/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 61 An article in Bioresource Techno... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

An article in Bioresource Technology ["Medium Optimization for Phenazine-1-carboxylic Acid Production by a gacA qscR Double Mutant of Pseudomonas sp. M18 Using Response Surface Methodology" (Vol. \(101(11), 2010,\) pp. \(4089-4095)]\) described an experiment to optimize culture medium factors to enhance phenazine-1-carboxylic acid (PCA) production. A \(2^{5-1}\) fractional factorial design was conducted with factors soybean meal, glucose, corn steep liquor, ethanol, and \(\mathrm{MgSO}_{4}\). Rows below the horizontal line in the table (coded with zeros) correspond to center points. (a) What is the generator of this design? (b) What is the resolution of this design? (c) Analyze factor effects and comment on important ones. (d) Develop a regression model to predict production in terms of the actual factor levels. (e) Does a residual analysis indicate any problems? $$ \begin{array}{ccccccc} \hline \text { Run } & X_{1} & X_{2} & X_{3} & X_{4} & X_{5} & \text { Production }(\mathrm{g} / \mathrm{L}) \\ \hline 1 & \- & \- & \- & \- & \+ & 1575.5 \\ 2 & \+ & \- & \- & \- & \- & 2201.4 \\ 3 & \- & \+ & \- & \- & \- & 1813.9 \\ 4 & \+ & \+ & \- & \- & \+ & 2164.1 \\ 5 & \- & \- & \+ & \- & \- & 1739.6 \\ 6 & \+ & \- & \+ & \- & \+ & 2483.2 \\ 7 & \- & \+ & \+ & \- & \+ & 2159.1 \\ 8 & \+ & \+ & \+ & \- & \- & 2257.7 \\ 9 & \- & \- & \- & \+ & \- & 1386.3 \\ 10 & \+ & \- & \- & \+ & \+ & 1967.8 \\ 11 & \- & \+ & \- & \+ & \+ & 1306.0 \\ 12 & \+ & \+ & \- & \+ & \- & 2486.9 \\ 13 & \- & \- & \+ & \+ & \+ & 2374.9 \\ 14 & \+ & \- & \+ & \+ & \- & 2932.7 \\ 15 & \- & \+ & \+ & \+ & \- & 2458.9 \\ 16 & \+ & \+ & \+ & \+ & \+ & 3204.9 \\ \hline 17 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 2630.4 \\ 18 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 2571.6 \\ 19 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 2734.5 \\ 20 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 2480.4 \\ 21 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 2662.5 \end{array} $$ $$ \begin{array}{llccc} \hline \text { Variable } & \text { Component } && {\text { Levels (g/L) }} \\\ \hline & & -1 & 0 & +1 \\ X_{1} & \text { Soybean meal } & 30 & 45 & 60 \\ X_{2} & \text { Ethanol } & 12 & 18 & 24 \\ X_{3} & \text { Corn steep liquor } & 7 & 11 & 14 \\ X_{4} & \text { Glucose } & 10 & 15 & 20 \\ X_{5} & \mathrm{MgSO}_{4} & 0 & 1 & 2 \end{array} $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) Generator: \(E = ABCD\); (b) Resolution: V; (c) Analyze effects and comment on factors; (d) Develop regression model using factor levels; (e) Residuals should show random scatter.

Step by step solution

01

Determine the Generator

In a \(2^{5-1}\) fractional factorial design, the generator is determined by identifying the defining relation. For this setup, one factor is confounded with a combination of others. Assuming \(D = ABC\) or any cyclic permutation (like \(E = ABCD\)) is typical, leading to the generator \(I = ABCDE\). Thus, \(E = ABCD\) can be used as a generator.
02

Determine the Resolution

The resolution of a fractional factorial design is determined by counting the number of letters in the shortest defining relation excluding \(I\). The generator \(I = ABCDE\) has 5 letters, which indicates a resolution V design.
03

Analyze Factor Effects

To analyze factor effects, compute the average production for each level of a factor and observe differences. Calculate the main effects by comparing means of + and - levels of factors like soybean meal, glucose, etc. Perform a statistical test or factorial effect plot to identify significant factors. The higher absolute effects indicate more important factors.
04

