/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 22 Test the given claim. Identify t... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. A study investigated rates of fatalities among patients with serious traumatic injuries. Among 61,909 patients transported by helicopter, 7813 died. Among 161,566 patients transported by ground services, 17,775 died (based on data from "Association Between Helicopter vs Ground Emergency Medical Services and Survival for Adults With Major Trauma," by Galvagno et al., Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. \(307,\) No. 15 ). Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the rate of fatalities is higher for patients transported by helicopter. a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test. b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval. c. Considering the test results and the actual sample rates, is one mode of transportation better than the other? Are there other important factors to consider?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Reject the null hypothesis. Fatality rate is higher for helicopter-transported patients. Confidence interval confirms this finding.

Step by step solution

01

- Define Null Hypothesis and Alternative Hypothesis

Let the proportion of fatalities for helicopter transport be denoted as \( p_1 \) and for ground transport be \( p_2 \). The null hypothesis \( H_0 \) and alternative hypothesis \( H_1 \) are:\( H_0: p_1 \, \leq \, p_2 \)\( H_1: p_1 \, > \, p_2 \)
02

- Calculate Sample Proportions

Compute the sample proportions for each group.Helicopter: \( \, \hat{p}_1 = \, \frac{7813}{61909} \approx \, 0.126 \)Ground: \( \, \hat{p}_2 = \, \frac{17775}{161566} \approx \, 0.110 \)
03

- Compute the Test Statistic

Use the formula for the test statistic for comparing two proportions:\[ z = \, \frac{\hat{p}_1 \, - \, \hat{p}_2}{\sqrt{\hat{p}(1-\hat{p})\left(\frac{1}{n_1}\,+\,\frac{1}{n_2}\right)}} \]Where \( \hat{p} \) is the combined sample proportion:\[ \hat{p} = \frac{x_1 + x_2}{n_1 + n_2} = \frac{7813 + 17775}{61909 + 161566} \approx 0.114 \]Then the test statistic is:\[ z = \, \frac{0.126 - 0.110}{\sqrt{0.114 \times (1 - 0.114) \times \left( \frac{1}{61909} + \frac{1}{161566} \right) }} \approx 7.03 \]
04

- Determine Critical Value and P-value

Using a significance level of 0.01, the critical value for a one-tailed test is:\[ z_{critical} = 2.33 \]The P-value for the calculated test statistic is practically 0 (P < 0.01).
05

- State the Conclusion About the Null Hypothesis

Since the test statistic (7.03) is greater than the critical value (2.33), and the P-value is less than 0.01, reject the null hypothesis \( H_0 \).
06

- Provide Final Conclusion Addressing the Original Claim

At a 0.01 significance level, there is enough evidence to support the claim that the rate of fatalities is higher for patients transported by helicopter.
07

- Construct a Confidence Interval

To construct a confidence interval for the difference in proportions, use the formula:\[ (\hat{p}_1 - \hat{p}_2) \, \pm \, Z_{\alpha/2} \times \sqrt{ \frac{\hat{p}_1 (1 - \hat{p}_1)}{n_1} + \frac{\hat{p}_2 (1 - \hat{p}_2)}{n_2} } \]At a 99% confidence level, \( Z_{\alpha/2} = 2.575 \).The confidence interval is:\[ (0.126 - 0.110) \, \pm \, 2.575 \times \sqrt{ \frac{0.126 (0.874)}{61909} + \frac{0.110 (0.890)}{161566} } \approx \, 0.016 \, \pm \, 0.007 \]This results in the interval: [0.009, 0.023]
08

