/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 12 Use the listed paired sample dat... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Use the listed paired sample data, and assume that the samples are simple random samples and that the differences have a distribution that is approximately normal. Listed below are "attractiveness" ratings made by participants in a speed dating session. Each attribute rating is the sum of the ratings of five attributes (sincerity, intelligence, fun, ambition, shared interests). The listed ratings are from Data Set 18 "Speed Dating." Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that there is a difference between female attractiveness ratings and male attractiveness ratings. $$\begin{array}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \text { Rating of Male by Female } & 4.0 & 8.0 & 7.0 & 7.0 & 6.0 & 8.0 & 6.0 & 4.0 & 2.0 & 5.0 & 9.5 & 7.0 \\ \hline \text { Rating of Female by Male } & 6.0 & 8.0 & 7.0 & 9.0 & 5.0 & 7.0 & 5.0 & 4.0 & 6.0 & 8.0 & 6.0 & 5.0 \\ \hline \end{array}$$

Short Answer

Expert verified
There is not enough evidence to support a difference between female and male attractiveness ratings.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the Differences

Given the ratings of males by females \[ [4.0, 8.0, 7.0, 7.0, 6.0, 8.0, 6.0, 4.0, 2.0, 5.0, 9.5, 7.0] \] and the ratings of females by males \[ [6.0, 8.0, 7.0, 9.0, 5.0, 7.0, 5.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 6.0, 5.0] \]. Calculate the differences (rating of male by female - rating of female by male) for each pair. The differences are: \[ [-2.0, 0.0, 0.0, -2.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 0.0, -4.0, -3.0, 3.5, 2.0] \]
02

Calculate the Mean and Standard Deviation of Differences

Calculate the mean (\bar{d}) and standard deviation (\text{s}d) of the differences. Mean of differences: \[ \bar{d} = \frac{-2.0 + 0.0 + 0.0 - 2.0 + 1.0 + 1.0 + 1.0 + 0.0 - 4.0 - 3.0 + 3.5 + 2.0}{12} = -0.125 \] Calculate the standard deviation of differences: \[ s_d \approx 2.216 \]
03

State the Hypotheses

State the null hypothesis (H_0) and the alternative hypothesis (H_1). \[ H_0: \mu_d = 0 \] (There is no difference between female and male attractiveness ratings) \[ H_1: \mu_d eq 0 \] (There is a difference between female and male attractiveness ratings)
04

Calculate the Test Statistic

Use the formula to find t: \[ t = \frac{\bar{d} - \mu_d}{s_d / \sqrt{n}} \] Where \( \bar{d} = -0.125 \), \( \mu_d = 0 \), \( s_d \approx 2.216 \), and \( n = 12 \). \[ t = \frac{-0.125 - 0}{2.216 / \sqrt{12}} \approx -0.197 \]
05

Determine the Critical t-Value

Using a significance level of 0.05 with \( n-1 = 11 \) degrees of freedom, find the critical t-value from the t-distribution table, which is approximately \( \pm 2.201 \).
06

Make the Decision

Compare the calculated t-value with the critical t-value. If \(|t| < 2.201\), fail to reject \(H_0\). Here, \( |-0.197| < 2.201 \), so we fail to reject \( H_0 \).
07

Conclusion

Since we fail to reject the null hypothesis, we conclude that there is not enough evidence to support the claim that there is a difference between female and male attractiveness ratings.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a crucial method used in statistics to determine if there is enough evidence to support a specific claim about a population parameter. In this exercise, we want to test if there’s a significant difference between female and male attractiveness ratings.
We start by formulating two hypotheses: the null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) and the alternative hypothesis (\(H_1\)).
  • \(H_0\) states there is no difference in ratings (\(\mu_d = 0\)).
  • \(H_1\) states there is a difference in ratings (\(\mu_d eq 0\)).

After defining these hypotheses, we calculate a test statistic to determine which hypothesis is supported by the data. If the test statistic falls within a critical region, we reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis.
Significance Level
The significance level, denoted as \(\alpha\), is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true. It measures the risk of making a Type I error.
In this exercise, we use a significance level of 0.05, which means we are accepting a 5% chance of incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis.

For example, with \(\alpha = 0.05\) in our problem, we compare our test statistic to the critical values from the t-distribution table corresponding to 95% confidence level. If our test statistic falls within these critical values, we do not reject the null hypothesis.
t-Distribution
The t-distribution is used in statistics when the sample size is small and/or the population standard deviation is unknown. It is similar to the normal distribution but has thicker tails, providing more allowance for variability in small samples.

In this problem, because we have a small sample size (n = 12), we use the t-distribution. We calculate our test statistic using the t-formula: \[ t = \frac{\bar{d} - \mu_d}{s_d / \sqrt{n}} \]
We then compare this calculated t-value to the critical t-value (found in t-tables) to determine whether to reject the null hypothesis.
Mean Differences
Calculating the mean difference is a key step in a paired sample t-test. Here, we subtract the rating of each female by a male from the rating of each male by a female.
These differences help us understand if there’s a consistent trend in one set of ratings being higher or lower than the other.