Develop Regression Model

A regression model predicting PCA production can be formulated: \(Y = \beta_0 + \beta_1X_1 + \beta_2X_2 + \beta_3X_3 + \beta_4X_4 + \beta_5X_5 + \ldots\), where \(Y\) is production, each \(X\) represents a factor coded value, and \(\beta\) are coefficients determined by fitting the data (e.g., using software for regression analysis).
05

Conduct Residual Analysis

Residual analysis involves evaluating the residuals (differences between observed and predicted values) to check for non-random patterns. Plot residuals to ensure they are randomly scattered about zero without pattern, which indicates a good model fit without significant problems like heteroscedasticity or non-normality.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Regression Model
A regression model serves as a mathematical tool used to describe the relationship between a response variable and one or more predictor variables. In the context of fractional factorial design, it helps us better understand how different factors influence Phenazine-1-carboxylic acid production. To develop an effective regression model, we use the observed data—like the production volumes from each experimental run—to fit a mathematical equation. This equation predicts outcomes based on different combinations of factor levels.For this design setup, the regression model can be expressed as:- \( Y = \beta_0 + \beta_1X_1 + \beta_2X_2 + \beta_3X_3 + \beta_4X_4 + \beta_5X_5 \) Here, \( Y \) is the response variable representing PCA production in grams per liter. Each \( X \) represents the coded levels of the factors like soybean meal or ethanol, and \( \beta \) are coefficients indicating how much each factor contributes to the response.Regression analysis software can aid in estimating these coefficients by minimizing the differences between observed and predicted values. Through this process, the model gives insights into the impact of individual factors on PCA production.
Factor Effects Analysis
Factor effects analysis is crucial in understanding which of the experimental factors significantly affect the outcome. In a fractional factorial design like the one used in our PCA production experiment, we analyze factor effects by calculating the average production for varying levels of each factor. Here's the simple way to think about it: - Compare mean production at the '+' and '-' levels of a factor to estimate its effect. - A larger difference implies a more significant effect. To identify important factors, a factorial effect plot or statistical tests, such as ANOVA, can be used. These tools help in pinpointing which factors increase or decrease PCA production significantly. This analysis ensures that resources are optimized by focusing on modifying the levels of factors with substantial effects. Ignoring less impactful factors means more efficient experimentation.
Response Surface Methodology
Response Surface Methodology (RSM) is an essential approach used to optimize and refine the factors involved in experiments like PCA production. RSM is specifically beneficial for understanding the interaction between variables and their joint effect on the response variable, providing a deeper dive beyond individual factor effects. With RSM, the primary goal is to maximize or minimize a desired response. It involves:
  • Building a model to estimate the response surface and coefficients.
  • Using design of experiments, including fractional factorial designs, to gather data efficiently.
  • Exploring the response surface for optimal settings of experimental factors.
  • Using graphical presentation techniques like contour plots for better visualization.
Through RSM, we gain a holistic understanding of how the factors work together, allowing for fine-tuning and precise control of production processes. This method is particularly helpful when multiple factors and their interactions influence the response, as seen in complex biological processes like PCA production.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider the following computer output from a single replicate of a \(2^{4}\) experiment in two blocks with \(\mathrm{ABCD}\) confounded. (a) Comment on the value of blocking in this experiment. (b) What effects were used to generate the residual error in the ANOVA? (c) Calculate the entries marked with "?" in the output. Factorial Fit: y Versus Block, \(\mathrm{A}, \mathrm{B}, \mathrm{C}, \mathrm{D}\) Estimated Effects and Coefficients \(s\) and Coefficients $$ \begin{array}{lrrrrc} \text { Term }&\text { Effect } & {\text { Coef }} & \text { SE Coef } & {t} & {P} \\ \hline \text { Constant } & & 579.33 & 9.928 & 58.35 & 0.000 \\ \text { Block } & & 105.68 & 9.928 & 10.64 & 0.000 \\ \text { A } & -15.41 & -7.70 & 9.928 & -0.78 & 0.481 \\ \text { B } & 2.95 & 1.47 & 9.928 & 0.15 & 0.889 \\ \text { C } & 15.92 & 7.96 & 9.928 & 0.80 & 0.468 \\ \text { D } & -37.87 & -18.94 & 9.928 & -1.91 & 0.129 \\ \text { A*B } & -8.16 & -4.08 & 9.928 & -0.41 & 0.702 \\ \text { A*C } & 5.91 & 2.95 & 9.928 & 0.30 & 0.781 \\ \text { A*D } & 30.28 & ? & 9.928 & ? & 0.202 \\ \text { B*C } & 20.43 & 10.21 & 9.928 & 1.03 & 0.362 \\ \text { B*D } & -17.11 & -8.55 & 9.928 & -0.86 & 0.437 \\ \text { C*D } & 4.41 & 2.21 & 9.928 & 0.22 & 0.835 \\ \hline {2}{l} {S=39.7131} && \text { R-Sq }=96.84 \% & \text { R-Sq }(\text { adj })=88.16 \% \end{array} $$

