/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 45 Consider the following computer ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Consider the following computer output from a single replicate of a \(2^{4}\) experiment in two blocks with \(\mathrm{ABCD}\) confounded. (a) Comment on the value of blocking in this experiment. (b) What effects were used to generate the residual error in the ANOVA? (c) Calculate the entries marked with "?" in the output. Factorial Fit: y Versus Block, \(\mathrm{A}, \mathrm{B}, \mathrm{C}, \mathrm{D}\) Estimated Effects and Coefficients \(s\) and Coefficients $$ \begin{array}{lrrrrc} \text { Term }&\text { Effect } & {\text { Coef }} & \text { SE Coef } & {t} & {P} \\ \hline \text { Constant } & & 579.33 & 9.928 & 58.35 & 0.000 \\ \text { Block } & & 105.68 & 9.928 & 10.64 & 0.000 \\ \text { A } & -15.41 & -7.70 & 9.928 & -0.78 & 0.481 \\ \text { B } & 2.95 & 1.47 & 9.928 & 0.15 & 0.889 \\ \text { C } & 15.92 & 7.96 & 9.928 & 0.80 & 0.468 \\ \text { D } & -37.87 & -18.94 & 9.928 & -1.91 & 0.129 \\ \text { A*B } & -8.16 & -4.08 & 9.928 & -0.41 & 0.702 \\ \text { A*C } & 5.91 & 2.95 & 9.928 & 0.30 & 0.781 \\ \text { A*D } & 30.28 & ? & 9.928 & ? & 0.202 \\ \text { B*C } & 20.43 & 10.21 & 9.928 & 1.03 & 0.362 \\ \text { B*D } & -17.11 & -8.55 & 9.928 & -0.86 & 0.437 \\ \text { C*D } & 4.41 & 2.21 & 9.928 & 0.22 & 0.835 \\ \hline {2}{l} {S=39.7131} && \text { R-Sq }=96.84 \% & \text { R-Sq }(\text { adj })=88.16 \% \end{array} $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
Blocking isolates variability due to block differences. Effects used include any high-order interactions not modeled. Missing values are 15.14 and 1.53 for the coefficient and t-value of A*D.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Role of Blocking

Blocking is used to account for variability in experimental results due to factors not directly under investigation. In this experiment, the effect \(\mathrm{ABCD}\) is confounded with the block, meaning any variation due to differences in blocks is captured in the effect \(\mathrm{ABCD}\). This helps to isolate the effects of the factors of interest.
02

Identifying Effects in Residual Error

In the ANOVA table, the residual error is calculated using all effects not included in the model fit, typically higher-order interactions or noise that cannot be attributed to any of the primary factors or their interactions. Given \(\mathrm{ABCD}\) is confounded with blocks, the high-order interaction effects such as \(\mathrm{A*B*C}\), or any unmeasured random noise would contribute to the residual error.
03

