/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 15 Exercise 1.4 introduces a study ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Exercise 1.4 introduces a study on using the Buteyko shallow breathing technique to reduce asthma symptoms and improve quality of life. As part of this study 600 asthma patients aged \(18-69\) who relied on medication for asthma treatment were recruited and randomly assigned to two groups: one practiced the Buteyko method and the other did not. Those in the Buteyko group experienced, on average, a significant reduction in asthma symptoms and an improvement in quality of life. (a) Identify the population of interest and the sample in this study. (b) Comment on whether or not the results of the study can be generalized to the population, and if the findings of the study can be used to establish causal relationships.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Population: Asthma sufferers aged 18-69 using medication. Sample: 600 patients in the study. Results can be generalized but causation should be interpreted with caution.

Step by step solution

01

Define the Population of Interest

The population of interest includes all individuals who suffer from asthma and rely on medication for treatment. These individuals fall within the age range of 18 to 69.
02

Identify the Sample

The sample consists of the 600 asthma patients aged 18-69 who were selected to participate in the study. These patients were randomly assigned to either practice the Buteyko method or not.
03

Generalizability of Results

Since the patients were randomly assigned and represent a specific demographic (asthma sufferers aged 18-69 who use medication), the results can be generalized to similar populations. However, the scope of generalization is limited to individuals matching the demographic profile of the sample.
04

Assessing Causal Relationships

The use of random assignment allows for some level of causal inference, as it helps to minimize confounding variables. However, it is important to note that without further experimental controls or multiple studies, establishing a direct causal relationship is challenging.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Population and Sample
In a statistical study, understanding the concepts of 'population' and 'sample' is crucial.
The 'population' refers to the entire group that you are interested in researching. In the study about the Buteyko shallow breathing technique, the population includes all individuals suffering from asthma between the ages of 18 and 69 who rely on medication for treatment.
The 'sample,' on the other hand, is a subset of this population that is actually studied. In this case, the sample is the 600 asthma patients selected to participate in the study. Random samples like this one are vital because they aim to create a miniature representation of the entire population. Some of the main points to remember about this concept include:
  • The population encompasses everyone we are interested in.
  • The sample is the specific group we investigate.
  • The aim is for the sample to closely resemble the population, ensuring better study results.
It's essential to define both clearly in any research study to make findings relevant and applicable.
Generalizability
Generalizability refers to the extent to which study findings can be applied to broader populations beyond the sample used.
In this research, the random assignment of the 600 asthma patients aged 18-69 enhances generalizability.
This means that while we can't generalize our findings to people outside of this age range or those not reliant on medication, the results can be confidently applied to similar groups. Some important considerations for generalizability are:
  • The sample must be representative of the population.
  • Participants should be randomly selected and assigned within the population's defined boundaries.
  • Findings are only as generalizable as the representativeness of the sample.
Ensuring a study's results are generalizable means the findings are relevant and can inform larger-scale applications.
Random Assignment
Random assignment is a method used to randomly allocate participants into different groups in a study.
This is crucial in the Buteyko study as it divides the 600 patients into two groups randomly: one using the method and one as a control group, not using the Buteyko method.
By doing so, each participant had an equal chance of being in any group, which helps eliminate bias. Some benefits of random assignment include:
  • It reduces potential biases in grouping participants.
  • Ensures each group is similar to one another, aside from the treatment variable.
  • Enhances the study's reliability by minimizing the effects of confounding variables.
Random assignment is a core process in experimental design that enhances the validity of the study's causal conclusions.
Causal Inference
Causal inference is about drawing conclusions regarding cause and effect relationships from a study.
The Buteyko study uses random assignment to help support causal inference by reducing the impact of confounding variables.
This strengthens the possibility of stating that the Buteyko method led to reduced symptoms and improved quality of life. However, establishing a causal relationship is often challenging and may require:
  • Multiple studies to confirm findings.
  • Further controls to eliminate alternative explanations.
  • Consideration of all possible confounding factors.
While the study provides support for the Buteyko method's effectiveness, robust causal inferences require careful consideration and expert evaluation of all potential influencing factors.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In a study of the relationship between socio-economic class and unethical behavior, 129 University of California undergraduates at Berkeley were asked to identify themselves as having low or high social-class by comparing themselves to others with the most (least) money, most (least) education, and most (least) respected jobs. They were also presented with a jar of individually wrapped candies and informed that the candies were for children in a nearby laboratory, but that they could take some if they wanted. After completing some unrelated tasks, participants reported the number of candies they had taken. \(^{15}\) (a) Identify the main research question of the study. (b) Who are the subjects in this study, and how many are included? (c) The study found that students who were identified as upper-class took more candy than others. How many variables were recorded for each subject in the study in order to conclude these findings? State the variables and their types.

A statistics student who is curious about the relationship between the amount of time students spend on social networking sites and their performance at school decides to conduct a survey. Various research strategies for collecting data are described below. In each, name the sampling method proposed and any bias you might expect. (a) He randomly samples 40 students from the study's population, gives them the survey, asks them to fill it out and bring it back the next day. (b) He gives out the survey only to his friends, making sure each one of them fills out the survey. (c) He posts a link to an online survey on Facebook and asks his friends to fill out the survey. (d) He randomly samples 5 classes and asks a random sample of students from those classes to fill out the survey.

The General Social Survey asked the question, "After an average work day, about how many hours do you have to relax or pursue activities that you enjoy?" to a random sample of 1,155 Americans. The average relaxing time was found to be 1.65 hours. Determine which of the following is an observation, a variable, a sample statistic (value calculated based on the observed sample), or a population parameter. (a) An American in the sample. (b) Number of hours spent relaxing after an average work day. (c) 1.65 . (d) Average number of hours all Americans spend relaxing after an average work day.

A large college class has 160 students. All 160 students attend the lectures together, but the students are divided into 4 groups, each of 40 students, for lab sections administered by different teaching assistants. The professor wants to conduct a survey about how satisfied the students are with the course, and he believes that the lab section a student is in might affect the student's overall satisfaction with the course. (a) What type of study is this? (b) Suggest a sampling strategy for carrying out this study.

Exercise 1.2 introduced a study exploring the effect of antibiotic treatment for acute sinusitis. Study participants either received either a 10-day course of an antibiotic (treatment) or a placebo similar in appearance and taste (control). At the end of the 10-day period, patients were asked if they experienced improvement in symptoms. What are the explanatory and response variables in this study?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.