For example, the differences in our problem are: \[ [-2.0, 0.0, 0.0, -2.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 0.0, -4.0, -3.0, 3.5, 2.0] \]
We then compute the mean of these differences (\(\bar{d}\)), which in our case is -0.125. This mean difference helps in calculating the t-statistic for the hypothesis test.
Standard Deviation
The standard deviation (\(s_d\)) of the differences measures the amount of variability or spread in our data.
It is calculated based on the differences between each pair of ratings. A higher standard deviation indicates that the data points are spread out over a wider range of values.

In this exercise, the standard deviation of our differences is approximately 2.216. This value is used in the formula to calculate the t-statistic, which will help us decide whether to accept or reject the null hypothesis.
Understanding the standard deviation is crucial as it influences the width of confidence intervals and the test's sensitivity.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Use the listed paired sample data, and assume that the samples are simple random samples and that the differences have a distribution that is approximately normal. A popular theory is that presidential candidates have an advantage if they are taller than their main opponents. Listed are heights (cm) of presidents along with the heights of their main opponents (from Data Set 15 "Presidents"). a. Use the sample data with a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that for the population of heights of presidents and their main opponents, the differences have a mean greater than \(0 \mathrm{cm} .\) b. Construct the confidence interval that could be used for the hypothesis test described in part (a). What feature of the confidence interval leads to the same conclusion reached in part (a)? $$\begin{array}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \text { Height (cm) of President } & 185 & 178 & 175 & 183 & 193 & 173 \\\ \hline \text { Height (cm) of Main Opponent } & 171 & 180 & 173 & 175 & 188 & 178 \\ \hline \end{array}$$

Use the listed paired sample data, and assume that the samples are simple random samples and that the differences have a distribution that is approximately normal. Listed below are "attribute" ratings made by participants in a speed dating session. Each attribute rating is the sum of the ratings of five attributes (sincerity, intelligence, fun, ambition, shared interests). The listed ratings are from Data Set 18 "Speed Dating" in Appendix B. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that there is a difference between female attribute ratings and male attribute ratings. $$\begin{array}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \text { Rating of Male by Female } & 29 & 38 & 36 & 37 & 30 & 34 & 35 & 23 & 43 \\ \hline \text { Rating of Female by Male } & 36 & 34 & 34 & 33 & 31 & 17 & 31 & 30 & 42 \\ \hline \end{array}$$

Test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. A trial was conducted with 75 women in China given a 100-yuan bill, while another 75 women in China were given 100 yuan in the form of smaller bills (a 50-yuan bill plus two 20-yuan bills plus two 5-yuan bills). Among those given the single bill, 60 spent some or all of the money. Among those given the smaller bills, 68 spent some or all of the money (based on data from "The Denomination Effect," by Raghubir and Srivastava, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 36). We want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that when given a single large bill, a smaller proportion of women in China spend some or all of the money when compared to the proportion of women in China given the same amount in smaller bills. a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test. b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval. c. If the significance level is changed to 0.01, does the conclusion change?

Use the listed paired sample data, and assume that the samples are simple random samples and that the differences have a distribution that is approximately normal. A study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of hypnotism in reducing pain. Results for randomly selected subjects are given in the accompanying table (based on "An Analysis of Factors That Contribute to the Efficacy of Hypnotic Analgesia," by Price and Barber, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Vol. 96, No. 1). The values are before and after hypnosis; the measurements are in centimeters on a pain scale. Higher values correspond to greater levels of pain. Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the mean of the "before/after" differences. Does hypnotism appear to be effective in reducing pain? $$\begin{array}{l|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c} \hline \text { Subject } & \text { A } & \text { B } & \text { C } & \text { D } & \text { E } & \text { F } & \text { G } & \text { H } \\ \hline \text { Before } & 6.6 & 6.5 & 9.0 & 10.3 & 11.3 & 8.1 & 6.3 & 11.6 \\ \hline \text { After } & 6.8 & 2.4 & 7.4 & 8.5 & 8.1 & 6.1 & 3.4 & 2.0 \\ \hline \end{array}$$

Assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. (Note: Answers in Appendix D include technology answers based on Formula 9 - 1 along with "Table" answers based on Table \(A\) - 3 with df equal to the smaller of \(\boldsymbol{n}_{I}-\boldsymbol{I}\) and \(\boldsymbol{n}_{2}-\boldsymbol{I} .\) ) Is Old Faithful Not Quite So Faithful? Listed below are time intervals (min) between eruptions of the Old Faithful geyser. The "recent" times are within the past few years, and the "past" times are from 1995. Does it appear that the mean time interval has changed? Is the conclusion affected by whether the significance level is 0.05 or \(0.01 ?\) $$\begin{array}{l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l} \hline \text { Recent } & 78 & 91 & 89 & 79 & 57 & 100 & 62 & 87 & 70 & 88 & 82 & 83 & 56 & 81 & 74 & 102 & 61 \\ \hline \text { Past } & 89 & 88 & 97 & 98 & 64 & 85 & 85 & 96 & 87 & 95 & 90 & 95 & & & & & \\ \hline\end{array}$$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.