- Interpret Confidence Interval

Since the confidence interval [0.009, 0.023] does not include 0, it supports the conclusion that the fatality rate is higher for helicopter-transported patients.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

null hypothesis
In hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis, symbolized as \(H_0\), states that there is no significant effect or difference in the context of the study. It's a default position that assumes there is no relationship between the variables.
For this exercise, we are comparing the fatality rates of patients transported by helicopter and ground services. The null hypothesis is: \(H_0: p_1 \leq p_2\). This means that we assume there is no higher fatality rate for patients transported by helicopter compared to those transported by ground.
The null hypothesis is always tested with the aim of providing evidence to accept or reject it, which helps in making informed conclusions about the data.
alternative hypothesis
Contrary to the null hypothesis, the alternative hypothesis, noted as \(H_1\), suggests that there is a significant effect or difference. It is what you aim to prove.
In our example, the alternative hypothesis is: \(H_1: p_1 > p_2\). This posits that the fatality rate for patients transported by helicopter is higher than that for those transported by ground services.
To establish the alternative hypothesis, we need to provide sufficient evidence to show that the observed effect is true and not due to random chance. This is typically done through statistical tests that measure the probability of our results assuming the null hypothesis is true.
P-value
The P-value is a measure that helps you determine the significance of your results in a hypothesis test. It's the probability of obtaining test results at least as extreme as the observed results, assuming that the null hypothesis is true.
In this problem, the P-value is calculated from the test statistic (Z-score). The smaller the P-value, the stronger the evidence against the null hypothesis. In our case, the P-value is practically zero (\(P < 0.01\)), which is less than the significance level of 0.01. This leads us to reject the null hypothesis.
Essentially, a low P-value indicates that the observed data is highly unlikely under the null hypothesis, suggesting that the alternative hypothesis is likely true.
test statistic
A test statistic is a standardized value that is calculated from sample data during a hypothesis test. It helps to determine whether to reject the null hypothesis.
For comparing two proportions like in this exercise, we use the Z-test. The formula for the test statistic for comparing two proportions is:
\(z = \frac{\text{prop}_1 - \text{prop}_2}{\text{SE}}\)
Where SE is the standard error calculated based on both sample proportions and sizes.
In this problem, the test statistic came out to be approximately 7.03. This high value, being far exceeding the critical value of 2.33 at a 0.01 significance level, indicates that the difference in fatality rates between helicopter and ground transportation is statistically significant.
confidence interval
A confidence interval (CI) gives an estimated range of values which is likely to include the parameter of interest. It is calculated from the sample data and provides a measure of the uncertainty around the sample estimate.
To construct a CI for the difference in proportions, we use the formula:
\[\text{diff} \, \pm \, Z_{\alpha/2} \, \times \, \text{SE} \]
Where diff is the difference between sample proportions, \(Z_{\alpha/2} \) is the critical value for the desired confidence level, and SE is the standard error.
For a 99% CI in this case, the result is [0.009, 0.023], which does not include zero. This supports our conclusion that there is a statistically significant difference in fatality rates, with helicopter transport having a higher fatality rate.
fatalities rate comparison
Fatality rate comparison looks at the mortality rates between two groups to understand if there is a significant difference. In this exercise, we compare the fatality rates of patients transported by helicopter versus those transported by ground services.
The sample proportions showed that 12.6% of patients transported by helicopter died, whereas only 11% of those transported by ground services died. The hypothesis testing and confidence interval calculated both supported the conclusion that the fatality rate is indeed higher for helicopter transport.
While the statistical analysis shows a higher fatality rate for helicopter transport, it's essential to consider other influencing factors like the severity of injuries, distance to the hospital, and availability of medical facilities. Statistical conclusions should always be complemented with contextual understanding to derive meaningful insights.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. A study investigated survival rates for in-hospital patients who suffered cardiac arrest. Among 58,593 patients who had cardiac arrest during the day, 11,604 survived and were discharged. Among 28,155 patients who suffered cardiac arrest at night, 4139 survived and were discharged (based on data from "Survival from In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest During Nights and Weekends," by Peberdy et al., Joumal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 299, No. 7). We want to use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the survival rates are the same for day and night. a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test. b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval. c. Based on the results, does it appear that for in-hospital patients who suffer cardiac arrest, the survival rate is the same for day and night?

Assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. (Note: Answers in Appendix D include technology answers based on Formula 9 - 1 along with "Table" answers based on Table \(A\) - 3 with df equal to the smaller of \(\boldsymbol{n}_{I}-\boldsymbol{I}\) and \(\boldsymbol{n}_{2}-\boldsymbol{I} .\) ) Color and Creativity Researchers from the University of British Columbia conducted trials to investigate the effects of color on creativity. Subjects with a red background were asked to think of creative uses for a brick; other subjects with a blue background were given the same task. Responses were scored by a panel of judges and results from scores of creativity are given below. Higher scores correspond to more creativity. The researchers make the claim that "blue enhances performance on a creative task." a. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that blue enhances performance on a creative task. b. Construct the confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a). What is it about the confidence interval that causes us to reach the same conclusion from part (a)? $$\begin{array}{l|l} \hline \text { Red Background: } & n=35, \bar{x}=3.39, s=0.97 \\ \hline \text { Blue Background: } & n=36, \bar{x}=3.97, s=0.63 \\ \hline \end{array}$$

In one segment of the TV series MythBusters, an experiment was conducted to test the common belief that people are more likely to yawn when they see others yawning. In one group, 34 subjects were exposed to yawning, and 10 of them yawned. In another group, 16 subjects were not exposed to yawning, and 4 of them yawned. We want to test the belief that people are more likely to yawn when they are exposed to yawning. a. Why can't we test the claim using the methods of this section? b. If we ignore the requirements and use the methods of this section, what is the \(P\) -value? How does it compare to the \(P\) -value of 0.5128 that would be obtained by using Fisher's exact test? c. Comment on the conclusion of the Mythbusters segment that yawning is contagious.

Use the listed paired sample data, and assume that the samples are simple random samples and that the differences have a distribution that is approximately normal. As part of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, the Department of Health and Human Services obtained self-reported heights (in.) and measured heights (in.) for males aged \(12-16 .\) Listed below are sample results. Construct a \(99 \%\) confidence interval estimate of the mean difference between reported heights and measured heights. Interpret the resulting confidence interval, and comment on the implications of whether the confidence interval limits contain \(0 .\) $$\begin{array}{|l|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline \text { Reported } & 68 & 71 & 63 & 70 & 71 & 60 & 65 & 64 & 54 & 63 & 66 & 72 \\ \hline \text { Measured } & 67.9 & 69.9 & 64.9 & 68.3 & 70.3 & 60.6 & 64.5 & 67.0 & 55.6 & 74.2 & 65.0 & 70.8 \\ \hline \end{array}$$

Assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. (Note: Answers in Appendix D include technology answers based on Formula 9 - 1 along with "Table" answers based on Table \(A\) - 3 with df equal to the smaller of \(\boldsymbol{n}_{I}-\boldsymbol{I}\) and \(\boldsymbol{n}_{2}-\boldsymbol{I} .\) ) Blanking Out on Tests Many students have had the unpleasant experience of panicking on a test because the first question was exceptionally difficult. The arrangement of test items was studied for its effect on anxiety. The following scores are measures of "debilitating test anxiety." which most of us call panic or blanking out (based on data from "Item Arrangement, Cognitive Entry Characteristics, Sex and Test Anxiety as Predictors of Achievement in Examination Performance," by Klimko, Journal of Experimental Education, Vol. 52, No. 4.) Is there sufficient evidence to support the claim that the two populations of scores have different means? Is there sufficient evidence to support the claim that the arrangement of the test items has an effect on the score? Is the conclusion affected by whether the significance level is 0.05 or 0.01? $$\begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline {}{} {\text { Questions Arranged from Easy to Difficult }} \\ \hline 24.64 & 39.29 & 16.32 & 32.83 & 28.02 \\ \hline 33.31 & 20.60 & 21.13 & 26.69 & 28.90 \\ \hline 26.43 & 24.23 & 7.10 & 32.86 & 21.06 \\ \hline 28.89 & 28.71 & 31.73 & 30.02 & 21.96 \\ \hline 25.49 & 38.81 & 27.85 & 30.29 & 30.72 \\ \hline\end{array}$$ $$\begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|} \hline {}{} {\text { Questions Arranged from Difficult to Easy }} \\ \hline 33.62 & 34.02 & 26.63 & 30.26 \\ \hline 35.91 & 26.68 & 29.49 & 35.32 \\ \hline 27.24 & 32.34 & 29.34 & 33.53 \\ \hline 27.62 & 42.91 & 30.20 & 32.54 \\ \hline\end{array}$$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.