/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 47 Rock-paper-scissors is a hand ga... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Rock-paper-scissors is a hand game played by two or more people where players choose to sign either rock, paper, or scissors with their hands. For your statistics class project, you want to evaluate whether players choose between these three options randomly, or if certain options are favored above others. You ask two friends to play rock-paper-scissors and count the times each option is played. The following table summarizes the data: $$ \begin{array}{ccc} \text { Rock } & \text { Paper } & \text { Scissors } \\ \hline 43 & 21 & 35 \end{array} $$ Use these data to evaluate whether players choose between these three options randomly, or if certain options are favored above others. Make sure to clearly outline each step of your analysis, and interpret your results in context of the data and the research question.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Players do not choose options randomly; they favor certain options.

Step by step solution

01

Define the Hypotheses

First, define the null and alternative hypotheses. The null hypothesis \((H_0)\) is that players choose rock, paper, and scissors with equal probability. The alternative hypothesis \((H_a)\) states that players do not choose the options equally.
02

Collect Observed Frequencies

From the data, we have the following observed frequencies: Rock \(O_1 = 43\), Paper \(O_2 = 21\), and Scissors \(O_3 = 35\).
03

Calculate Expected Frequencies

Assuming random choice, each option should be equally likely. Total number of plays is \(43 + 21 + 35 = 99\). Thus, the expected frequency for each option is \(E = \frac{99}{3} = 33\).
04

Use the Chi-Square Test

Calculate the chi-square statistic using the formula: \[\chi^2 = \sum \frac{(O_i - E)^2}{E}\]where \(O_i\) are observed frequencies and \(E\) are expected frequencies.
05

Perform Calculations

Substitute the values into the chi-square formula:\[\chi^2 = \frac{(43-33)^2}{33} + \frac{(21-33)^2}{33} + \frac{(35-33)^2}{33}\]Calculate each term: \(\frac{(43-33)^2}{33} = \frac{100}{33} \approx 3.03\), \(\frac{(21-33)^2}{33} = \frac{144}{33} \approx 4.36\), \(\frac{(35-33)^2}{33} = \frac{4}{33} \approx 0.12\).Finally, compute \(\chi^2\), which equals approximately \(3.03 + 4.36 + 0.12 = 7.51\).
06

Determine the Critical Value

Find the critical chi-square value from the chi-square distribution table for \(df = 2\) (degrees of freedom = number of outcomes - 1) at a significance level \(\alpha\) (commonly 0.05). The critical value \(\chi^2_{0.05, 2} \approx 5.991\).
07

Interpret Results

Compare the calculated chi-square statistic \(7.51\) to the critical value \(5.991\). Since \(7.51 > 5.991\), we reject the null hypothesis. This suggests that players do not choose rock, paper, or scissors equally.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
In hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis, denoted as \(H_0\), is a critical concept. It represents a statement of no effect or no difference, implying no change or preference in the case under examination. For our rock-paper-scissors game scenario, the null hypothesis states that the players choose rock, paper, and scissors with equal probability.

In simpler terms, \(H_0\) presupposes that each choice occurs purely by chance, so there is no tendency toward any specific option.

This idea forms the cornerstone of statistical testing, as it provides a baseline or unexciting assumption against which we can test a new theory or observation.
Alternative Hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis, often represented as \(H_a\), is the statement you want to test against the null hypothesis. In the context of our exercise, the alternative hypothesis suggests that players do not choose rock, paper, and scissors with equal probability.

This implies that there is a noticeable difference, meaning players favor certain options over others.

The alternative hypothesis is essential because rejecting the null hypothesis implies acceptance of the alternative, thus revealing new insights or trends in the data. It drives the investigation by suggesting an outcome where behavior is not random.
Observed Frequencies
Observed frequencies (\(O_i\)) represent the actual data collected during an experiment or observation. For the rock-paper-scissors game, the observed frequencies are the counts of each choice made by the players: Rock \(O_1 = 43\), Paper \(O_2 = 21\), and Scissors \(O_3 = 35\).

These figures act as the raw data used to assess whether any significant deviation from randomness exists.
  • They reflect the real-world behavior shown by the participants.
  • They are crucial for comparing against expected frequencies in statistical analysis.
Understanding observed frequencies is fundamental, as they are the starting point in your comparison to assess if players act randomly or prefer certain moves more than others.
Expected Frequencies
Expected frequencies (\(E\)) are the theoretical counts we'd anticipate if the players' choices were random. Given that there are three options—Rock, Paper, Scissors—with a total of 99 plays, and assuming each choice is equally likely, we calculate the expected frequency for each option as follows: \(E = \frac{99}{3} = 33\).

