, 10) and repeat parts (a) and (b). d. What do you conclude about the possible effect from a single pair of values?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. The pattern indicates an upward trend.Hence, a correlation can be expected for variables x and y.

b. The values are recorded as shown below:

x

y

1

1

2

1

3

1

1

2

1

3

2

2

2

3

3

2

3

3

10

10

The correlation coefficient is 0.906.

Also, there is sufficient evidence to support the existence ofa linear correlation between the two variables.

c. The correlation coefficient is 0, and there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the two variables.

d. A single pair of values has a substantial effect on the correlation measure.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The scatterplot generated on Minitab is given.

02

Analyze the scatterplot

a.

A scatterplot is a two-dimensional graph thatrepresents a pair of values for two variables.

Here,the scatterplot represents an overall upward pattern, which means the values of one variable are expected to increase with the other.

Due to this pattern and moderately close observations, it can be expected that there exists a linear correlation between the two variables.

03

Compute the measure of the correlation coefficient

b.

The observations obtained from the scatterplot are as follows:

x

y

1

1

2

1

3

1

1

2

1

3

2

2

2

3

3

2

3

3

10

10

The formula for the correlation coefficient is shown below:

\(r = \frac{{n\sum {xy} - \left( {\sum x } \right)\left( {\sum y } \right)}}{{\sqrt {n\left( {\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - {{\left( {\sum x } \right)}^2}} \sqrt {n\left( {\sum {{y^2}} } \right) - {{\left( {\sum y } \right)}^2}} }}\)

The valuesare in the table below:

x

y

\({x^2}\)

\({y^2}\)

\(xy\)

1

1

1

1

1

2

1

4

1

2

3

1

9

1

3

1

2

1

4

2

1

3

1

9

3

2

2

4

4

4

2

3

4

9

6

3

2

9

4

6

3

3

9

9

9

10

10

100

100

100

\(\sum x = 28\)

\(\sum y = 28\)

\(\sum {{x^2}} = 142\)

\(\sum {{y^2} = } \;142\)

\(\sum {xy\; = \;} 136\)

Substitute the values to obtain the correlation coefficient.

\(\begin{aligned} r &= \frac{{10\left( {136} \right) - \left( {28} \right)\left( {28} \right)}}{{\sqrt {10\left( {142} \right) - {{\left( {28} \right)}^2}} \sqrt {10{{\left( {142} \right)}^2} - {{\left( {28} \right)}^2}} }}\\ &= 0.906\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the correlation coefficient is 0.906.

04

Step 4:Conduct a hypothesis test for correlation

Let\(\rho \)be the true correlation coefficient.

Form the hypotheses as shown:

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\rm{H}}_{\rm{o}}}:\rho = 0\\{{\rm{{\rm H}}}_{\rm{a}}}:\rho \ne 0\end{array}\)

The samplesize is10(n).

The test statistic is computed as follows:

\(\begin{aligned} t &= \frac{r}{{\sqrt {\frac{{1 - {r^2}}}{{n - 2}}} }}\\ &= \frac{{0.906}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{1 - {{0.906}^2}}}{{10 - 2}}} }}\\ &= 6.054\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the test statistic is 6.054.

The degree of freedom is computedbelow:

\(\begin{aligned} df &= n - 2\\ &= 10 - 2\\ &= 8\end{aligned}\)

The p-value is computedfrom the t-distribution table.

\(\begin{aligned} p{\rm{ - value}} &= 2P\left( {T > t} \right)\\ &= 2P\left( {T > 6.054} \right)\\ &= 2\left( {1 - P\left( {T < 6.054} \right)} \right)\\ &= 0.0003\end{aligned}\)

As thep-value is lesser than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.

Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to prove theexistence of a linear correlation between thetwo variables.

05

Analyze the scatterplot after removing the coordinates (10,10)

c.

The data without coordinate (10,10) is

x

y

1

1

2

1

3

1

1

2

1

3

2

2

2

3

3

2

3

3

The scatterplot hence formed is shown below:

Thus, there appears to be an association between the two variables.

