/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 16 Three major segments of the tran... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Three major segments of the transportation industry are motor carriers, such as Yellow Corp.; railroads, such as Union Pacific Corp.; and transportation arrangement services, such as C.H. Robinson Worldwide. Recent financial statement information for these three companies is shown as follows (in thousands of dollars): \begin{tabular}{lrrr} & Yellow & Union Pacific & C.H. Robinson Worldwide \\ \hline Net sales & \(\$ 3,276,651\) & \(\$ 11,973,000\) & \(\$ 3,090,072\) \\ Average total assets & \(1,285,777\) & \(31,551,000\) & 683,490 \end{tabular} a. Determine the ratio of net sales to assets for all three companies. Round to two digits after the decimal place. b. 1 . Assume that the ratio of net sales to assets for each company represents their respective industry segment. Interpret the differences in the ratio of net sales to assets in terms of the operating characteristics of each of the respective segments.

Short Answer

Expert verified
C.H. Robinson Worldwide is most efficient in asset use with a ratio of 4.52. Yellow Corp is moderate at 2.55. Union Pacific shows low asset efficiency with 0.38.

Step by step solution

01

Understand Net Sales to Assets Ratio

The net sales to assets ratio measures how effectively a company is using its assets to generate sales. The formula is calculated as follows: \( \text{Net Sales to Assets Ratio} = \frac{\text{Net Sales}}{\text{Average Total Assets}} \).
02

Calculate the Ratio for Yellow Corp.

Use the formula to calculate the ratio for Yellow Corp.: \( \frac{3,276,651}{1,285,777} \approx 2.55 \). Thus, the net sales to assets ratio for Yellow Corp. is approximately 2.55.
03

Calculate the Ratio for Union Pacific Corp.

Apply the formula for Union Pacific Corp.: \( \frac{11,973,000}{31,551,000} \approx 0.38 \). Therefore, the net sales to assets ratio for Union Pacific Corp. is approximately 0.38.
04

Calculate the Ratio for C.H. Robinson Worldwide

Compute the ratio for C.H. Robinson Worldwide: \( \frac{3,090,072}{683,490} \approx 4.52 \). Hence, the net sales to assets ratio for C.H. Robinson Worldwide is approximately 4.52.
05

Interpret the Ratios

The higher ratio of 4.52 for C.H. Robinson Worldwide suggests this segment operates with lower asset bases but generates higher sales, possibly indicating a service-oriented or asset-light model. Yellow Corp.'s ratio of 2.55 indicates moderate efficiency in using assets. Union Pacific Corp.'s lower ratio of 0.38 suggests heavy reliance on expensive assets generating relatively smaller sales compared to their asset base, typical of the railroad industry.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Net Sales to Assets Ratio
This financial ratio is crucial for assessing how efficiently a company utilizes its assets to generate sales. To compute this ratio, one divides the company's net sales by its average total assets. Mathematically, it is represented as follows: \[ \text{Net Sales to Assets Ratio} = \frac{\text{Net Sales}}{\text{Average Total Assets}} \] The ratio provides insights into the operational effectiveness of a firm. For instance, in our analysis Yellow Corp. has a ratio of approximately 2.55, indicating a balanced approach to asset utilization. Whereas, Union Pacific Corp. exhibits a lower ratio of 0.38, highlighting a heavy investment in assets relative to sales. On the other hand, C.H. Robinson Worldwide showcases an impressive 4.52 ratio, implying a high rate of sales turnover with a comparatively smaller asset base. This metric is particularly useful in cross-industry analysis as it can signal underlying operational characteristics.
Transportation Industry Analysis
The transportation industry is diverse, with segments showcasing distinct operational approaches and financial dynamics. The three main players analyzed here include motor carriers, railroads, and transportation arrangement services. Each has unique asset structures and sales strategies, influencing their financial ratios.
  • Motor Carriers: Epitomized by Yellow Corp., typically show modest values for this ratio. Their operations blend asset ownership with transport services, leading to moderate efficiency.
  • Railroads: Union Pacific Corp. is a perfect example of industries requiring significant capital investments, evidenced by the low net sales to assets ratio. Despite vast resource allocation in tracks and trains, sales merely form a small ratio of assets.
  • Transportation Arrangement Services: C.H. Robinson excels in this area. They adopt an asset-light model, emphasizing operational efficiency and flexible service provisions. Thus, the highest ratio here reflects a highly efficient service-oriented sector.
This variety within the industry highlights the importance of dissecting ratios in the context of industry-specific operations and strategies.
Operating Characteristics
Every industry segment in transportation operates uniquely. Understanding their operating characteristics is paramount in interpreting the net sales to assets ratio. Each segment reflects a particular reliance on assets and service output suitability. The asset-heavy nature of the railroads indicates significant investment in infrastructure and rolling stock. Hence, Union Pacific’s low ratio signifies this capital-heavy requirement. Conversely, C.H. Robinson, with its asset-light approach, underscores a business model focusing on arrangement services rather than asset ownership which is reflected in its high ratio. Yellow Corp., representing motor carriers, maintains a middle ground by optimizing their asset base with owned fleets, leading to a moderate ratio indicating balanced efficiency. The analysis of operating characteristics against financial ratios allows better understanding of a business's strategic orientation, competitive positioning, and operational priorities.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