Missing Coefficient Calculation

To find the missing coefficient for \(\mathrm{A*D}\), divide the effect (30.28) by 2, giving us 15.14. For the standard error t-ratio, divide the coefficient by the standard error (9.928), resulting in a t-value of 1.53 (15.14 / 9.928). Therefore, these entries are 15.14 and 1.53, respectively.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Blocking
Blocking is a vital technique in experimental design used to reduce variability. When conducting experiments, there are often uncontrollable factors that can influence the results. These factors are not the main focus of the experiment but can introduce unwanted noise into the data. In a factorial design like the one in question, blocking helps to neutralize these extraneous variables.
By dividing the experimental units into blocks, and ensuring that each block is treated as similarly as possible except for the variation induced intentionally, one can achieve a clearer understanding of the primary factors being studied. In our specific case, the effect \(\mathrm{ABCD}\) is confounded, or mixed, with the block. This means any variability due to blocks is incorporated into the \(\mathrm{ABCD}\) interaction effect.
This practice allows researchers to effectively isolate and accurately measure the effects of the factors actually being studied, improving the precision and reliability of the results.
ANOVA
ANOVA, or Analysis of Variance, is a statistical method used to analyze differences among group means in a sample. It's a crucial tool in factorial experiment design, providing a way to discern whether any of the independent variables on their own, or in interaction with each other, have a significant impact on the dependent variable.
In this experiment, ANOVA is applied to partition the observed variance into components due to different sources, such as factor effects and block effects. The technique operates under the null hypothesis that all group means are equal, and tests against this.
By interpreting F-values and associated p-values, researchers determine whether to reject or accept the hypothesis. In our analysis, significant values highlight which factors have a substantial effect on the outcome, thus guiding decisions on which variables might require more focused examination or adjustment.
Confounding
Confounding is a condition in experimental design where the effects of two or more variables are mixed, making it hard to distinguish between their individual impacts. It’s crucial to identify and minimize confounding to preserve the integrity of the conclusions drawn from the experiment.
In the presented experiment, the interaction \(\mathrm{ABCD}\) is confounded with the block. This implies that any changes due to this interaction are indistinguishable from changes due to differences among the blocks. This can lead to challenges when interpreting the results.
Recognizing confounding is integral to accurate analysis, often requiring redesign of the experiment to separate variable effects if possible. However, in some scenarios, it is an acceptable method to control other variability sources, especially when complicated high-order interactions are involved.
Residual Error
Residual error represents the variation in the data that cannot be explained by the factors included in the model. In other words, it's the unexplained part of the variability after accounting for the known factors and their interactions.
Residuals are the differences between observed and predicted values and in the context of ANOVA, they are crucial for assessing model fit. In factorial experiments, these errors can arise from unmeasured noise or interactions not included in the model.
For this particular experiment, higher-order interactions that were not specifically modeled, such as \(\mathrm{A*B*C}\), contribute to the residual error. These errors must be carefully considered, as they hold information about the adequacy and limitations of the model. Understanding them is key to improving the design and interpretation of experimental results.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider the first-order model $$ \hat{y}=50+1.5 x_{1}-0.8 x_{2} $$ where \(-1 \leq x_{i} \leq 1\). Find the direction of steepest ascent.

Suppose that a response \(y_{1}\) is a function of two inputs \(x_{1}\) and \(x_{2}\) with \(y_{1}=2 x_{2}^{2}-4 x_{1}^{2}-x_{1} x_{2}+4\) (a) Draw the contours of this response function. (b) Consider another response \(y_{2}=\left(x_{1}-2\right)^{2}+\left(x_{2}-3\right)^{2}\). (c) Add the contours for \(y_{2}\) and discuss how feasible it is to minimize both \(y_{1}\) and \(y_{2}\) with values for \(x_{1}\) and \(x_{2}\).

Consider a \(2^{2}\) design in two blocks with \(A B\) confounded with blocks. Prove algebraically that \(S S_{\mathrm{AB}}=S S_{\text {Blocks }}\).

An article in Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology ["A Study of Antifungal Antibiotic Production by Thermomonospora sp MTCC 3340 Using Full Factorial Design" (2003, Vol. 78, pp. \(605-610\) ) ] considered the effects of several factors on antifungal activities. The antifungal yield was expressed as Nystatin international units per \(\mathrm{cm}^{3}\). The results from carbon source concentration (glucose) and incubation temperature factors follow. See Table E14-1. (a) State the hypotheses of interest. (b) Test your hypotheses with \(\alpha=0.5\). (c) Analyze the residuals and plot the residuals versus the predicted yield. (d) Using Fisher's LSD method, compare the means of anti-fungal activity for the different carbon source concentrations. (Table)

Heat-treating metal parts is a widely used manufacturing process. An article in the Journal of Metals (1989, Vol. 41 ) described an experiment to investigate flatness distortion from heat-treating for three types of gears and two heat-treating times. The data follow: $$ \begin{array}{lcc} \hline & \ {\text { Time (minutes) }} \\ \ \text { Gear Type } & \mathbf{9 0} & \mathbf{1 2 0} \\ \hline \text { 20-tooth } & 0.0265 & 0.0560 \\ & 0.0340 & 0.0650 \\ \text { 24-tooth } & 0.0430 & 0.0720 \\ & 0.0510 & 0.0880 \\ \text { 28-tooth } & 0.0405 & 0.0620 \\ & 0.0575 & 0.0825 \end{array} $$ (a) Is there any evidence that flatness distortion is different for the different gear types? Is there any indication that heat-treating time affects the flatness distortion? Do these factors interact? Use \(\alpha=0.05 .\) (b) Construct graphs of the factor effects that aid in drawing conclusions from this experiment. (c) Analyze the residuals from this experiment. Comment on the validity of the underlying assumptions.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.