/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 43 For a natural number \(n \geq 2\... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

For a natural number \(n \geq 2\), let \(0

Short Answer

Expert verified
There must exist some \( k \) for which \(1/3 \leq \sum_{j=1}^k x_j \< 2/3\)

Step by step solution

01

- Understand the Given Conditions

Given a sequence of real numbers such that 1. They are in non-decreasing order: \(0 < x_1 \leq x_2 \leq \cdots \leq x_n\)2. Their sum equals 1: \( \sum_{i=1}^n x_i = 1 \)3. The maximum term is less than or equal to \(2/3\): \( x_n \leq 2/3 \)
02

- Propose the Existence of an Appropriate K

We need to prove that there exists some integer \( k \) (\(1 \leq k \leq n \)) such that: \(1/3 \leq \sum_{j=1}^k x_j \< 2/3\).
03

- Consider the Contradictions

Assume, for the sake of contradiction, that no such \(k\) exists. This means:1. \( \sum_{j=1}^k x_j < 1/3 \) for all \(1 \leq k \leq n-1\)2. \( \sum_{j=1}^k x_j \geq 2/3 \) whenever \( \sum_{j=1}^k x_j \geq 1/3 \)
04

- Evaluate Partial Sums

Let's examine the partial sums. Define: \( S_k = \sum_{j=1}^k x_j \) for \( k = 1, 2, ..., n \) We know that \( S_{n} = 1 \text{ and by assumption, } S_n \leq 2/3\)This is a contradiction because \( S_n \) must equal 1 thus disallowing all sums before n to be less than or equal to 1/3
05

- Intermediate Value Theorem

By the intermediate value theorem, since the sequence of partial sums \( S_k \) goes from less than or equal to \(1/3\) to exactly 1, there must be some \( k \) for which \( S_{k} \) falls between \( 1/3 \) and \(2/3\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Natural Numbers
Natural numbers are the backbone of this problem. They include all positive integers starting from 1, 2, 3, and so on.
This sequence goes on infinitely.
In our exercise, we deal with a natural number 'n', where 'n' is greater than or equal to 2.
Natural numbers do not include zero or any negative numbers. These numbers are very familiar as they are typically the kind we first learn to count with.
They are used to quantify and order objects in the real world.
For example:
  • If n = 4, then there are four numbers in the sequence, such as 1, 2, 3, 4.
  • The condition \( n \geq 2 \) guarantees that we are working with at least two elements.
Understanding these numbers helps us set the stage for dealing with more complex mathematical constructs.
Real Numbers
Real numbers encompass a broader set that includes natural numbers, whole numbers, integers, rational numbers, and irrational numbers.
They can be thought of as points on an infinite line, commonly called the number line.
In this exercise, the numbers \( x_1, x_2, ..., x_n \) are all real numbers.
They follow these properties:
  • They are arranged in non-decreasing order, meaning each term is equal to or greater than the one before it: \( 0
  • Their sum is exactly 1: \( \sum_{i=1}^n x_i = 1 \).
  • The largest term is not greater than \( 2/3 \): \( x_n \leq 2/3 \).
Real numbers are very important in mathematics because they include both rational numbers (numbers that can be expressed as a fraction) and irrational numbers (numbers that cannot be expressed as fractions, like \( \pi \) and \( \sqrt{2} \)). This gives us a comprehensive way to discuss and measure quantities, magnitudes, and distances in various contexts.
Partial Sums
Partial sums are sums of the first 'k' terms of a sequence.
They are very useful for understanding the intermediate stages of accumulation in a series.
For this problem, we define partial sums as follows: \( S_k = \sum_{j=1}^k x_j \).
This means:
  • \( S_1 = x_1 \)
  • \( S_2 = x_1 + x_2 \)
  • \( S_3 = x_1 + x_2 + x_3 \)
  • And so on, until \( S_n = x_1 + x_2 + ... + x_n \).
In our exercise, we deduced that the partial sums must include a value between 1/3 and 2/3.
This is a crucial point because it establishes the existence of a specific 'k' where \( 1/3 \leq S_k < 2/3 \).
To find such a 'k', we use the Intermediate Value Theorem, ensuring that the sequence passes through the required range.
Intermediate Value Theorem
The Intermediate Value Theorem (IVT) is a fundamental theorem in calculus.
It states that if a continuous function, f, takes on values f(a) and f(b) at two points a and b, then it also takes on any value between f(a) and f(b) at some point between a and b.
In our problem, let's apply the IVT to the partial sums:
Suppose we have a sequence \( S_k = \sum_{j=1}^k x_j \), where \( S_1, S_2, ..., S_n \) are the partial sums and \( S_n = 1 \).
According to the given conditions: \( S_n = 1 \) and \( S_k < 1/3 \) for all \( 1 \leq k < n \).
The IVT tells us that since \( S_n = 1 \leq 2/3 \) and \( S_1 \) started from a smaller value, there must be a value 'k' such that \( 1/3 \leq S_k < 2/3 \).
This is important because it helps us bridge the gap in our sequence, ensuring that every intermediate value is covered.
In this case, it leads us to the proof required by the exercise, affirming that such a 'k' indeed exists.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Note that if the edges of a regular octahedron have length 1 , then the distance between any two of its vertices is either 1 or \(\sqrt{2}\). Are there other configurations of six points in \(\mathbb{R}^3\) for which the distance between any two of the points is either 1 or \(\sqrt{2}\) ? If so, find them.

Consider an arbitrary circle of radius 2 in the coordinate plane. Let \(n\) be the number of lattice points (points whose coordinates are both integers) inside, but not on, the circle. a. What is the smallest possible value for \(n\) ? b. What is the largest possible value for \(n\) ?

Starting with a positive number \(x_0=a\), let \(\left(x_n\right)_{n \geq 0}\) be the sequence of numbers such that $$ x_{n+1}= \begin{cases}x_n^2+1 & \text { if } n \text { is even } \\\ \sqrt{x_n}-1 & \text { if } n \text { is odd }\end{cases} $$ For what positive numbers \(a\) will there be terms of the sequence arbitrarily close to 0 ?

The Wohascum Center branch of Wohascum National Bank recently installed a digital time/temperature display which flashes back and forth between time, temperature in degrees Fahrenheit, and temperature in degrees Centigrade (Celsius). Recently one of the local college mathematics professors became concerned when she walked by the bank and saw readings of \(21^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and \(71^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\), especially since she had just taught her precocious five-year-old that same day to convert from degrees \(\mathrm{C}\) to degrees \(\mathrm{F}\) by multiplying by \(9 / 5\) and adding 32 (which yields \(21^{\circ} \mathrm{C}=69.8^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\), which should be rounded to \(70^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\) ). However, a bank officer explained that both readings were correct; the apparent error was due to the fact that the display device converts before rounding either Fahrenheit or Centigrade temperature to a whole number. (Thus, for example, \(21.4^{\circ} \mathrm{C}=70.52^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\).) Suppose that over the course of a week in summer, the temperatures measured are between \(15^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and \(25^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and that they are randomly and uniformly distributed over that interval. What is the probability that at any given time the display will appear to be in error for the reason above, that is, that the rounded value in degrees \(\mathrm{F}\) of the converted temperature is not the same as the value obtained by first rounding the temperature in degrees \(\mathrm{C}\), then converting to degrees \(\mathrm{F}\) and rounding once more?

Let \(p(x)=x^3+a_1 x^2+a_2 x+a_3\) have rational coefficients and have roots \(r_1, r_2, r_3\). If \(r_1-r_2\) is rational, must \(r_1, r_2\), and \(r_3\) be rational?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.