/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 24 According to Benford's law, a va... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

According to Benford's law, a variety of different data sets include numbers with leading (first) digits that follow the distribution shown in the table below.Test for goodness-of-fit with the distribution described by Benford's law. $$\begin{array}{l|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c} \hline \text { Leading Digit } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 & 9 \\ \hline \begin{array}{l} \text { Benford's Law: Distribution } \\ \text { of Leading Digits } \end{array} & 30.1 \% & 17.6 \% & 12.5 \% & 9.7 \% & 7.9 \% & 6.7 \% & 5.8 \% & 5.1 \% & 4.6 \% \\ \hline \end{array}$$ The author recorded the leading digits of the sizes of the clectronic document files for the current edition of this book. The leading digits have frequencies of \(55,25,17,24,18,12,12,3,\) and 4 (corresponding to the leading digits of 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 and \(9,\) respectively). Using a 0.05 significance level, test for goodness-of-fit with Benford's law.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Calculate expected frequencies, perform chi-square test, compare to critical value to determine if the distribution follows Benford's Law.

Step by step solution

01

- Define the Hypotheses

Set up the null and alternative hypotheses. The null hypothesis \(H_0\) states that the leading digits follow Benford's Law. The alternative hypothesis \(H_1\) states that the leading digits do not follow Benford's Law.
02

- Calculate Expected Frequencies

Using the sample size of the leading digits (in this case, the sum of the frequencies of the digits), compute the expected frequencies by multiplying the sample size by the Benford's Law proportions. The sample size \(n = 55 + 25 + 17 + 24 + 18 + 12 + 12 + 3 + 4 = 170\). For each digit, \[ \text{Expected Frequency} = \text{Benford's Law percentage} \times \text{Total sample size} \]
03

- Perform Calculations for Each Digit

Calculate the expected frequency for each leading digit: \(1: 170 \times 0.301 = 51.17\), \(2: 170 \times 0.176 = 29.92\), \(3: 170 \times 0.125 = 21.25\), \(4: 170 \times 0.097 = 16.49\), \(5: 170 \times 0.079 = 13.43\), \(6: 170 \times 0.067 = 11.39\), \(7: 170 \times 0.058 = 9.86\), \(8: 170 \times 0.051 = 8.67\), \(9: 170 \times 0.046 = 7.82\).
04

- Conduct Chi-Square Test

Use the Chi-Square test formula: \[ \chi^2 = \sum \frac{(O_i - E_i)^2}{E_i} \] where \(O_i\) are the observed frequencies and \(E_i\) are the expected frequencies. Calculate it for each digit: \(\chi^2 = \frac{(55 - 51.17)^2}{51.17} + \frac{(25 - 29.92)^2}{29.92} + ... + \frac{(4 - 7.82)^2}{7.82} \)
05

- Find Chi-Square Critical Value

Determine the chi-square critical value at the 0.05 significance level with degrees of freedom \(df = \text{number of categories} - 1 = 9 - 1 = 8\). Look up the critical value in a chi-square distribution table, which is 15.507.
06

- Compare and Conclude

Compare the computed chi-square statistic with the critical value. If \(\chi^2\) is less than or equal to 15.507, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Otherwise, we reject the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Test
The Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Test is a statistical hypothesis test used to determine if a sample data matches a population with a specific distribution. In our case, we want to check if the leading digits of the electronic document file sizes follow Benford's Law.

The test involves several steps: calculating the expected frequencies based on Benford's Law, comparing these expected frequencies with the observed frequencies from the sample data, and then computing the chi-square statistic using the formula:
\[ \chi^2 = \sum \frac{(O_i - E_i)^2}{E_i} \]
Here, \( O_i \) represents the observed frequencies, and \( E_i \) the expected frequencies. The result is then compared against a critical value from the chi-square distribution table to draw conclusions about our hypotheses.
Null and Alternative Hypotheses
Hypothesis testing begins with the formulation of two competing statements: the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis.

The **null hypothesis** \( H_0 \) assumes that there is no significant difference between the observed data and the expected data according to a specific distribution. For our exercise, this would mean that the leading digits follow Benford's Law.

Conversely, the **alternative hypothesis** \( H_1 \) suggests that there is a significant difference, implying that the leading digits do not follow Benford's Law. The goal of the test is to collect evidence to either reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Expected and Observed Frequencies
Understanding expected and observed frequencies is crucial in carrying out the Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Test.

**Observed frequencies** are the actual counts we obtain from our sample data. In our context, this means counting how many times each digit (1 through 9) appears as the leading digit in the document file sizes.
For instance:
  • Digit 1: 55
  • Digit 2: 25
  • ... and so on

**Expected frequencies** are the counts we expect to find if the data perfectly follows the theoretical distribution, in this case, Benford's Law. These are calculated by multiplying the total sample size by the percentage distribution provided by Benford's Law.
For digit 1:
\[ \text{Expected Frequency} = \text{170} \times 0.301 = 51.17 \]
Significance Level in Hypothesis Testing
The significance level, denoted by \( \alpha \), is a threshold used to determine whether the observed data is significantly different from the expected data under the null hypothesis.

