/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 29 Suppose the domain of the propos... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Suppose the domain of the propositional function \(P(x, y)\) consists of pairs \(x\) and \(y,\) where \(x\) is \(1,2,\) or 3 and \(y\) is \(1,2,\) or \(3 .\) Write out these propositions using disjunctions and conjunctions. $$ \begin{array}{ll}{\text { a) } \forall x \forall y P(x, y)} & {\text { b) } \exists x \exists y P(x, y)} \\ {\text { c) } \exists x \forall y P(x, y)} & {\text { d) } \forall y \exists x P(x, y)}\end{array} $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) All conjunctions, b) All disjunctions, c) Conjunctions within disjunctions, d) Disjunctions within conjunctions.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Notations

The symbols \(\forall\) and \(\exists\) are used to denote 'for all' and 'there exists' respectively. In this problem, \(P(x, y)\) is a propositional function where the domain of \(x\) and \(y\) includes the numbers 1, 2, and 3.
02

Translate Part (a)

Part (a) asks for \(\forall x \forall y P(x, y)\). This means that for all values of \(x\) and \(y\), the proposition \(P(x, y)\) must be true. This can be written as:\[ P(1, 1) \land P(1, 2) \land P(1, 3) \land P(2, 1) \land P(2, 2) \land P(2, 3) \land P(3, 1) \land P(3, 2) \land P(3, 3) \]
03

Translate Part (b)

Part (b) asks for \(\exists x \exists y P(x, y)\). This means that there exists at least one pair \((x, y)\) such that \(P(x, y)\) is true. This can be written as:\[ P(1, 1) \lor P(1, 2) \lor P(1, 3) \lor P(2, 1) \lor P(2, 2) \lor P(2, 3) \lor P(3, 1) \lor P(3, 2) \lor P(3, 3) \]
04

Translate Part (c)

Part (c) asks for \(\exists x \forall y P(x, y)\). This means that there is some \(x\) such that for all values of \(y\), \(P(x, y)\) is true. This can be written as:\[ (P(1, 1) \land P(1, 2) \land P(1, 3)) \lor (P(2, 1) \land P(2, 2) \land P(2, 3)) \lor (P(3, 1) \land P(3, 2) \land P(3, 3)) \]
05

Translate Part (d)

Part (d) asks for \(\forall y \exists x P(x, y)\). This means that for all values of \(y\), there is some \(x\) such that \(P(x, y)\) is true. This can be written as:\[ (P(1, 1) \lor P(2, 1) \lor P(3, 1)) \land (P(1, 2) \lor P(2, 2) \lor P(3, 2)) \land (P(1, 3) \lor P(2, 3) \lor P(3, 3)) \]

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Quantifiers in Logic
In propositional logic, **quantifiers** are symbols used to describe the variables in a logical statement. The two primary quantifiers are the universal quantifier \(\forall\), which means 'for all,' and the existential quantifier \(\exists\), which means 'there exists.' These quantifiers help express statements about all members of a domain or existence of some member within a domain.
For example, in the problem, we have **\( \forall x \forall y P(x, y) \)**, which translates to 'for all values of \( x \) and \( y \), \( P(x, y) \) must be true.' This means that every combination of \( x \) and \( y \) within the given domain satisfies \( P(x, y) \). Similarly, a statement like **\( \exists x \exists y P(x, y) \)** indicates that there exists at least one pair \( (x, y) \) such that \( P(x, y) \) is true.
Quantifiers are extremely powerful tools in logic, allowing precise expression of statements about entire sets or the existence of elements within sets.
Disjunctions and Conjunctions
Disjunctions and conjunctions are fundamental operations in propositional logic. **Conjunction** is the \( \land \) operation and means 'and.' A statement involving a conjunction is true only if both propositions involved are true. For instance, in our problem, **\( P(1,1) \land P(1,2) \land P(1,3) \)** means that all of these individual propositions must be true for the entire statement to be true.
On the other hand, **disjunction** is the \( \lor \) operation and means 'or.' A statement involving disjunction is true if at least one of the propositions involved is true. For example, **\( P(1,1) \lor P(1,2) \lor P(1,3) \)** means that if any one of these propositions is true, the entire statement is true.
Understanding these logical operations is crucial for correctly interpreting logical statements and expressions, as seen in solving parts (b), (c), and (d) of the provided problem.鈥
Propositional Functions
Propositional functions are expressions in logic that contain variables and become propositions when the variables are replaced with specific values. The function describes a relationship between these variables that can be either true or false. For instance, **\( P(x, y) \)** in our exercise is a propositional function with \(x\) and \(y\) being variables that may each take values from 1 to 3.
When specific values are assigned to these variables, \( P(x, y) \) becomes a proposition, which can be evaluated as true or false. For example, if \( P(1, 1) \) is replaced for \( x \) and \( y \), it becomes a statement that can be true or false depending on the context or condition provided by \( P \).
By understanding propositional functions, students can learn to form more complex logical statements and understand how conditions and relationships among variables work within logical frameworks.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Show that the equivalence \(p \wedge \neg p \equiv \mathbf{F}\) can be derived using resolution together with the fact that a conditional statement with a false hypothesis is true. [Hint: Let \(q=\) \(r=\mathbf{F}\) in resolution.

Determine whether this argument, taken from Kalish and Montague [KaMo64], is valid. If Superman were able and willing to prevent evil, he would do so. If Superman were unable to prevent evil, he would be impotent; if he were unwilling to prevent evil, he would be malevolent. Superman does not prevent evil. If Superman exists, he is neither impotent nor malevolent. Therefore, Superman does not exist.

Show that \(\exists x P(x) \wedge \exists x Q(x)\) and \(\exists x(P(x) \wedge Q(x))\) are not logically equivalent.

Let \(C(x)\) be the statement " \(x\) has a cat," let \(D(x)\) be the statement " \(x\) has a dog," and let \(F(x)\) be the statement "x has a ferret." Express each of these statements in terms of \(C(x), D(x), F(x),\) quantifiers, and logical connectives. Let the domain consist of all students in your class. a) A student in your class has a cat, a dog, and a ferret. b) All students in your class have a cat, a dog, or a ferret. c) Some student in your class has a cat and a ferret, but not a dog. d) No student in your class has a cat, a dog, and a ferret. e) For each of the three animals, cats, dogs, and ferrets, there is a student in your class who has this animal as a pet.

Suppose that five ones and four zeros are arranged around a circle. Between any two equal bits you insert a 0 and between any two unequal bits you insert a 1 to produce nine new bits. Then you erase the nine original bits. Show that when you iterate this procedure, you can never get nine zeros. [Hint: Work backward, assuming that you did end up with nine zeros.]

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.