A \(2^{4}\) factorial design was run in a chemical process. The design factors are \(A=\operatorname{time}, B=\) concentration, \(C=\) pressure, and \(D=\) temperature. The response variable is yield. The data follow: (Table) (a) Estimate the factor effects. Based on a normal probability plot of the effect estimates, identify a model for the data from this experiment. (b) Conduct an ANOVA based on the model identified in part (a). What are your conclusions? (c) Analyze the residuals and comment on model adequacy. (d) Find a regression model to predict yield in terms of the actual factor levels. (e) Can this design be projected into a \(2^{3}\) design with two replicates? If so, sketch the design and show the average and range of the two yield values at each cube corner. Discuss the practical value of this plot.

Four factors are thought to influence the taste of a soft-drink beverage: type of sweetener \((A),\) ratio of syrup to water \((B),\) carbonation level \((C),\) and temperature \((D) .\) Each factor can be run at two levels, producing a \(2^{4}\) design. At each run in the design, samples of the beverage are given to a test panel consisting of 20 people. Each tester assigns the beverage a point score from 1 to \(10 .\) Total score is the response variable, and the objective is to find a formulation that maximizes total score. Two replicates of this design are run, and the results are shown in the table. Analyze the data and draw conclusions. Use \(a=0.05\) in the statistical tests. $$ \begin{array}{ccc} \hline \ {\begin{array}{c} \text { Treatment } \\ \text { Combination } \end{array}} & {\text { Replicate }} \\ \ & \text { I } & \text { II } \\ \hline(1) & 159 & 163 \\ a & 168 & 175 \\ b & 158 & 163 \\ a b & 166 & 168 \\ c & 175 & 178 \\ a c & 179 & 183 \\ b c & 173 & 168 \\ a b c & 179 & 182 \\ d & 164 & 159 \\ a d & 187 & 189 \\ b d & 163 & 159 \\ a b d & 185 & 191 \\ c d & 168 & 174 \\ a c d & 197 & 199 \\ b c d & 170 & 174 \\ a b c d & 194 & 198 \end{array} $$

An article in Industrial Quality Control \((1956,\) pp. 5-8) describes an experiment to investigate the effect of two factors (glass type and phosphor type) on the brightness of a television tube. The response variable measured is the current (in microamps) necessary to obtain a specified brightness level. The data are shown in the following table: (a) State the hypotheses of interest in this experiment. (b) Test the hypotheses in part (a) and draw conclusions using the analysis of variance with \(\alpha=0.05\). (c) Analyze the residuals from this experiment. $$ \begin{array}{cccc} \hline {\begin{array}{c} \text { Glass } \\ \text { Type } \end{array}} && {\text { Phosphor Type }} \\ \ & \mathbf{1} & \mathbf{2} & \mathbf{3} \\ \hline 1 & 280 & 300 & 290 \\ & 290 & 310 & 285 \\ & 285 & 295 & 290 \\ \hline 2 & 230 & 260 & 220 \\ & 235 & 240 & 225 \\ & 240 & 235 & 230 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

