/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 10 Determine whether the series is ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Determine whether the series is convergent or divergent. $$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\left(n^{-1.4}+3 n^{-1.2}\right)$$

Short Answer

Expert verified
The series is convergent.

Step by step solution

01

Break down the series into simpler components

The given series is \( \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \left(n^{-1.4} + 3n^{-1.2}\right) \). We can split this series into two separate series: \( \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} n^{-1.4} \) and \( 3\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} n^{-1.2} \). This allows us to analyze the convergence of each series individually.
02

Determine the convergence of each component using the p-series test

For the series \( \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} n^{-p} \), the series converges if \( p > 1 \) and diverges if \( p \leq 1 \). First, consider \( \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} n^{-1.4} \). Since 1.4 > 1, this series converges. Now, consider \( 3\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} n^{-1.2} \); since 1.2 > 1, it also converges based on the p-series test.
03

Use linearity to combine results

Since both \( \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} n^{-1.4} \) and \( 3\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} n^{-1.2} \) converge, we use the fact that the sum of two convergent series is also convergent. This means that the original series \( \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \left(n^{-1.4} + 3n^{-1.2}\right) \) is convergent.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

p-Series Test
Understanding the p-series test is crucial for analyzing series convergence. A p-series is in the form of \( \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} n^{-p} \). The test provides a simple criterion:
  • If \( p > 1 \), the series converges.
  • If \( p \leq 1 \), the series diverges.
This test is powerful because it allows us to easily determine convergence without complex calculations.
For our exercise, we applied the p-series test to the components \( n^{-1.4} \) and \( 3n^{-1.2} \). Given that both exponents (1.4 and 1.2) are greater than 1, the respective p-series converge.
Divergence
Divergence refers to a series not settling towards a finite limit. In simpler terms, if a series diverges, partial sums keep growing.
Understanding divergence is the counterpart to recognizing convergence. While the p-series test focuses on identifying convergence, it inherently tells us about divergence when \( p \leq 1 \).
In exercises like ours, when no divergence was present because \( p > 1 \) in both components, it's important to know divergence can signal when to stop looking for a finite sum. Knowing divergence helps in ruling out possibilities, streamlining our analysis.
Linearity in Series
The principle of linearity in series dictates that the summation of linear combinations of series behaves predictably. Essentially, we can add series term by term.
This property simplifies solving complex series problems. If two series are known to converge, their linear combination is also convergent.
In our example, both components \( \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} n^{-1.4} \) and \( 3\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} n^{-1.2} \) converged individually. Thus, combining them still results in convergence. Breaking complex series into manageable parts and leveraging linearity offers clearer paths to solutions.
Component Series Analysis
Component series analysis involves breaking a complicated series into simpler, manageable parts for detailed examination. This is akin to solving a puzzle by focusing on individual pieces first.
In our exercise, the original series \( \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} (n^{-1.4} + 3n^{-1.2}) \) was split into two distinct series.
  • First series: \( \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} n^{-1.4} \)
  • Second series: \( 3\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} n^{-1.2} \)
Through this analysis, you can individually apply convergence tests, making the problem much simpler. This strategy not only aids in clear understanding but significantly reduces the potential for errors.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Find the sum of the series. $$\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{3^{n}}{5^{n} n !}$$

Use series to evaluate the limit. $$\lim _{x \rightarrow 0} \frac{1-\cos x}{1+x-e^{x}}$$

Test the series for convergence or divergence. $$\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{5^{k}}{3^{k}+4^{k}}$$

The resistivity \(\rho\) of a conducting wire is the reciprocal of the conductivity and is measured in units of ohm-meters \((\Omega-m) .\) The resistivity of a given metal depends on the temperature according to the equation $$\rho(t)=\rho_{20} e^{\alpha(t-20)}$$ where \(t\) is the temperature in \(^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) . where \(t\) is the temperature in \(^{\circ} \mathrm{C} .\) There are tables that list the values of \(\alpha\) (called the temperature coefficient) and \(\rho_{20}\) (the resistivity at \(20^{\circ} \mathrm{C} )\) for various metals. Except at very low temperatures, the resistivity varies almost linearly with temperature and so it is common to approximate the expression for \(\rho(t)\) by its first- or second-degree Taylor polynomial at \(t=20\) . (a) Find expressions for these linear and quadratic approximations. (b) For copper, the tables give \(\alpha=0.0039 /^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and \(\rho_{20}=1.7 \times 10^{-8} \Omega-\mathrm{m} .\) Graph the resistivity of copper and the linear and quadratic approximations for \(-250^{\circ} \mathrm{C} \leqslant t \leqslant 1000^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) (c) For what values of \(t\) does the linear approximation agree with the exponential expression to within one percent?

A car is moving with speed 20 \(\mathrm{m} / \mathrm{s}\) and acceleration 2 \(\mathrm{m} / \mathrm{s}^{2}\) a given instant. Using a second-degree Taylor polynomial, estimate how far the car moves in the next second. Would it be reasonable to use this polynomial to estimate the distance traveled during the next minute?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.