06

Compute the correlation coefficient

The values are in the table below:

x

y

\({x^2}\)

\({y^2}\)

\(xy\)

1

1

1

1

1

2

1

4

1

2

3

1

9

1

3

1

2

1

4

2

1

3

1

9

3

2

2

4

4

4

2

3

4

9

6

3

2

9

4

6

3

3

9

9

9

\(\sum x = 18\)

\(\sum y = 18\)

\(\sum {{x^2}} = 42\)

\(\sum {{y^2} = } \;42\)

\(\sum {xy\; = \;} 36\)

Substitute the values to obtain the correlation coefficient:

\(\begin{aligned} r &= \frac{{9\left( {36} \right) - \left( {18} \right)\left( {18} \right)}}{{\sqrt {9\left( {42} \right) - {{\left( {18} \right)}^2}} \sqrt {9{{\left( {42} \right)}^2} - {{\left( {18} \right)}^2}} }}\\ &= 0\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the correlation coefficient is 0.

07

Conduct a hypothesis test for correlation

Let\(\rho \)denote the actual correlation coefficient.

The hypotheses areformulatedas shown below

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\rm{H}}_{\rm{o}}}:\rho = 0\\{{\rm{{\rm H}}}_{\rm{a}}}:\rho \ne 0\end{array}\)

The samplesize is9(n).

The test statistic is computed as follows:

\(\begin{aligned} t &= \frac{r}{{\sqrt {\frac{{1 - {r^2}}}{{n - 2}}} }}\\ &= \frac{0}{{\sqrt {\frac{{1 - {0^2}}}{{9 - 2}}} }}\\ &= 0\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the test statistic is 0.

The degree of freedom is computedbelow:

\(\begin{aligned} df &= n - 2\\ &= 9 - 2\\ &= 7\end{aligned}\)

The p-value is computed from the t-distribution table.

\(\begin{aligned} p - value &= 2P\left( {t > 0} \right)\\ &= 2\left( {1 - P\left( {t < 0} \right)} \right)\\ &= 1\end{aligned}\)

As the p-value is greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis fails to be rejected.

Therefore, there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the variables have a linear correlation between them.

08

Discuss the effect of a single pair of values

The result changes to a large extent as one single paired observation is removed from the data. The correlation measure changes from 0.906 to 0 as one pair is removed from the data.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Interpreting the Coefficient of Determination. In Exercises 5鈥8, use the value of the linear correlation coefficient r to find the coefficient of determination and the percentage of the total variation that can be explained by the linear relationship between the two variables.

Pizza and Subways r = 0.992 (x = cost of a slice of pizza, y = subway fare in New York City

In Exercises 5鈥8, we want to consider the correlation between heights of fathers and mothers and the heights of their sons. Refer to the

StatCrunch display and answer the given questions or identify the indicated items.

The display is based on Data Set 5 鈥淔amily Heights鈥 in Appendix B.

Should the multiple regression equation be used for predicting the height of a son based on the height of his father and mother? Why or why not?

The following exercises are based on the following sample data consisting of numbers of enrolled students (in thousands) and numbers of burglaries for randomly selected large colleges in a recent year (based on data from the New York Times).

Repeat the preceding exercise, assuming that the linear correlation coefficient is r= 0.997.

Explore! Exercises 9 and 10 provide two data sets from 鈥淕raphs in Statistical Analysis,鈥 by F. J. Anscombe, the American Statistician, Vol. 27. For each exercise,

a. Construct a scatterplot.

b. Find the value of the linear correlation coefficient r, then determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support the claim of a linear correlation between the two variables.

c. Identify the feature of the data that would be missed if part (b) was completed without constructing the scatterplot.

x

10

8

13

9

11

14

6

4

12

7

5

y

9.14

8.14

8.74

8.77

9.26

8.10

6.13

3.10

9.13

7.26

4.74

Interpreting the Coefficient of Determination. In Exercises 5鈥8, use the value of the linear correlation coefficient r to find the coefficient of determination and the percentage of the total variation that can be explained by the linear relationship between the two variables.

Bears r = 0.783 (x = head width of a bear, y = weight of a bear)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.