An article in the Journal of Applied Electrochemistry (May 2008, Vol. \(38(5),\) pp. \(583-590\) ) presented a \(2^{7-3}\) fractional factorial design to perform optimization of polybenzimidazolebased membrane electrode assemblies for \(\mathrm{H}_{2} / \mathrm{O}_{2}\) fuel cells. The design and data are shown in the following table. $$ \begin{array}{ccccccccc} \text { Runs } & A & B & C & D & E & F & G & \begin{array}{l} \text { Current Density } \\ \left(\mathbf{C D} \mathbf{~ m A} \mathbf{c m}^{2}\right) \end{array} \\ \hline 1 & -1 & -1 & -1 & -1 & -1 & -1 & -1 & 160 \\ 2 & +1 & -1 & -1 & -1 & +1 & +1 & +1 & 20 \\ 3 & -1 & +1 & -1 & -1 & +1 & +1 & -1 & 80 \\ 4 & +1 & +1 & -1 & -1 & -1 & -1 & +1 & 317 \\ 5 & -1 & -1 & +1 & -1 & +1 & -1 & +1 & 19 \\ 6 & +1 & -1 & +1 & -1 & -1 & +1 & -1 & 4 \\ 7 & -1 & +1 & +1 & -1 & -1 & +1 & +1 & 20 \\ 8 & +1 & +1 & +1 & -1 & +1 & -1 & -1 & 88 \end{array} $$ $$ \begin{array}{rrrrrrrrr} \hline \text { Runs } & A & B & C & D & E & F & G & \begin{array}{l} \text { Current Density } \\ \left(\mathbf{C D} \mathrm{mA} \mathrm{cm}^{2}\right) \end{array} \\ \hline 9 & -1 & -1 & -1 & +1 & -1 & +1 & +1 & 1100 \\ 10 & +1 & -1 & -1 & +1 & +1 & -1 & -1 & 12 \\ 11 & -1 & +1 & -1 & +1 & +1 & -1 & +1 & 552 \\ 12 & +1 & +1 & -1 & +1 & -1 & +1 & -1 & 880 \\ 13 & -1 & -1 & +1 & +1 & +1 & +1 & -1 & 16 \\ 14 & +1 & -1 & +1 & +1 & -1 & -1 & +1 & 20 \\ 15 & -1 & +1 & +1 & +1 & -1 & -1 & -1 & 8 \\ 16 & +1 & +1 & +1 & +1 & +1 & +1 & +1 & 15 \end{array} $$ The factors and levels are shown in the following table. $$ \begin{array}{llll} \hline & \text { Factor } & \ {-\mathbf{1}} & \ {+\mathbf{1}} \\ \hline \text { A } & \begin{array}{l} \text { Amount of binder in the } \\ \text { catalyst layer } \end{array} & 0.2 \mathrm{mg} \mathrm{cm}^{2} & 1 \mathrm{mg} \mathrm{cm}^{2} \\\ \text { B } & \text { Electrocatalyst loading } & 0.1 \mathrm{mg} \mathrm{cm}^{2} & 1 \mathrm{mg} \mathrm{cm}^{2} \\ \text { C } & \begin{array}{l} \text { Amount of carbon in the } \\ \text { gas diffusion layer } \end{array} & 2 \mathrm{mg} \mathrm{cm}^{2} & 4.5 \mathrm{mg} \mathrm{cm}^{2} \\\ \text { D } & \text { Hot compaction time } & 1 \mathrm{~min} & 10 \mathrm{~min} \\ \mathrm{E} & \text { Compaction temperature } & 100^{\circ} \mathrm{C} & 150^{\circ} \mathrm{C} \\ \mathrm{F} & \text { Hot compaction load } & 0.04 \text { ton } \mathrm{cm}^{2} & 0.2 \text { ton } \mathrm{cm}^{2} \\ \mathrm{G} & \text { Amount of PTFE in the } & 0.1 \mathrm{mg} \mathrm{cm}^{2} & 1 \mathrm{mg} \mathrm{cm}^{2} \\ & \text { gas diffusion layer } & & \end{array} $$ (a) Write down the alias relationships. (b) Estimate the main effects. (c) Prepare a normal probability plot for the effects and interpret the results. (d) Calculate the sum of squares for the alias set that contains the ABG interaction from the corresponding effect estimate

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.