/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 22 According to Benford's law, a va... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

According to Benford's law, a variety of different data sets include numbers with leading (first) digits that follow the distribution shown in the table below.Test for goodness-of-fit with the distribution described by Benford's law. $$\begin{array}{l|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c} \hline \text { Leading Digit } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 & 9 \\ \hline \begin{array}{l} \text { Benford's Law: Distribution } \\ \text { of Leading Digits } \end{array} & 30.1 \% & 17.6 \% & 12.5 \% & 9.7 \% & 7.9 \% & 6.7 \% & 5.8 \% & 5.1 \% & 4.6 \% \\ \hline \end{array}$$ Exercise 21 lists the observed frequencies of leading digits from amounts on checks from seven suspect companies. Here are the observed frequencies of the leading digits from the amounts on the most recent checks written by the author at the time this exercise was created: \(83,58,27,21,21,21,6,4,9 .\) (Those observed frequencies correspond to the leading digits of \(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,\) and \(9,\) respectively.) Using a 0.01 significance level, test the claim that these leading digits are from a population of leading digits that conform to Benford's law. Does the conclusion change if the significance level is \(0.05 ?\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
At 鉄ㄎ扁煩 = 0.01, we do not reject H鈧; the digits follow Benford's law. At 鉄ㄎ扁煩 = 0.05, we reject H鈧; the digits do not follow Benford's law.

Step by step solution

01

State the Hypotheses

State the null and alternative hypotheses. The null hypothesis (H鈧): The observed frequencies follow Benford's law.The alternative hypothesis (H鈧): The observed frequencies do not follow Benford's law.
02

Calculate the Expected Frequencies

Calculate the expected frequencies for each leading digit based on Benford's law and the total number of checks observed.Total checks = 250 (sum of observed frequencies)Expected frequencies:For leading digit 1: Expected frequency = 0.301 脳 250 = 75.25 For leading digit 2: Expected frequency = 0.176 脳 250 = 44 For leading digit 3: Expected frequency = 0.125 脳 250 = 31.25 For leading digit 4: Expected frequency = 0.097 脳 250 = 24.25 For leading digit 5: Expected frequency = 0.079 脳 250 = 19.75 For leading digit 6: Expected frequency = 0.067 脳 250 = 16.75 For leading digit 7: Expected frequency = 0.058 脳 250 = 14.5 For leading digit 8: Expected frequency = 0.051 脳 250 = 12.75 For leading digit 9: Expected frequency = 0.046 脳 250 = 11.5
03

Compute the Chi-Square Test Statistic

Compute the chi-square (蠂虏) test statistic using the formula: \[ 蠂虏 = \sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac {(O_i - E_i )虏}{E_i} \]Where 鉄∣_i鉄 are the observed frequencies and 鉄∣_i鉄 are the expected frequencies.鉄ㄏ嚶测煩 = ((83 - 75.25)虏 / 75.25) + ((58 - 44)虏 / 44) + ((27 - 31.25)虏 / 31.25) + ((21 - 24.25)虏 / 24.25) + ((21 - 19.75)虏 / 19.75) + ((21 - 16.75)虏 / 16.75) + ((6 - 14.5)虏 / 14.5) + ((4 - 12.75)虏 / 12.75) + ((9 - 11.5)虏 / 11.5)鉄ㄏ嚶测煩 = 0.779 + 4.273 + 0.578 + 0.436 + 0.084 + 1.089 + 4.976 + 5.018 + 0.543 = 17.776
04

Determine the Degrees of Freedom

Calculate the degrees of freedom (鉄╠f鉄):鉄╠f鉄 = (number of leading digits - 1)鉄╠f鉄 = 9 - 1 = 8
05

Compare Against Chi-Square Distribution

Compare the computed chi-square value to the critical value from chi-square distribution tables for 鉄╠f鉄 = 8 at the significance levels of 0.01 and 0.05.For 鉄ㄎ扁煩 = 0.01, critical value 鉄ㄏ嚶测煩 (8) = 20.090For 鉄ㄎ扁煩 = 0.05, critical value 鉄ㄏ嚶测煩 (8) = 15.507Since 17.776 < 20.090 but 17.776 > 15.507, this leads to rejection of H鈧 at the 0.05 significance level but not at 0.01 level.
06

Conclusion

Based on the chi-square test, at the significance level of 0.01, we do not reject the null hypothesis; hence, we cannot conclude that the leading digits do not follow Benford's law. However, at the significance level of 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis; thus, suggesting the leading digits do not conform to Benford's law.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

