/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 3 Find the partial derivatives of ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 10: Problem 3

Find the partial derivatives of the function $$w=\sqrt{4 r^{2}+3 s^{2}+7 t^{2}}$$ \(\frac{\partial w}{\partial r}=\) ________. \(\frac{\partial w}{\partial s}=\) ________. \(\frac{\partial w}{\partial t}=\) ________.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The short answer based on the step-by-step solution is: \(\frac{\partial w}{\partial r}=\frac{4r}{\sqrt{4r^2 + 3s^2 + 7t^2}}\) \(\frac{\partial w}{\partial s}=\frac{3s}{\sqrt{4r^2 + 3s^2 + 7t^2}}\) \(\frac{\partial w}{\partial t}=\frac{7t}{\sqrt{4r^2 + 3s^2 + 7t^2}}\)

Step by step solution

01

Express the given function in the form of \(w^2=\)

First, let's rewrite the given function as a square so that we can later use the chain rule. The given function is: \[w = \sqrt{4r^2 + 3s^2 + 7t^2}\] Squaring both sides, we have: \[w^2 = 4r^2 + 3s^2 + 7t^2\] Now, we will differentiate this equation with respect to r, s, and t.
02

Differentiate with respect to \(r\)

To find the partial derivative with respect to \(r\), we differentiate the equation with respect to \(r\) while keeping \(s\) and \(t\) constant: \[\frac{\partial(w^2)}{\partial r} = \frac{\partial(4r^2 + 3s^2 + 7t^2)}{\partial r}\] Applying the derivative, we get: \[2w\frac{\partial w}{\partial r} = 8r\] Now we need to find the expression for \(\frac{\partial w}{\partial r}\): \[\frac{\partial w}{\partial r}=\frac{8r}{2w}=\frac{4r}{w}\]
03

Differentiate with respect to \(s\)

Now, we will differentiate the equation with respect to \(s\) while keeping \(r\) and \(t\) constant: \[\frac{\partial(w^2)}{\partial s} = \frac{\partial(4r^2 + 3s^2 + 7t^2)}{\partial s}\] Applying the derivative, we get: \[2w\frac{\partial w}{\partial s} = 6s\] Now we need to find the expression for \(\frac{\partial w}{\partial s}\): \[\frac{\partial w}{\partial s}=\frac{6s}{2w}=\frac{3s}{w}\]
04

Differentiate with respect to \(t\)

Lastly, we will differentiate the equation with respect to \(t\) while keeping \(r\) and \(s\) constant: \[\frac{\partial(w^2)}{\partial t} = \frac{\partial(4r^2 + 3s^2 + 7t^2)}{\partial t}\] Applying the derivative, we get: \[2w\frac{\partial w}{\partial t} = 14t\] Now we need to find the expression for \(\frac{\partial w}{\partial t}\): \[\frac{\partial w}{\partial t}=\frac{14t}{2w}=\frac{7t}{w}\]
05

Substitute the expression for \(w\)

Now we can substitute the expression for \(w\) from the original equation \(w = \sqrt{4r^2 + 3s^2 + 7t^2}\) back into our partial derivative expressions: \[\frac{\partial w}{\partial r}= \frac{4r}{\sqrt{4r^2 + 3s^2 + 7t^2}}\] \[\frac{\partial w}{\partial s}= \frac{3s}{\sqrt{4r^2 + 3s^2 + 7t^2}}\] \[\frac{\partial w}{\partial t}= \frac{7t}{\sqrt{4r^2 + 3s^2 + 7t^2}}\] So, the partial derivatives of the function are: \[\frac{\partial w}{\partial r}=\frac{4r}{\sqrt{4r^2 + 3s^2 + 7t^2}}\] \[\frac{\partial w}{\partial s}=\frac{3s}{\sqrt{4r^2 + 3s^2 + 7t^2}}\] \[\frac{\partial w}{\partial t}=\frac{7t}{\sqrt{4r^2 + 3s^2 + 7t^2}}\]

