/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 14 Spray paint, Part 1. Suppose the... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Spray paint, Part 1. Suppose the area that can be painted using a single can of spray paint is slightly variable and follows a nearly normal distribution with a mean of 25 square feet and a standard deviation of 3 square feet. Suppose also that you buy three cans of spray paint. (a) How much area would you expect to cover with these three cans of spray paint? (b) What is the standard deviation of the area you expect to cover with these three eans of spray paint? (c) The area you wanted to cover is 80 square feet. What is the probability that you will be able to cover this entire area with these three cans of spray paint?

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) 75 sq ft, (b) 5.196 sq ft, (c) Probability is 83.15%.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the Expected Area for One Can

Given that the average area covered by one can is 25 square feet, to find the total expected area covered by three cans, multiply the expected area of one can by the number of cans: \( 25 \times 3 = 75 \) square feet.
02

Calculate the Standard Deviation for Three Cans

The standard deviation for the total area covered by three cans is calculated by multiplying the standard deviation of one can by the square root of the number of cans. Thus, it is \( 3 \times \sqrt{3} = 3 \times 1.732 = 5.196 \) square feet.
03

Find the Z-score for 80 Square Feet

To find the probability of covering 80 square feet, first calculate the z-score using the formula: \( z = \frac{{X - \mu}}{{\sigma}} \), where \( X = 80 \), \( \mu = 75 \), and \( \sigma = 5.196 \). Thus, \( z = \frac{{80 - 75}}{{5.196}} = 0.963 \).
04

Look Up the Z-score in the Normal Distribution Table

Find the probability that corresponds to the z-score of 0.963 in the standard normal distribution table. This probability is approximately 0.8315, which means there is an 83.15% chance that you can cover 80 square feet with three cans.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Expected Value
The expected value of a random variable is like a long-term average. Think of it as what you would anticipate as an outcome if you could repeat an experiment countless times. Here, the expected value concept helps us determine how much area three cans of spray paint can cover on average.
To calculate the expected value, we multiply the expected area for one can by the total number of cans. If one can covers an average of 25 square feet, three cans would cover:
  • Expected area = 25 square feet/can × 3 cans = 75 square feet.
This sum tells us that, on average, you would cover 75 square feet with three cans. Each can contributes equally to this expected total. It's a prediction derived from the mean of our distribution.
Standard Deviation
Standard deviation is a measure that tells us how much variability exists in a set of data. It shows how spread out the values are from the mean. A smaller standard deviation indicates data points are close to the mean, while a larger one shows more spread.
For three cans of spray paint, the standard deviation helps us understand how the total area covered can differ from the expected average. We calculate it by multiplying the standard deviation of one can by the square root of the number of cans:
  • Standard deviation for one can = 3 square feet.
  • Total standard deviation = 3 × \( \sqrt{3} \) ≈ 5.196 square feet.
This calculation tells us that while the average coverage is 75 square feet, it can typically vary by about 5.196 square feet from this average.
Z-score
Z-scores allow us to understand a single score's position relative to a group of scores, specifically in a standard normal distribution. It tells us how many standard deviations an element is from the mean.
In the context of spray paint coverage, if we want to find out the likelihood of covering 80 square feet with three cans, we first find the z-score:
  • Formula: \( z = \frac{{X - \mu}}{{\sigma}} \)
  • Where \( X = 80 \) (desired coverage), \( \mu = 75 \) (expected value from our calculation), \( \sigma = 5.196 \) (standard deviation).
  • Thus, \( z = \frac{{80 - 75}}{{5.196}} ≈ 0.963 \).
This z-score tells us that covering 80 square feet is about 0.963 standard deviations above the expected mean of 75 square feet.
Probability Calculation
Probability calculations allow us to find out the likelihood of an event occurring within a given framework. Using the z-score from the previous section, we determine the probability of covering at least 80 square feet with three cans of spray paint.
Here, for a z-score of 0.963, we look up a standard normal distribution table to find the corresponding probability.
  • A z-score table shows this corresponds to a probability of approximately 0.8315.
  • This means there is an 83.15% chance that three cans of spray paint will cover the desired 80 square feet.
This probability is derived from the standardized normal distribution table and helps us make decisions based on likely outcomes.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Triathlon times, Part L. In triathlons, it is common for racers to be placed into age and gender groups. Friends Leo and Mary both completed the Hermosa Beach Triathlon, where Leo competed in the Men, Ages \(30-34\) group while Mary competed in the Women, Ages 25 - 29 group. Leo completed the race in 1: 22: 28 (4948 seconds), while Mary completed the race in 1:31:53 (5513 seconds). Obviously Leo finished faster, but they are curious about how they did within their respective groups. Can you help them? Here is same information on the performance of their groups: \- The finishing times of the Men, Ages \(30-34\) group has a mean of 4313 seconds with a standard deviation of 583 seconds. \- The finishing times of the Women, Ages 25 - 29 group has a mean of 5261 seconds with a standard deviation of 807 seconds. \- The distributions of finishing times for both groups are approximately Normal. Remember: a better performance corresponds to a faster finish. (a) What are the Z-ncores for Leo's and Mary's finishing times? What do these Z-scores tell you? (b) Did Leo or Mary rank better in their respective groups? Explain your reasoning. (c) What percent of the triathletes did Leo finish faster than in his group? (d) What percent of the triathletes did Mary finish faster than in her group? (e) If the distributions of finishing times are not nearly normal, would your answers to parts (a)change? Explain your reasoning.