Commonly set at 0.05 (5%), the significance level represents the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true.

In our test:
  • If the chi-square statistic is less than or equal to the critical value at \( \alpha = 0.05 \), we **fail to reject the null hypothesis**, concluding that the leading digits conform to Benford's Law.
  • If it exceeds the critical value, we **reject the null hypothesis**, suggesting that the leading digits do not follow Benford's Law.

For this exercise:
  • Degrees of freedom: 8 (number of categories minus one)
  • Critical value at \( \alpha = 0.05\) is 15.507

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

According to Benford's law, a variety of different data sets include numbers with leading (first) digits that follow the distribution shown in the table below.Test for goodness-of-fit with the distribution described by Benford's law. $$\begin{array}{l|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c} \hline \text { Leading Digit } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 & 9 \\ \hline \begin{array}{l} \text { Benford's Law: Distribution } \\ \text { of Leading Digits } \end{array} & 30.1 \% & 17.6 \% & 12.5 \% & 9.7 \% & 7.9 \% & 6.7 \% & 5.8 \% & 5.1 \% & 4.6 \% \\ \hline \end{array}$$ Exercise 21 lists the observed frequencies of leading digits from amounts on checks from seven suspect companies. Here are the observed frequencies of the leading digits from the amounts on the most recent checks written by the author at the time this exercise was created: \(83,58,27,21,21,21,6,4,9 .\) (Those observed frequencies correspond to the leading digits of \(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,\) and \(9,\) respectively.) Using a 0.01 significance level, test the claim that these leading digits are from a population of leading digits that conform to Benford's law. Does the conclusion change if the significance level is \(0.05 ?\)

Conduct the hypothesis test and provide the test statistic and the P-value and/or critical value, and state the conclusion. The author purchased a slot machine (Bally Model 809 ) and tested it by playing it 1197 times. There are 10 different categories of outcomes, including no win, win jackpot, win with three bells, and so on. When testing the claim that the observed outcomes agree with the expected frequencies, the author obtained a test statistic of \(x^{2}=8.185\) Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the actual outcomes agree with the expected frequencies. Does the slot machine appear to be functioning as expected?

Conduct the hypothesis test and provide the test statistic and the P-value and/or critical value, and state the conclusion. In analyzing hits by V-1 buzz bombs in World War II, South London was subdivided into regions, each with an area of 0.25 \(\mathrm{km}^{2} .\) Shown below is a table of actual frequencies of hits and the frequencies expected with the Poisson distribution. (The Poisson distribution is described in Section \(5-3 .\) ) Use the values listed and a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the actual frequencies fit a Poisson distribution. Does the result prove that the data conform to the Poisson distribution? $$\begin{array}{l|c|c|c|c|c} \hline \text { Number of Bomb Hits } & 0 & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 \text { or more } \\ \hline \text { Actual Number of Regions } & 229 & 211 & 93 & 35 & 8 \\ \hline \begin{array}{l} \text { Expected Number of Regions } \\ \text { (from Poisson Distribution) } \end{array} & 227.5 & 211.4 & 97.9 & 30.5 & 8.7 \\ \hline \end{array}$$

Conduct the hypothesis test and provide the test statistic and the P-value and/or critical value, and state the conclusion. In his book Outliers, author Malcolm Gladwell argues that more baseball players have birth dates in the months immediately following July \(31,\) because that was the age cutoff date for nonschool baseball leagues. Here is a sample of frequency counts of months of birth dates of American-born Major League Baseball players starting with January: 387,329,366,344 \(336,313,313,503,421,434,398,371 .\) Using a 0.05 significance level, is there sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that American-born Major League Baseball players are born in different months with the same frequency? Do the sample values appear to support Gladwell's claim?

Conduct the hypothesis test and provide the test statistic and the P-value and/or critical value, and state the conclusion. A classic story involves four carpooling students who missed a test and gave as an excuse a flat tire. On the makeup test, the instructor asked the students to identify the particular tire that went flat. If they really didn't have a flat tire, would they be able to identify the same tire? The author asked 41 other students to identify the tire they would select. The results are listed in the following table (except for one student who selected the spare). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the author's claim that the results fit a uniform distribution. What does the result suggest about the likelihood of four students identifying the same tire when they really didn't have a flat? $$\begin{array}{lc|c|c|c} \hline \text { Tire } & \text { Left Front } & \text { Right Front } & \text { Left Rear } & \text { Right Rear } \\ \hline \text { Number Selected } & 11 & 15 & 8 & 6 \\ \hline \end{array}$$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.