/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 36 In a survey of 106 senior inform... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In a survey of 106 senior information technology and data security professionals at major U.S. companies regarding their confidence that they had detected all significant security breaches in the past year, the following responses were obtained. $$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \hline & \begin{array}{c} \text { Very } \\ \text { Answer } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Moderately } \\ \text { confident } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Not very } \\ \text { confident } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Not at all } \\ \text { confident } \end{array} & \text { confident } \\ \hline \text { Respondents } & 21 & 56 & 22 & 7 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ What is the probability that a respondent in the survey selected at random a. Had little or no confidence that he or she had detected all significant security breaches in the past year? b. Was very confident that he or she had detected all significant security breaches in the past year?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. The probability that a randomly selected respondent had little or no confidence in detecting all significant security breaches in the past year is \(\frac{29}{106}\). b. The probability that a randomly selected respondent was very confident in detecting all significant security breaches in the past year is \(\frac{21}{106}\).

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the probability of each confidence level

The first step is to calculate the probability of a respondent falling into each confidence level category, which can be done by dividing the number of respondents for each category by the total number of respondents. For little or no confidence (combining "not very confident" and "not at all confident" categories): No confidence: \[ P_{no} = \frac{22 + 7}{106} \] For very confident: \[ P_{very} = \frac{21}{106} \]
02

Find the probability for little or no confidence

Now, we will calculate the probability of a randomly selected respondent having little or no confidence. \[ P_{no} = \frac{22 + 7}{106} = \frac{29}{106} \] So, the probability of a respondent having little or no confidence is \(\frac{29}{106}\).
03

Find the probability for very confident

Next, we will calculate the probability of a randomly selected respondent being very confident. \[ P_{very} = \frac{21}{106}\] So, the probability of a respondent being very confident is \(\frac{21}{106}\). The probabilities for each question are: a. Little or no confidence: \(\frac{29}{106}\) b. Very confident: \(\frac{21}{106}\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Survey Analysis
Survey analysis is a powerful tool often used in research to gather and comprehend vast amounts of data from a particular audience. In this context, the survey analyzed responses from senior information technology and data security professionals at major U.S. companies. The objective was to assess their confidence in having detected all significant security breaches from the past year. Understanding survey results involves categorizing responses effectively and interpreting these to draw valuable insights. By compiling data from different confidence levels such as "very confident," "moderately confident," "not very confident," and "not at all confident," researchers can summarize the general sentiment among participants.
  • This type of analysis helps in identifying trends or patterns within the data.
  • It provides a clear picture of the population's overall attitudes or beliefs.
  • It assists in making informed decisions based on empirical evidence.
Survey analysis, therefore, acts as a lens through which comprehensive insights can be extracted and subsequently utilized in policy-making or strategic planning.
Confidence Levels
Confidence levels in survey responses refer to the degree of certainty or assurance respondents feel about a particular issue or situation. In this survey, respondents were asked about their confidence in having detected all significant security breaches in the past year. Four distinct categories were used to gauge confidence levels: - Very confident - Moderately confident - Not very confident - Not at all confident The distribution of responses among these categories indicates how secure professionals felt regarding their ability to identify breaches. Breaking down data into such levels helps pinpoint the areas where more confidence-building measures might be necessary. When analyzing these levels,
  • Being very confident suggests assertiveness in one's processes and controls.
  • Moderate confidence indicates some assurance but highlights areas of doubt.
  • Low confidence levels can point to potential gaps in security protocols.
Understanding the reasons behind varying levels of confidence allows for better targeted improvements and resource allocation.
Data Security Professionals
Data security professionals play a crucial role in safeguarding an organization's information and ensuring that sensitive data remains protected from unauthorized access or breaches. In the survey, senior information technology and data security professionals from major U.S. companies were assessed to determine their confidence in the security measures they had in place. Their responses not only highlight individual perspectives but also reflect on the maturity and effectiveness of the implementing security measures. Key responsibilities of data security professionals typically include:
  • Risk assessment and management to identify and mitigate potential threats.
  • Implementing and maintaining robust security protocols to defend against breaches.
  • Regularly updating security systems and educating stakeholders on security best practices.
Their feedback, as captured in surveys like this, offers valuable insights into industry standards and the challenges these professionals face in maintaining data integrity.
Statistical Calculation
Statistical calculations are vital in interpreting survey results, providing a quantitative basis for understanding what the data means. In this particular exercise, we calculated the probability of responses falling into certain confidence categories.Using probabilities, we can infer how likely a randomly chosen respondent is to fall into either "very confident" or "not confident" categories regarding their detection of security breaches. This is achieved by dividing the number of respondents in a specific confidence level by the total number of survey respondents.To calculate the required probabilities, you use the formula:\[ P = \frac{\text{Number of respondents in the category}}{\text{Total respondents}} \]For instance:
  • The probability of being 'very confident' is calculated as \( \frac{21}{106} \).
  • The probability of having 'little or no confidence' involves adding the counts of 'not very confident' and 'not at all confident' and then dividing by the total, leading to \( \frac{29}{106} \).
These calculations help to quantify the sentiments captured in the survey and support more data-driven decision-making.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The arrival times of the 8 a.m. Bostonbased commuter train as observed in the suburban town of Sharon over 120 weekdays is summarized below: $$ \begin{array}{lc} \hline & \begin{array}{c} \text { Frequency of } \\ \text { Arrival Time, } \boldsymbol{x} \end{array} & \text { Occurrence } \\ \hline 7: 56 \text { a.m. }

