/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 30 Give the contrapositive, convers... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Give the contrapositive, converse, and inverse of each statement in the referenced exercise. Exercise 19

Short Answer

Expert verified
Contrapositive: "If the sum of A and B is not 90 degrees, then A and B are not complementary." Converse: "If the sum of A and B is 90 degrees, then A and B are complementary." Inverse: "If A and B are not complementary, then the sum of A and B is not 90 degrees."

Step by step solution

01

Find the contrapositive

Recall that the contrapositive of a statement "If p, then q" is "If not q, then not p." Using our symbols, this would be "If the sum of A and B is not 90 degrees, then A and B are not complementary."
02

Find the converse

The converse of a statement "If p, then q" is "If q, then p." In our case, this would be "If the sum of A and B is 90 degrees, then A and B are complementary."
03

Find the inverse

The inverse of a statement "If p, then q" is "If not p, then not q." For our problem, this would be "If A and B are not complementary, then the sum of A and B is not 90 degrees." So, the contrapositive, converse, and inverse of the statement in Exercise 19 are as follows: Contrapositive: "If the sum of A and B is not 90 degrees, then A and B are not complementary." Converse: "If the sum of A and B is 90 degrees, then A and B are complementary." Inverse: "If A and B are not complementary, then the sum of A and B is not 90 degrees."

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Conditional Statements
Conditional statements are the backbone of logical reasoning and come in the form 'If p, then q', where 'p' is the hypothesis and 'q' is the conclusion. In mathematics and logic, we represent these statements symbolically, such as 'If A, then B', where 'A' means 'p' and 'B' means 'q'. It's important to grasp that these statements create a relationship where 'B' is true if 'A' is true. Understanding this concept is essential before diving into the more complex variations like contrapositives, converses, and inverses.

For example, consider the statement 'If it rains, the ground is wet.' Here, 'it rains' is the hypothesis and 'the ground is wet' is the conclusion. This logical structure is used extensively in mathematics to form proofs and to establish relationships between different mathematical concepts.
Contrapositive
The contrapositive flips and negates both the hypothesis and conclusion of a conditional statement, and is a key concept in logical equivalences. If you start with the statement 'If p, then q', the contrapositive is 'If not q, then not p'. A crucial point to understand is that a statement and its contrapositive are logically equivalent; this means that if the original statement is true, its contrapositive is also true, and vice versa.

For example, take the statement 'If a shape is a square, then it has four sides.' The contrapositive would be 'If a shape does not have four sides, then it is not a square.' Both statements are essentially conveying the same truth, but from different angles. This property makes the contrapositive a powerful tool in mathematical proofs and logical arguments.
Converse
The converse of a conditional statement switches the hypothesis and the conclusion without negating them. For the initial statement 'If p, then q', the converse is 'If q, then p'. It's important to recognize that a statement and its converse are not logically equivalent - the truth of one does not necessarily imply the truth of the other.

Example

In the context of geometric statements, consider 'If a figure is a rectangle, then it has four right angles'. The converse would state 'If a figure has four right angles, then it is a rectangle'. While the original statement is true, the converse isn't necessarily true, as other figures like squares also have four right angles but are not rectangles. Understanding the distinction between a conditional statement and its converse is essential for correctly interpreting mathematical theorems and logical assertions.
Inverse
The inverse of a conditional statement involves negating both the hypothesis and the conclusion, forming 'If not p, then not q'. While it may seem similar to the contrapositive, the inverse is not guaranteed to have the same truth value as the original statement.

Consider the original statement 'If there is smoke, there is a fire.' The inverse would be 'If there is no smoke, there is no fire.' This is not necessarily true, as fire can exist without producing visible smoke, emphasizing that the truth of an inverse must be examined independently of the original conditional statement. Differentiating between when to use the inverse and when to rely on the contrapositive is a skill that enhances problem-solving abilities in logical reasoning and proofs.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let \(\mathbf{R}\) be the domain of the predicate variable \(x\). Which of the following are true and which are false? Give counterexamples for the statements that are false. a. \(x>2 \Rightarrow x>1\) b. \(x>2 \Rightarrow x^{2}>4\) c. \(x^{2}>4 \Rightarrow x>2\) d. \(x^{2}>4 \Leftrightarrow|x|>2\)

Give an example to show that a universal conditional statement is not logically equivalent to its inverse. Being on time each day is a necessary condition for keeping this job.

If the square of an integer is odd, then the integer is odd.

Use universal instantiation or universal modus ponens to fill in valid conclusions for the arguments in \(2-4 .\) \(\forall\) real numbers \(r, a\), and \(b\), if \(r\) is positive, then \(\left(r^{a}\right)^{b}=r^{a b}\). \(r=3, a=1 / 2\), and \(b=6\) are particular real numbers such that \(r\) is positive.

In exercises \(28-33\), reorder the premises in each of the arguments to show that the conclusion follows as a valid consequence from the premises. It may be helpful to rewrite the statements in ifthen form and replace some statements by their contrapositives. Exercises 28-30 refer to the kinds of Tarski worlds discussed in Example 2.1.12 and 2.3.1. Exercises 31 and 32 are adapted from Symbolic Logic by Lewis Carroll.* 1\. I trust every animal that belongs to me. 2\. Dogs gnaw bones. 3\. I admit no animals into my study unless they will beg when told to do so. 4\. All the animals in the yard are mine. 5\. I admit every animal that I trust into my study. 6\. The only animals that are really willing to beg when told to do so are dogs. \(\therefore\) All the animals in the yard gnaw bones.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.