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Multivariable Calculus
In multivariable calculus, we extend the concepts of single-variable calculus to functions that depend on more than one variable. This allows us to study functions in a more comprehensive way. For example, consider a function like \(w = \sqrt{4r^2 + 3s^2 + 7t^2}\), which depends on three variables: \(r\), \(s\), and \(t\).
When working with functions of multiple variables, we can explore how changes in each variable individually affect the function's output, providing insights into the dynamics of the system represented by the function. One fundamental tool in this analysis is the **partial derivative**, which helps determine how a function changes as one specific variable changes while keeping others constant.
This ability to study variations in each direction separately is a cornerstone of multivariable calculus, making it crucial for fields like physics, engineering, and economics.
  • The function \(w = \sqrt{4r^2 + 3s^2 + 7t^2}\) represents a surface in \(3D\) space.
  • Understanding its behavior involves calculating partial derivatives with respect to each variable.
Chain Rule
The **chain rule** in calculus is a powerful method for finding the derivative of composite functions. In its essence, the chain rule helps us differentiate functions where one function is nested inside another. The chain rule is especially beneficial in multivariable calculus, where functions frequently depend on multiple other functions.
For example, in our problem, the function \(w = \sqrt{4r^2 + 3s^2 + 7t^2}\) can be thought of as a function \(w\) of another function \(u = 4r^2 + 3s^2 + 7t^2\). The derivative of \(w\) with respect to any of its variables, like \(r\), can be found using the chain rule:
  • First, differentiate \(u\) with respect to \(r\), yielding partial derivatives of \(4r^2\).
  • Then multiply the result by the derivative of the outer function, \(\sqrt{u}\), with respect to \(u\).
This technique enables the differentiation of more complex forms systematically and accurately.
Differentiation
**Differentiation** is the process of finding the derivative of a function, which measures the rate at which a function is changing at any given point. Partial differentiation specifically refers to this process applied to multivariable functions.
Consider the function \(w = \sqrt{4r^2 + 3s^2 + 7t^2}\). To differentiate this function with respect to one of its variables, such as \(r\), we treat all other variables as constants. This focuses on understanding how changes in \(r\) alone affect \(w\).
The procedure involves several key steps:
  • Start by expressing \(w\) in a simpler form if possible, such as \(w^2 = 4r^2 + 3s^2 + 7t^2\).
  • Apply the differentiation rules to isolate the desired partial derivative.
  • For instance, differentiating \(4r^2\) with respect to \(r\) gives \(8r\).
This allows us to derive expressions like \(\frac{\partial w}{\partial r}\), providing a clear picture of how each individual variable functions in the composition of \(w\). This clarity in understanding is fundamental for solving real-world problems involving changes along multiple dimensions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

If \(z=f(x)+y g(x),\) what can we say about \(z_{y y} ?\) \(\odot z_{y y}=0\) \(\odot z_{y y}=y\) \(\odot z_{y y}=z_{x x}\) \(\odot z_{y y}=g(x)\) \(\odot\) We cannot say anything

Let \(E(x, y)=\frac{100}{1+(x-5)^{2}+4(y-2.5)^{2}}\) represent the elevation on a land mass at location \((x, y)\). Suppose that \(E, x,\) and \(y\) are all measured in meters. a. Find \(E_{x}(x, y)\) and \(E_{y}(x, y)\). b. Let \(\mathbf{u}\) be a unit vector in the direction of \(\langle-4,3\rangle .\) Determine \(D_{\mathbf{u}} E(3,4)\). What is the practical meaning of \(D_{\mathbf{u}} E(3,4)\) and what are its units? c. Find the direction of greatest increase in \(E\) at the point (3,4) . d. Find the instantaneous rate of change of \(E\) in the direction of greatest decrease at the point \((3,4) .\) Include units on your answer. e. At the point \((3,4),\) find a direction \(\mathbf{w}\) in which the instantaneous rate of change of \(E\) is \(0 .\)