goodness-of-fit test
A goodness-of-fit test is a statistical test used to determine how well sample data fit a distribution from a population with a normal distribution. In this case, we want to test if the leading digits of some data follow Benford's Law. The goodness-of-fit test compares the observed data with the data we would expect if the null hypothesis is true. If the differences between the observed and expected data are too large, we can reject the null hypothesis.
chi-square test
The chi-square test, pronounced as 'kai-square,' is a statistical method used in a goodness-of-fit test to see if the observed data matches the expected data. The formula for the chi-square statistic is: \[ 蠂虏 = \sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac {(O_i - E_i )虏}{E_i} \]Where \( O_i \) is the observed frequency for each category, and \( E_i \) is the expected frequency for each category based on Benford's Law. In our example, we calculate the chi-square test statistic by summing up the differences between observed and expected frequencies squared, divided by the expected frequencies for each of the leading digits from 1 to 9.
null hypothesis
The null hypothesis, often denoted by \( H_0 \), is a statement assumed to be true for the purposes of testing. In the context of our chi-square test for Benford's Law, the null hypothesis is that the observed leading digit frequencies follow Benford's Law. The alternative hypothesis \( H_1 \) is that the frequencies do not follow Benford's Law. The goal of the test is to determine whether there is enough statistical evidence to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis.
significance level
The significance level, often denoted by \( \, 伪 \, \), is the threshold at which you decide whether an observed result is statistically significant. Common significance levels are 0.01 and 0.05. In our test, these correspond to a 1% and 5% likelihood, respectively, of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true (Type I error). If the calculated chi-square statistic is greater than the critical value for a given significance level and degrees of freedom, we reject the null hypothesis. In our example, at the 0.05 significance level, we reject \( H_0 \), while at the 0.01 level, we do not.
leading digits distribution
The leading digits distribution according to Benford's Law states that in many naturally occurring collections of numbers, the first digits are not uniformly distributed. Instead, smaller digits occur more frequently as leading digits. For example, the number '1' appears as the leading digit about 30.1% of the time, '2' appears 17.6% of the time, and so on, decreasing to '9', which appears 4.6% of the time. This distribution forms the basis for our expected frequencies in the chi-square goodness-of-fit test.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

According to Benford's law, a variety of different data sets include numbers with leading (first) digits that follow the distribution shown in the table below.Test for goodness-of-fit with the distribution described by Benford's law. $$\begin{array}{l|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c} \hline \text { Leading Digit } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 & 9 \\ \hline \begin{array}{l} \text { Benford's Law: Distribution } \\ \text { of Leading Digits } \end{array} & 30.1 \% & 17.6 \% & 12.5 \% & 9.7 \% & 7.9 \% & 6.7 \% & 5.8 \% & 5.1 \% & 4.6 \% \\ \hline \end{array}$$ When working for the Brooklyn district attorney, investigator Robert Burton analyzed the leading digits of the amounts from 784 checks issued by seven suspect companies. The frequencies were found to be \(0,15,0,76,479,183,8,23,\) and \(0,\) and those digits correspond to the leading digits of \(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,\) and \(9,\) respectively. If the observed frequencies are substantially different from the frequencies expected with Benford's law, the check amounts appear to result from fraud. Use a 0.01 significance level to test for goodnessof-fit with Benford's law. Does it appear that the checks are the result of fraud?

Conduct the hypothesis test and provide the test statistic and the P-value and/or critical value, and state the conclusion. The police department in Madison, Connecticut, released the following numbers of calls for the different days of the week during a February that had 28 days: Monday (114): Tuesday (152): Wednesday (160); Thursday (164): Friday (179); Saturday (196): Sunday (130). Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the different days of the weck have the same frequencies of police calls. Is there anything notable about the observed frequencies?

Conduct the hypothesis test and provide the test statistic and the P-value and/or critical value, and state the conclusion. The author purchased a slot machine (Bally Model 809 ) and tested it by playing it 1197 times. There are 10 different categories of outcomes, including no win, win jackpot, win with three bells, and so on. When testing the claim that the observed outcomes agree with the expected frequencies, the author obtained a test statistic of \(x^{2}=8.185\) Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the actual outcomes agree with the expected frequencies. Does the slot machine appear to be functioning as expected?

In a study of the "denomination effect;" 43 college students were each given one dollar in the form of four quarters, while 46 other college students were each given one dollar in the form of a dollar bill. All of the students were then given two choices: (1) keep the money; (2) spend the money on gum. The results are given in the accompanying table (based on "The Denomination Effect," by Priya Raghubir and Joydeep Srivastava, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 36.) Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that whether students purchased gum or kept the money is independent of whether they were given four quarters or a SI bill. Is there a "denomination effect"? $$\begin{array}{l|c|c} \hline & \text { Purchased Gum } & \text { Kept the Money } \\ \hline \text { Students Given Four Quarters } & 27 & 16 \\ \hline \text { Students Given a S1 Bill } & 12 & 34 \\ \hline \end{array}$$

Conduct the hypothesis test and provide the test statistic and the P-value and/or critical value, and state the conclusion. In his book Outliers, author Malcolm Gladwell argues that more baseball players have birth dates in the months immediately following July \(31,\) because that was the age cutoff date for nonschool baseball leagues. Here is a sample of frequency counts of months of birth dates of American-born Major League Baseball players starting with January: 387,329,366,344 \(336,313,313,503,421,434,398,371 .\) Using a 0.05 significance level, is there sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that American-born Major League Baseball players are born in different months with the same frequency? Do the sample values appear to support Gladwell's claim?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.