/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q. 8.12 We have 100components that we wi... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

We have 100components that we will put to use in a sequential fashion. That is, the component 1is initially put in use, and upon failure, it is replaced by a component2, which is itself replaced upon failure by a componentlocalid="1649784865723" 3, and so on. If the lifetime of component i is exponentially distributed with a mean 10+i/10,i=1,...,100estimate the probability that the total life of all components will exceed1200. Now repeat when the life distribution of component i is uniformly distributed over(0,20+i/5),i=1,...,100.

Short Answer

Expert verified

- the lifetime of the component is exponentially distributed.9767.

- the lifetime of the component is uniformly distributed.9997.

Step by step solution

01

Given Information.

Given 100components that we will put in use in a sequential fashion. That is, the component 1is initially put in use, and upon failure, it is replaced by a component2, which is itself replaced upon failure by the component3, and so on. If the lifetime of component i is exponentially distributed with mean

10+i/10,i=1,...,100.

02

Explanation.

Let Xirepresents the lifetime of ith componentlocalid="1649784720827" i=1,…,100. Assume that the components are used one at a time, whereby the failed component is replaced immediately new one. Also, let these lifetimes be exponential random variables with parametersλi. Then,

μi=EXi=1λiandσi2=VarXi=1λi2,

and since it is given that the lifetime is variable with mean10+i/10,i=1,…,100, we have thatλi=10/(100+i). So,

μi=10+i10andσi2=100+2i+i2100

Let Xdenote the total lifetime of all componentslocalid="1649784745171" X=∑1100Xi.

Then, since lifetimes are obviously independent random variables, using the corresponding properties of expectation and variance we get: the random variable Xis a gamma random variable with mean

E[X]=E∑i=1100Xi=∑i=1100μi=∑i=110010+i10=100(10)+110∑i=1100i=(*)100(10)+100(101)10(2)=1505

and variance

Var(X)=Var∑i=1100Xi=∑i=1100σi2=∑i=1100100+2i+i2100=100(100)+2∑i=1100i+1100∑i=1100i2

(*),(**)=100(100)+100(101)+100(101)(201)100(6)=23483.5

03

Explanation.

The probability that the total life of all components will exceed 1200is

P{X>1200}.

To approximate this probability we use the central limit theorem and in that case, we get:

P{X>1200}=1-P{X≤1200}=1-PX-E[X]Var(X)≤1200-E[X]Var(X)=1-PX-150523483.5≤1200-150523483.5≈1-Φ(-1.99)=Φ(-z)=1-Φ(z)Φ(1.99)

04

Explanation.

(*)the sum of first nnatural numbers:∑i=1ni=n(n+1)2

(**)the sum of the squares of first nnatural numbers: ∑i=1ni2=n(n+1)(2n+1)6

05

Explanation.

The lifetime of components is uniformly distributed.

Now, assume that the lifetime Xiis uniformly distributed over(0,20+i/5),

i=1,…,100.So,

μi=EXi=(20+i/5)+02=10+i10

σi2=VarXi=((20+i/5)-0)212=1003+23i+1300i2

In this case, the total lifetime of all componentslocalid="1649784800135" X=∑1100Xiris a random variable with mean

E[X]=E∑i=1100Xi=∑i=1100μi=∑i=110010+i10=1505

and variance

Var(X)=Var∑i=1100Xi=∑i=1100σi2=∑i=11001003+23i+1300i2=1003(100)+23∑i=1100i+1300∑i=1100i2=(*),(*)100003+13100(101)+100(101)(201)300(6)=7827.83

Using the central limit theorem we get the required probability:

P{X>1200}=1-P{X≤1200}=1-PX-E[X]Var(X)≤1200-E[X]Var(X)=1-PX-15057827.83≤1200-15057827.83≈1-Φ(-3.45)=Φ(-z)=1-Φ(z)Φ(3.45)=Table 5.1 (textbook, Chapter 5).9997

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let Xbe a Poisson random variable with a mean of20.

(a)Use the Markov inequality to obtain an upper boundp=P(X≥26).

(b)Use the one-sided Chebyshev inequality to obtain an upper boundp.

(c)Use the Chernoff bound to obtain an upper boundp.

(d)Approximate pby making use of the central limit theorem.

(e)Determine pby running an appropriate program.

Each of the batteries in a collection of 40batteries is equally likely to be either a type A or a type B battery. Type A batteries last for an amount of time that has a mean of 50and a standard deviation of 15; type B batteries last for a mean of 30and a standard deviation of 6.

(a) Approximate the probability that the total life of all 40batteries exceeds 1700

(b) Suppose it is known that 20of the batteries are type A and 20are type B. Now approximate the probability that the total life of all 40batteries exceeds 1700.

A person has 100 light bulbs whose lifetimes are independent exponentials with mean 5 hours. If the bulbs are used one at a time, with a failed bulb being replaced immediately by a new one, approximate the probability that there is still a working bulb after 525 hours.

Civil engineers believe that W, the amount of weight (in units of 1000pounds) that a certain span of a bridge can withstand without structural damage resulting, is normally distributed with a mean of 400and standard deviation of40. Suppose that the weight (again, in units of 1000pounds) of a car is a random variable with a mean of 3and standard deviation.3. Approximately how many cars would have to be on the bridge span for the probability of structural damage to exceed.1?

A tobacco company claims that the amount of nicotine in one of its cigarettes is a random variable with a mean of 2.2mg and a standard deviation of 0.3mg. However, the average nicotine content of 100randomly chosen cigarettes was 3.1mg. Approximate the probability that the average would have been as high as or higher than 3.1 if the company’s claims were true

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.