Bernoulli, the standard deviation. Use the probability rules from Section 3.5 to derive the standard deviation of a Bernoulli random variable, i.e. a random variable \(X\) that takes value 1 with probability \(\mathrm{p}\) and value 0 with probability \(1-p\). That is, compute the square root of the variance of a generic Bernoulli random variable.

GRE scores, Part 1. Sophia who took the Graduate Record Examination (GRE) scored 160 on the Verbal Reasoning section and 157 on the Quantitative Reasoning section. The mean score for Verbal Reasoning section for all test takers was 151 with a standard deviation of \(7,\) and the mean score for the Quantitative Reasoning was 153 with a standard deviation of 7.67 . Suppose that both distributions are nearly normal. (a) What is Sophia's Z-score on the Verbal Reasoning section? On the Quantitative Reasoning section? Draw a standard normal distribution curve and mark these two Z-scores. (b) What do these Z-scores tell you? (c) Relative to others, which section did she do better on? (d) Find her percentile scores for the two exams. (e) What percent of the test takers did better than her on the Verbal Reasoning section? On the Quantitative Reasoning section? (f) Explain why simply comparing raw scores from the two sections could lead to an incorrect conclusion as to which section a student did better on. (g) If the distributions of the scores on these exams are not nearly normal, would your answers to parts (b) \- (e) change? Explain your reasoning.

Distribution of \(\mu\). Suppose the true population proportion were \(p=0.6\) and a researcher takes a simple random sample of size \(n=50\). (a) Find and interpret the standard deviation of the sample proportion \(\hat{p} .\) (b) Calculate the probability that the sample propartion will be larger than 0.65 for a random sample of size 50 .

CFLs. A manufacturer of compact fluorescent light bulbs advertises that the distribution of the lifespans of these light bulbs is nearly normal with a mean of 9,000 hours and a standard deviation of 1.000 hours. (a) What is the probability that a randomly chosen light bulb lasts more than 10.500 hours? (b) Describe the distribution of the mean lifespan of 15 light bulbs. (c) What is the probability that the mean lifespan of 15 randomly chosen light bulbs is more than 10.500 hours? (d) Sketch the two distributions (population and sampling) on the same scale. (e) Could you estimate the probabilities from parts (a) and (c) if the lifespans of light bulbs had a skewed distribution?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.