In this exercise we consider how to apply the Method of Lagrange Multipliers to optimize functions of three variable subject to two constraints. Suppose we want to optimize \(f=f(x, y, z)\) subject to the constraints \(g(x, y, z)=c\) and \(h(x, y, z)=k\). Also suppose that the two level surfaces \(g(x, y, z)=c\) and \(h(x, y, z)=k\) intersect at a curve \(C\). The optimum point \(P=\left(x_{0}, y_{0}, z_{0}\right)\) will then lie on \(C\). a. Assume that \(C\) can be represented parametrically by a vector-valued function \(\mathbf{r}=\mathbf{r}(t) .\) Let \(\overrightarrow{O P}=\mathbf{r}\left(t_{0}\right) .\) Use the Chain Rule applied to \(f(\mathbf{r}(t)), g(\mathbf{r}(t)),\) and \(h(\mathbf{r}(t)),\) to explain why $$\begin{array}{l} \nabla f\left(x_{0}, y_{0}, z_{0}\right) \cdot \mathbf{r}^{\prime}\left(t_{0}\right)=0 \\ \nabla g\left(x_{0}, y_{0}, z_{0}\right) \cdot \mathbf{r}^{\prime}\left(t_{0}\right)=0, \text { and } \\ \nabla h\left(x_{0}, y_{0}, z_{0}\right) \cdot \mathbf{r}^{\prime}\left(t_{0}\right)=0\end{array}$$ Explain how this shows that \(\nabla f\left(x_{0}, y_{0}, z_{0}\right), \nabla g\left(x_{0}, y_{0}, z_{0}\right),\) and \(\nabla h\left(x_{0}, y_{0}, z_{0}\right)\) are all orthogonal to \(C\) at \(P\). This shows that \(\nabla f\left(x_{0}, y_{0}, z_{0}\right), \nabla g\left(x_{0}, y_{0}, z_{0}\right),\) and \(\nabla h\left(x_{0}, y_{0}, z_{0}\right)\) all lie in the same plane. b. Assuming that \(\nabla g\left(x_{0}, y_{0}, z_{0}\right)\) and \(\nabla h\left(x_{0}, y_{0}, z_{0}\right)\) are nonzero and not parallel, explain why every point in the plane determined by \(\nabla g\left(x_{0}, y_{0}, z_{0}\right)\) and \(\nabla h\left(x_{0}, y_{0}, z_{0}\right)\) has the form \(s \nabla g\left(x_{0}, y_{0}, z_{0}\right)+t \nabla h\left(x_{0}, y_{0}, z_{0}\right)\) for some scalars \(s\) and \(t\). c. Parts (a.) and (b.) show that there must exist scalars \(\lambda\) and \(\mu\) such that $$\nabla f\left(x_{0}, y_{0}, z_{0}\right)=\lambda \nabla g\left(x_{0}, y_{0}, z_{0}\right)+\mu \nabla h\left(x_{0}, y_{0}, z_{0}\right)$$ So to optimize \(f=f(x, y, z)\) subject to the constraints \(g(x, y, z)=c\) and \(h(x, y, z)=k\) we must solve the system of equations $$\nabla f(x, y, z)=\lambda \nabla g(x, y, z)+\mu \nabla h(x, y, z)$$ $$\begin{array}{l}g(x, y, z)=c, \text { and } \\\h(x, y, z)=k .\end{array}$$ for \(x, y, z, \lambda,\) and \(\mu .\) Use this idea to find the maximum and minimum values of \(f(x, y, z)=\) \(x+2 y\) subject to the constraints \(y^{2}+z^{2}=8\) and \(x+y+z=10\).

Use the chain rule to find \(\frac{d z}{d t}\), where $$z=x^{2} y+x y^{2}, \quad x=1-t^{5}, \quad y=3-t^{2}$$ First the pieces: \(\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}=\) ________. \(\frac{\partial z}{\partial y}=\) ________. \(\frac{d x}{d t}=\) ________. \(\frac{d y}{d t}=\) ________. End result (in terms of just \(t)\) \(\frac{d z}{d t}=\) __________.

Let \(f\) be the function defined by \(f(x, y)=2 x^{2}+3 y^{3}\). a. Find the equation of the tangent plane to \(f\) at the point (1,2) . b. Use the linearization to approximate the values of \(f\) at the points (1.1,2.05) and (1.3,2.2) c. Compare the approximations form part (b) to the exact values of \(f(1.1,2.05)\) and \(f(1.3,2.2) .\) Which approximation is more accurate. Explain why this should be expected.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

Logic and Functions

Read Explanation

Decision Maths

Read Explanation

Applied Mathematics

Read Explanation

Geometry

Read Explanation

Discrete Mathematics

Read Explanation

Calculus

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.