/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 9 An article in the British Medica... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

An article in the British Medical Journal ["Comparison of Treatment of Renal Calculi by Operative Surgery, Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy" (1986, Vol. 292, pp. \(879-882\) ) ] reported that percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PN) had a success rate in removing kidney stones of 289 out of 350 (83\%) patients. However, when the stone diameter was considered, the results looked different. For stones of \(<2 \mathrm{~cm}, 87 \%(234 / 270)\) of cases were successful. For stones of \(\geq 2 \mathrm{~cm},\) a success rate of \(69 \%(55 / 80)\) was observed for PN. a. Are the successes and size of stones independent? Use \(\alpha=0.05\) b. Find the \(P\) -value for this test.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. Not independent, as CHI-sq > 3.841; b. P-value < 0.05, hence reject null.

Step by step solution

01

Formulate Hypotheses

To determine if successes and size of stones are independent, we need to set up our null and alternative hypotheses. - Null Hypothesis (\(H_0\)): Success and stone size are independent.- Alternative Hypothesis (\(H_a\)): Success and stone size are not independent.
02

Create a Contingency Table

Construct a contingency table from the given data:\[\begin{array}{c|c|c|c}& \text{< 2 cm} & \text{≥ 2 cm} & \text{Total} \\hline\text{Success} & 234 & 55 & 289 \\text{Failure} & 36 & 25 & 61 \\text{Total} & 270 & 80 & 350 \\end{array}\]
03

Calculate Expected Frequencies

Using the formula for expected frequency for a cell in a contingency table, calculate each expected frequency:The formula is:\[E_{ij} = \frac{(\text{Row total})_i \times (\text{Column total})_j}{\text{Grand total}}\]- Expected frequency for \(< 2 \text{ cm, Success}\) is \(\frac{270 \times 289}{350} = 223.2\)- Expected frequency for \(\geq 2 \text{ cm, Success}\) is \(\frac{80 \times 289}{350} = 65.8\)Repeat this calculation for all cells in the table.
04

Perform Chi-Square Test

Use the Chi-Square formula:\[\chi^2 = \sum \frac{(O_i - E_i)^2}{E_i}\]where \(O_i\) is the observed frequency and \(E_i\) is the expected frequency.Calculate \(\chi^2\) for each cell and sum them:- \(< 2 \text{ cm, Success}: \frac{(234 - 223.2)^2}{223.2} \approx 0.522\)- \(\geq 2 \text{ cm, Success}: \frac{(55 - 65.8)^2}{65.8} \approx 1.770\)Complete the calculation for Failure cells and sum all.
05

Find Critical Value and Compare

Degrees of freedom for the table: \((rows - 1)(columns - 1) = 1 \times 1 = 1\).Find the critical value for \(\chi^2\) with \(\alpha = 0.05\): the critical value is 3.841.Compare calculated \(\chi^2\) with critical value to determine independence.
06

Interpret the Result

Compare the calculated \(\chi^2\) to the critical value. If \(\chi^2\) is greater than the critical value, reject the null hypothesis.If \(\chi^2 < 3.841\), we fail to reject the null hypothesis, indicating success and stone size are independent.
07

Calculate P-value

Utilize a Chi-Square distribution table or calculator to find the P-value based on the \(\chi^2\) statistic calculated. Find the P-value, which indicates the probability of observing the data under the null hypothesis.
08

