/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 40 Find a counterexample to the sta... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Find a counterexample to the statement that every positive integer can be written as the sum of the squares of three integers.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The number 7 is a counterexample.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Statement

The statement claims that every positive integer can be expressed as the sum of the squares of three integers.
02

Identify Simple Cases

Consider small positive integers to check if they can be written as sums of the squares of three integers.
03

Test with Small Numbers

Test cases from 1, 2, 3, etc. We seek an integer that cannot be represented as such a sum. For example, let's test the number 7.
04

Analyze the Number 7

Attempt to write 7 as the sum of the squares of three integers: For three integers, we would have \(a^2 + b^2 + c^2 = 7\) The squares of integers up to 7 are 0, 1, and 4. The possible combinations are: \((0, 0, 7)\),\((0, 1, 6)\),\((0, 2, 5)\),\((0, 3, 4)\),\((1, 1, 5)\),\((1, 2, 4)\),\((1, 3, 3)\),\((2, 2, 3)\)And their squares are: (0, 0, 49),\((0, 1, 36)\), \((0, 4, 25)\), \((0, 9, 16)\),\((1, 1, 25)\), \((1, 4, 16)\), \((1, 9, 9)\), \((4, 4, 9)\)None of these combinations add up to 7.
05

Confirm a Counterexample

Since none of the combinations of the sums of squares of three integers yield 7, the number 7 is a counterexample to the statement.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Sums of Squares
In mathematics, the 'sum of squares' typically refers to expressing a number as the sum of the squares of other numbers. For example, the number 5 can be expressed as 1虏 + 2虏. This concept is frequently encountered in different areas of mathematics, including algebra and number theory.
When investigating whether every number can be represented as the sum of squares of three integers, it's important to explore combinations of squares systematically. Squares are numbers like 0, 1, 4, 9, and so on. By testing small numbers and their squares, we can determine which numbers can and cannot be written this way.
For instance, consider the number 7 as used in the exercise. If we try combinations like 0虏, 1虏, and 2虏, it soon becomes evident that no combination totaling 7 exists. Therefore, 7 is a counterexample. Knowing that not all numbers can be sums of squares highlights the complexity and limitations within certain number representations.
Positive Integers
Positive integers are the set of all whole numbers greater than zero, including 1, 2, 3, and so on. These numbers are foundational to the field of mathematics and are often used in counting, sequencing, and various mathematical calculations.
The exercise relies on understanding positive integers because we are looking at whether these numbers can be written as the sum of squares. The term 'integer' specifically excludes fractions and decimals, which makes the problem more challenging and interesting.
In our example, examining small positive integers helps quickly identify a potential counterexample. As we tested numbers like 1, 2, 3, and eventually 7, we discovered that 7 could not be written as the sum of squares of three integers, providing a clear and specific counterexample. This approach exemplifies the systematic nature of mathematical exploration.
Discrete Mathematics
Discrete mathematics is a branch of mathematics dealing with discrete elements that uses algebra and arithmetic. It is essential in fields like computer science, cryptography, and combinatorics. Problems in discrete mathematics involve objects that can be counted, often dealing with integers.
The problem solving method demonstrated in the exercise aligns well with discrete mathematics' emphasis on systematic analysis and finding specific examples or counterexamples.
By examining discrete elements, such as specific integers and their properties (like being sums of squares), we can uncover patterns or exceptions. Here, identifying the integer 7 as a number that cannot be represented as the sum of squares of three integers underscores the importance of discrete methods. Through such analysis, we gain deeper insight into the structure and behavior of numbers in mathematical contexts.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Prove that \(n^{2}+1 \geq 2^{n}\) when \(n\) is a positive integer with \(1 \leq n \leq 4 .\)

Prove that given a real number \(x\) there exist unique numbers \(n\) and \(\epsilon\) such that \(x=n+\epsilon, n\) is an integer, and \(0 \leq \epsilon<1 .\)

Prove the triangle inequality, which states that if \(x\) and \(y\) are real numbers, then \(|x|+|y| \geq|x+y|\) (where \(|x|\) rep- resents the absolute value of \(x,\) which equals \(x\) if \(x \geq 0\) and equals \(-x\) if \(x < 0 )\)

Determine whether this argument, taken from Kalish and Montague [KaMo64], is valid. If Superman were able and willing to prevent evil, he would do so. If Superman were unable to prevent evil, he would be impotent; if he were unwilling to prevent evil, he would be malevolent. Superman does not prevent evil. If Superman exists, he is neither impotent nor malevolent. Therefore, Superman does not exist.

For each of these collections of premises, what relevant conclusion or conclusions can be drawn? Explain the rules of inference used to obtain each conclusion from the premises. a) 鈥淚f I take the day off, it either rains or snows.鈥 鈥淚 took Tuesday off or I took Thursday off.鈥 鈥淚t was sunny on Tuesday.鈥 鈥淚t did not snow on Thursday.鈥 b) 鈥淚f I eat spicy foods, then I have strange dreams.鈥 鈥淚 have strange dreams if there is thunder while I sleep.鈥 鈥淚 did not have strange dreams.鈥 c) 鈥淚 am either clever or lucky.鈥 鈥淚 am not lucky.鈥 鈥淚f I am lucky, then I will win the lottery.鈥 d) 鈥淓very computer science major has a personal computer.鈥 鈥淩alph does not have a personal computer.鈥 鈥淎nn has a personal computer.鈥 e) 鈥淲hat is good for corporations is good for the United States.鈥 鈥淲hat is good for the United States is good for you.鈥 鈥淲hat is good for corporations is for you to buy lots of stuff.鈥 f ) 鈥淎ll rodents gnaw their food.鈥 鈥淢ice are rodents.鈥 鈥淩abbits do not gnaw their food.鈥 鈥淏ats are not ro- dents.鈥

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.