/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 10 (Kazdan-Wamer's Results.) a. L... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

(Kazdan-Wamer's Results.) a. Let a metric on \(R^{2}\) be given by $$ E(x, y)=1, \quad F(x, y)=0, \quad G(x, y)>0, \quad(x, y) \in R^{2} . $$ Show that the curvature of this metric is given by $$ \frac{\partial^{2}(\sqrt{G})}{\partial x^{2}}+K(x, y) \sqrt{G}=0 . $$ b. Conversely, given a function \(K(x, y)\) on \(R^{2}\), regard \(y\) as a parameter and let \(\sqrt{G}\) be the solution of \((*)\) with the initial conditions $$ \sqrt{G}\left(x_{0}, y\right)=1, \quad \frac{\partial \sqrt{G}}{\partial x}\left(x_{0}, y\right)=0 . $$ Prove that \(G\) is positive in a neighborhood of \(\left(x_{0}, y\right)\) and thus defines a metric in this neighborhood. This shows that every differentiable function is locally the curvature of some (abstract) metric. *. Assume that \(K(x, y) \leq 0\) for all \((x, y) \in R^{2}\). Show that the solution of part \(b\) satisfies \(\sqrt{G(x, y)} \geq \sqrt{G\left(x_{0}, y\right)}=1 \quad\) for all \(x\) Thus, \(G(x, y)\) defines a metric on all of \(R^{2}\). Prove also that this metric is complete. This shows that any nonpositive differentiable function on \(\mathrm{R}^{2}\) is the curvature of some complete metric on \(\mathrm{R}^{2}\). If we do not insist on the metric being complete, the result is true for any differentiable function \(K\) on \(R^{2}\). Compare J. Kazdan and F. Warner, "Curvature Functions for Open 2-Manifolds," Ann. of Math. 99 (1974), 203-219, where it is also proved that the condition on \(K\) given in Exercise 2 of Sec. \(5-4\) is necessary and sufficient for the metric to be complete.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The curvature formula is derived, and local positivity of \(G\) ensures it defines a metric. For \(K \leq 0\), \(G \geq 1\) everywhere ensures completeness.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Metric Conventions

Given: the metric components for a 2D region are specified as \(E(x, y) = 1\), \(F(x, y) = 0\), \(G(x, y) > 0\). These form the first fundamental form for a surface embedded in \(\mathbb{R}^2\).
02

Metric Tensor Determinant

The metric tensor for the given metric is: \[g_{ij} = \begin{pmatrix} E & F \ F & G \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & G \end{pmatrix}\]. The determinant \(g\) of the metric tensor is therefore \(\det(g) = E \, G = G\).
03

Components of the Inverse Metric Tensor

Since \(g_{ij}\) is diagonal: \[ g^{ij} = \begin{pmatrix} 1/E & 0 \ 0 & 1/G \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 1/G \end{pmatrix} \].
04

Christoffel Symbols Calculation

Calculate the necessary Christoffel symbols. Since \(F = 0\), some simplifications occur:\[ \Gamma^x_{xy} = \frac{1}{2} g^{xx} \partial_y g_{xy} = 0 \]\[ \Gamma^y_{xy} = \frac{1}{2} g^{yy} \partial_x g_{yy} = \frac{1}{2G} \partial_x G \]and\[ \Gamma^x_{xx} = \Gamma^x_{yy} = \Gamma^y_{yy} = 0 \].
05

Calculate Curvature

Using curvature formula for surfaces, we simplify to obtain:\[ K(x, y) = -g^{xx}\partial_{xx}(\ln \sqrt{G}) = -\partial_{xx}\left( \ln \sqrt{G} \right) \]. Since \(\ln \sqrt{G} = \frac{1}{2} \ln(G)\), we get the desired expression:\[ \frac{\partial^2 (\sqrt{G})}{\partial x^2} + K(x, y) \sqrt{G} = 0 \].
06

Solution to the Differential Equation

Given \( K(x, y) \) and initial conditions, solve \[ \frac{\partial^2 (\sqrt{G})}{\partial x^2} + K(x, y) \sqrt{G} = 0 \]. The initial conditions provided are \( \sqrt{G}(x_0, y) = 1\) and \(\frac{\partial \sqrt{G}}{\partial x}(x_0, y) = 0\),which mean there is a unique solution locally defining \(\sqrt{G} > 0\), hence \(G > 0\).
07

Proving Positivity and Completeness

Since \( K(x, y) \leq 0 \), for all \( (x, y) \) in \( \mathbb{R}^2 \), it follows that \( \sqrt{G} \geq 1 \). Thus, \(G(x, y) \) is positive throughout \(\mathbb{R}^2\). The metric being complete is shown using similar steps by Kazdan and Warner results since the integral curves do not reach any finite endpoint in finite parameter distance.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Curvature of Surfaces
The curvature of a surface is a critical concept in differential geometry. It helps us understand how a surface bends in space.
For the given exercise, we used the metric for a 2D region defined by components:

- \(E(x, y) = 1\)
- \(F(x, y) = 0\)
- \(G(x, y) > 0\)

To find the curvature, we use the Christoffel symbols and metric tensor. Finally, the curvature formula for the specific metric is simplified to:
\[ \frac{\frac{\text{partial}^2 (\text{sqrt}(G))}{\text{partial} x^2}}{\text{partial} x^2} + K(x, y) \text{sqrt}(G) = 0 \]
where \(K(x, y)\) is the Gaussian curvature.
Metric Tensor
The metric tensor is a generalized notion of distance within a space. It provides a way to measure lengths and angles, making it a fundamental tool in differential geometry.

