/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 40 Find a counterexample to the sta... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Find a counterexample to the statement that every positive integer can be written as the sum of the squares of three integers.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The number 7 is a counterexample.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Statement

The statement claims that every positive integer can be expressed as the sum of the squares of three integers.
02

Identify Simple Cases

Consider small positive integers to check if they can be written as sums of the squares of three integers.
03

Test with Small Numbers

Test cases from 1, 2, 3, etc. We seek an integer that cannot be represented as such a sum. For example, let's test the number 7.
04

Analyze the Number 7

Attempt to write 7 as the sum of the squares of three integers: For three integers, we would have \(a^2 + b^2 + c^2 = 7\) The squares of integers up to 7 are 0, 1, and 4. The possible combinations are: \((0, 0, 7)\),\((0, 1, 6)\),\((0, 2, 5)\),\((0, 3, 4)\),\((1, 1, 5)\),\((1, 2, 4)\),\((1, 3, 3)\),\((2, 2, 3)\)And their squares are: (0, 0, 49),\((0, 1, 36)\), \((0, 4, 25)\), \((0, 9, 16)\),\((1, 1, 25)\), \((1, 4, 16)\), \((1, 9, 9)\), \((4, 4, 9)\)None of these combinations add up to 7.
05

Confirm a Counterexample

Since none of the combinations of the sums of squares of three integers yield 7, the number 7 is a counterexample to the statement.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Sums of Squares
In mathematics, the 'sum of squares' typically refers to expressing a number as the sum of the squares of other numbers. For example, the number 5 can be expressed as 1² + 2². This concept is frequently encountered in different areas of mathematics, including algebra and number theory.
When investigating whether every number can be represented as the sum of squares of three integers, it's important to explore combinations of squares systematically. Squares are numbers like 0, 1, 4, 9, and so on. By testing small numbers and their squares, we can determine which numbers can and cannot be written this way.
For instance, consider the number 7 as used in the exercise. If we try combinations like 0², 1², and 2², it soon becomes evident that no combination totaling 7 exists. Therefore, 7 is a counterexample. Knowing that not all numbers can be sums of squares highlights the complexity and limitations within certain number representations.
Positive Integers
Positive integers are the set of all whole numbers greater than zero, including 1, 2, 3, and so on. These numbers are foundational to the field of mathematics and are often used in counting, sequencing, and various mathematical calculations.
The exercise relies on understanding positive integers because we are looking at whether these numbers can be written as the sum of squares. The term 'integer' specifically excludes fractions and decimals, which makes the problem more challenging and interesting.
In our example, examining small positive integers helps quickly identify a potential counterexample. As we tested numbers like 1, 2, 3, and eventually 7, we discovered that 7 could not be written as the sum of squares of three integers, providing a clear and specific counterexample. This approach exemplifies the systematic nature of mathematical exploration.
Discrete Mathematics
Discrete mathematics is a branch of mathematics dealing with discrete elements that uses algebra and arithmetic. It is essential in fields like computer science, cryptography, and combinatorics. Problems in discrete mathematics involve objects that can be counted, often dealing with integers.
The problem solving method demonstrated in the exercise aligns well with discrete mathematics' emphasis on systematic analysis and finding specific examples or counterexamples.
By examining discrete elements, such as specific integers and their properties (like being sums of squares), we can uncover patterns or exceptions. Here, identifying the integer 7 as a number that cannot be represented as the sum of squares of three integers underscores the importance of discrete methods. Through such analysis, we gain deeper insight into the structure and behavior of numbers in mathematical contexts.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A statement is in prenex normal form (PNF) if and only if it is of the form $$ Q_{1} x_{1} Q_{2} x_{2} \cdots Q_{k} x_{k} P\left(x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots, x_{k}\right) $$ where each \(Q_{i}, i=1,2, \ldots, k,\) is either the existential quantifier or the universal quantifier, and \(P\left(x_{1}, \ldots, x_{k}\right)\) is a predicate involving no quantifiers. For example, \(\exists x \forall y(P(x, y) \wedge Q(y))\) is in prenex normal form, whereas \(\exists x P(x) \vee \forall x Q(x)\) is not (because the quantifiers do not all occur first). Every statement formed from propositional variables, predicates, \(\mathbf{T},\) and \(\mathbf{F}\) using logical connectives and quantifiers is equivalent to a statement in prenex normal form. Exercise 51 asks for a proof of this fact. Show how to transform an arbitrary statement to a statement in prenex normal form that is equivalent to the given statement. (Note: A formal solution of this exercise requires use of structural induction, covered in Section \(5.3 . )\)

Exercises \(48-51\) establish rules for null quantification that we can use when a quantified variable does not appear in part of a statement. Establish these logical equivalences, where \(x\) does not occur as a free variable in \(A\) . Assume that the domain is nonempty. $$ \begin{array}{l}{\text { a) }(\forall x P(x)) \vee A \equiv \forall x(P(x) \vee A)} \\ {\text { b) }(\exists x P(x)) \vee A \equiv \exists x(P(x) \vee A)}\end{array} $$

Determine the truth value of each of these statements if the domain consists of all integers. $$ \begin{array}{ll}{\text { a) } \forall n(n+1>n)} & {\text { b) } \exists n(2 n=3 n)} \\ {\text { c) } \exists n(n=-n)} & {\text { d) } \forall n(3 n \leq 4 n)}\end{array} $$

Translate each of these statements into logical expressions using predicates, quantifiers, and logical connectives. a) Something is not in the correct place. b) All tools are in the correct place and are in excellent condition. c) Everything is in the correct place and in excellent condition. d) Nothing is in the correct place and is in excellent condition. e) One of your tools is not in the correct place, but it is in excellent condition.

Find all squares, if they exist, on an \(8 \times 8\) checkerboard such that the board obtained by removing one of these squares can be tiled using straight triominoes. [Hint: First use arguments based on coloring and rotations to eliminate as many squares as possible from consideration. \(]\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.