A survey in which people were asked how they were planning to prepare their taxes in 2007 revealed the following: $$ \begin{array}{lc} \hline \begin{array}{l} \text { Method of } \\ \text { Preparation } \end{array} & \text { Percent } \\ \hline \text { Computer software } & 33.9 \\ \hline \text { Accountant } & 23.6 \\ \hline \text { Tax preparation service } & 17.4 \\ \hline \text { Spouse, friend, or other } & \\ \text { relative will prepare } & 10.8 \\ \hline \text { By hand } & 14.3 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ What is the probability that a randomly chosen participant in the survey a. Was planning to use an accountant or a tax preparation service to prepare his taxes? b. Was not planning to use computer software to prepare his taxes and was not planning to do his taxes by hand?

In a survey conducted in the fall 2006, 800 homeowners were asked about their expectations regarding the value of their home in the next few years; the results of the survey are summarized below: $$ \begin{array}{lc} \hline \text { Expectations } & \text { Homeowners } \\ \hline \text { Decrease } & 48 \\ \hline \text { Stay the same } & 152 \\ \hline \text { Increase less than } 5 \% & 232 \\ \hline \text { Increase 5-10\% } & 240 \\ \hline \text { Increase more than 10\% } & 128 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ If a homeowner in the survey is chosen at random, what is the probability that he or she expected his or her home to a. Stay the same or decrease in value in the next few years? b. Increase \(5 \%\) or more in value in the next few years?

In an attempt to study the leading causes of airline crashes, the following data were compiled from records of airline crashes from 1959 to 1994 (excluding sabotage and military action). $$ \begin{array}{lc} \hline \text { Primary Factor } & \text { Accidents } \\ \hline \text { Pilot } & 327 \\ \hline \text { Airplane } & 49 \\ \hline \text { Maintenance } & 14 \\ \hline \text { Weather } & 22 \\ \hline \text { Airport/air traffic control } & 19 \\ \hline \text { Miscellaneous/other } & 15 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Assume that you have just learned of an airline crash and that the data give a generally good indication of the causes of airline crashes. Give an estimate of the probability that the primary cause of the crash was due to pilot error or bad weather.

According to data obtained from the National Weather Service, 376 of the 439 people killed by lightning in the United States between 1985 and 1992 were men. (Job and recreational habits of men make them more vulnerable to lightning.) Assuming that this trend holds in the future, what is the probability that a person killed by lightning a. Is a male? b. Is a female?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.