For our problem, the metric tensor is given by:

\[ g_{ij} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & G \ \end{pmatrix} \]
This tensor provides a means to calculate geometric properties like distance and curvature on surfaces. By differentiating the components and using the inverse metric tensor, we get a complete understanding of the geometry of our surface.
The determinant of this tensor is simply \(G\), since \(E = 1\) and \(F = 0\).
Christoffel Symbols
Christoffel symbols are essential in describing how vectors change as they move along a surface. They show how vector fields change direction while barely moving across the surface.

For the given metric components, the Christoffel symbols simplify due to the zeros in the metric tensor:
- \(\tilde{\text{Gamma}}^y_{xy} = \frac{1}{2G} \frac{\text{partial} G}{\text{partial} x} \)
The symbols enable us to determine the surface curvature and other important geometrical constructs. Calculating these symbols requires applying the metric tensor components and their derivatives correctly.

These symbols play a crucial role in the equations of geodesics, which are the shortest paths between points on a curved surface.
Completeness of Metrics
Completeness in the context of a metric space means that all infinite sequences within the space approach a limit within the space.
For a metric defined by \(G(x, y)\) to be complete, all geodesics (shortest paths) on the surface must be infinitely extendable.

With \(K(x, y) \leq 0\) for all \((x, y)\), it's shown that \( \text{sqrt}(G) \geq 1\), meaning \(G > 0\), and this ensures the metric is complete over \(\mathbb{R}^2\).
Thus, the metric does not break or become undefined anywhere, enabling a complete and well-behaved geometry.
Kazdan-Warner Theorem
The Kazdan-Warner theorem explores the curvature functions a metric can exhibit. It states that any differentiable function on \( \text{R}^2\) can locally be the curvature of some metric.

In our specific problem, by solving the differential equation:

\[ \frac{\frac{\text{partial}^2 (\text{sqrt}(G))}{\text{partial} x^2}}{\text{partial} x^2} + K(x, y) \text{sqrt}(G) = 0 \]
given initial conditions, we demonstrated that any nonpositive differentiable function \(K(x, y)\) can be represented by some complete metric over \( \text{R}^2\).
This shows the flexibility and universality in defining metrics with desired curvatures.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let \(S_{1} \subset R^{3}\) be a (connected) complete surface and \(S_{2} \subset R^{3}\) be a connected surface such that any two points of \(S_{2}\) can be joined by a unique geodesic. Let \(\varphi: S_{1} \rightarrow S_{2}\) be a local isometry. Prove that \(\varphi\) is a global isometry.