Expected frequencies provide a benchmark or a point of reference in chi-square testing:
  • They help determine how far off the actual observations are from the assumption of random choice.
  • They are essential in calculating the chi-square statistic, which measures the discrepancy between observed and expected values.
By comparing observed frequencies to expected frequencies, we can assess the likelihood that any deviations are due to chance, or if there's potentially a preference in choices.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A survey on 1,509 high school seniors who took the SAT and who completed an optional web survey shows that \(55 \%\) of high school seniors are fairly certain that they will participate in a study abroad program in college. \(^{19}\) (a) Is this sample a representative sample from the population of all high school seniors in the US? Explain your reasoning. (b) Let's suppose the conditions for inference are met. Even if your answer to part (a) indicated that this approach would not be reliable, this analysis may still be interesting to carry out (though not report). Construct a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of high school seniors (of those who took the SAT) who are fairly certain they will participate in a study abroad program in college, and interpret this interval in context. (c) What does "90\% confidence" mean? (d) Based on this interval, would it be appropriate to claim that the majority of high school seniors are fairly certain that they will participate in a study abroad program in college?

Does being part of a support group affect the ability of people to quit smoking? A county health department enrolled 300 smokers in a randomized experiment. 150 participants were assigned to a group that used a nicotine patch and met weekly with a support group; the other 150 received the patch and did not meet with a support group. At the end of the study, 40 of the participants in the patch plus support group had quit smoking while only 30 smokers had quit in the other group. (a) Create a two-way table presenting the results of this study. (b) Answer each of the following questions under the null hypothesis that being part of a support group does not affect the ability of people to quit smoking, and indicate whether the expected values are higher or lower than the observed values. i. How many subjects in the "patch + support" group would you expect to quit? ii. How many subjects in the "patch only" group would you expect to not quit?

A survey of 2,254 American adults indicates that \(17 \%\) of cell phone owners browse the internet exclusively on their phone rather than a computer or other device. \(^{59}\) (a) According to an online article, a report from a mobile research company indicates that 38 percent of Chinese mobile web users only access the internet through their cell phones. \(^{60}\) Conduct a hypothesis test to determine if these data provide strong evidence that the proportion of Americans who only use their cell phones to access the internet is different than the Chinese proportion of \(38 \%\). (b) Interpret the p-value in this context. (c) Calculate a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of Americans who access the internet on their cell phones, and interpret the interval in this context.

About \(25 \%\) of young Americans have delayed starting a family due to the continued economic slump. Determine if the following statements are true or false, and explain your reasoning. \(^{14}\) (a) The distribution of sample proportions of young Americans who have delayed starting a family due to the continued economic slump in random samples of size 12 is right skewed. (b) In order for the distribution of sample proportions of young Americans who have delayed starting a family due to the continued economic slump to be approximately normal, we need random samples where the sample size is at least 40 . (c) A random sample of 50 young Americans where \(20 \%\) have delayed starting a family due to the continued economic slump would be considered unusual. (d) A random sample of 150 young Americans where \(20 \%\) have delayed starting a family due to the continued economic slump would be considered unusual. (e) Tripling the sample size will reduce the standard error of the sample proportion by one-third.

On June 28, 2012 the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the much debated 2010 healthcare law, declaring it constitutional. A Gallup poll released the day after this decision indicates that \(46 \%\) of 1,012 Americans agree with this decision. At a \(95 \%\) confidence level, this sample has a \(3 \%\) margin of error. Based on this information, determine if the following statements are true or false, and explain your reasoning. \(5 \varepsilon\) (a) We are \(95 \%\) confident that between \(43 \%\) and \(49 \%\) of Americans in this sample support the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on the 2010 healthcare law. (b) We are \(95 \%\) confident that between \(43 \%\) and \(49 \%\) of Americans support the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on the 2010 healthcare law. (c) If we considered many random samples of 1,012 Americans, and we calculated the sample proportions of those who support the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, \(95 \%\) of those sample proportions will be between \(43 \%\) and \(49 \%\). (d) The margin of error at a \(90 \%\) confidence level would be higher than \(3 \%\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.