Make a Conclusion based on P-value

Compare the P-value with \(\alpha = 0.05\). If the P-value is less than 0.05, reject the null hypothesis, indicating a dependence between success rate and stone size. If the P-value is greater, you fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a critical component of statistical analysis. It helps us determine if there is enough evidence to support a particular claim about a dataset. In our exercise, we need to test if the success rate of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PN) is independent of the size of kidney stones.
To begin, we set up two hypotheses:
  • The Null Hypothesis (\(H_0\)) - This assumes that the success of PN is independent of stone size.
  • The Alternative Hypothesis (\(H_a\)) - This assumes that the success of PN depends on the size of the stone.
We will use a chi-square test for independence to examine these hypotheses. If the data provides sufficient evidence against the null hypothesis, we will reject it in favor of the alternative hypothesis. It's important to set a significance level, \(\alpha\), which is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true. In this exercise, we use \(\alpha = 0.05\). This means there is a 5% risk of concluding that the stone size affects the success rate when it actually does not.
Contingency Table
A contingency table is a data matrix that displays the frequency distribution of the variables, in our case, the success of PN and stone size. It allows us to visually compare the observed data with what might be expected if, indeed, the two variables were independent.
In the exercise, we created the following table based on the data: - For stones of size <2 cm, there are 234 successes and 36 failures out of 270 trials.- For stones of size ≥2 cm, the table shows 55 successes and 25 failures out of 80 trials.
The contingency table helps us structure our calculations. Specifically, it will be key for finding expected frequencies for each cell, which we'll need to carry out the chi-square test. Expected frequencies are based on the assumption that the null hypothesis is true. They are calculated as: \[E_{ij} = \frac{(\text{Row total})_i \times (\text{Column total})_j}{\text{Grand total}}\]where \(E_{ij}\) represents the expected frequency for cell \(i, j\). This is crucial, as large deviations between observed and expected frequencies signal potential dependence between our variables.
P-value Calculation
The p-value is a probability measure that underpins hypothesis testing. It informs us about the likelihood of observing our data if the null hypothesis is true.
In the chi-square test for independence, after calculating your \(\chi^2\) statistic, you use a chi-square distribution table to find your p-value. Here’s how it works:
  • First, you calculate the \(\chi^2\) statistic using: \[\chi^2 = \sum \frac{(O_i - E_i)^2}{E_i}\]where \(O_i\) is the observed frequency and \(E_i\) is the expected frequency.
  • Once you have your \(\chi^2\) value, compare it to a chi-square distribution table with your degrees of freedom (calculated as \((\text{rows}-1)(\text{columns}-1)\)).
  • Determine your p-value from the table or using a calculator. This step tells you the probability of obtaining a test result at least as extreme as the one observed, given that the null hypothesis is true.
If the p-value is less than the \(0.05\) significance level, it suggests a significant departure from the null hypothesis, thus leading you to reject it. Conversely, a higher p-value implies insufficient evidence against the null hypothesis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The bacterial strain Acinetobacter has been tested for its adhesion properties. A sample of five measurements gave readings of 2.69,5.76,2.67,1.62 and 4.12 dyne- \(\mathrm{cm}^{2}\). Assume that the standard deviation is known to be 0.66 dyne-cm \(^{2}\) and that the scientists are interested in high adhesion (at least 2.5 dyne-cm \(^{2}\) ). a. Should the alternative hypothesis be one-sided or two-sided? b. Test the hypothesis that the mean adhesion is 2.5 dyne- \(\mathrm{cm}^{2}\) c. What is the \(P\) -value of the test statistic?

Suppose that of 1000 customers surveyed, 850 are satisfied or very satisfied with a corporation's products and services. a. Test the hypothesis \(H_{0}: p=0.9\) against \(H_{1}: p \neq 0.9\) at \(\alpha=0.05 .\) Find the \(P\) -value. b. Explain how the question in part (a) could be answered by constructing a \(95 \%\) two-sided confidence interval for \(p\).

A primer paint can be used on aluminum panels. The primer's drying time is an important consideration in the manufacturing process. Twenty panels are selected, and the drying times are as follows: \(1.6,1.3,1.5,1.6,1.7,1.9,1.8,1.6,\) \(1.4,1.8,1.9,1.8,1.7,1.5,1.6,1.4,1.3,1.6,1.5,\) and \(1.8 .\) Is there evidence that the mean drying time of the primer exceeds \(1.5 \mathrm{hr} ?\)

Medical researchers have developed a new artificial heart constructed primarily of titanium and plastic. The heart will last and operate almost indefinitely once it is implanted in the patient's body, but the battery pack needs to be recharged about every 4 hours. A random sample of 50 battery packs is selected and subjected to a life test. The average life of these batteries is 4.05 hours. Assume that battery life is normally distributed with standard deviation \(\sigma=0.2\) hour. a. Is there evidence to support the claim that mean battery life exceeds 4 hours? Use \(\alpha=0.05 .\) b. What is the \(P\) -value for the test in part (a)? c. Compute the power of the test if the true mean battery life is 4.5 hours. d. What sample size would be required to detect a true mean battery life of 4.5 hours if you wanted the power of the test to be at least \(0.9 ?\) e. Explain how the question in part (a) could be answered by constructing a one-sided confidence bound on the mean life.

The proportion of residents in Phoenix favoring the building of toll roads to complete the freeway system is believed to be \(p=0.3 .\) If a random sample of 10 residents shows that one or fewer favor this proposal, we will conclude that \(p<0.3\). a. Find the probability of type I error if the true proportion is \(p=0.3\). b. Find the probability of committing a type II error with this procedure if \(p=0.2\). c. What is the power of this procedure if the true proportion is \(p=0.2 ?\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.