Let \(U \subset R^{3}\) be an open connected subset of \(R^{2}\) and let \(\mathbf{x}: U \rightarrow S\) be an isothermal parametrization (i.e., \(E=G, F=0\); cf. Sec. 4-2) of a regular surface \(S\). We identify \(R^{2}\) with the complex plane \(\mathbb{C}\) by setting \(u+i v=\zeta\), \((u, v) \in R^{2}, \zeta \in \mathbb{C}\). \(\zeta\) is called the complex parameter corresponding to \(\mathbf{x}\). Let \(\phi: \mathbf{x}(U) \rightarrow \mathbb{C}\) be the complex- valued function given by $$ \phi(\zeta)=\phi(u, v)=\frac{e-g}{2}-i f=\phi_{1}+i \phi_{2} $$ where \(e, f, g\) are the coefficients of the second fundamental form of \(S\). a. Show that the Mainardi-Codazzi equations (cf. Sec. 4-3) can be written, in the isothermal parametrization \(\mathrm{x}\), as $$ \left(\frac{e-g}{2}\right)_{a}+f_{*}=E H_{a} \quad\left(\frac{e-g}{2}\right)_{*}-f_{*}=-E H_{*} $$ and conclude that the mean curvature \(H\) of \(\mathbf{x}(U) \subset S\) is constant if and only if \(\phi\) is an analytic function of \(\zeta\) (i.e., \(\left(\phi_{1}\right)_{a}=\left(\phi_{2}\right)_{2},\left(\phi_{1}\right)_{\nu}=\) \(\left.-\left(\phi_{2}\right)_{2}\right) .\) h. Define the "complex derivative" $$ \frac{\partial}{\partial \bar{\zeta}}=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{a}{\partial x}-i \frac{\partial}{\partial x}\right) \text {. } $$ and prove that \(\phi(\zeta)=-2\left\langle\mathbf{x}_{\gamma}, N_{\zeta}\right\rangle\), where by \(\mathbf{x}_{c}\), for instance, we mean the vector with complex coordinates $$ \mathbf{x}_{p}=\left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial \zeta}, \frac{\partial y}{\partial \zeta}, \frac{\partial z}{\partial \zeta}\right) $$ c. Let \(f: U \subset C \rightarrow V \subset C\) be a one-to-one complex function given by \(f(u+i v)=x+i y=\eta\). Show that \((x, y)\) are isothermal parameters on \(S\) (i.e., \(\eta\) is a complex parameter on \(S\) ) if and only if \(f\) is analytic and \(f^{\prime}(\zeta) \neq 0, \zeta\) \& \(U\). Let \(\mathbf{y}=\mathbf{x} \circ f^{-1}\) be the correspond ing parametrization and define \(\phi(\eta)=-2\left\\{\mathbf{y}_{4}, N_{4}\right\\}\). Show that on \(x(U) \cap y(V) .\) $$ \phi(\zeta)=\psi(\eta)\left(\frac{3 \eta}{\partial \zeta}\right)^{2} $$ d. Let \(S^{2}\) be the unit sphere of \(R^{3}\). Use the stereographic projection (cf. Exercise 16, Sec. 2.2) from the poles \(N=(0,0,1)\) and \(S=(0,0,-1)\) to cover \(S^{2}\) by the coordinate neighborhoods of two (isothermal) complex parameters, \(\zeta\) and \(\eta\), with \(\zeta(S)=0\) and \(n(N)=0\), in such a way that in the intersection \(W\) of these coordinate neighborhoods (the sphere minus the two poles) \(\eta=\zeta^{-1}\). Assume that there exists on each coontinate neighborhood analytic functicns \(\psi(\zeta), \psi(n)\) such that \((+)\) holds in W. Use Liouville's theorem to prove that \(\varphi(\zeta)=0\) (hence, \(\psi(\eta)=0\) ). c. Let \(S \subset R^{3}\) be a regular surface with constant mean curvature homeomorphic to a sphere. Assume that there exists a conformal diffeomorphism \(\varphi: S \rightarrow S^{2}\) of \(S\) onto the unit sphere \(S^{2}\) (this is a consequence of the uniformization theorem for Riemann surfaces and will be assumed here). Let \(\bar{\zeta}\) and \(\bar{\eta}\) be the complex parameters corresponding ander \(\varphi\) to the parameters \(\zeta\) and \(\eta\) of \(S^{2}\) given in part \(\mathrm{d}\). By part a, the function \(\phi(\bar{\zeta})=((e-g) / 2)-\) if is analytic. The similar function \(\psi(\bar{p})\) is also 5.3. Complete Surfaces. Theorem of Hopf.Aioow \(93 t\) analytic, and by part c they are related by \((+)\). Use part d to show that \(\phi(\bar{\zeta})=0\) (hence, \(\psi(\bar{i})=0\) ). Conclude that \(S\) is made up of umbilical points and hence is a sphere. This proves Hopf's theorem.

(The Infinite Möbius Strip.) Let $$ C=\left\\{(x, y, z) \in R^{3} ; x^{2}+y^{2}=1\right\\} $$ be a cylinder and \(A: C \rightarrow C\) be the map (the antipodal map) \(A(x, y, z)=\) \((-x,-y,-z)\). Let \(M\) be the quotient of \(C\) by the equivalence relation \(p \sim A(p)\), and let \(\pi: C \rightarrow M\) be the \(\operatorname{map} \pi(p)=\\{p, A(p)\\}, p \in C .\) a. Show that \(M\) can be given a differentiable structure so that \(\pi\) is a local diffeomorphism ( \(M\) is then called the infinite Möbius strip). b. Prove that \(M\) is nonorientable. c. Introduce on \(M\) a Riemannian metric so that \(\pi\) is a local isometry. What is the curvature of such a metric?

Let \(S\) and \(\bar{S}\) be regular surfaces and let \(\varphi: S \rightarrow \bar{S}\) be a diffeomorphism. Assume that \(\bar{S}\) is complete and that a constant \(c>0\) exists such that $$ I_{p}(v) \geq c \bar{I}_{\psi(p)}\left(d \varphi_{p}(v)\right) $$ for all \(p \in S\) and all \(v \in T_{p}(S)\), where \(I\) and \(\bar{I}\) denote the first fundamental forms of \(S\) and \(\bar{S}\), respectively. Prove that \(S\) is complete.

Let \(S \subset R^{3}\) be a regular surface. A sequence \(\left\\{p_{n}\right\\}\) of points on \(S\) is a Cauchy sequence in the (intrinsic) distance \(d\) if given \(\epsilon>0\) there exists an index \(n_{0}\) such that when \(n, m \geq n_{0}\) then \(d\left(p_{n}, p_{m}\right)<\epsilon\). Prove that \(S\) is complete if and only if every Cauchy sequence on \(S\) converges to a point in \(S\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.