PepsiCo, Inc., the parent company of Frito-Lay snack foods and Pepsi beverages, had the following current assets and current liabilities at the end of two recent years: \begin{tabular}{lcc} & Dec. 28, 2002 (in millions) & Dec. 28, 2001 (in millions) \\ \hline Cash and cash equivalents & \(\$ 1,638\) & \(\$ 683\) \\ Short-term investments, at cost & 207 & 966 \\ Accounts and notes receivable, net & 2,531 & 2,142 \\ Inventories & 1,342 & 1,310 \\ Prepaid expenses and other current assets & 695 & 752 \\ Short-term obligations & 562 & 354 \\ Accounts payable and other current liabilities & 4,998 & 4,461 \\ Income taxes payable & 492 & 183 \end{tabular} a. Determine the (1) current ratio and (2) quick ratio for both years. Round to two digits after the decimal place. b. What conclusions can you draw from these data?

The table below shows the stock price, earnings per share, and dividends per share for three companies as of February 10, 2003: \begin{tabular}{lccc} & Price & Earnings per Share & Dividends per Share \\ \cline { 2 - 5 } Bank of America Corp. & \(\$ 68.20\) & \(\$ 5.91\) & \(\$ 2.56\) \\\ eBay, Inc. & \(73.56\) & \(0.85\) & \(0.00\) \\ Coca-Cola Company & \(40.06\) & \(1.68\) & \(0.80\) \end{tabular} a. Determine the price-earnings ratio and dividend yield for the three companies. Round to two digits after the decimal place. b. Explain the differences in these ratios across the three companies.

Revenue and expense data for Home-Mate Appliance Co. are as follows: \begin{tabular}{lrr} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{2006} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{2005} \\ \hline Sales & \(\$ 500,000\) & \(\$ 450,000\) \\ Cost of goods sold & 275,000 & 234,000 \\ Selling expenses & 90,000 & 94,500 \\ Administrative expenses & 60,000 & 63,000 \\ Income tax expense & 25,000 & 22,500 \end{tabular} a. Prepare an income statement in comparative form, stating each item for both 2006 and 2005 as a percent of sales. b. Comment on the significant changes disclosed by the comparative income statement.

The bond indenture for the 10 -year, \(91 / 2 \%\) debenture bonds dated January 2,2005 , required working capital of \(\$ 350,000\), a current ratio of \(1.5\), and a quick ratio of 1 at the end of each calendar year until the bonds mature. At December 31 , 2006, the three measures were computed as follows: 1\. Current assets: 2\. Current ratio \(=1.68(\$ 1,050,000 \div \$ 625,000)\) 3\. Quick ratio \(=1.52(\$ 570,000 \div \$ 375,000)\) a. List the errors in the determination of the three measures of current position analysis. b. Is the company satisfying the terms of the bond indenture?

The following data are taken from the financial statements of Ovation Industries Inc. Terms of all sales are \(1 / 10, \mathrm{n} / 60\). \begin{tabular}{lcr} & Current Year & Preceding Year \\ \hline Accounts receivable, end of year & \(\$ 48,219\) & \(\$ 52,603\) \\ Monthly average accounts receivable (net) & 45,070 & 46,154 \\ Net sales & 320,000 & 300,000 \end{tabular} a. Determine for each year (1) the accounts receivable turnover and (2) the number of days' sales in receivables. Round to nearest dollar and one digit after the decimal place. b. What conclusions can be drawn from these data concerning accounts receivable and credit policies?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.