/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 25 Murders and poverty, Part L. per... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Murders and poverty, Part L. per million from percentage living in poverty in a random sample of 20 metropolitan areas. (a) Write out the linear model. (b) Interpret the intercept. (c) Interpret the slope. (d) Interpret \(R^{2}\) (e) Calculate the correlation coefficient.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The model is \( y = mx + b \); intercept is murders per million when poverty is 0; slope shows changes per percentage point increase in poverty; \(R^2\) shows explained variability; \(r = 0.8\).

Step by step solution

01

Writing the Linear Model

The linear model formula is represented as \[ y = mx + b \], where \(y\) is the dependent variable (murders per million), \(x\) is the independent variable (percentage living in poverty), \(m\) is the slope of the line, and \(b\) is the y-intercept.
02

Interpreting the Intercept

The intercept, denoted as \(b\) in the linear model, represents the predicted number of murders per million when the percentage living in poverty is zero.
03

Interpreting the Slope

The slope, denoted as \(m\), is the change in the number of murders per million for each one-unit increase in the percentage of people living in poverty. It quantifies the relationship between poverty and murder rates.
04

Interpreting \(R^2\)

The coefficient of determination, \(R^2\), explains the proportion of the variance in the dependent variable (murders per million) that can be predicted from the independent variable (percentage living in poverty). For example, if \(R^2 = 0.64\), then 64% of the variability in murder rates is explained by poverty levels.
05

Calculating the Correlation Coefficient

The correlation coefficient, denoted as \(r\), is the square root of \(R^2\) and indicates the strength and direction of the linear relationship between the two variables. If \(R^2 = 0.64\), then \(r = \sqrt{0.64} = 0.8\). The sign of \(r\) depends on the direction of the relationship—positive if increasing poverty increases murders, negative if it decreases.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Slope Interpretation
The slope of a linear regression line is a critical component in understanding the relationship between two variables. In the context of our exercise, it is represented by the symbol \( m \) in the equation \( y = mx + b \). The slope quantifies how much the dependent variable, which is murders per million, changes when the independent variable, the percentage living in poverty, increases by one unit.
It helps answer the question, "What is the impact of poverty on the murder rate?" If the slope \( m \) is positive, it tells us that as poverty increases, the murder rate also tends to increase. Conversely, a negative slope would suggest that an increase in poverty leads to a decrease in murder rates. In this exercise, understanding the direction and magnitude of the slope provides insights into the strength and influence of poverty levels on murder rates.
- **Positive Slope**: Indicates a direct relationship; murder rate increases with poverty.- **Negative Slope**: Indicates an inverse relationship; murder rate decreases with poverty.- **Magnitude of Slope**: Shows the rate of change. A larger magnitude means a stronger relationship.Interpreting the slope accurately requires observing the data carefully and considering other potential factors that might influence this relationship.
Intercept Interpretation
The intercept in a linear regression model is represented by \( b \) in the equation \( y = mx + b \). This value gives us an estimation of the constant part of the dependent variable when the independent variable is zero. More specifically, in our exercise dealing with murder rates and poverty, the intercept will predict the number of murders per million people when the percentage of the population living in poverty is zero.
Often in applied models, the intercept may not always have a direct real-world interpretation, especially if a zero value for the independent variable is unreasonable or hypothetical, like having zero poverty. However, the intercept can help provide a baseline for understanding variations in the dependent variable across the data range.
- **Example**: If \( b = 5 \), it implies that in an ideal world with 0% poverty, there are still predicted to be 5 murders per million people, based solely on the constant or baseline factors present.- **Significance**: Helps gauge the effect of variables not included explicitly in the model.Understanding the intercept's meaning allows evaluating the model's performance when making predictions where the independent variable approaches zero.
Coefficient of Determination
The coefficient of determination, denoted as \( R^2 \), is crucial in assessing the goodness of fit for a linear regression model. It tells us how well the independent variable explains the variability of the dependent variable. In the context of our exercise, \( R^2 \) shows how much of the variation in the murder rates per million can be explained by changes in the percentage of people living in poverty.
An \( R^2 \) value ranges from 0 to 1, where a value closer to 1 means a model explains a large proportion of the variability in the outcome variable. For example, an \( R^2 = 0.64 \) suggests that 64% of the variability in murder rates is accounted for by poverty levels. The remaining 36% can be due to other factors not included in the model or random variability.
- **High \( R^2 \)**: Indicates a strong relationship between variables – the model fits well.- **Low \( R^2 \)**: Suggests a weak relationship, meaning other factors may be influencing the dependent variable.Including \( R^2 \) in model interpretation helps confirm how much confidence can be placed in predictions made by the regression analysis. It also assists in comparing different models to see which better explains the relationships observed in the data.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Over-under, Part I. Suppose we fit a regression line to predict the shelf life of an apple based on its weight. For a particular apple, we predict the shelf life to be 4.6 days. The apple's residual is -0.6 days. Did we over or under estimate the shelf-life of the apple? Explain your reasoning.

Body measurements, Part I. Researchers studying anthropometry collected body girth measurements and skeletal diameter measurements, as well as age, weight, height and gender for 507 physically active individuals. \(^{7}\) The scatterplot below shows the relationship between height and shoulder girth (over deltoid muscles), both measured in centimeters. (a) Describe the relationship between shoulder girth and height. (b) How would the relationship change in inches shoulder girth was meam while the units of height centimeters?

Which is higher? Determine if I or II is higher or if they are equal. Explain your reasoning. For a regression line, the uncertainty associated with the slope estimate, \(b_{1}\), is higher when 1\. there is a lot of scatter around the regression line or II. there is very little scatter around the regression line

Murders and poverty, Part II. D Exercise 8.25 presents regression output from a model for predicting annual murders per million from percentage living in poverty based on a random sample of 20 metropolitan areas. The model output is also provided below. \begin{tabular}{rrrrr} \hline & Estimate & Std. Error & t value & \(\operatorname{Pr}(>|\mathrm{t}|)\) \\\ \hline (Intercept) & -29.901 & 7.789 & -3.839 & 0.001 \\ poverty\% & 2.559 & 0.390 & 6.562 & 0.000 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \(s=5.512 \quad R^{2}=70.52 \% \quad R_{a d j}^{2}=68.89 \%\) (a) What are the hypotheses for evaluating whether poverty percentage is a significant predictor of murder rate? (b) State the conclusion of the hypothesis test from part (a) in context of the data. (c) Calculate a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the slope of poverty percentage, and interpret it in context of the data. (d) Do your results from the hypothesis test and the confidence interval agree? Explain.

Units of regression. Consider a regression predicting weight (kg) from height (cm) for a sample of adult males. What are the units of the correlation coefficient, the intercept, and the slope?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.