/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 72 Use the formal definition of the... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Use the formal definition of the limit of a sequence to prove the following limits. $$\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} b^{-n}=0, \text { for } b > 1$$

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Prove that if \(b > 1\), then \(\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} b^{-n} = 0\). Answer: By using the formal definition of the limit and transforming the inequality \(b^{-n} < \epsilon\) to find a suitable natural number \(N\), we can prove that \(\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} b^{-n} = 0\) for all \(b > 1\).

Step by step solution

01

Rewrite inequality

To begin, let's rewrite the inequality \(|b^{-n} - 0| < \epsilon\). Since \(b > 1\), we have \(b^{-n} > 0\), so the absolute value is not necessary: $$b^{-n} < \epsilon$$ Next, take the natural logarithm of both sides, which gives us: $$-n \ln(b) < \ln(\epsilon)$$ Since \(\ln(b) > 0\), we can divide by it: $$-n < \frac{\ln(\epsilon)}{\ln(b)}$$ Finally, we can multiply both sides by \(-1\) and arrive at the inequality: $$n>-\frac{\ln(\epsilon)}{\ln(b)}$$
02

Find N

Now we need to find a natural number \(N\) that satisfies the inequality \(n > -\frac{\ln(\epsilon)}{\ln(b)}\) for all \(n > N\). Define \(N = \lfloor -\frac{\ln(\epsilon)}{\ln(b)} \rfloor + 1\), where \(\lfloor x \rfloor\) denotes the largest integer less than or equal to \(x\). Since \(N\) is greater than \(-\frac{\ln(\epsilon)}{\ln(b)}\) and \(N\) is an integer, it's true that: $$n > -\frac{\ln(\epsilon)}{\ln(b)}, \forall n > N$$
03

Prove the limit

We want to prove that $$\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} b^{-n} = 0$$ According to the formal definition, we need to find a natural number \(N\) that depends on \(\epsilon > 0\), such that the inequality \(b^{-n} < \epsilon\) holds for all \(n > N\). From Step 2, we found that for \(n > \lfloor -\frac{\ln(\epsilon)}{\ln(b)} \rfloor + 1 = N\), the inequality \(b^{-n} < \epsilon\) holds, so the formal definition of a limit is satisfied for every \(\epsilon > 0\). Therefore, we can conclude that: $$\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} b^{-n} = 0 \text{, for } b > 1$$

