/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 53 Let \(P(x)\) and \(Q(x)\) be pre... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Let \(P(x)\) and \(Q(x)\) be predicates and suppose \(D\) is the domain of \(x\). In 53-56, for the statement forms in each pair, determine whether (a) they have the same truth value for every choice of \(P(x), Q(x)\), and \(D\), or (b) there is a choice of \(P(x), Q(x)\), and \(D\) for which they have opposite truth values. $$ \begin{aligned} &\forall x \in D,(P(x) \wedge Q(x)), \text { and } \\ &(\forall x \in D, P(x)) \wedge(\forall x \in D, Q(x)) \end{aligned} $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
The two statement forms have the same truth value for every choice of \(P(x), Q(x)\), and \(D\). In the given example with \(D = \{1\}\), \(P(x)\) as "x is even", and \(Q(x)\) as "x is odd", both statement forms evaluate to False, showing that they do not have opposite truth values for this choice of predicates and domain.

Step by step solution

01

Statement 1

: $$ \forall x \in D,(P(x) \wedge Q(x)) $$ This statement says that for every \(x\) in the domain \(D\), the predicates \(P(x)\) and \(Q(x)\) are both true.
02

Statement 2

: $$ (\forall x \in D, P(x)) \wedge(\forall x \in D, Q(x)) $$ This statement says that for every \(x\) in the domain \(D\), predicate \(P(x)\) is true, and for every \(x\) in the domain \(D\), predicate \(Q(x)\) is true. Now, let's see if we can find a choice of \(P(x), Q(x)\), and \(D\) for which these statements have opposite truth values.
03

Example

: Consider a domain \(D = \{1\}\). Let \(P(x)\) be the predicate "x is even" and \(Q(x)\) be the predicate "x is odd". For statement 1: $$ \forall x \in D, (P(x) \wedge Q(x)) $$ For the given \(P(x), Q(x)\), and \(D\), this statement means "For every \(x\) in the domain, \(x\) is both even and odd." Since there is no such number that is both even and odd, statement 1 is False in this case. For statement 2: $$ (\forall x \in D, P(x)) \wedge (\forall x \in D, Q(x)) $$ For the given \(P(x), Q(x)\), and \(D\), this statement means "For every \(x\) in the domain, \(x\) is even, and for every \(x\) in the domain \(x\) is odd." Since \(1\) is not even, the first part of the statement is False, and because the two conditions are conjoined with an "and" (i.e., \(\wedge\)), the entire statement 2 is False in this case.
04

Conclusion

: Since we found a choice of \(P(x), Q(x)\), and \(D\) for which both statements are False, they do not have opposite truth values and thus have the same truth value for this particular choice. Therefore, they have the same truth value for every choice of \(P(x), Q(x)\), and \(D\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Universal Quantifier
The universal quantifier is a symbol in predicate logic that is written as \(\forall\) and translates to 'for all' or 'for every'. It is used to indicate that the statement that follows holds true for every element within a certain domain. In a mathematical context, whenever we see the universal quantifier, we are dealing with statements that must apply universally to the subject matter in question.

Take, for example, the proposition \(\forall x \in D, P(x)\). This is read as 'For every x in the domain D, P(x) is true.' When working with universal quantifiers, the entire statement is only true if the predicate holds for every single element within the domain; even one exception would render the statement false. Understanding the universal quantifier is crucial as it forms the backbone of many mathematical proofs and logical arguments.
Predicate Logic
Predicate logic is a symbolic language that allows us to express statements involving variables and their properties in a formal manner. Predicates are statements or functions that return a truth value, true or false, depending on the inputs to the function. They are often denoted by capital letters and can be followed by variables, like \(P(x)\).

In predicate logic, we can express more complex statements using quantifiers and logical connectives. Predicate logic is highly useful in mathematics and computer science, providing a framework to formulate and solve problems in a precise and unambiguous way. It extends propositional logic by dealing with predicates and quantifiers, allowing for a more detailed analysis of the logical structure of statements.
Logical Conjunction
A logical conjunction is a fundamental operation in logic represented by the symbol \(\wedge\), and often read as 'and'. It is used to combine two or more propositions or predicates into a single statement that is only true when all of the combined elements are true. For instance, the statement \(P(x) \wedge Q(x)\) asserts that both \(P(x)\) and \(Q(x)\) are true for an element \(x\).

If either of the conjuncts is false, the entire conjunction is false; they must all be true to satisfy the conjunction. This operation is commutative, meaning that the order of the conjuncts does not impact the truth value of the statement. Logical conjunction plays a central role in constructing more involved logical expressions, and its understanding is critical when analyzing the logic of compound statements.
Truth Values
Truth values are the possible values that a logical statement can have. In classical logic, which is the most commonly used framework, there are two truth values: true and false. A statement such as \(P(x)\) has a truth value which is determined by whether the specific predicate applied to \(x\) corresponds with reality or a set of logical rules.

Truth values become even more interesting when we examine compound statements formed by several predicates and logical connectives. The overall truth value is a result of each part of the statement. The way these smaller parts interact is governed by truth tables that outline the outcomes of various logical operations, like conjunctions, disjunctions, and negations. Understanding how these operations affect the truth value of larger expressions is essential for working through problems in logic and mathematics.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In each of 14-19, (a) rewrite the statement in English without using the symbol \(\forall\) or \(\exists\) but expressing your answer as simply as possible, and (b) write a negation for the statement. \(\forall\) colors \(C, \exists\) an animal \(A\) such that \(A\) is colored \(C\).

Let \(Q(x, y)\) be the predicate "If \(x

How could you determine the truth or falsity of the following statements for the students in your discrete mathematics class? Assume that students will respond truthfully to questions that are asked of them. a. There is a student in this class who has dated at least one person from every residence hall at this school. b. There is a residence hall at this school with the property that every student in this class has dated at least one person from that residence hall. c. Every residence hall at this school has the property that if a student from this class has dated at least one person from that hall, then that student has dated at least two people from that hall.

Let \(C\) be the set of cities in the world, let \(N\) be the set of nations in the world, and let \(P(c, n)\) be " \(c\) is the capital city of \(n . "\) Determine the truth values of the following statements. a. P (Tokyo, Japan) b. \(P\) (Athens, Egypt) c. \(P\) (Paris, France) d. \(P\) (Miami, Brazil)

Use the facts that the negation of a \(\forall\) statement is a \(\exists\) statement and that the negation of an if-then statement is an and statement to rewrite each of the statements \(42-45\) without using the word sufficient or necessary. Having a large income is not a necessary condition for a person to be happy.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.