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Formal Definition of Limit
The formal definition of the limit of a sequence provides a rigorous way to say that a sequence gets arbitrarily close to a number, as the index goes off to infinity. For a sequence \(a_n\) to have a limit \(L\), we use the statement: "\(a_n\) approaches \(L\) as \(n\) approaches infinity". In formal terms, \(\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = L\) if for every positive number \(\epsilon\), however small, there exists a natural number \(N\) such that for all \(n > N\), \(|a_n - L| < \epsilon\).*
This definition can be broken down into parts to better understand it:*
  • The sequence \(a_n\) is assumed to come arbitrarily close to \(L\).
  • \(|a_n - L|\) represents the distance between the term \(a_n\) and the limit \(L\).
  • \(\epsilon\) can be thought of as a tolerance level. No matter how small this value is, we should be able to find a time \(N\) after which all terms \(a_n\) fall within this tolerance when \(n > N\).
This allows us to formally prove whether sequences like \(b^{-n}\) converge to a particular value when \(n\) becomes very large.
Natural Logarithm
The natural logarithm is a key mathematical function often denoted as \(\ln(x)\). It is the inverse function of the exponential function when the base of the logarithm is \(e\), where \(e\) is approximately equal to 2.71828. The function \(\ln(x)\) has several important properties:
  • \(\ln(1) = 0\) because \(e^0 = 1\).
  • The natural logarithm is only defined for positive numbers, meaning it does not work for zero or negative numbers.
  • The derivative of \(\ln(x)\) is \(\frac{1}{x}\), which is useful in calculus and when dealing with growth problems.
  • It can transform multiplicative processes into additive ones, which simplifies many algebraic operations.
In the context of limits, the natural logarithm helps by simplifying expressions during inequality manipulations. In the exercise, \(\ln(b)\) is particularly important because multiplying by it allows us to isolate \(n\) when showing that for \(b > 1\), \(b^{-n}\) approaches zero.
Inequality Manipulation
Inequality manipulation involves using algebraic rules to transform inequalities into more useful forms. This process is crucial when proving limits rigorously. Here's how it works:
  • **Start with the Target Expression**: The inequality \(b^{-n} < \epsilon\) serves as our starting point.
  • **Apply Algebraic Operations**: Depending on the context, operations such as logarithms might be applied. In this case, taking the natural logarithm of both sides gives us a manageable linear form:
\[ -n \ln(b) < \ln(\epsilon) \]
  • **Rearranging and Solving**: Further manipulation involves dividing by constants (like \(\ln(b)\)) and multiplying or dividing by \(-1\). Considerations include being cautious about reversing inequality signs when multiplying or dividing by negatives.
  • **Conclusion**: After manipulation, you'll have an expression, often involving \(n\), that supports finding a suitable \(N\) for proving limits. Here, such manipulation helps to show that \(n > -\frac{\ln(\epsilon)}{\ln(b)}\) must be satisfied.
This guides right to the solution, demonstrating how each step is essential in limiting the sequence.
Sequence Convergence
Sequence convergence refers to the tendency of a sequence to approach a specific value, called the limit, as the sequence progresses. A sequence \(a_n\) is said to converge to a limit \(L\) if the terms of the sequence get closer and closer to \(L\) as \(n\) increases.
  • **Behavior of Terms**: In practical terms, the terms \(a_n\) of the sequence will "settle" near \(L\) and for any small positive number \(\epsilon\), you can find a point \(N\) after which all terms are within \(\epsilon\) distance of \(L\).
  • **Convergence Example**: In our exercise, sequences of the form \(b^{-n}\) are shown to converge to 0 when \(b > 1\). This is done by demonstrating \(b^{-n}\) becomes negligibly small as \(n\) becomes very large.
  • **Importance of \(N\)**: Finding \(N\) is key because it's the threshold beyond which the sequence's behavior is under control. For \(n > N\), a sequence that converges will consistently behave as expected.
Understanding sequence convergence means recognizing that no matter how the sequence starts or fluctuates initially, eventually, its terms will reliably approach the limit when properly proven.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Here is a fascinating (unsolved) problem known as the hailstone problem (or the Ulam Conjecture or the Collatz Conjecture). It involves sequences in two different ways. First, choose a positive integer \(N\) and call it \(a_{0} .\) This is the seed of a sequence. The rest of the sequence is generated as follows: For \(n=0,1,2, \ldots\) $$a_{n+1}=\left\\{\begin{array}{ll} a_{n} / 2 & \text { if } a_{n} \text { is even } \\ 3 a_{n}+1 & \text { if } a_{n} \text { is odd .} \end{array}\right.$$ However, if \(a_{n}=1\) for any \(n,\) then the sequence terminates. a. Compute the sequence that results from the seeds \(N=2,3\), \(4, \ldots, 10 .\) You should verify that in all these cases, the sequence eventually terminates. The hailstone conjecture (still unproved) states that for all positive integers \(N\), the sequence terminates after a finite number of terms. b. Now define the hailstone sequence \(\left\\{H_{k}\right\\},\) which is the number of terms needed for the sequence \(\left\\{a_{n}\right\\}\) to terminate starting with a seed of \(k\). Verify that \(H_{2}=1, H_{3}=7\), and \(H_{4}=2\). c. Plot as many terms of the hailstone sequence as is feasible. How did the sequence get its name? Does the conjecture appear to be true?

Consider the sequence \(\left\\{x_{n}\right\\}\) defined for \(n=1,2,3, \ldots\) by $$x_{n}=\sum_{k=n+1}^{2 n} \frac{1}{k}=\frac{1}{n+1}+\frac{1}{n+2}+\dots+\frac{1}{2 n}.$$ a. Write out the terms \(x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}\). b. Show that \(\frac{1}{2} \leq x_{n}<1,\) for \(n=1,2,3, \ldots\). c. Show that \(x_{n}\) is the right Riemann sum for \(\int_{1}^{2} \frac{d x}{x}\) using \(n\) subintervals. d. Conclude that \(\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} x_{n}=\ln 2\).

Evaluate the limit of the following sequences or state that the limit does not exist. $$a_{n}=\cos \left(0.99^{n}\right)+\frac{7^{n}+9^{n}}{63^{n}}$$

Consider series \(S=\sum_{k=0}^{n} r^{k},\) where \(|r|<1\) and its sequence of partial sums \(S_{n}=\sum_{k=0}^{n} r^{k}\) a. Complete the following table showing the smallest value of \(n,\) calling it \(N(r),\) such that \(\left|S-S_{n}\right|<10^{-4},\) for various values of \(r .\) For example, with \(r=0.5\) and \(S=2,\) we find that \(\left|S-S_{13}\right|=1.2 \times 10^{-4}\) and \(\left|S-S_{14}\right|=6.1 \times 10^{-5}\) Therefore, \(N(0.5)=14\) $$\begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline r & -0.9 & -0.7 & -0.5 & -0.2 & 0 & 0.2 & 0.5 & 0.7 & 0.9 \\ \hline N(r) & & & & & & & 14 & & \\ \hline \end{array}$$ b. Make a graph of \(N(r)\) for the values of \(r\) in part (a). c. How does the rate of convergence of the geometric series depend on \(r ?\)

In Section \(8.3,\) we established that the geometric series \(\sum r^{k}\) converges provided \(|r| < 1\). Notice that if \(-1 < r<0,\) the geometric series is also an alternating series. Use the Alternating Series Test to show that for \(-1 < r <0\), the series \(\sum r^{k}\) converges.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.